asmentoring partnerships and scholarships—while others may focus more on providing communitysupport, such as diversity workshops and social activities. These differences are products of eachsite’s context and driven by local students’ needs and goals.One component of the leadership structure of Access is the Core Organizer (CO) Team. The COteam is responsible for supporting communication, mentorship, and self-reflection in thenetwork. The CO team meets on a regular basis to coordinate mentorship of student leaders,grant and funding applications, and future plans for the network. The team originated from thevarious site leaders that came together initially to write the grant that funded the creation ofAccess. This team has changed and expanded as
outcomes, assessments, and examples of student work [3]. Theprogram with a micro-credential will not only attract a higher level of interest from the studentsbut also reward the students in the form of a competitive edge in the job market for completingthe curriculum. For SUNY, the micro-credential is recorded in the student’s transcript. Themicro-credential can also be an attractive outcome for potential part-time students when the RFcurriculum is a track in a professional development program for even wider participation in theRF curriculum.Curriculum Implementation Plan – EET Department at SUNY Farmingdale State College 1. Course Map The course map in Figure 1 illustrates the planned sequence of courses in the RF engineering curriculum at
. As a team we planned a three day game design workshop for middle school students that: ● fosters interest in computer science careers by exposing students to basic programming concepts; ● encourages the development of ethical decision-making capacities by designing games that address contemporary challenges in adolescents’ lives; and ● harnesses the motivational affordances of games to encourage students to engage in interest driven learning.Game Jam workshops are potentially well suited to achieving the goals we note above because of their open-ended nature [3]. Game jams build on the affordances of games, offering youth a playful and agenticperspective on design and problem solving, while exposing them to basic
CSCL-tool are considered. However, participants differ in theirinterindividual tool usage, e.g., webcam usage, due to personal or technical reasons. In result, aCSCL-session planned on a web-conferencing platform can unintentionally turn into a session ona spectrum from videoconferencing (all participants use their webcam and microphone) overaudioconferencing (participants refusing webcam usage) to synchronous text-chat (webcam- andmicrophone-refusal). In worst case this can cause misleading conclusions about the didacticmatch between tool and task with negative effect on teaching and learning. To consider theusers’ interindividual tool usage, we conducted an online experiment with 45 undergraduatestudents building 15 three-student groups
presented a reflexive model of an identity-based approach toengineering leadership instruction. Moreover, the model may be applied in a wide variety ofengineering classes, given the central role that leadership plays in training for the profession.That said, in a lower-division setting, the lower-division lesson plan may provide an introductionand contextualization of leadership in the engineering profession. Therefore, it might be mostappropriate for an engineering survey course, as students are introduced to various aspects of theengineering profession.The upper-division lesson plan can provide richer insight into how engineering leadership ispracticed, as well as practical scaffolding for students’ pursuing their own professionaldevelopment
participants already know their education and career intentions before theyparticipate in the program. In that case, the impact of the program on those intentions is usually amatter of reinforcing, rather than redirecting, the paths that students are already on. Results fromthe comprehensive survey appear to confirm this. 89% of WIL participants agreed or stronglyagreed that, after the WIL program, they plan to work in their field of study – a small increasefrom the 85% who agreed or strongly agreed prior to the program. The proportion who “stronglyagreed” rose from 49 to 56%. Among “high-intensity” WIL participants, 88% agreed or stronglyagreed – which marked an increase of five percentage points from the 83% who agreed orstrongly agreed prior to the
through an interface software between AD2 and printed circuit board.Instructors can supervise and instruct students to complete the laboratory activity remotely. OurEE program has 25 sets of AD2 for instructional laboratory usage. We plan to apply the AD2devices to electronic printing laboratory remote activities. Figure 2. Experimental Setup for Remote Activity (Circuit Testing)Research designWe obtained the Institutional Review Board’s (IRB) approval for this research project. Currently,we are in the process of completing this study. We are recruiting participants from students whocompleted or currently enrolled in the EPL course. We plan to have 10 students who completedthe EPL in the traditional in-person condition and 10
