to self-report if they could not get into theirfirst choice major. Within the United States, the universities awarding the highest number ofengineering degrees were research university [6]. Based on research conducted by the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Institutional Research and Analytics in 2022, GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, Purdue University, Texas A&M, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Arizona State University, University of Michigan, University of Central Florida, andUniversity of California-Irvine graduated the most engineering undergraduates, more than 2,000each. Therefore, research universities are a good place to start examining which student groupsreport a higher rate of not being able to declare the
(MSEd), and engineering education (PhD).Dr. Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics ( ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering Pathways for Appalachian Youth: Design Principles and Long-term Impacts of School-Industry Partnerships IntroductionBroadening participation in the skilled technical workforce is a national priority due toincreasing demand for
San AntonioDr. Jose Francisco Herbert Acero, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Francisco Herbert got his Ph.D. degree in engineering sciences from the Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESM) in 2015. He serves as professor of instruction at the Mechanical Engineering department of the University of Texas at San Antonio.Dr. Harry R. Millwater Jr., The University of Texas at San AntonioProf. Heather Shipley, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Heather J. Shipley is currently the Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the University College and Burzik Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Texas at San Antonio. She holds a BS degree in Chemistry from Baylor
. Howe, and A. E. Weil, “Engineering play with blocks as an informal learning context for executive function and planning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 803–818, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20421.[8] A. MacDonald, L. Danaia, S. Sikder, and C. Huser, “Early Childhood Educators’ Beliefs and Confidence Regarding STEM Education,” Int. J. Early Child., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 241–259, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13158-021-00295-7.[9] M.-H. Park, D. M. Dimitrov, L. G. Patterson, and D.-Y. Park, “Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” J. Early Child. Res., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 275–291, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1476718X15614040.[10] A. S. Bustamante, D. B
for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship (CMTE) at the University of Toronto. She also currently sits as the President of the Board for BrainSTEM Alliance and is the Executive Director of Work Integrated Learning at the Calgary Economic Development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Identifying the skills and student activities that influence career pathways for Black vs. non- Black Engineering GraduatesIntroductionBackgroundCareer pathways for engineering graduates have continued to shift over the past several decadesand continue to evolve and engineering education evolves. With the increase of career pathwaysfor engineering graduates there has been increasing
Paper ID #45136An exploration of the relationship between physical, social, and emotionalresource access and the development of engineering identity and belongingAnne-Marie C.A. Zamor, Rowan UniversityDr. Justin Charles Major, Rowan University Dr. Justin C. Major (they/them) is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University where they leads ASPIRE Lab (Advancing Student Pathways through Inequality Research in Engineering). Justin’s research focuses on low-income students, engineering belonging and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and
we will propose appropriate supports, such as workshops andgroup activities, to help international students in engineering adjust to the gender-related culturein the U.S.IntroductionInternational graduate students in engineering are a significant presence in the U.S., with manyof them hailing from countries with distinct cultures from that of the U.S. The Institute ofInternational Education reported that 385,097 international graduate students were enrolled inU.S. higher education during the 2021-2022 academic year [1]. In addition, 54% of internationalstudents pursued degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields,with a majority of them enrolled in engineering and computer science programs [1]. In terms ofthe
Engineering at Arizona State University. She holds a PhD from Arizona State University in Learning, Literacies and Technologies with a focus on engineering education. Her research interests span four related areas: democratization of engineering education, ways of thinking, engineering curiosity among pre-college students, and faculty development.Dr. Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of En- gineering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research
instruction.Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 CAREER: ‘Support our Troops’: Re-storying Student Veteran and Service Member Deficit in Engineering through Professional Formation and Community Advocacy: YEAR 2IntroductionToday, the need to recruit, retain, train, and sustain a diverse science, technology, engineeringand mathematics (STEM) workforce able to meet the socio-technical challenges of 21st centurysociety is more urgent than ever before. Together, student veterans and service members (SVSM
Paper ID #37712Board 257: Development and Initial Outcomes of an NSF RIEF Project inUnderstanding Teamwork Experience and its Linkage to EngineeringIdentity of Diverse StudentsDr. Yiyi Wang Yiyi Wang is an assistant professor of civil engineering at San Francisco State University. In addition to engineering education, her research also focuses on the nexus between mapping, information technology, and transportation and has published in Accident Analysis & Prevention, Journal of Transportation Geog- raphy, and Annuals of Regional Science. She served on the Transportation Research Board (TRB) ABJ80 Statistical Analysis
