Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Gene McGinnis; Denise Theobald-Roberts

biochemical engineering through an experimentabout chemical reactions. The scouts discussed the health effects of smoking and then performeda simple experiment to collect particulate deposit from cigarette smoke as well as its reactivity.Two types of cigarettes, one with a filter and one without a filter, were used. Analysis wasperformed on the chemical reaction and then on the smoke particulate deposit. The occurrence ofa fast color change was indicative of a chemical reaction when smoke was contacted with a non-hazardous laboratory chemical solution. The depository effect of the smoke was quantified. Thechemical reaction observation and quantification of the smoke particulates based on theirdeposition-capacity on the human lung was qualitatively

Conference Session

K-12 Outreach Initiatives

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

William Smith; Angela Quick

conflicting worldviews and popular culture dominates and leaves many asisolated individuals, perhaps the greatest contribution is the sense of community perceived by themagnet students. This is apparent in the numbers of students who volunteer to appear onevenings or Saturday afternoons in the schools’ laboratories to finish their experimental workand perhaps share pizza following.Like most agents of change, the magnet school prompted some resistance. However, thecommunity is beginning to recognize and hail the school’s benefits and contributions. The firstsenior class will graduate in the spring of 2003. These authors hope to submit another paper in afew years showing tracking data as the magnet high school students proceed through theircollege

Conference Session

Using IT to Enhance Design Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul Ranky

) machined parts, to CAD 3D models, to physicalclay models that are hand or robot crafted in the automotive and aircraft industries.Rapid prototyping has many other integrated physical and intellectual domains, includingsoftware.This paper introduces our knowledge management and teaching / learning methodology.Furthermore, to some extent we discuss our object / component knowledgedocumentation architecture and offer real-world examples, mostly during the softwaredemonstration part of this paper, of this industry/academia sponsored R&D effort.IntroductionRapid prototyping in engineering, IT, manufacturing, and other fields is an importantarea of science and technology. These should be communicated to everybody who isinvolved in product innovation

Conference Session

Program Delivery Methods & Technology

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Kenneth Ragsdell; Halvard Nystrom

their MS program.Typically, UMR classes are delivered in person by senior faculty at Fort Leonard Wood. Anormal class involves the instructor lecturing for most, if not all, of the class period. Studentsask questions in class, but have little time for small group discussion, or one-on-one discussionswith the instructor. Students work on homework, read the book and other assigned material, andwork on laboratory assignments and the semester project in small groups (learning teams), orindividually. We do not have space to discuss the learning team concept here, but interestedreaders can learn more at the course webpage. Ragsdell decided to ask the class to consider arather radical experiment in delivery style at the first class meeting. The

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

James Krogmeier; Mustafa Kamasak; Maribel Figuera; Luis Torres; Jan Allebach; George Chiu; Edward Delp; Charles Bouman; Catherine Rosenberg; Lynne Slivovsky

lectures and texts.In traditional laboratory courses, students learn by completing a carefully prescribed procedureduring an experiment. While both these modes of learning continue to play an important role inengineering and computer science education, we have developed a course to provide our studentswith an undergraduate research experience focused on mobility. In our junior/senior level designcourse, Mobile Communications Projects, students work in teams under the direct supervision ofa faculty member. Students attend a common lecture, in which a variety of topics on wirelesscommunications are covered by participating faculty members; and a lab section, during whichthe teams of students meet with their assigned faculty member. Additionally

Conference Session

Outreach and Freshman Programs

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Mark Smith; Wayne Walter

Concept Selection Matrix is described. Some basic system engineering tools arepresented including the first house of Quality Function Deployment (QFD), and FAST andFunctional Flow Block Diagrams. In the detailed design and prototype development portion,product specifications, project milestones, design sketches and mockups for feasibility arecovered. This is followed by a discussion of validation testing in the laboratory and at thecustomer site.5. Project ActivitiesAt an initial rollout meeting, a marketing specialist explained the need for student teams todevelop a mission statement and a passion for what they are doing for their customer. It is a lackof this passion, he explained, that typically causes companies to lose market share. He

Conference Session

Industrial Collaborations

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

John Kissock; Rebecca Blust

analytical and technical skills sets that the UDIAC focuses upon are LeanManufacturing, Energy Systems, Data Collection Equipment and Computer Software Tools.Lean Manufacturing is a concept that can be applied to any type of organization, not justmanufacturing. Teaching students the principles and tools of these concepts is key. The teamfocuses on the elimination of waste as explained by John Nicholas in his book, “CompetitiveManufacturing Management.Nicholas breaks the subject of waste into several categories that include; inventory, time, motion,overproduction, waiting, resources etc.6 Once the team has identified the type of waste, they go towork on the solution. Many solutions stem from the Just- In-Time (J.I.T.) principles. Someexamples of

Conference Session

Where Are Tomorrow's Civil Engineers?

