coordinator for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She teaches at the graduate and undergraduate level, using both face-to-face and blended online learning instruction. She is an Adjunct Faculty for the Transportation Systems and, the City & Regional Planning programs at MSU. Her research interests include engineering education, student success, online engineering pedagogy and program assessment solutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, bicycle access, and ethics in engineering. She has several published works in engineering education and online learning. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of City &
firms,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2018.[19] W. Faulkner, “Becoming and belonging: Gendered processes in engineering,” in The Gender Politics of ICT, J. Archibald, J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Payne, and E. Turner, Eds. London: Middlesex University Press, 2005, pp. 15–26.[20] N. Pless and T. Maak, “Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 129-147, 2004.[21] J. W. Smith and S. Joseph, “Workplace challenges in corporate America: Differences in black and white,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 743-765, 2010.[22] D. Riley, A. E. Slaton, and A. L
● Practice Run Hint List Sample Homework Performance ● Exam Review Session Questions ● AIP/Ethics Training and ● Lead a Lecture ● Discussion Board - Lesson ● Hashtag War TEDTalk ● 4-Year Plan Draft ● Guest Speaker Interview ● Discussion Board - ● Prototype Part for Class ● Peer Review Lab Report Relevant Journal Article Lesson/Purpose ● Conflict Resolution ● Discussion Board - ● Instructor Chosen Practices Relevant Engineering Assignment TechnologyCommon to Gehringer’s [8] list of faculty
. Report was to be written to executive leadership. An ability to recognize -Staffing Final Report: Reasonable ethical and professional conversions and expectation for responsibilities in employees. engineering situations -Ingredient Final Report: Identification of and make informed suppliers alternative suppliers for items that judgements which must including the were at risk of not being delivered consider the impact of Madagascar consistently? 4 engineering solutions in vanilla shortage
. Full participation in this pedagogical study wasencouraged (but not required) for the students enrolled in the module; appropriate processes werefollowed to obtain ethical (IRB) approval from LJMU before the study began. We have groupedthe participants into 5 categories (G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5) based on their backgrounds.The Professional and Leadership Skills module contains a 3-hour creativity lecture sessioncomposed of two parts: (1) entrepreneurship and (2) creativity. The entrepreneurship portionfocuses on the definition of entrepreneurship, the characteristics and competencies ofentrepreneurs, and examples of local entrepreneurs. The creativity portion of the session (theportion of greatest interest here) focuses on creativity identity
,yet, it is clear the model is applicable among many disciplines. Part 1 of the model specifies thefive-core components of interdisciplinary collaboration: 1) interdependence, 2) newly createdprofessional activities, 3) flexibility, 4) collective ownership of goals, and 5) reflection on theprocess [17]. Part 2 outlines the influences on interdisciplinary collaboration: professional role,structural characteristics, personal characteristics, and a history of collaboration [17]. Figure 1describes Bronstein’s [17] model and serves as the framework for the remainder of this paper. Professional Role Structural Characterisics - Holding values and ethics specific to each - Manageable
Paper ID #26740Analysis of Student Engagement Data from U.S. News & World Report Re-garding Online Graduate Engineering ProgramsPeter Wesley Odom, Purdue University Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue University College of EngineeringFrancisco J. Montalvo, Purdue UniversityJason Marion Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Student
and visual media • Evaluate images and their sources • Use images and visual media effectively • Design and create meaningful images and visual media • Understand many of the ethical, legal, social, and economic issues surrounding the creation and use of images and visual media, and access and use visual materials ethicallyAcross disciplines, students engage with images and visual materials throughout the course oftheir education. Although students are expected to understand, use, and create images inacademic work, they are not always prepared to do so. Scholarly work with images requiresresearch, interpretation, analysis, and evaluation skills specific to visual materials. These abilitiescannot be taken for granted and
supportive engineering skills and mindsetsDuring this process the committee looked to see how well the outcomes in the onion mapped toinstitutional learning outcomes. Communication and cooperation were both part of the “basicengineering skills” whereas ethics, leadership, and culture and global awareness were allsubcategories of “multiple perspectives on role of engineers and engineering work.” We alsolooked at the mapping of the current ME learning outcomes to the onion in Figure 1. Ourdepartment outcomes include the following: our graduates will be successful in their careers, ourgraduates set and meet their own goals for career fulfillment, our graduates will continueprofessional development, our
