training of graduate students through formal pedagogycoursework. Pedagogy courses and certificates are increasingly recognized as vital preparationfor their roles as TAs and future faculty members.19, 20 The University of California, Berkeleyrequires departments to offer a semester-long training course for first-time TAs. The courseformat in our department is flexible and usually involves readings, peer teaching evaluations, andclass discussion. Books we find useful for the course include McKeachie’s Teaching Tips21 and 11What The Best College Teachers Do.22 Topics typically covered include setting course policies,assessment of student learning, ethics
, human factors, product liability, and ethical issues) • Final Evaluation and Verification (Manufacture and Assembly, Testing and Refinement, Project/Development Cost) • Conclusions and RecommendationsThese sections were chosen for assessment because these sections require students to apply their: 1) Knowledge of how to recognize the audience for a particular communication, determine the needs of that audience, and successfully address those needs; 2) Ability to present test results through graphics and text; 3) Ability to analyze and interpret data; and 4) Ability to develop reasonable conclusions and recommendations based on their interpretation.These are all
self-directed professional development (lifelong learning), interpersonal skills(people skills), team working skills, able to work well in a diverse environment (cultural, gender,age, company position, etc.), oral communication, written communication, professional skills,good work habits, sound ethics and integrity, timeliness, time management, knowledge ofcontemporary issues, and understands the societal impacts of technical solutions. Theseattributes were derived largely from ABET’s student outcomes for Engineering Technologyprograms. The student’s evaluation contains open-ended questions for the student to share theirexperiences. The final evaluations are intended to be the vehicle that the faculty supervisor willuse for grading. An
providing better career opportunities.There is also a connection between study abroad programs and increased soft skills in students.Soft skills are moving higher and higher on the list of things employers are looking for in anengineer. CENews published the results of a survey they conducted that supported this claimsaying that “[W]e’ve talked about [what] we need to incorporate perhaps more in the education,so that students [who graduate are] more prepared for a job, and that includes management skills,written skills, oral communication skills, ethics, technical skills, more broad-based knowledge,more emphasis on humanities.” There is evidence that study abroad experiences, particularlysemester long programs, improve soft skills such as writing
communication and workstyles, coining the rules for team ethics and accountability and accepting the team member’sshortcomings. Several students reported that functioning as part of a team was a learningexperience on its own that prompted them to reflect on their own contribution to the prototypedesign and development and compare their share against that of the other team members. In anattempt to solve team-conflict and self-regulate, the students embraced soft skills: for somesharing equal amount of work was effective; for others, establishing individual member roles andaccountability was critical. Having learned to trust, the students tended to more frequentlydiscuss and review the content of the learning modules with their team members
suchanalyses are consistent with the ABET engineering criteria 3(c), 3(h) and 3(j) that students havethe ability to make decisions “within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”, “understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context” andhave “a knowledge of contemporary issues”.10 Via this debate and corresponding case study, thestudents learn how to think outside the box and look at the big picture in its entirety whenapproaching a problem. The second debate “Do alternative energy sources stand a chance?” is scheduled at the endof the summer program. As the Young Scholars become acquainted with
(where 1 = Not Really, 3 = Neutral and 5 = Absolutely). Dimensions Developed to Measure Participant’s CS Interest Code Dimension atcs Attitudes about CS competency. atcsgender Attitudes about the role of gender in CS atct Understanding of computational thinking blg Sense of belonging in the CS classroom. clet Attitudes about social implications and ethics. cltrcmp Understanding around cultural competency. mtr Access to CS Mentors. prcs Pre-Collegiate CS awareness. Table 1: Survey Instrument Dimensions to Measure CS
student groups,” itfalls short of this claim. Beyond the vignette's loose interpretation of “real classroomexperiences,” the vignette allows for a shallow interpretation of the concepts of “funds ofknowledge" and "place-based education.” Moll et al (1992) describe “funds of knowledge” ascultural knowledge and aspects of a student's home life that students bring to classroom. Toclaim that this is present anywhere in this vignette seems to miss the mark. So then, what difference does it make whether Rick introduced the concept of “crushedcans” or not? Beyond the ethics of research, this case study matters because the entire argumentfor the relevance and importance of the “crushed can” metaphor rests on Rick himselfintroducing the concept. If
Engineering DesignAbstractAs engineering students consider the economic, social, political and ethical aspects of design,they are often treated as compulsory aspects that must be checked off a list as they dive deeperinto the technical aspects of design. Getting students to appreciate the real-world societalrelevance as an integral part of design is often challenging. The World Energy Exercise, whichintegrates an interactive and state-of-the-art computer simulation with a role-playing exercise,opens a social and active learning pathway, which helps students connect their engineeringdesigns with real-world societal relevance. The exercise enables students to control variousenergy related policy levers that impact global climate change. One lever in