- of top academic and vested in their sistent connection to research laboratories success the university in line with national UARC modelCareer Student goals are re- Guidance to stu- Provide proven, skilledEmpowerment fined and dreams are dents in bridging candidates to intern 4 connected to action- undergraduate expe- and full-time hiring able plans riences to careers pipelinesin a STEM career, (2) commitment to succeeding in the program, and (3) need. Need is broad
strategic interventions that may combat observed trends. The intellectual merit of thisresearch project is that it will provide a greater understanding of the disparity between minoritystudents and Caucasian students, as it relates to engineering colleges’ dropout rates, and will helpcollege administrators devise a comprehensive research-based plan that could enhance thepersistence and retention rates of underrepresented minorities within their institutions. The broaderimpact of this research is three-fold: it will (1) strengthen working communities and the nation’sworkforce, (2) advance racial equity and justice, and (3) lead to the building of an economy forall.IntroductionIn the U.S., the social and political climate of the 1970s, including the
students withmathematical concepts necessary to learning spatial transformations and allied mathematicalrepresentations. The project will also provide the foundation for planned further research addinga language-processing component to an AI for high school students, which would be trained on alarge dataset of common high school math topics and language used by students. To ensurerigorous evaluation of the project, the research team will anticipate confounding factors so as tominimize their effects, and two learning conditions (AI-powered and non-AI) will be employedand compared with the same essential visualization and functional manipulation, thus advancinginstruction that applies across multiple STEM disciplines. The project will create a
(50 to 100 mins) Assignments Week PM - Project Initiation, Integration and Change Management – 1 fundamental management Understanding and incorporating steps Stakeholder needs analysis, etc Week PM - Managing Systems and Trends and Benefits in Project Management HW -1 PM 2 IT Projects – Less rework and Improved productivity through defined roles and responsibilities and resource management Week PM – Strategic Planning, Project Life Cycles – Improved Project Cost HW 2 - PM 3 Project
projectwas something new and different. I learned a lot from researching more into origami and howEngineers are planning on using the concept. China had created the paper, Japan started theorigami and todays Engineers are origami to be able to produce a light weight, fast assemblingstructures. The technology improves by the day and in the future origami designs will be morecommon.”“The attempt took me about two tries as I am not very arts and crafty with paper especially. Theproject was overall satisfying, setting out to do something I am not good at and seeing theprocess as I made the object come into fruition with its result. I can see why engineers use thismethod to hand create their project to have a visual of what the result might be and go
management, operation of automated systems,machining, and electro-mechanical maintenance skills, managing cyber-physical systems, andsystem-wide implementation and improvement of technological processes for manufacturingfirms.A curriculum development and assessment committee was formed in the Autumn of 2020 to devisea plan for measuring student learning outcomes based on the Engineering TechnologyAccreditation Commission (ETAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,Inc [1]. During 2020-2021, the faculty team was charged with the implementation of a robustframework for the assessment of student learning outcomes using Canvas; the university’s learningmanagement system (LMS) which can be used as a tool to help in decision-making
improvement in the number &Not Weeding diversity of engineering graduates in thethem Out of US through use of recruiting, admissions, retention best practices.Engineering • Synthesize research & best practices to identify core initiatives that supportInitiative success • Identify programs that work for specific student audiences • Communicate evidence-based practices and partner with institutions to implement these. Action Plan• Four brainstorming sessions with national experts in Spring 2022 to identify successful programs and initiatives, as well as areas for improvement• Conversations with the
, translucent and opaque; universal systems model;Spanish art; and geometry and CAD models. These lessons were organized with the followingpedagogical materials: Lesson outline including objectives, standards alignment, and shortoverview of the lesson; video lectures and resources to be displayed in the classroom; lectureslides for teachers; teacher guide consisting of detailed lesson plan, scripts, and other helpfulresources to teach the lesson. The lesson modules address the need for student training in AItechnologies to be aware and be prepared for the disruptive applications to meet the complexchallenges in future.Teachers presented the lesson to students to get experience as well as feedback to further improvethe lesson plan and implementation. To
