conclusions. Finally, we introduce the OrganizedInnovation Model for Education, which is based on features of the ERC Program and other 2similar multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional university research centers (MMURCs). In thisfinal section, we provide specific recommendations for educators, university leaders, and policymakers on how educational systems might be enhanced to produce a better prepared, leadership-ready engineering workforce.Section 1: The Problem A common lament is that when an organization’s best engineer is promoted to aleadership role, that organization loses the best engineer and gains the worst leader. The skill setsrequired for engineering jobs and leadership roles are
term learner gains 8,9To have a greater understanding of how this directly applies to deeper learning we need to take alook at Figure 1 below which graphically represents Webb’s Depth of Knowledge taxonomy.10As learning blocks are heavily focused on application of knowledge, many of the Do-It/Challenge-It sections revolved around Level 2-4 activities with the majority focusing on Level 3-4 activitiesbut scaled for time. What follows below is a sampling of two badges and two learning blocks.Badges incorporate all the various pieces from all of the learning blocks into a set of achievementsin a recognizable way. So a daily badge will require both completion of an engineering themedblock, an art themed block, a science themed block, a technology
predictors for later academic success and retention (Durdella & Kim, 2012). A statistical analysis based on data retrieved from U.S department of Education and theNational Center for Education Statistics, year 2011-12 is shown in Figure 1 (Molina, 2015). Amajority of veterans are currently enrolled in associate degree or certificate programs (54 %),and only 19 % are enrolled in public 4-year colleges. Their average age is 25, the majority ofthem have dependents (52%), are U.S. born (94%), white (63%), and male (79%). Only 20 % ofveterans are enrolled in STEM fields. Figure 1: Undergraduate student veterans by numbers (Molina, 2015) Strategies recommended for institutions to serve as a veteran friendly include: a
and students expressed concerningstudents’ multimodal mobile use as support for school assignments?The results show that students and teachers have many different experiences of students’multimodal mobile use related to school assignments. However, the use is limited in severalways. To a large extent teachers and students have expressed that multimodal mobileresources can be used advantageously by students to support school assignments for severalpurposes. Among disadvantages identified mobile device multimodality in some respects canbe disruptive. The result also indicates that different multimodal mobile media have specificpossibilities for supporting students’ learning as it is related to school assignments.1. IntroductionIt has become
/community, breakingthe ice with the students is usually not an issue.A common request is for university students and industry alumni to represent their particularengineering disciplines and to break down into stations with 1-2 ambassadors per discipline(sometimes even with a poster or other backdrop prepared ahead of time). Then high schoolstudents spend time at each of their top stations, corresponding to their career leanings. After 5-7minutes, they are instructed to ‘switch stations’. Bringing a demo, or actual representativeoutput of a project creates interest and focuses audience attention.As far as reaching the greatest number of high school students, the best venue is during theschool day, during one or more class sessions. If the class is
. References [1] Beam, T. K., Pierrakos, O., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). Preliminary findings on freshmen engineering students' professional identity: Implications for recruitment and retention. Proceedings of the[2] Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs. engineering switchers. Proceedings of the 39th Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350571[3] Matusovich, H. M., Barry, B. E., Meyers, K., & Louis, R. (2011). A multi-institution comparison of students’ development of an identity as an engineer. Proceedings of the 118th ASEE Annual
. Research Questions Our goal with the IPE study is to answer the following research question: How do informal engineering programs (such as Design Squad, a WGBH multimedia informal engineering program for middle schoolaged children) support engineeringrelated learning over time (i.e., engineering pathways)? To get at this larger question, we will also explore five related, secondary questions: 1. What is the profile of children who benefit the most (i.e., develop positive outcome expectations about engineering, greater engineeringrelated selfefficacy, and an increased interest in engineering) after exposure to informal STEM programs? 2. How much exposure to informal STEM programs is sufficient to support