, Engineering Technology(ET) program offers a combined electrical and mechanical engineering technology major, withseveral courses related to renewable energy, energy conversion, green energy manufacturing andsustainability. Our main goal is to create a highly skilled professional workforce ready to “hit theground running” after graduation and also having most of the qualities of a “global engineer”, acritical thinker and an innovator which is in total agreement with ABET criterion c (“an ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability”). Our ET program developed during the past 6-7years
., Eastern Washington University Jason Durfee is a Professor of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Profes- sional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University, he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, computational fluid dynamics, professional ethics, and piano technology.Dr. Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University PhD. in Mechanical Engineering, Wash- ington State UniversityMs. Doris M. Munson, Eastern
graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore
Collaboration of Working Groups in Global Airline Operations: Leveraging Smartphone Push-To-Talk Functionalities. in 10th Annual IEEE IT Professional Conference, The College of New Jersey. 2015. Computer Society Chapter of Princeton and the Princeton Chapter of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery): IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)39. Cohn, A., et al., Analysis of the Potential for Delay Propagation in Passenger Airline Networks. 2007.40. Fernando, A.C., Business ethics and corporate governance. 2010: Pearson Education India.41. Gomes Da Costa, A.C., Por uma pedagogia da presenca [For a pedagogy of presence]. Brasilia: Fundacao Centro Brasileiro para a Infacia e Adolescéncia (FCBIA
. With great effort to haveno interference in these discussions, the PI or a dedicated undergraduate assistant attended thesesessions and took notes. The undergraduate assistant was also critical in providing support andmaintaining order and timeliness among the students on a day-to-day basis, as well as facilitatingvarious activities, workshops, and events that occurred during the program. The seminars andworkshops that were offered throughout the program were presented by experts in theirrespective fields. The subjects of the seminars included twice-exceptional education and thecreative product. Workshops were presented on responsible conduct of research and ethics,graduate school and preparing for the GRE exam, and technical writing. These
design projects for second and third year students,and the 1955 L. E. Grinter Report5 recommended twin goals for engineering education oftechnical (including analysis and creative design) and general (ethics, humanities, socialsciences, math and basic sciences), with engineering content limited to upper division classes.6Constrained by institutional credit-hour caps, courses on engineering design or laboratoryexperiences that supported design activities, such as shop or manufacturing technology, weregradually eliminated from the engineering curriculum.This approach started to reverse in the early 1990’s as employers identified the paucity of real-world content, engineering design and creative content as important shortcomings of
- ing, where she leads research projects that focus on technology in education. She holds a doctorate degree in the psychology in of education from Arizona State University and a masters degree in public health from the University of Arizona.Mr. Derrick Cornell Gilmore, Kentucky State University Derrick C. Gilmore is the Director of Research, Grants and Sponsored Programs at Kentucky State Uni- versity. In this role he provides oversight of administrative functions that include research compliance, re- search ethics, education and policy, administration, and technology transfer. His research interest include: sponsored research capacities/impacts at Minority Serving Institutions, behavioral health for African
; Radiation) Important to know • Fluid (flow) properties • Electrical fundamentals & photo-voltaic effect • Engineering design process • Foundations and ethics of team work • Problem identification and evaluations • Students should use systematic problem-solving method to evaluate and
,phenomenon, or process under investigation by thinking and thus writing and thus thinking evenmore about them” (p. 41). “Analytic Memos” can act as a “prompt or trigger for writtenreflection on the deeper and complex meanings it evokes”45 (p. 42). Examples of “AnalyticMemos” that Saldaña45 provided includes reflections about personal connections to the data,study’s research questions, codes, definitions, patterns, categories, themes, concepts, assertions,possible networks, theory, problems with the study, personal or ethical dilemmas, futuredirections of the study, other analytic memos, and study’s final reporting (pp. 43–50).“Analytical Memos” were used to help deeply contemplate the meaning of the data and usedthem to help analyze the data45
National Science Foundation. We wouldalso like to thank The ASU Polytechnic School and the evaluation team for supporting datacollection and participation in this research.Bibliography!1. Walther, Joachim, Pawley, Alice L and Sochacka, Nicki Wendy (2015) ‘Exploring Ethical Validation as a KeyConsideration in Interpretive Research Quality’, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle,Washington, ASEE Conferences. [online] Available from: https://peer.asee.org/24063!2. Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. (2005) ‘The interview’, in The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 695–727.!3. Roulston, K (2010) Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications. [online]Available from: http://books.google.com/books?id
software testing techniques. This preparationshould increase the students’ chances of success in both creating testable requirements for theirapplications as well as creating adequate test cases.CS/CMP 403 – Senior Problem This is capstone course of Computer Science at AAMU and a continuation of CS/CMP401 (software engineering). During this course, the student is expected to code a single,meaningful project started earlier in CS/CMP 401 and present the results of this project in class.This project must meet a set of standards for software design and documentation. Topics ofprofessional ethics and responsibilities are discussed in the class. Software-testing techniquesmust be used in this course on the selected project to ensure the quality
