practice withinengineering education tend to extend only to other science disciplines [3, 1]. Lattuca et. al.’s2017 engineering education study found that a curricular emphasis on interdisciplinary topicsand skills (specifically including participating in non-engineering co-curricular activities andhumanitarian engineering projects), “significantly and positively relate to engineering students’reports of interdisciplinary skills” [4]. In this paper, we suggest an interdisciplinary computerprogramming exercise based on Ada Lovelace’s 1843 program for Charles Babbage’s AnalyticalEngine, thus promoting knowledge transfer between the humanities (history) and computerscience. Every student of computer science should be aware of the Bernoulli
their careers, which can affect an individual’s perception of theirexpertise. A study of project managers showed that having technical skills are the bare minimumfor the job [6]. Having exceptional professional skills is what leads to success in roles withgreater responsibilities in management [6]. This emphasis on professional skills could allude to ashift in expertise from technical to professional skills when switching to a managerial role inlater career stages. The transition away from technical expertise may be difficult for engineers tonavigate, as professional skills align less with the technical skills associated with early career.We present our examination of practicing engineers’ definition of their expertise by genderidentity and
Paper ID #33840Predicting Interest in Engineering Majors: The Role of Critical Agencyand Career GoalsHeather Perkins, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heather entered the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the fall of 2014, after com- pleting her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. In Spring 2021, she defended her dissertation and began a post-doctoral research position at Purdue University. She has par- ticipated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confidence, their influence upon womens’ performance in
their availability to prepare, including non-computing related jobs, caring for a familymember, or ongoing health issues. While we do consider the support mechanisms students mayleverage to overcome obstacles, in general, these results emphasize the larger issues in existinghiring structures, and demonstrate the importance of not treating students as a monolith. Thefindings from this work are intended to inform educators about how to better prepare students tosucceed on technical interviews, and to encourage industry to reform the process to make it moreequitable.1 IntroductionBetween 2019 and 2029, demand for workers in computing occupations are expected to surge28.8% [1]. For specific positions the projected rate is even higher, with 35.0
, realism, experimentalism, and existentialism. These philosophies were correlated tofive teaching styles: expert (who is interested in knowledge transfer), formal authority (whonever hesitate to give negative feedback), personal (who encourages students to follow theirway), facilitator (who present alternative and encourage students to take the initiative andresponsibility to construct knowledge), and delegator (who expects students to studyindependently in projects). Saritas argued that teachers mostly adapt a facilitator teaching styleand prefer experimentalist philosophy [12].Typically, we develop TPS with administrators and promotion committees in mind. However,Brinthaupt et al. debated that there is an exclusion of the students’ feedback in
interests in Engineering Education include engineering epistemology, equity and inclusion, and engineering culture.Mrs. Bailey Braaten, Ohio State University Bailey Braaten is currently a doctoral candidate at the Ohio State University, where she is in her fifth year of the STEM education PhD program. She is a graduate research assistant on the EHR Core NSF funded project, examining first year engineering students’ beliefs around smartness and engineering. She is also a graduate research assistant on the KEEN project, funded by the Kern Family Foundation, focusing on the assessment of entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML) in first-year engineering courses. Bailey received her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Ohio
into three constructs of teaching,social and cognitive presence designed to examine key elements of an online course (measuredwith an existing 34-item survey and qualitative interview questions). Preliminary findingssuggest no statistically significant differences in sense of belonging, teaching presence, socialpresence or cognitive presence between students in marginalized and dominant identity groups(continued analysis of qualitative data will reveal nuances between groups not apparent in surveydata); however, belonging was higher for students who attended class physically versus virtuallymost of the time. In addition, compared to a past (pre-pandemic) comparison, social presencewas lower for all fall 2020 students. This project is supported