project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming Shawn Griffiths is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Wyoming. Shawn holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Utah State University (2009), M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Arkansas (2011) and
Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt serves as the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and on the AAAS Committee for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F
engineering.Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State UniversityDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State Uni- versity. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG), utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics
engineering design and how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Nick AuYeung, Oregon State University I received my BS from the University of Connecticut and my Ph.D. at Oregon State University, both in Chemical Engineering. I then did postdoctoral research in solar thermochemistry at the
ASEE CIA paper - Google Docs ● Resolve problems at the interface of art and design and computer science through innovative thinking and visual expression. ● Demonstrate an ability to evaluate ethical consequences in creative expression, technical innovation and professional practice. ● Practice lifelong learning, inquiry, and discovery via directed selfresearch and inquiry for artistic and technical projects. These objectives are obtained through the combination of existing courses present in the Computer Science and Art & Design programs, thus requiring little institutional overhead. The
. Solicit (at least 3) and answer questions at the Town hall meeting 10 Judges Rubric of Final Project and Presentation expectations high/ low/ neutral / moderate Missing excelle poor fair /good ntClarity of Theme 0 1 2 3 4(addresses ethics/3Ps)Educational Quality of Exhibit 0 1 2 3 4(clear take away objective )Overall Quality of
on ethical, economic, anddesign method issues.As might be expected, some students resisted the design processes described here as “a completewaste of time”. Students argued that designers are “born, not created”. Many examples from theliterature to support quantitatively the effectiveness of development process were given incounter argument. Students are asked to follow the prescribed procedure for a few weeks. Apromise to discuss, evaluate, and incorporate any suggested improvements usually swaysstalwart resistors (this is an excellent way to give students ownership and responsibility of theirown learning). After the first design milestone during one semester, an elated team gave a class-time testimonial about how the design process and
Press.Maskell, D. (1999). Student‐based Assessment in a Multi‐disciplinary Problem‐based Learning Environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 237-241.Matthew, R. G. S., & Hughes, D. C. (1994). Getting at deep learning: a problem-based approach. Engineering Science and Education Journal, 3(5), 234-240. doi:10.1049/esej:19940510Maudsley, G. (1999). Do we all mean the same thing by" problem-based learning"? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Academic Medicine, 74(2), 178-185.McGee, E. O., & Bentley, L. (2017). The equity ethic: Black and Latinx college students reengineering their STEM careers toward justice. American Journal of Education, 1124(1), 36.National Science
industry expertratings for each dimension (ordered from highest rating to lowest rating): Appreciate othercultures (understanding and avoiding ethnocentrism); Work in teams of ethnic and culturaldiversity; Communicate across cultures (understand cultural differences); Practice engineeringin global context (international internship, service learning, virtual global engineering project,etc.); Deal with ethical issues that arise from cultural or national differences; View as citizens ofthe world (appreciate challenges facing mankind: sustainability, environmental protection,poverty, security, and public health); Understand connectedness of the world, global economy;Understand cultural issues on product design, manufacture, and use (understanding of
Paper ID #25598Counting Past Two: Engineers’ Leadership Learning TrajectoriesDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a
Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making Systems Engineering I Systems Engineering II Electrical Engineering Capstone Table 1: Courses for MSEE Master’s ProgramThe EML approach using the KEEN framework will help provide further relevance andmotivation for the student in coming up with entrepreneurial ideas for their projects.Capstone Course DescriptionThe capstone course offers the student the opportunity to integrate skills developed throughoutthe graduate program by completing a project that focuses on a current issue or need requiring anengineering solution. Since the program has two system engineering courses, the capstonecourse was used
engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, she is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve the experiences of people at any level in engineering education.Dr. Stephen Secules, Purdue University, West Lafayette Stephen received a PhD in education at the University of Maryland researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught an introduction to engineering to undergraduate engineers and to
