Department of Mathematics at Hong Kong Baptist University (2010-2011) he focused on developing meshfree numerical methods. Given his multidisciplinary background, he was appointed as the director of research in the Construction Materials Institute (2011-2013) at the University of Tehran and assistant professor at Islamic Azad University. In that capacity, he had the opportunity of leading several industry-related research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre has authored and co-authored over 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 50 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 7 graduate students and mentored over 20 undergraduate students. He has
, turning, welding, tapping, and threading components. • One additional lab period could be added if needed. • Additional pieces of equipment could be used, but they must already be at the university. • Similar materials must be used: aluminum for machining and steel for welding. • The cost of the materials should not be significantly increased from the current year’s lab.Each team submitted a report describing the proposed product and the sequence of lab activitiesneeded to fabricate each component. Each team also presented a 5-minute “sales pitch” to theirclassmates. The students peer evaluated the projects in four categories: feasibility, cost,presentation quality, and appeal. The highest scoring project (Fig. 5) was created in
-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 95 alumni to date. He also leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research and have 10 alumni. He also leads an NSF-funded cybersecurity education project and serves as a co-PI on two International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) projects funded by the NSF. He has published over 90 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Dr. Christian Matheis, Guilford College Visiting assistant professor, Justice and Policy Studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
the near future, we could imagine automated tools able to evaluate the quality of studentinteractions across different platforms, although how much can be inferred from loggedcommunications data raises questions that go beyond technology.In conclusion, Slack proved to be a useful tool in our engineering course. Students found it easyto use and reported that it facilitated collaboration and innovation. The perspectives shared bystudents show that innovation is a very hard thing to teach; it requires laying a solid foundation,supporting engagement, and fostering intrinsic motivation.This model may not work with all students. But with some, it works very well. For thosestudents, the freedom afforded by collaborating with peers and producing high
) interdisciplinary groups of summer school students are taskedto develop possible research project proposals following specific formats, such as the AllianceGrant model by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council that brings togetheruniversity researchers and industry and NGO stakeholders addressing interdisciplinarychallenges of direct relevance to industry partners. A sample summer school curriculum is shownin Figure 3, where the four stages are highlighted accordingly. Note that modules M0 to M10shown in Figure 3 relate to thematic, disciplinary and activity groupings.The development and writing of joint grant proposals is a learning and development process thatspans the entire summer school experience, exposing graduate students to the many
and outside of class time. To achievethis goal, design projects designed to make students work in teams are assigned during the courseof the semester. Active learning techniques are not new [1-7]. On the other hand, its support forteaching at the university level has been a hot topic of research in recent years [8-19]. Accordingto Bonwell and Eison, Active Learning is described as follows: "When using active learningstudents are engaged in more activities than just listening. They are involved in dialog, debate,writing, and problem solving, as well as higher-order thinking, e.g., analysis, synthesis,evaluation." [4].According to Johnson, Johnson, and Smith, Cooperative Learning is described as follows: "Is aninstructional paradigm in which
company’s premises. 13 Such tasks include providing secureauthentication, strong encryption methods, disaster recovery plan, and anti-corruptiontechniques.The end-user components include the host at the customer premises or any host that is used bythe customer. The major challenge is the location of the host itself and how the network engineeris going to be able to enforce the security measures on a computer that is not maintained by theorganization that is providing the service and does not fall directly under the network engineer’sdirect supervision. Such challenges include maintaining the latest patches, service packs, virusprotection definitions, clients, and even the basic rules of security as in writing the logon nameand password on a sticky
, students initially are overwhelmed and frequentlystate “I don’t know how to start the solution.” Active problem solving helps them piece togethersmaller problems that they do know how to solve in order to reach the solution of the complexproblem. This also leads to more efficient office hours, where students come as a group with anattempted solution to various problems. Instruction Team (PT, TA, Profs):A coordinated effort by the two instructors, teaching assistant, and peer teacher results in officehours that span the entire week. Students are repeatedly told they can see any person involved,including professor from other section. This team approach allows for students to get help moreeasily, as well as seeing different approaches to solve the
is the teacher’s responsibility to teach themeverything they need to learn. These students like the traditional teaching method oflecturing. It has been extensively studied in the literature that other learning styles such asactive learning, self-learning, and cooperative learning are more effective1. As pointedout by Donawa et al2, the primary purpose of all education is to teach students how tolearn effectively. Various efforts have been made to get the students actively involved in thelearning/teaching process3, 4, 5 over the last century. Extensive research on peer teaching4suggests that having students teach each other is an extremely effective way to increasestudent learning. Recently, Plett et al6 experimented with students grading