projects are central to our teaching pedagogy. In moving to ERT, we had manyquestions centering on retaining our pedagogy in a completely online environment. Thisdilemma required us to become collaborative learners ourselves, demonstrating anentrepreneurial mindset [2]. Specifically, we took risks to explore ways to create an onlinestructure to enable students to reach course learning objectives. Within our own discoveryprocess, we developed stronger collegial relationships and applied our learning not just to theclassroom, but to our service and scholarship work. Moving online in ERT changed the way welived out our culture and provided new collaboration tools that benefited all aspects of our workas faculty. These benefits can extend beyond the
Paper ID #39350Exploring how Different Instructional Methods Compare to Improve StudentPerformance and Satisfaction in an Online Environment.Mr. Michael Roberts, University of Florida Currently, I work as a Technology Coach for a research grant. I have research experience in numerous fields including Magnetic Barkhausen Noise (MBN) in HY80 steel, Engineering Education, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and my current senior design project involves designing a sensor to detect volatile gases in moon regolith (moon rock). long with my research experience, I have developed my programming and computational skills which have
the goals of the project, I suspect that thedeans—and perhaps the programs included in the study—are more committed to diversity andinclusion than is typical in other engineering programs. As a result, the patterns of disadvantagedocumented here may be conservative estimates of the patterns in engineering education morebroadly.The ASEE-DIS asked students a range of questions about their experiences with engineeringpeers and professors, their thoughts about the engineering profession, and their future careerplans. The school-specific sample sizes ranged from 82 students (school 101) to 909 students (inschool 109). Response rates range from 4-45%, with an average response rate of 16.5%. 5Although 2,575 students began the survey, I use only the
Paper ID #32316Exploring a New Mentorship Model: From One-on-One to Flash MentoringDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of San Diego Marissa Forbes, PhD is a Research Associate in the University of San Diego Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, where she works on the Engineering Exchange for Social Justice (ExSJ). Her research ar- eas include broadening participation in engineering education, engineering for social and eco-justice, and water justice. Dr. Forbes earned her MS and PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder in Civil (envi- ronmental) Engineering. She previously served as the project manager and lead editor of
follow the K-12 engineering education principles byutilizing the project-based learning (PBL) approach. The PBL is introduced by Kilpartick andthis method is used in education by Dewey. This method is based on designing or creatingproduct, solving problem, investigating, and developing an answer (J Dewey, 1980; J Dewey,2008; Kilpatrick, 1918). The PBL approach improves group work skills and collaboration whilekeeping students more engaged in learning by keeping them motivated as the key element of thisstrategy (Harun, Yusof, Jamaludin, & Hassan, 2012; Huang, 2010). The fundamental norms of agroup of students working together are communication and collaboration skills as well as anintrinsic motivation to become an effective group (Blumenfeld
Paper ID #32543Academic Success and Retention of Underprepared StudentsDr. Robin A. M. Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. While her doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching of STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineering teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst
strategies that two graduate teaching assistants and threeundergraduate course assistants used to intervene in the groups’ work during four collaborativeproblem solving undergraduate engineering discussion sections. It also investigates how thesestrategies influenced the quality of students’ interactions in the groups. This study set out toanswer the following research questions:1) What were the strategies that the TAs and CAs used to intervene with the groups’ work?2) What was impact of these strategies on the quality of students’ interactions in the groups?MethodsDesign A qualitative exploratory design is used in this study [14], which is a part of a multi-yeardesign-based implementation project [15] that aims to develop tools to support
the need for more workin this area. Given this problem, this project builds on this need by focusing on Black womenengineering faculty-- a group that is one of the least represented among their colleagues. Theirunderrepresentation is partly explained by idiosyncrasies in their experiences that lead to varyingcareer outcomes; existing literature highlights four salient factors. Using Messick’s theory ofinstrument development as a methodological framework, the long-term goal of this study is to developthe Faculty Experiences & Outcomes Multidimensional Scale (FEOMS)-- a valid and reliableinstrument that examines the influence of mentoring, organizational climate, incivility, andperceptions of role expectations on career outcomes and jobs