based on this criterion. 4. Situated within the United States if data was collected. Because intersectionality may be (re)interpreted in different national contexts outside the United States, I limit the scope of papers to work done within the United States (but could be published in an international or non-US venue). 5. Focuses specifically on engineering education and engineering education students and stakeholders, including K-12 students, faculty, and administrators. This criterion excludes studies on engineering professionals or the engineering workplace. 6. Must be labeled with “engineering,” not STEM or science/technology studies since disciplinary differences may be obscured under the STEM umbrella
areflective practice that could lead to more effective teaching and mentoring. From a research point of view, we areworking on carrying out more interviews, transcribing, and coding them to get a better sense of what the revisedmentoring process should encompass.References[1] R. J. Burke, “Women and minorities in STEM: a primer,” in Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Upping the Numbers, R. J. Burke and M. C. Maitis, Eds., Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub., Inc., 2007, pp. 3-27.[2] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering
invest in and benefit fromteam-based involvement in service-learning. Humanitarian engineering programs and projectsbuild on the basics of service-learning concepts but expand and deepen them to address basichuman needs in the most marginalized populations. Both service-learning programs and HEP haveshown marked positive impacts on student professional formation including: professional skillslike teamwork and leadership [16], attitudes and identity as an engineer [17], and better recognitionof global and societal contexts [18]. Studies based on effectiveness of professional skills in directcorrelation with the involvement in service-learning are extensive, but tend to focus only on ABET(Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Paper ID #26713Work in Progress: First-Year Engineering College Students: Value Createdfrom Participating in a Living/Learning CommunityDr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D., is an Clinical Associate Professor at Boise State University, Idaho. His academic research interests include innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Ms. Kim M. B. Tucker, Boise State University Kim Tucker is currently completing her Doctoral Degree in Curriculum and Instruction and works as the Coordinator of Residential Learning for in the Living
College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in Educational Administration and Human Resource Development and worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher with the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning- INSPIRE at the School of Engineering Education-Purdue University. She was a recipient of the Ap- prentice Faculty Grant from the Educational Research Methods ASEE Division in 2009. She also has been an Electrical Engineering Professor for two Mexican universities. Dr. Mendoza is interested in sTEm education, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, Latino studies in engineering and computer aided/instructional technology in sTEm
Paper ID #26230Field Programs to Accomplish the Learning Objectives for Engineering Courses:A Case Study of the Road Surveying and Design Course at Southeast Univer-sity, ChinaDr. Jianchuan Cheng, Southeast University Dr. Jianchuan CHENG Professor, School of Transportation Southeast University(SEU) 2 Southeast Uni- versity Road, Nanjing,211189 P.R.China Tel:+86 25 83790385 E-mail: jccheng@seu.edu.cn Education 2002, Ph.D., Southeast University (Transportation) 1994, M.Eng., Southeast University (Trans- portation) 1985, B.Sc., Nanjing Institute of Technology (Civil Engineering) Major Research Interests: Road safety and
.,Hawkins Ash, C.,Phillips, C. (2018). Toward a National Agenda for Broadening Participation of AfricanAmericans in Engineering and Computer Science: Insights from Year One.Paper presented atthe 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UTPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practicalguide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Articles Included in the Review (19) 1. Bernadin, S., & Atuahene, F. (2007). Influential factors affecting the attraction and retention of minority faculty in engineering and technology programs BT - 114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, 2007 2. Berry, C. A., Cox, M. F., & Main, J. B. (2014). An examination of
) A. Student Organizations V. Advising (PROF VI.0.0) I. Grand Challenges (DESN I.F.0) A. Plan of Study IV. Types of Engineering II. Concern for Society B. Study Abroad V. Engineering History A. Assistive Technologies C. Co-op or Internship VI. Definition and Vocabulary B. Social Entrepreneurship 1. Interviews A. Nature of Engineering C. Design Safety D. Intro
Paper ID #11122Power Engineering Day-a way to attract high school students from underrep-resented groups to consider careers in electric powerDr. Lisa Shatz, Suffolk University Associate Professor at Suffolk University In Electrical Engineering. PI of NSF SSTEM grant, Electrical Engineering Scholars at Suffolk. Work with the Power Industry to put an emphasis on electric power in our curriculumDr. Timothy A Poynton, University of Massachusetts Boston Dr. Timothy Poynton is an associate professor in the Department of Counseling and School Psychology in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of
Paper ID #19642A New Application-Oriented Electronic Circuits Course for non-ElectricalEngineering Students Using Arduino and NI VirtualBenchDr. Hooman Rashtian, University of California, Davis Hooman Rashtian received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada in 2013 and the M.Sc. and B.Sc. degrees in Electrical En- gineering from Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, in 2008, and 2006, respectively. He was a Postdoctoral Scholar at Davis MM-Wave Research Center (DMRC) at University of California, Davis from 2014 to 2016. Since July