wedo or need to do much less. That creates a generation that will depend on help for scientific andengineering problems on the internet. One of the biggest concerns for the author, is theauthenticity of the info on the internet. And another big concern is the ability of our futuregeneration to distinguish and sort out the authentic from the non-authentic info. It is a challengefor the new generation, however, it is also our challenge to proactively embrace the technologyand integrate it in our plans for preparing our future engineers. As students get intocollege/university and go through the traditional curriculum and experience for engineering, theywill graduate with the tools of today’s engineers. As such, the author believes that there
not technical or hands-on basedactivities, they would not influence students to make a technical decision like choosing acapstone design project. However, critical skills like leadership, planning and organization canbe acquired from participation in these activities. A greater percentage of students thatparticipated in college club activities chose the Space section. This could mean that there aremore Space related college club in the College of Engineering. Currently, at North Carolina StateUniversity there are three high functioning Space related college clubs in the College ofEngineering which include, Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS),High-Powered Rocketry Club (HPRC), and Liquid Rocketry Lab (LRL), while the
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Raspberry Pi 4 B’s on some university networks.During the current academic semester, we will progress with evaluating these systems within anundergraduate class in engineering electromagnetics. As a part of this class, students will design,construct and test simple antennas. One step of the antenna testing process will be to connect thestudent-constructed antennas to an SDR using a balun and then verify that the antenna is workingby using the SDR to receive a live signal. This year, students will have the option to selectbetween the two options discussed within this paper as a part of this lab activity.Additional future work planned for this project includes evaluating the use of other
redesigned spaces encourage students toengage in hands-on projects and experiential learning. These transformed learning environmentsaim to cultivate a sense of belonging, creativity, and innovation among students, promoting theiroverall engagement and success [1], [2], [4], [5], [13].To ensure the effectiveness of these new initiatives, the College has implemented acomprehensive assessment plan. The National Survey for Student Engagement (NSSE) [9]isadministered each year for engineering students following the launch of the new programs. Thisassessment provides valuable insights into student experiences, perceptions, and outcomes,allowing the College to make data-informed decisions and continuously improve the support andlearning environment
Sig. Partial Eta SquaredIntervention 0.066 1 0.066 0.116 0.733 0.001Control 0.001 1 0.001 0.002 0.968 0.000Error(ARV) 76.253 135 0.565 Table 3: Student Behavioral Response- Evaluation of the course.Next Steps While our preliminary results have not shown differences between our control andintervention groups, we plan to dig further into our data and do more complex analyses to findpotential differences that cannot be shown using ANOVA. Additionally, we will look atdifferent types of active learning (interactive
these lessons, students critique the technology, identify its sources of bias (e.g., selective stakeholders in the design, datasets), and create a plan outlining how to improve the system. Further, each ethics activity was designed following the lessons that teach relatedtechnical concepts to ensure that students possess adequate background technical knowledge inorder to understand the ethics issues. For instance, Ethics lesson #3 was taught immediately afterstudents learn the processes of supervised learning and experiment using Google’s TeachableMachine to train AI models to detect faces. These ethics activities engaged students in reflectingon their personal and societal impact and brainstorming solutions to
. 10, no. 3, pp. 2–10, 1987.[5] J. M. Keller, “How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach,” VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba, vol. 1, p. 13, 2000.[6] K. Li and J. M. Keller, “Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review,” Comput Educ, vol. 122, pp. 54–62, 2018.[7] M. J. Borrego, M. J. Prince, C. E. Nellis, P. Shekhar, C. Waters, and C. J. Finelli, “Student perceptions of instructional change in engineering courses: A pilot study,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–1120.[8] D. C. Owens, T. D. Sadler, A. T. Barlow, and C. Smith-Walters, “Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science
