-term study abroad programs. The results of and conclusions from the three studieswill be disseminated to the larger engineering education community through an innovative,online approach. Not only will we provide this information in actionable forms, but we will alsobe able to query responders about their own programs, and update the information in near realtime. Specifically, we will aggregate information as the various models for developing globalpreparedness are being employed, and will assess their effectiveness. Results from this initiativeoffer the engineering education community a set of impactful and flexible research-basedglobally focused engineering education pedagogical practices that correlate to learning, diversestudent populations
Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE and IEEE.Nichole Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is a graduate student in the School of
tocontinue such efforts on larger scales. Figure 1 illustrates the structure of this collaboration andwhere the application of best practices and scaling up each program fits into the overall projectas it has been an ongoing effort, however future scaling of local intervention programs from eachcampus will be done independently. Figure 1: Urban Stem Collaboratory Flow Chart, highlighting the key components of the tri-campus collaboration. Three separate urban research universities provide individual support interventions for first year engineering students as well as unified support structures that give rise to STEM identity in engineering students.The University of Memphis (UofM) integrated its STEM Ambassador program as a
sociotechnical issue, leveragingfundamental circuits topics, and introducing students to potential subdisciplines in their field.Research PlanWith a cohort of graduate students, we will develop a series of new modules. We will pre-piloteach module at a small private institution (University of San Diego), pilot it at a large publicresearch institution (University of Michigan), and then scale it to other large circuits courses.Our research questions include#1 How can graduate students apply proven course design practices to effectively integratesociotechnical issues into an introduction to circuits course?#2 What is the impact of the modules on students’ sense of social responsibility and their adherenceto normative cultural beliefs? How do these impacts
of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering educa- tion. His current duties include assessment, team development and education research for DC Colorado’s hands-on initiatives. c American Society for Engineering
BaccalaureateAbstractThe California Central Coast Community College Collaborative (C6-LSAMP, C6) is a NationalScience Foundation Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation Bridge to theBaccalaureate grant project (NSF/LSAMP/B2B). C6-LSAMP is an innovative, cross-disciplinary, and multi-institutional collaboration developed by STEM leaders from eightCalifornia community colleges. The C6-LSAMP alliance leverages existing support structuresand best practices across the member institutions to address inequities in STEM outcomes for apopulation of students comprised of the underserved: Hispanic/Latinx and otherunderrepresented minorities (URMs) in rural areas. Within the five counties served by the C6-LSAMP colleges, only 13% of Hispanic/Latinx residents 25
community development [3-12] with federal support(NSF IUSE Exploration and Design Tier for Engaged Student Learning & Institution andCommunity Transformation). Through examination and refinement, researchers developed theCommunity-Engaged Educational Ecosystem Model (C-EEEM, pronounced ‘seam’) [1, 4, 13].The C-EEEM pilot contributed to our understanding of how to build learning environments thatsupport 1) improvements in student motivation and retention in STEM; 2) changes in placeattachment for participants; and 3) community impacts from project implementation. [4-6, 13,14]. Through support of an NSF IUSE Development and Implementation Tier grant, the C-EEEMis now in its second year for replication in two cities, Youngstown, Ohio and
and efforts to make School climatemore inclusive [11]. Administering the climate survey annually to all undergraduates will allowboth cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, supporting a tracking of the impacts of specificchanges to School-wide practices.Research in Organizational Change -Using a design-based implementation research (DBIR) approach implementation “problems” and“successes” provide important information for redesign and elaboration decisions [12]-[13]. Ourongoing analyses are currently being used to inform design decisions. The Studio 2.0 progressdescribed above provides a good example of this. Based on observations of student engagementduring the early versions of studio tasks, a group of faculty began meeting to develop
the National Academies, the IM STEM program identified spacesfor institutions to serve as the hub of inclusive mentoring, not only for academic spaces on campus, butspaces away from campus where students and recent graduates enter the engineering profession.RationaleAs the student population enrolled higher education institutions continues to diversify, a deepunderstanding and widespread adoption of inclusive mentoring practices that promote student success isneeded. The purpose of the IM STEM is to expand, elevate, and influence conversations about effectivementoring among communities of STEM faculty, graduate students, and government and industryprofessionals committed to developing a strong, diversified STEM workforce. The potential impact
area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education, with a focus on STEM teaching and learning, technology integration, online course design and delivery, program evaluation, and assessment. Dr. Lux’s current research agenda is STEM teaching and learning in K-12 contexts, technology integration in teacher preparation and K-12 contexts, educational gaming design and integration, and new technologies for teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering
about professional development activities.Working with peers from different engineering disciplines on a community-based design projectseems to be the best part of SEECS professional growth activities.Question 2: In your opinion and through your experience, what SEECS experience(activities/events) contributed the most to your personal growth. Please feel free to share anyexamples.Figure 4: Word cloud of the alumni responses for the question about personal growth activities.Interactions with peers from different backgrounds and bonding with peers at social events suchas end of semester dinners are the experiences’ alumni viewed has had most impact on theirpersonal growth.Question 3: What would be your suggestion to improve SEECS experience? What