framework for theteaching and learning process based on a concept familiar to most engineers: feedback controlsystems. Feedback control has long been a staple of engineering curricula, primarily in electricalengineering, but also across other disciplines such as mechanical and chemical engineering. Thisis largely due to the diversity of applications of control theory.[1] Feedback control concepts havealso been applied in areas outside of engineering, such as psychology and human behavior,particularly in the areas of goal setting and performance.[2,3] However, in the field of engineeringeducation, the concepts from control theory have been underused. We build upon the ideaspresented in the related literature by providing a novel control systems
their hardware and software configuration [1]. Every standalone subsystem requires inputinformation to carry out its corresponding task. Consequently, every subsystem must beautonomous to process the data from the low sensor component level to the high data controllevel, and generate an output data that can be used for the next subsystem as its input Page 26.1271.4information. This data is processed and analyzed by every single subsystem in its own uniquelanguage, and then translated to a universal language that is understood by all the subsequentsubsystems. The connection between the constituents of an SoS is architected in a scalable waymaking
analysis tutorials. Initial results from a laboratory-based study showed astatistically significant 1.21 standard deviation improvement in student performance compared tonormal textbook-based homework. The software has been used by over 1290 students at fourdifferent universities and some community colleges, with high levels of user satisfaction andgenerally favorable comments.1. IntroductionOne of the most widely taught courses in undergraduate engineering curricula is linear circuitanalysis, as many majors other than just electrical engineering require their students to have atleast general familiarity with electrical circuits. For example, around 19 mostly large (70-80student) sections of this course (including 2 sections completely online) are
andcomputer science.This paper is focused on engineering students who are both transfer students and sophomores,even though they may be classified as upper division students due to their total number of earnedcredit hours. During the 2012-2013 academic year, 581 students transferred into engineering andcomputer science in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU).Of this total, 458 were classified as upper division and 123 as lower division students. Thenumbers of new transfer students in fall 2013 are shown in Table 1. Lower Division Upper Division Total Fall 2013 Female 22 51 73 (15.7%) New Engineering & CS Male Transfers
were conductedwith employers.A general interview guide approach was taken to conduct the interviews. While this approachspecifies in advance the issues and questions to be discussed, it gives the interviewer freedom todecide on the sequence and wording of the questions during the course of the interview.Advantages to this approach are that it provides a systematic and comprehensive way to collectdata while allowing the interview to have a conversational tone and flow11. Exceptions to thisgenerally flexible interview approach were as follows: 1) Aside from gathering background anddemographic information about the interviewees, the first question that interviewees were alwaysasked was the very broad and general question, “Why do you hire WPI
research. Several students received research positions based on this activity. Aftereach meeting the participants were surveyed to determine how effective the meeting was and toidentify topics of interest for future meetings.Six of the 22 CIRC students were transfer students, leading to the realization that transferstudents were very much in need of a “little hand holding”.1 Based on this we applied for andreceived a second NSF CSEMS (award #0324212), this one focused on transfer students, Page 26.358.2beginning in Fall 2003. CIRC transfer students were then put into this second program calledCIRC/Maricopa Engineering Transition Scholars (CIRC/METS
the blending of science and engineeringas its first “conceptual shift,” combining the two into “Science and Engineering Practices”(NGSS, Appendix A). NGSS explains, “This integration is achieved by raising engineeringdesign to the same level as scientific inquiry in classroom instruction when teaching sciencedisciplines at all levels and by giving core ideas of engineering and technology the same status asthose in other major science disciplines” (NGSS, Appendix A). The following analysis examines how it addresses issues of equity and access in theimplementation of these “science and engineering practices.” To do this, the authors: 1. Examine the historical purposes of science and engineering education (as well as the connections
requirements. The case study revealed major technology trends, whichthe company is going to follow in the nearest future. These technologies will require new skillsets of young professionals. As universities are not able to adapt the curriculum in short- andmedium-term, the company’s business lab must be able to fill this gap, although there currentlyexists no process for the setup of new courses for the business lab in the company.UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COOPERATION FRAMEWORKBased on the case study findings and the success factors identified through literature review wepropose a generalized framework for university-industry cooperation in the area of IS, which isdepicted in figure 1. The framework is intended to formalize the steps for a successful long