unique. This restructuring would also allow students to work in an industry-like environment where teams have specific tasks and communication is critical. The particularuse case presented in this paper is to create a remote-sensing application for vital signmonitoring. Some details will not be included to avoid IP infringement with the sponsor of thisproject.The assessment plan is to evaluate if this new team structure improves learning outcomescompared to a traditional team. The two outcomes being compared in this study are ABETstudent outcome 3 and 5 by measuring student's communication and self-efficacy relative toother team structures (e.g. other capstone section). ABET 3 (Communication) relates to theability to communicate effectively with
has been implemented across three universities in undergraduate mechanicalengineering courses for engineering graphics. Instructors incorporated an average of four weeksof sketching instruction into their lesson plans, giving students the opportunity to practicefreehand sketching with SketchTivity as a part of engineering graphics instruction. We wished todiscover how SketchTivity can support instructors outside of mechanical engineering byinvestigating how instructors from several different fields perceive and teach sketching. Weinterviewed 7 instructors from civil engineering, construction science, architecture, andarchitectural engineering about their sketching instruction practices, their thoughts aboutsketching’s importance for engineers
theirindividual education plans. In addition to the activities throughout the academic year, annualsummer bridge programs are offered to support bonding amongst S-STEM students at IVC andUCI. The summer bridge program also allows transfer students to experience the academicculture and rigor of a university through project- based teamwork, and academic successworkshops. Students are also actively encouraged and supported in pursuing summer research orindustry internships.Figure 1. S-STEM program activitiesPreliminary evidence for program efficacyTo examine the success of the program, in a first step we investigated whether the ‘UC IrvinePathways to Engineering Collaborative’ increased the number of community college studentswho successfully transferred
Paper ID #38318Board 223: Broadening Participation in Engineering via the TransferStudent Pathway: Findings from an S-STEM-Enabled PartnershipDr. David B. Knight, Virginia Tech David Knight is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation and Director of Research of the Academy of Global Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems- level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the intersection between
Submittal(s) Timeline Introduction and team formation Week 1 Project ideation (incorporation of Project idea description including Weeks 1-4 biomimicry) the major reference article(s)) Project idea validation (optional) Interview notes, survey, etc. Weeks 4-10 Prototyping planning (optional) Prototyping plan Weeks 4-8 Prototyping (optional) Prototype and a short video Weeks 9-10 recording of the whole process Project report writing Final project report
Curriculum for High School FemalesAbstractComputer Science (CS) Frontiers is a 4-module curriculum, 9 weeks each, designed to bring thefrontiers of computing to high school girls for exploration and development. Our prior work hasshowcased the work in developing and piloting our first three modules, Distributed Computing,Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT). During the summer of 2022, wepiloted the completed curricula, including the new Software Engineering module, with 56 highschool camp attendees. This poster reports on the newly developed software engineering module,the experiences of 7 teachers and 11 students using the module, and our plans for improving thismodule prior to its release in
maintain this elevatedaverage rating in the self-efficacy areas over the course of the school year. The campers alsoexhibit a much larger increase in intent to persist ratings over the course of the year than the non-camper cohort.Future workWe plan to continue to compare the Pre-Camp and Pre-Soph survey responses of camp-attendingstudents to determine whether the camp impacts the factors of chemical engineering self-efficacy, coping self-efficacy, and student integration. Ongoing comparison of the Pre-Soph andPost-Soph ratings of the camp-attending and non-attending cohorts will help establish whetherany observed changes in these factors are lasting. Once our data set becomes adequately large,we additionally plan to employ a path analysis to
racial and ethnic groups. The total number of women earning engineering graduate degrees represent roughly athird or less of the total students across all racial and ethnic groups between 2000 and 2019 [5].This low diversity in doctoral degree holders impacts faculty diversity [2]. Nationally, only17.6% of tenured/tenure track faculty in engineering were female, 2% were black or AfricanAmerican, and 3.7% were Hispanic in 2019 [5].Project Description In order to address this lack of representation in higher education engineering programs,the University of Massachusetts Lowell S-STEM program began with an initial plan to recruitthree cohorts of 8 low-income, high-achieving students (24 students total) who wish to pursue acareer in