in1995 as a means of providing students with academic credit through participation in long-termservice-learning projects. Student teams are vertically-integrated multidisciplinary teams,comprised of students of all years of undergraduate study and multiple majors [1]. Studentoutcomes are often summarized to include technical skills, communication skills, organizationalskills, teamwork experiences, resourcefulness, resource management, sponsor awareness throughcustomer and client interaction, expanded community awareness, and professional ethics [1].Over 30 institutions across the US have an EPICS program, as well as multiple institutionsabroad. The EPICS program was implemented at Arizona State University in 2009 and has sincegrown to
practical domains such as engineering design. Limitations caused bythe bivalence principle (i.e., that truth-value of statements is a true-false binary) for example inscenarios where truth-values need to attain true, false, or indeterminate while conducting a three-valued logical calculus, has been a motivation, inter alia, to formalize multi-valued or probabilisticvarieties of logic.In this category we only mention one example which has a potential to offer an alternative perspec-tive for reasoning and decision making in design. Consider having a set of goals, specifications,constraints, priorities (financial, ethical, aesthetic, etc.), and statements (or formulae) encoding de-signers’ knowledge and degree of uncertainty. Next, suppose designers
course was designed to be taught by existing faculty and with the same number ofstudents per section as existing classes, i.e. zero additional resources after initial development.The integrated engineering and communication course, while designed hand-in-hand withengineering faculty, was created to be taught by communication faculty. For this reason, as wellas to ease the integration of the class into existing curriculum, the class was modeled veryclosely on the traditionally taught public speaking class. The integrated course taughtfoundational concepts covered in traditionally taught classes, including but not limited to ethics,communication apprehension, listening, analyzing an audience, and supporting ideas. Each ofthese concepts was taught
demonstrate how aerospace exploration and research transcends national boundaries;• Address economic, historical, ethical, and social perspectives;• Use appropriate technologies such as modeling, simulation, and distance learning to enhance aerospace education learning experiences and investigations;• Present a balance of aeronautics, space exploration, and robotics by offering a relevant context for learning and integrating STEM core content knowledge.UAF has attempted to incorporate as many of these concepts into our fledgling aerospace courses,aerospace minor, and design team experiences as possible. This is accomplished through the useof student teams to investigate research topics, individual student-led course material presentationsand
designation was not entirely accurate since thecompletion of Engineering Math was not actually required for graduation in any engineeringmajor, an ethical and implementation issue discussed at length in another paper presented at thisconference [8].Proposing the change in status of the course from optional to mandatory was difficult becauseprescribing more rigid degree program requirements is not ideal considering curricular flexibilityis important for engineering students [9]. And, with only ~14% of first year engineering studentsrequired to take Engineering Math, it was challenging to avoid deficit or remedial mindset andmessaging. This is a significant deviation from the WSM model implemented at manyinstitutions, where all engineering students are
. James Huff is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and teaches courses in design thinking and ethics. In the context of his research lab Beyond Professional Identity (BPI), he mentors undergrad- uate students, doctoral students, and academic professionals in using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a qualitative research method to conduct psychological investigations on identity as experienced in and out of professional domains. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Huff also received his B.S. in Computer Engineering from Harding UniversityDr. Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka is
Engineering Education, 2019 Preliminary findings from a comparative study of two bio- inspired design methods in a second-year engineering curriculumAbstractThe engineer of 2020 is expected to not only offer technical ingenuity but also adapt to acontinuously evolving environment while being able to operate outside the narrow limits of onediscipline and be ethically grounded in solving the complex problems of the future. To build thecompetencies of the future engineer, undergraduate education must train students to not onlysolve engineering challenges that transcend disciplinary boundaries, but also communicate,transfer knowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries. Oneapproach to train engineers in these
involves the consciousconsideration of the moral as well as ethical implications and consequences of classroompractices on students [2, p. 294]. On the other hand, self-reflection goes beyond critical inquiryby adding to conscious consideration the dimension of deep examination of personal values andbeliefs, embodied in the assumptions professors make and the expectations they have forstudents [2, p. 294]. This suggests that professors in general, and in particular mathematicsprofessors, must engage in some aspects of critical reflection that are needed for playing theeffective reflective practitioner role [1, p. 27] that is required for guiding students in theirlearning processes. 2.2 Reflective practice and professional developmentReflective