My name is Berrak Seren Tekalp, I am from Turkey, and I am a junior in Industrial Engineering at Quin- nipiac University. I have a mathematics and a general business minor. Beginning in my sophomore year, I’ve done many academic types of research with my professors. In these projects, I have used advanced features within the IBM SPSS Statistics and Excel programs. I am a hard and reliable worker. I have been able to expand my communication skills, and through my time as an active member of multiple student organizations and engineering groups at Quinnipiac. I’ve led numerous meetings and club projects. I am comfortable with working in teams. American c
number of exam items. Competency No. of Items Proportion Professional Drafting Practices in the Workplace-Communications 20 5.00% Drafting Equipment-Media-Reproduction 25 6.25% Architectural Sketching-Orthographic Projection 15 3.75% Lines-Lettering-General Terminology 10 2.50% Mathematics and Geometry 15 3.75% Architectural Products-Styles-History-Identification and Terminology 25 6.25% Site Layout-Identifications and Terminology
study, we compare narratives shared by 36 potential role models and 29 mentorsin STEM and how those narratives might differentially impact the viewer based on their identity-based and culturally-situated themes. Our results suggest that, despite the many contextualdifferences (e.g., age, point in professional career, race, ethnicity, etc.), role models and mentorsshare many of the same kinds of narratives around their values and aspirations. However, theapparent differences are often identity-relevant, and the role models’ narratives generated deepemotional responses in the researchers as viewers. Future work will explore students as viewersbased on these results.IntroductionThis work-in-progress study is part of a larger project to facilitate
Demographics and Career Perceptions of Manufacturing (Work in Progress) Introduction While manufacturing continues to be considered the backbone of economic growth in theUnited States (Nadine & Gielczyk, 2018), manufacturers continue to express concerns related tothe availability of a skilled workforce to fill the projected workforce demands—3.5 millionavailable manufacturing jobs by the year 2025 (The Manufacturing Institute & Deloitte, 2015).The 2018 report by Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute revealed that manufacturingexecutives believe there to be three main factors contributing to this concern: (1) the retirementof the baby boomer population, (2) the shifting
part of a larger study to understand students’experiences within the Engineering Stress Culture (ESC) that examines student perceptions ofstress as part of engineering culture through the lens of social identity theory. We havepreviously described correlative relationships between measures of engineering identity,inclusion, and mental health problems for engineering undergraduate students [4]. In the currentwork, we seek to answer the following research question: How do engineering studentsdescribe the relationship between stress and engineering culture?Through qualitative interviews, the current project seeks to explore the characteristics of theserelationships and describe how students perceive stress as a part of engineering culture
personality andbehavior that may either be interconnected or may separately play a role in student success. Wealso know that specific behaviors such as forming study groups can have an impact on studentsuccess [14]. In the current work, we are attempting to tease out the unique factors andinterrelations between these various research approaches to identify the best path forward foreffective student interventions.Experimental Methods/Materials/Project ApproachAll first-time in any college (FTIAC) students in the College of Engineering and AppliedSciences were invited to participate in an online survey for the project. Students were invitedand the consent forms administered during the first two weeks of the semester by giving shortpresentations in
set aside after one section of ENGR2100 (in the same classroom) during which a tutor will be available to help students with theirquestions about MATH 1110 and ENGR 1002. Kuh [9] has made an extensive study of high-impact practices in education, including collaborative assignments and projects. A primary goalof the current project is to increase student usage of tutoring resources while also encouragingearlier formation of effective study groups within the ENGR 2100 cohort.MethodFor the Fall 2019 semester, 83 incoming students were placed in the PREP cohort by virtue oftheir math placement scores or math transfer credits. Seven of these were transfer students, threewere classified as continuing students, and the balance were first-time in any
could increase awareness that “ethical considerations are present in everyevent.”13 Hess also stresses that in addition to inserting practical engineering ethicsconsiderations into existing assignments, student participation in problem-based, communityengagement projects such as Engineers Without Borders15 reinforces “a holistic understanding”of engineering ethics.13 As students appreciate how ethics grounds their practice, theyunknowingly practice the ethics of care.16,17 They care for stakeholders and consider multipleperspectives. The promising engineering instructional practices and community-based learningcan be extended to computer science curricula.Currently, we are in a developmental phase for the instructional component on