engineering/computing identity and belongingness as thePilot courses become more established and refined. We also plan to investigate the impact of thecourses on retention within engineering and computing.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge Alison Lapointe of the Discovery Center for Evaluation,Research, and Professional Learning at Miami University for assistance with survey generationand data processing.References[1] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Barriers and opportunities for2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways,”Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016.[2] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, “Engage to excel: producing
gender ratio and group size on both female and male-identifyingstudents is crucial for creating an optimal learning environment for the entire class. AtBinghamton University, only about 26% of undergraduate engineering students identify aswomen, highlighting the need for this research.In a 2020 article in the International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, Al Mulhimet al. extensively explored how group size directly impacts student success in projects and finalgrades. The study compared large groups (7-8 people) and smaller groups (3-4 people), findingthat students generally perceived larger groups more positively and tended to perform better.However, the paper emphasizes that other underlying factors contribute to the success
still located withina college or school of engineering. The American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) hasaccredited 75 baccalaureate programs with 31 of those programs located within colleges or schoolsof engineering, engineering and technology, architecture and engineering, or architecture,engineering, and technology [2]. Further, some construction management programs are alsoaccredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). ABET hasaccredited construction management programs at 33 institutions using its Applied Natural ScienceAccreditation Commission (ANSAC) criteria. ABET has also accredited construction engineeringtechnology programs at 33 institutions using its Engineering Technology
– including the presenter –each reviewed over 250 books published after 2014 to determine the first ever “Best STEMBooks” list for kindergarten through high school readers. Reviewers were representatives fromthe following participating organizations: • ASEE, • The International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA), • The National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), • The Society of Elementary Presidential Awardees (SEPA), and • The Children’s Book Council (CBC).The books reach K12 audiences, and thus, are valuable teaching tools for K12 educators,librarians, out-of-school educators, and parents.Selection Criteria: A separate team of educators developed the initial set of criteria for 2017book selection
staff and teachers, and served as museum liaison to UT Austin’s Science and Engineering departments and the local STEM professional community. She received training in inquiry-based learning from the Institute for Inquiry at the Exploratorium in San Francisco, CA. She is currently the Education Director for Phoenix Arising Aviation Academy and the Program Director for STEM Education programs with iFLY.Mr. Stuart B Wallock Stuart Wallock has spent the last 20 years involved with the convergence of technology, ecommerce, media and entertainment industries in various online and retail capacities. He holds a BA in Liberal Arts from UT Austin. Stuart joined SkyVenture/iFLY Indoor Skydiving from Dell, Inc., in October of
behaviors and their impact on engineering leadership potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional com- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Prof. Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. At Rocketdyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Bechtel), he con
and other academic publications and funded by federal agencies and private foundations. Her books on educational technologies, equitable workplace practices, and organizational change are widely used in higher education practice. She has received numerous awards for her research and teaching. Jaime regularly consults with colleagues and universities on faculty workload, pedagogical innovations, leadership, and organizational change.Milagros Rivera, George Mason University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work-in-progress: A data gathering effort on STEM faculty startup packages for assessing equity in recruitment Leigh McCue, Girum Urgessa, Tehama Lopez
and heat transfer by building and measuring their ownexperiments. 6References 1. Barker, B.S. and J. Ansorge, Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learn- ing Environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2007. 39(3): p. 229-243. 2. Nugent, G., et al., Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2010. 42(4): p. 391-408. 3. Cejka, E., C. Rogers, and M. Portsmore, Kindergarten Robotics: Using Robotics to Motivate Math, Science, and Engineering Literacy in Elementary School. International Journal of Engineering Edu- cation, 2006. 22(4
journals, magazines and conferences. Most of these papers are in the field of online engineering, remote and virtual laboratories and issues associated with their dissemination and usage.Prof. Michael E. Auer, Carinthia University of Applied Sciences Dr. (mult.) Michael E. Auer is Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Faculty of Engineering and IT of the Carinthia University of Applied Sciences Villach, Austria and has also a teaching position at the Uni- versity of Klagenfurt. He is a senior member of IEEE and member of ASEE, IGIP, etc., author or co-author of more than 170 publications and leading member of numerous national and international organizations in the field of Online Technologies. His current research
Paper ID #39068Telling Half a Story: A Mixed Methods Approach to UnderstandingCulturally Relevant Engineering Education in Nigeria and the U.S.Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Moses Olayemi is a Doctoral Candidate and Bilsland Dissertation Fellow in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests revolve around the professional development of engineering educators in low resource/post-conflict settings and the design and contextualization of in- struments to measure the impact of educational interventions. Research projects on these topics have and are currently being