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Sean Buchholtz; Reid Vander Schaaf

challenging but I haven’t talked to anyone who regrets choosing it.” b. Faculty. We cannot underestimate the importance of dynamic professors and instructors in attracting cadets to our department. One cadet attributed the ability of the student to cope with the heavy workload was attainable due to the fact “…the instructors in the department are very helpful and excited to teach.” Another cadet wrote that our open house for recruitment influenced his decision because “…the department was really “fired up” and extremely motivated for their major. I was impressed because I expected a bunch of

Conference Session

Engineering Education; An International Perspective

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Holger Dahms; Stefan Bartels; John Gassert; Jens Thiedke; Owe Petersen

universities establishing a presence in aforeign country and exporting their own faculty to teach courses. Other institutions have acoordinated program of study that includes formal consideration of how the study abroadexperience at a foreign university advances the student’s progress towards a degree.The Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) and the Fachhochschule Lübeck (FHL),University of Applied Sciences, Lübeck, Germany jointly developed and implemented a uniqueinternational student exchange program in the discipline of Electrical Engineering (EE). Theuniqueness of the program lies in the fact that it is fully integrated into the EE curriculum of bothinstitutions and constitutes a specific degree path at both institutions. Graduation is not

Conference Session

ET Distance Learning

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Susan Sauer; Mark Moore; Amin ul Karim; Ahmed Khan

Consortium (GWEC) wireless curriculum modules. These modules,designed through a collaborative effort of academia and industry and totaling 46 modulesat present, are revised regularly to maintain currency. Furthermore, industry membersprovide instructional tools to GWEC academic affiliates. This paper describes therevision and enhancement process of wireless technology lecture/laboratory courses byincorporating existing GWEC modules and industry tools at DeVry University, Dupagecampus. Page 8.146.1 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American

Conference Session

Assessment & Quality Assuranc in Engr Ed

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Swami Karunamoorthy

) COLLEGE LEVEL ASSESSMENT (Office of College Dean) PROGRAM LEVEL ASSESSMENT (Program Faculty Team) COURSE LEVEL ASSESSMENT (Instructor – Individual Faculty) Figure 1. Development of a Hierarchical Assessment System The faculty members in each academic program are responsible for developing anassessment scheme that is consistent with the College assessment system. Courseinstructors are responsible for developing a course level assessment method. If more thanone faculty member teaches a particular course, they all should agree on a unified set ofeducational objectives and learning outcomes for

Conference Session

Industry Initiatives for Graduate Programs

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Larry Trioloa; Charles Garnett; Barry Mohle; Alfred Wicks; Robert Kavetsky; Eugene Brown

an initiative with the goal of adding approximately 400 new research employeesper year to its R&D centers located throughout the United States. These comprise the NavalSurface Warfare Center, Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Naval Air Warfare Center, Space andNaval Warfare Systems Center, the Naval Research Laboratory, the Naval Medical ResearchCenter, and the Naval Medical Health Center.Internal studies4 of the Navy’s science and technology (S&T) needs have pointed to factors whichmust be addressed if this objective is to be met. Some of these factors are internal, such aslimitations imposed by the Civil Service System on the flexibility to hire new employees and theability to reward research productivity, but often these factors

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Deisenroth

this reason, objectivesusually contain active verbs (e.g.: analyze, create, locate, perform, etc.) that explicitly state thebehavior expected of the student that will be used as an indicator of completion of broadereducational goals.Learning objectives exist at two levels of education, the program level and the course level. Atthe program level, the selection of learning objectives creates the overall picture of a programand provides guidance and motivation for individual courses. At the course level, instructors cantailor the objectives to his/her course needs, student needs, and teaching style. Program learning Page 8.152.1

Conference Session

Topics in Civil ET

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Andrew Rose

impacts of technology.3In one engineering technology program,4 a required course in Designing for the Environment hasbeen proposed to better address this need. At one institution, economic, social and culturalimpacts have been incorporated into a web-based Environmental Impact Assessment course.5Lower level courses that teach engineering design concepts6 or introduction to engineeringcourses7 often include some discussion of social and economic issues.Incorporating professional issues such as the social and economic impact of engineering projectsinto the curriculum is best accomplished throughout the undergraduate curriculum.3 Instructorsmust take opportunities to include these within discipline specific courses where the relationbetween the

Conference Session

New Electrical ET Course Development

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Kathleen Ossman

digital signalprocessing are noticeably absent in engineering technology programs. A recent look at ABETaccredited electrical/electronics engineering technology programs [1] showed that only 6 of the 66programs accessed offered DSP as a required course in the curriculum. Another nine programsoffered DSP as a technical elective and the remaining 51 did not offer DSP to their students at all.As DSP becomes more pervasive in industrial applications, it is imperative that engineeringtechnology graduates have some exposure to digital signal processing theory and practice. Themain difficulty in teaching DSP to technology students is the level of mathematics. Studentsopening a textbook on digital signal processing [2] – [4] are faced with pages and