toundergraduate students from the various STEM (aerospace engineering, electrical engineering,mathematics, mechanical engineering, chemistry, biology, computer science, sociology, andpsychology), and non-STEM majors (political science, and English). The questionnaireadministration was repeated in Spring 2019 to students from the STEM and non-STEM majorswho had not responded in Fall 2018. The questionnaire included few additional items (gender.academic standing, GPA, design/project experience). These demographic items preceded theAT-20 items. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The studentswere invited to respond to the survey through their instructors who were provided copies of theinformed consent forms. The survey
characterization and modeling of their material properties. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Intersection of Race and Gender on Experiences of Undergraduate Engineering Students in Leadership RolesAbstractThis project explores the leadership beliefs, experiences, and knowledge/skills of undergraduateengineering students who have self-identified as having leadership experience at a Research Iminority serving institution for Asian Americans and Native Americans, as well as a HispanicServing Institution. Thirty-two undergraduate engineering students with self-identifiedleadership experience were recruited from the College of Engineering across
companies such as SIEMENS and for USAID projects.Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen, Illinois State University Dr. Natalie Shaheen is an assistant professor of special education at Illinois State University. Dr. Sha- heen’s research and teaching focus on equity and access for disabled students in technology-mediated K-12 learning environments.Dr. Anne Therese Hunt, I received my masters’ and doctoral degrees from Harvard University’s T. H. Chan School of Public Health, where I served on the faculty for twelve years before starting a research consulting company. There, I have been involved with research design and analysis on diverse projects at the Harvard School of Public Health, the Harvard Institute for International
students: worked onengineering design projects, participated in skill workshops, took math and science preparatorycourses, and team building activities. Additionally, the ECI scholars were provided with anupperclassman peer mentor.In 2019, with changes in funding and a new direction by the administration, it was necessary tochange the model of the ECI Summer Bridge program. Instead of a six-week program, the newmodel would be a five-day program that mainly focused on developing students’ math skills,teamwork, and ensuring students were acclimated to campus. The goal for the change was tocreate a shorter in-person interaction that was more cost-effective, while still providing similarmath placement and success outcomes.C. ECI 5-day Summer Bridge
adjusted to new ways of teaching, learning, andcommunicating online. Programs designed to support peer to peer connection becameincreasingly important as students grabbled with being disconnected from one another. Formany, this disconnection and social isolation negatively impacted their mental wellbeing andacademic progress [2] [3]. For existing programs designed to support student connection andengagement, operating in a socially distant, remote format made it challenging to meet theirgoals. The authors summarize their experience with adapting a makerspace peer mentoringprogram with a focus on the successes and challenges they experienced during the process.BackgroundThis project takes place at Western Washington University (WWU), a public
). Before joining MSU Mankato, Dr. Kim was a Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at Purdue University, teaching courses in the thermal fluid sciences, and conducting research in nanotechnol- ogy. His research expertise and interests lie in the controlled synthesis of CNTs for thermal and biological applications. While at Purdue, he was actively involved in research sponsored by DARPA (Defense Ad- vanced Research Projects Agency) in the development of carbon nanotube (CNT) enhanced wicks for vapor chambers (Thermal Ground Plane Program), and in enhancement of thermal interfaces using CNTs (Nano Thermal Interface Program). Currently, his research activities are concentrated in the area of engineering
seen in students outside the stereotyped group [1]. For example, when African American collegeIndex Terms – HBCU,stereotype threat students are stereotyped as intellectually inferior when enrolled at predominantly White institutions of higher INTRODUCTION education, anything that reminds them of their race can Despite the projected growth of underrepresented significantly decrease achievement [10]. In theirstudents in science, technology, engineering and groundbreaking work, Aronson and Steele showed