– in anticipation that this willensure the highest level of professionalism when construction management students graduate.1. The nature of construction industry, trends and changesThe construction industry is currently one of the largest industries in western democracies. In theUnited States, it is on a par with education and health and along with associated investment andservice industries, it contributes about 9% of the US Gross Domestic Product (GDP) andemploys more than 10 million workers. Australia has a similar profile, where the constructionindustry contributes to 8% of the GDP and employs more than a million people – about 9% ofthe total workforce1.Modern construction spans design, new construction, rehabilitation, renovation
, helping men develop a personal motivation forengaging in gender equity efforts, utilizing male roles models, providing opportunities for male-only dialogues, and engagement in solution-building. Barriers include apathy, fear of status loss,and lack of knowledge about gender inequities15. Additional theory and research indicate thatthere are key stages in the development of an ally identity and effective ally behaviors16-21.Overall, there appears to be accord among investigators such that (1) potential allies must firstunderstand unearned advantage and how it works in their own lives as well as how it impacts thelives of systemically disadvantaged persons; (2) successful ally development approacheseducate, inspire, and support members of the
written, distributable articulation of suchpriorities is also felt to be required. But if we are interested in the social relations associatedwith engineering codes of ethics, we must ask: Why precisely is such an articulation felt to benecessary? After all, many features of many professional operations never find such formalexpression; although Codes of Ethics for History professors exist, they are rarely invoked inpractice or passed along for graduate students, for example. Moreover, although developing acode of ethics is commonly viewed as having been an essential part of engineering’sprofessionalization in the United States,1 the question of how codes of ethics actually shape dailyengineering practice is a, huge realm for study. To delve into
present, about fifty percent of the projects are multidisciplinaryand more than eighty percent are Industry-sponsored projects, as shown in Table 1.Table 1: List of current projects at Mechanical Engineering Senior Design at FAMU-FSUCollege of Engineering. Project Project Description Sponsor CEE ECE IME ME No. 1. Oleophobic Sealing Solutions Cummins X 2. Improving the Range of an Electric Vehicle Cummins X X 3. Marine Keel Cooler Optimization Tool Cummins X 4. High Speed Motor Test Rig Turbocor X 5
, many other industries have been or are planning to introducerobots into their manufacturing processes.1 In the Pacific Northwest region several companies inaerospace, electronics, apparel, and commercial cookware have either introduced robots or ex-panded their use in recent years. As such, an introduction to robotics in the context of manufac-turing is becoming more important for students pursuing degrees in Manufacturing Engineering.There is, however, always a challenge when teaching robotics to find the correct balance betweenapplication and modeling. Many robotics courses taught in Electrical or Mechanical EngineeringDepartments have a tendency to emphasize modeling over application, but a well-prepared Man-ufacturing Engineer needs to
teachers should teach (1, 2). Further, they address differentlearning styles (3, 4), focus explicitly on communication, teamwork, and leadershipskills (5, 6), and stress on educating students for life by helping them learn how tolearn. (5, 7)“Skillful engineering teachers” are those who are committed to the profession, and atthe same time, do possess knowledge in three domains: engineering knowledge (i.e.,their main disciplinary expertise and its related areas), pedagogical knowledge (i.e.,how students learn, effective pedagogies in achieving learning goals), andpedagogical content knowledge (e.g., how best to demonstrate procedures, relateconcepts, and correct students’ misconceptions within given constraints) (8) .However,expertise in any domain
engineering education:A Mediated Discourse Analysis of student presentations in a first year projects course Page 26.880.3 Ideologies of depoliticization in engineering education: A Mediated Discourse Analysis of student presentations in a first year projects course1. IntroductionThis paper works toward two goals. The first is to build on our previous work on“becoming an engineer”,1 in which we have attempted to understand engineering learningwithin a broader framework that focuses not only on the development of knowledge orcognitive capacities, but also on additional dimensions, including the development ofidentities within social