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven Beyerlein; Michael Klein; Matt Walker; Kevin Organ; Dan Gerbus

of Idaho eleven years ago. Dr. Odom maintains an avid interest in the literature of creativityand management and is especially well versed on the subjects of team dynamics and leadership styles. He wasrecognized for his role in development of the IEW by a university teaching award in 1998.DR. STEVEN BEYERLEINDr. Steven Beyerlein is a leader in the design implementation of process-oriented engineering curricula thatstresses cooperative learning, computer technology, and mini-projects. Since joining the UI fifteen years ago, hehas regularly taught introductory courses, shaped the senior laboratory course, and collaboratively taught seniordesign. He was recognized for his faculty development and outreach activities by a university teaching

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul Johnson; Harold Larson; Charles Standridge; Shirley Fleischmann

requirements. Astatke and Mack1 discussthe use of a web-based mathematics course to prepare students to take a mathematics placementexamination. This course helped students place above a remedial (non-college) algebra courseinto calculus or a pre-calculus course. Fisher, Della-Piana, and Crawley3 as well as Fisher,Quinones, and Golding4 discuss the establishment of learning communities for non-calculus readyfreshman students. This program uses the clustering strategy. Students are placed in cohorts andscheduled for the same sections of three classes: Introduction to Engineering and PhysicalScience, a module-based class in pre-calculus, and a first-year English composition class.Students in each cohort work closely with each other and faculty teaching

Conference Session

Trends in Biological & Agricultural Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Ron Lacey; Ann Kenimer

. Beyond theirmanagement responsibilities, many senior leaders provide mentoring to the freshmen in theirteams. Senior leaders provide freshmen with information about instructors, summer internshipopportunities, departmental laboratory and computer resources, and student clubs, among othertopics. Placement of senior leaders in freshman design teams yields numerous benefits. Seniors getan opportunity to obtain management experience before graduation. Freshmen get an opportunityto meet others in their major and to receive much greater mentoring than can be provided throughtraditional instructor/student contact.This paper describes the process through which senior/freshman teaming is achieved in thesecourses. In addition, the paper explores freshman

Conference Session

Contemporary Issues in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Mary Jo Cartwright; Allie Knowlton; Donald Falkenburg

Session 1363 Creating Sharable Learning Activities Examples from a Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum Donald R. Falkenburg, Allie Knowlton, Mary Jo Cartwright, Wayne State University Wayne State University CNC Connection Corp.AbstractMany engineering faculty have been involved in projects to improve teaching and learning usingweb-based resources. Information-based learning materials have proven to be adaptable anddynamic; they have enhanced the educational process

Conference Session

Technical Issues in Arch Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Daniel Davis

2306school and a variety of professional careers in the design and building industries. The major is structured to providea proper foundation in mathematics and the basic sciences, while retaining the hands-on laboratory and studiofeatures that are the hallmark of all architectural and engineering technologies. The program is accredited by theTechnology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (TAC/ABET)and is as follows: TABLE I [1] 2000-2001 Architecture CurriculumSem 1 Course Credits/Contact HrsAET 110 Introduction to Architectural Process 4 Credits/8

Conference Session

Assessment Issues

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Patrick Norris; Duco Jansen; Sean Brophy

students’ understanding of specific conceptsimmediately follows class activities designed to teach these concepts. The immediate feedbackprovides students and the instructor with some indication of the level understanding of the class.Students who don’t quite understand may see that they are not alone, and realize where theirmisconceptions or gaps in knowledge lie.Short answer questions require students to generate their own response, rather than recall it froma list of options. The instructor designed questions requiring students to list a casual chain ofevents, or to simply provide a term. This feature has a range of possibilities and depends oncontent and specific learning goals. Two applications of the system were observed to documentuse of

Conference Session

Curricular Change Issues

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Carolyn Clark; Prudence Merton; Jim Richardson; Jeffrey Froyd

, Undergraduate Laboratory Science, andEngineering program (IMPULSE)] in the 1997–98 academic year and offered a pilot for 48students in fall 1998. Unlike other FC institutions, UMD piloted their program for only onesemester before they proposed adoption of the program to the college. They made this choice fora number of reasons. Early data were indicating greater retention and class attendance, andstudents were receiving better grades when compared to other sections of similar classes.Secondly, the school was receiving good publicity about the program and interest in the programwas coming in from potential students and their parents. Probably the biggest incentive for quickaction, however, was the impending loss of their dean, who was a big supporter of