How Metacognition Supports SDLStudies show there is a gap between what graduating engineers can do and what employers want.Engineers are primarily hired and rewarded for solving ill-structured problems [8], [9]. Ill-structured problems are context and content dependent [10] and require the ability to generate avariety of novel solutions (no single solution is necessarily right or wrong) and to decide whichsolution is the best for the given problem in the given context [11]. Thus, engineers must havethe metacognitive skills and be able to self-direct their problem solving activities to negotiate theproblems they encounter in practice.In a prior paper [12], we reported on data from alumni of IRE who participated in our study anddescribed how
other educators who are interested in adopting CPBL-beyond-Classroom to redesign their courses based on the learning needs of their own students. A. IntroductionThe ability to solve real-world problems and design systems or components under realisticconstraints are essential to engineering and computer science graduates, as both mandated byABET and highly valued in professional practice. To help students develop such valuable skills,project-based learning (PBL) has been considered as a useful pedagogy by many engineering/CSeducators. However, it is also recognized that PBL may not always function if not designed andintegrated in the curriculum appropriately [1-4]. This challenge magnifies at commuter campuseswhere students having difficulty
engineering identity? H4. Engineering undergraduates’ leadership self-concept negatively correlates with engineering identity H5. Experiences that contribute to engineering identity will negatively impact leadership self-concept for engineering undergraduates.The quantitative analysis will provide a key foundation for a second phase of the project deployingqualitative methods. This qualitative study will utilize grounded theory to explore engineeringstudents’ experiences to answer the following research question: 3. How do engineering undergraduates define engineering leadership and develop a sense of engineering leadership identity?The project is currently completing the quantitative
determine the extent to which the various international academic and non-academicexperiences impact the global preparedness of engineering students; 2) the identification of thekey constructs that characterize a globally prepared engineering graduate. By addressing bothgaps, we will contribute to the understanding of how engineering students become globallyprepared, while providing educators with important, actionable items about curricular andextracurricular practices that can enhance engineering global preparedness. This paper providesan overview to date of a research endeavor that addresses these two concerns.Overview of the WorkThis project is being conducted by a multidisciplinary team from four universities. Its fourmajor objectives are
research project. We aim forparticipation in E125 to become a “low-cost” doorway into ethics research opportunities forstudents who might not otherwise consider making space for ethics in their busy schedules.Graduate students are also participating in curriculum evaluation and design. During the spring2013 semester a graduate student instructor is working alongside the E125 instructor to evaluatehow activities could best be scaled up for delivery to a larger number of students. Page 23.881.8ConclusionsEmotions are beginning to establish a presence in the engineering ethics literature, but the role ofemotion in ethical reasoning and decision-making
Paper ID #22684Enhancing Learning by Assessing More than Content KnowledgeProf. Renee Cole, University of Iowa Dr. Ren´ee Cole is a Professor of Chemistry at the University of Iowa. Dr. Cole earned a B.A. in chemistry from Hendrix College, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in physical chemistry from the University of Okla- homa. Her research focuses on issues related to how students learn chemistry and how that guides the design of instructional materials and teaching strategies as well on efforts related to faculty development and the connection between chemistry education research and the practice of teaching. She is a PI
. S. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Incorporated, 2006. [15] National Research Council et al., How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press, 2000. [16] S. Tayal, “Engineering design process,” International Journal of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, pp. 1–5, 2013. [17] T. Floyd-Smith, D. Wilson, D. C. Jones, M. Plett, R. Bates, and N. Veilleux, “Investigation of belonging for engineering and science undergraduates by year in school,” in ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) Conference, 2012. [18] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year
more. Finally,the project will develop industry, K-12 and university partnerships to facilitate pathways tocareers in the exciting field of reconfigurable electronics for first-generation, minority and otherunder-served populations, including veterans. In summary, this project will provide the trainingand educational resources and promote best practices for community college, university, andhigh school instructors to enable them to teach new hardware technologies to a broad range ofstudents, including those who have not previously had access to this level of training and careerchoice. This paper will address first year project activities including the Faculty ProfessionalDevelopment workshop on VHDL and FPGA design, the assessment results and
Page 23.767.3survey for the 2011-2012 academic year.MethodologyThe basic research questions of the project are focused on the attitudes of the students towardsservice-learning and on the impact of S-L on student performance. Over the last eight years, S-Lhas been integrated to various degrees (ranging from 5% to 100% of the grade awarded) in anaverage of 30 engineering courses, and 42 faculty have attempted to implement it (approximatelyhalf of the faculty in the College of Engineering). In 2011-2012, a total of 1059 (unduplicated)students were engaged in S-L projects in the College of Engineering (out of a total enrollment of1828 full time undergraduate and graduate students). Those students contributed for a total of48,368 hours of work for