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Not engineering to help but learning to (un)learn: Integrating research and teaching on epistemologies of technology design at the margins Abstract Locating engineering education projects in sites occupied by marginalizedcommunities and populations serves primarily to reinforce themisapprehension that the inhabitants of such sites are illiterate, inept,incapable and therefore in need of aid or assistance from researchers, facultyand students. Drawing on the emerging literature on engineering educationand social justice, I examine the stated objectives, content, duration, andoutcomes of exemplar projects
sometimes when I'm like I can't believe I suck at math, like why?” (1stinterview), “I guess career-wise maybe so I'm not very strong at math” (2nd interview), and thefollowing passage from the 3rd interview: I realized, like, one: I sucked at (ooh… gosh...). Um, you're probably gonna be sick of hearing me talk after this!... S: No no... R: 1- I suck at math. S: Ok... Page 26.1582.6 R: I don't suck, I was, was pretty weak at math. I didn't have natural. My sister has a lot more aptitude for learning math.The repetition of this theme, in both 1st and 2nd person speech, suggests that this is a
Control Mass Rigid Boundary Ideal Gas Model Open System Pinned Joint Steam Tables Control Volume Linear Translation Friction Factor Closed System Rigid Body Newtonian Fluid Insulated Boundary Viscous Drag Lumped Element Figure 1 -- Common Concepts in Core Engineering Science Coursesfreshman engineering textbook. Saterbak, McIntire, and San9 have used this approach for an in-troductory
on the scenarios and open-endedquestions related to issues of sexual harassment.Participants:A total of 96 subjects participated in this study, although not every participant responded toevery scenario. We have clarified the numbers of participants responding to each scenario in the Page 26.1434.3results section. Participants consisted of engineering students (19 female; 14 male), facultymembers (19 female; 14 male), and professionals (27 female; 11 male). Students and facultywere recruited from universities ranging from research 1 to smaller, liberal arts schools. Studentswere predominantly sophomores and juniors, while faculty members all
communication skills among students in C-I courses. Results from C-Icourse completion questionnaires showed that we still had some room to improve our students’perception of the value of the communication assignments they completed (see Figure 1).However, results also indicated that students realized that improving their communication skillswas essential for careers in engineering (see Figure 2). 180 160 140 120 100 Fall 2007 80 Spring 2008 60 40 20 0 Very Little Little Somewhat Much Very MuchFigure 1: Student responses to question, “How much did the
unrealistic and difficult to relate to their own circumstances.2,3 Over the course of everydayengineering design work, many students do not realize they are engaging in ethical processes atall,2,4 and have little to no recognition of how their considerations shape and are shaped by theorganizational context of the program. Indeed, it is often only on looking back “after thingsturned out nasty” that reasoning seemingly unrelated to ethics may be identified as ethical.1 Likewise, students may not recognize that engineering design is inherently tied to ethics.However, the products of an engineering design process, and especially the use of thoseproducts, undoubtedly are.1 Scholars have argued that ethical issues arise on a day-to-day basisin the
illustrating how courses taught in a higher education makerspace meet long-standing design education goals (such as design across the curriculum). This paper presents thebenefits of makerspace-hosted design courses, highlighting three models that illustrate the abilityof a higher education makerspace to improve design education.Design Education: History and ChallengesThe importance of design as a component of engineering education is stressed in Fiesel’s (et al.)description of engineering as “a hands-on profession where doing is key.”1 According to Fiesel, akey aspect of the profession is to design, analyze, and build creations that harness and modifyenergy, materials, and information to solve problems and improve humanity’s standard of living.The
intentionally create possibility: 1. Find your purpose and declare a statement of possibility 2. Communicate and enroll others into possibility 3. Define a project, event, program or initiative 4. Layout a plan 5. Get into action 6. Acknowledge and Celebrate along the way2.3.4 Using Intentional Possibility in LearningPeople that live in possibility develop a number of traits we wish to develop in our students.They are driven, motivated, engaged, focused and prone to openly accept and handleadversity as challenge.By engaging students in possibility and having them enrol volunteers to develop a project thatimpacts between 50 and 200 people, we can provide an environment in which the studentincreases resiliency, self-confidence and