: The transition from H.S. to college of first-yearengineering students. Proceedings from 2013 ASEE North Central Section Conference, Columbus, OH.[26] Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (2nd ed.).San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.[27] Kuh, G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview ofpsychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved fromhttp://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/psychometric_framework_2002.pdf[28] Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. EducationalResearcher, 18(2), 5-11.[29] Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B., &
continuously interacting with thedifferent social and material aspects of their surroundings such that each mutually constitutes theother. For a community of practice to function, members need to mutually generate andappropriate a shared repertoire of ideas, commitments, values, ethics and memories. Thiscorresponds to earlier observations by Brown et. al14 that learning communities are “bound byintricate, socially constructed webs of belief, which are essential to understanding what they do”(p.33). The co-generation of these shared practices and purposes motivates members to developand use various resources such as tools, documents, routines, expectations, vocabulary or othersymbol systems. As these resources are continuously shared back and forth
members as well as from theperspective of the team, almost as if we were in the team. Togethering is described as “ananalytical category that accounts for the ethical manner in which individuals engage, respond,and tune to each other, despite their cognitive, emotional, and other differences.”9 The three keycomponents of togethering, which build upon each other, are engaging, responding, and tuning.When a team engages, each individual team member makes a commitment, manifested in action,to work with others in the joint activity. 9 When team members respond, they make efforts tocoordinate individual contributions (their engagements) through agreements and disagreements. 9When the engagement and response contributions of team members results in the
.32Our account of Andrew’s experiences speak powerfully to these themes. At each stage of careertransition, Andrew encountered a startling gap between his expectations and assumptions aboutprofessional work, on one hand, and his lived experience of that work, on the other. Fortunately,Andrew’s personal characteristics (including personality, work ethic, attitude, etc.) likely gavehim an advantage in these situations, allowing him to develop strategies to survive and even thrivewhen faced with ambiguous job roles, incalcitrant coworkers, and sharp increases inresponsibility. Yet even the apparently resilient Andrew acknowledged the emotional andpsychological toll of these challenges, to the point of exploring other employment opportunitiesand new
below. Table 1. Summary of capstone course schedule Week Course Activity 1-4 Lectures covering the following topics: Course orientation and teamwork workshop Need analysis, conducting research, project management Safety, ethics, and other requirements Client relationship management 5-6 PUM #1 – focused on need analysis/specifications 7 Lecture on conceptual design 8–9 PUM #2 – focused on specifications/conceptual design 10 Lecture on prototype design 11 - 12 PUM #3 – focused on conceptual design
work in teams, as well as to understand themotivations and perspectives of others. Communication allows one to convey engineeringsolutions in economic terms, and to substantiate claims with data and facts. Finally, character isdisplayed through such behaviors as fulfilling commitments in a timely manner, discerning andpursuing ethical practices, and contributing to society as an active citizen. It was noted thatservice learning, as applied through engineering, embraces many of these example behaviors.Accordingly, a new hypothesis was posed for the 2014-2015 offering of the first-yearprogramming sequence: that by embracing the entrepreneurial mindset as stated by KEEN –curiosity, connection, and creating value – as well as developing various
elements from the literature.These elements include: (1) the uncertainty of interpreting the problem, constraints, and goalswithin a complex, open-ended situation;10 (2) the unpredictability of solving divergent problemsthat require the evaluation and judgment of many alternative solution paths;6, 7 (3) the uncertaintyof optimizing a design that satisfies the competing demands and constraints of the client as wellas safety, economical, environmental, and ethical concerns;5, 7 (4) the uncertainty of solvingdynamic problems that require a person to constantly adjust, reevaluate and evolve asunanticipated problems arise;6, 9 and (5) designing solutions within imperfect models andincomplete information that requires all engineers to reason through
Engineering Curriculum Abstract In addition to providing the technical expertise required to solve 21st century problems, theengineers of 2020 will be expected to adapt to a continuously evolving environment while oper-ating outside the limits of their discipline and remaining ethically grounded. Their undergraduatetraining must therefore be designed to nurture engineers to transcend traditional disciplinaryboundaries, and to communicate, transfer knowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries. One approach to this challenge is to incorporate biomimicry or bio-inspireddesign into the engineering curriculum. Our research aims to create instructional resources thatprovide exposure to the abundance of design examples that
engineering ABET criteria may force an even furthernarrowing of the engineering curriculum and thus limit the development of the so-called “21stcentury skills” for all students [25], organizations such as NSBE and SHPE continue to provideunique opportunities for engineering students of color to develop many of the professional skillsoutside of the classroom such as those described in the Engineer 2020 vision. These twoprofessional organizations provide unique opportunities for students to acquire skills and buildknowledge that is not (or cannot be) taught in traditional engineering classrooms. AfricanAmerican and Latina/o engineering students develop skills such as communication, ethics, andtime and resource management through interactions with the