Conference Session

Assessment of Graphics Programs

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Thomas Krueger; Theodore Aanstoos; Ronald Barr

this project-centered approach, the Engineering Graphics curriculum has beenorganized into a set of learning modules with specific educational outcomes. Table 1 lists thecurrent modularization scheme and learning outcomes. It consists of ten units that serve asindividual student projects, plus an integrated PROCEED project that is conducted at theconclusion of the course. With this modularization scheme, the ten individual units trainstudents to develop computer skills and abilities that can be later used in the larger team project.These modern course outcomes, as outlined in Table 1, were fully implemented in the Fall 2002semester using some preliminary computer graphics laboratory notes written by our group10.The initial modules stress

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Fredrick Cowan; Alan Gravitt; Donna Llewellyn; Marion Usselman

Session 1168 UTILIZING CONSTRAINT GRAPHS IN HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS F. Scott Cowan 1, Marion Usselman2, Donna Llewellyn3, and Alan Gravitt4 1 G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering 2 Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC) 3 Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332

Conference Session

Visualization and Computer Graphics

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Eric Wiebe; Theodore Branoff; Nathan Hartman

are addressed within a framework of astudent identifying key geometric features within the virtual product and how this geometryneeds to be controlled in order for the model to be of maximum usefulness in the productdevelopment process.II. Dynamic modelingEngineering graphics has, in many ways, struggled with the same issues that technologyeducation has over the past 40 years. That is, how to move beyond teaching 'craft' with the endall and be all goal of creating a 'product', to teaching 'process', where how you get to the finishedstage is more important than the product itself 10. In other words, the final product and itsprecursor stages become artifacts that represent the problem-solving process of an appliedgeometric problem. It is

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Frederick Berry; Patricia Carlson

might be termed classical engineeringsituations. Much time was spent in laboratories, working through standard exercises in datacollection and analysis. Unlike the teaching that now characterizes medicine or the law,engineers were taught in an environment curiously devoid of a sense of practice. Over the years,this “decontextualization” caused distortions in attitudes and values, along with graduatingengineers who had little exposure to the types of professional maturity and judgment they wouldneed from the very first day they stepped into the work world.16Most would agree that expectations for today’s engineering education incorporates richer notionsof how people learn and of how to nurture the higher-order skills necessary for a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Toniann Rotante; Sarah Brem; Norma Hubele; George Runger; Kathryn Kennedy

Session 1526 Case-Based Reasoning for Engineering Statistics George Runger, Sarah Brem, Norma Hubele, Toniann Rotante, Kathryn Kennedy Arizona State UniversityAbstractIn this paper, we report on the formulation and early results of research supported by the NationalScience Foundation’s Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS).Using findings from cognitive science, we discuss the design of an intelligent tutoring system(ITS) that utilizes case-based reasoning (CBR) to scaffold undergraduate engineering students intheir learning of introductory probability and

Conference Session

Technology, Communication, & Ethics

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Sageev Pneena; Kathy Bernard; Carol Romanowski

membersprovide an invaluable link between industry and the engineering school by mentoring our studentsone-on-one. Because of students’ intense schedules, we do not require mentoring; however,students who elect to work with a mentor consistently perform better than those who do not.Clearly, the relationship that develops between a dedicated experienced professional and a young“apprentice” has no substitute.Between 1987 and 1999, our program grew to reach about 65 percent of our upper-level studentsat some level of instruction—either via our “stand-alone” three-credit technical electives10 or viashort modules integrated into design project, internship, laboratory, and other engineeringcourses. Our TC faculty tailored the short modules (typically five or

Conference Session

Technology, Communication, & Ethics

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Paulette Beatty; Jackie Revuelto; Dianne Kraft; Carolyn Clark

. Common Programmatic FeaturesAll of the Foundation Coalition institutions use a cohort or cluster system and blockschedule some of their freshmen students, and often some sophomore students as well,for two or more courses. [The terms “cohort” and “cluster” are used interchangeably; inthis report we primarily use “cohort.”] This structure is usually connected to an integratedcurriculum, which means that the faculty teaching those courses work together, to agreater or lesser degree, to provide coordinated instruction to these students. For thefreshman curriculum, that means that faculty work across disciplines. For example, somecombination of engineering, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and, at times, Englishcourses are scheduled for students as a

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Blaine Lilly; John Merrill

(OSU). His current responsibilities primarily include teaching courses andcurriculum development for the FE program. Mr. Masud received his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from OSU in2002, and received in B.S from Florida Institute o f Technology in 1999.STUART H. BRAND is an Instructional Lab Supervisor for the First-Year Engineering Program at The Ohio StateUniversity (OSU) College of Engineering. His current responsibilities include lab support, curriculum development,and educational multimedia development. He received his B.S. in Physics from OSU 1997, after serving as asubmarine nuclear propulsion plant operator for the United States Navy.MICHAEL J. HOFFMANN is an Instructional Laboratory Supervisor at The Ohio State University (OSU