Community College (JCCC) of Kansas as they considered thefeasibility of establishing photonics programs or photonics certificates and/or infusing photonicscoursework into existing programs. MPEC has provided additional technical assistance toColumbia Area Career Center (CACC) of Missouri as they work to expand their photonicsprograms to include evening offerings of photonics certificates. All of these institutions havevisited IHCC for laboratory tours and in-depth discussions of curriculum design, laboratoryequipment needs, graduate job placement and other challenges to program startup. Eachinstitution has received a follow-up visit from MPEC for additional on-site technical assistance.STC plans to add two or three photonics courses with a
Paper ID #6133The iCollaborate MSE Project: Progress Update 2013Prof. Kathleen L Kitto, Western Washington University Kathleen L. Kitto is currently the acting vice provost for research and the dean of the Graduate School. Additionally, she serves as special assistant to the provost for strategic initiatives. She is a faculty member within the Department of Engineering Technology and specializes in Materials Science and Engineering.Dr. Debra S. Jusak, Western Washington University Dr. Jusak is vice provost for academic resources. She is also a professor, having taught computer science for twenty-two years
Engineering at the University of Memphis. He is also a member of the CAESAR DTL and DRONES Research Cluster. His research foci include signal processing, sensor system analysis and design (with a focus on infrared wavelengths), turbulence mitigation, light propagation, and incorporation of electrical engineering concepts to transportation issues such as intelligent transportation system development, freight logistics, pre-emptive malfunction detection, workforce development, and student retention. He serves as faculty advisor for the University of Memphis student chapters of National Society of Black Engineers and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Stefano Alessandro Blasoni, The University of
is a professor of computer science. She taught for twenty-two years, was department chair for four of those years, and graduate program advisor for three. She is currently serving as special assistant to the provost. Page 24.1222.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The iCollaborate MSE Project: Progress Update 2014AbstractThe iCollaborate Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) project is a multiyear,multifaceted research project designed to understand how student learning outcomes,student engagement, and successful
multiple best paper awards and keynote presentations at international and national conferences and workshops.Dr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Joachim Walther is a Professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia and the Founding Director of the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through
students will need as they pursue their academic and professional careers:resume writing and interviewing. In Year 1 the seminars were “Getting into Graduate School”and “Finding an Internship.” In Year 2 the seminars were “How to do Undergraduate Research”and again “Finding an Internship.” To measure the impact of each seminar, students were askedto rate their understanding of the processes of resume writing and of interviewing before andafter experiencing the S-STEM seminar designed around those topics. The following graphreveals a statistically significant perception of positive change in the students’ understanding ofcreating a resume. Figure 2. Graph showing responses to WRC survey regarding students’ rating of own understanding of
faculty representatives presented the benefits ofmentorship, mentorship goals, and best practices. Career center representatives shared availableresources, while the grant team provided an in-depth overview of the project's goals, objectives,and activities. The workshop concluded with the group brainstorming activities for the upcomingyear and planning research initiatives to inform and enrich the project.Professional Development LunchesStarting in winter quarter, the grant team initiated a weekly lunch for the students. Each week,the grant team planned a menu and divided the food responsibilities among each other. Thisinformal gathering provided faculty members an opportunity to connect with students whileaddressing homesickness through home
MR module focusing on the design and operation of hydraulicgrippers has been developed, leveraging MR functionalities for integration into fluid powercourses. A research study has been executed within a fluid power course to assess the impact ofMR on students' spatial skills and engineering learning outcomes. The MR module,encompassing a 10-minute tutorial session and a 20-minute simulation lab, was administered to102 students enrolled in the course. The Revised PSVT:R assessment tool, provided by PurdueUniversity, was employed to evaluate improvements in students' spatial skills. Also, self-reflection surveys were designed and completed by 90 students to analyze improvements inunderstanding and assess attitudes toward MR technology. The
particularly interested in using technologies to capture data to enable more sophisticated modeling of infrastructure and health care systems. He is also interested in improving students’ critical thinking skills through innovative pedagogical practices. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Infusing STEM Courses with Problem-Based Learning about Transportation Disruptive Technologies1.0 INTRODUCTIONTransportation is on the cusp of a transformative change in how we move about due to theintroduction of disruptive technologies such as automated vehicles (AV). These vehicles arefully automated and designed to drive themselves without human input. Leveraging the
maximize the impact both regionally andnationally.United States – Australia Renewable Energy and Green SkillsLearning Exchange Project - Phase 1 - Building and Implementing theUS-Australia Green Learning Exchange and NetworkProject SummaryIntellectual MeritThe goal of this U.S.-Australia Renewable Energy and Green Skills Learning Exchangeproject is to develop a community of technical educators to improve curricula andpedagogy by sharing best practices in the content, teaching, certifications, articulationand career pathways for the green skills in renewable energy disciplines in both theUnited States and Australia. Specific renewable energy technician-level disciplines to betargeted will include but not be limited to: solar photovoltaic and solar