on the faculty-sponsored project withincreasingly positive results. In addition to developing clear expectations, the students arerequired to develop a project proposal, complete significant literature research, peer reviewfellow student projects, orally present and defend their written proposal, and ultimately composea technical article and present that work at a poster session. The entire sequence providesstudents with the opportunity to explore the forefront of biomedical engineering, develop theircommunication skills and their ability to critically analyze technical work, and to develop theskills and confidence to complete a demanding project.Over the past two years we have added steps to improve the course by providing
seems to be a match between the needs of engineering education for the21st century and female preferences for learning when it comes to the importance of teamwork.Team or group work (the two are used interchangeably in this paper) is supposed to be apedagogy that women prefer, since it involves collaborative rather than competitive learning,interactional negotiations, a peer setting for confidence building and a safer environment forerror correction for those unsure of their skills. It also provides the opportunity to learn fromeach other’s strengths. Presumably, the emphasis on teamwork will thus make engineeringeducation more palatable for female students, and has been recommended as a strategy to makeengineering (and other math and science
at Purdue University Calumet began in fall of2000 with a few courses. During the building and promotion of the new degree program, corefaculty conducted informal surveys of current students. These surveys were completed in classand the number of surveys completed consisted of 30 to 150. (Variables were due to programgrowth). We were interested in how students found out about the program, what they liked aboutthe degree program, and what they looked for in a program degree in relation to career goals.Top responses (in order of number of responses) were as follows: How they found out about the program 1. They heard about the degree from family and peers 2. They heard about the degree from counselors in area High Schools and Community
also served as an industrial consultant to ExxonMobil, Laitrum, Inc. and LLB, Inc., and has secured over $1.0 M in external research funding. Brian has authored 40 peer-reviewed journal articles, 3 peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and one U.S Patent. He is also the author of a textbook entitled “Materials Engineering and Science for Chemical and Materials Engineers” that is published by John Wiley and Sons. In addition, he has given over 30 national and international presentations, including nine presentations to Louisiana elementary school children though the state’s “Speaking of Science” program
expanded to include increased utilization as a collaboration tool betweenteams and community sponsors as well as a tool for peer to peer evaluation of project teamprogress.ReflectionFor the fall semester 2012, students were given reflective work as part of the course study.Students were asked to reflect on the following questions: 1. Did having a “real” customer improve your performance? Explain 2. Did you feel that you were helping the community with the project? Explain. 3. Do you see yourself doing service in any community in the future? Has this class experience changed that outlook?Eighty-five percent of students felt that having a “real” customer improved their performance,while 11.5% stated that their experience was improved
ability and connectivity than a contemporarybasic feature phone. Smartphones run complete operating system software, providing a platformfor application developers. Apple iOS and Google Android are two examples of popularsmartphone platforms. Today, smartphones offer multi-touch screen interfaces featuring manysmall apps with different functions. Some of these small apps are educational applications viaonline market places, such as the Android Play store and the Apple App store. At the time of ourproposal writing in 2010, no suitable apps were available in the stores. Currently there are a fewsimple apps serving as calculators and interest tables. We have developed an app with a muchmore comprehensive coverage that allows students to learn most
learned that team work and group work is vital. (F,3) Problem Solving I think they learned some problem solving skills. (C,4) To talk about what they’re learning, you know, to write it down and just plan things out and think about it. (D,4) Other They’ve learned simple machines. (B,3) They learned what the engineering process is. (F,3) Types of Engineers That it could be different processes, like with chemical engineers...and manufacturing, you know designing different ways to make things. (A,2) I think they learned what engineers do and that there's lots of
research involves cognitive/social psychology studies of science and engineering problem solving and creativity. His educational research and design work focuses on K-12 urban education in writing, science, technol- ogy, engineering, and mathematics—both in isolation and in various combinations.Birdy Reynolds, University of PittsburghMs. Shelly Renee Brown MEd, The Quality of Life Technology Engineering Research Center; University ofPittsburgh Shelly Brown, M.Ed. is an education and outreach coordinator for the QoLT Center at the Human En- gineering Research Laboratories and the University of Pittsburgh Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology. Ms. Brown is responsible for all K-12 outreach projects and
share some overlap with the Myers-Briggs Sensing type but add somenew wrinkles for library instruction. 1. The thriftiness trait can be used to motivate Realistic engineering students. Mention a few prices of engineering journals or other resources, and they will pay attention. Mention that their tuition pays for library services. 2. Don’t embarrass Realistic engineering students by calling on them individually. Let them volunteer when they do the “oral pop quiz.” If asking an individual to do a search in front of the class, a librarian should make the point that the class has to help him. 3. Give reasons for new ideas such as using peer-reviewed journals instead of Google. It helps to appeal to Realistic
stages,and learn to use the team and peer evaluation forms utilized during the adjourning stage. Thethird BESTEAMS introductory module on project management,13 which is discussed later in thispaper, is also demonstrated.Assessing Student Performance: Teaching Fellows, over the years, have been involved withassessing their students’ performance in ENES 100. In this module, Bloom’s “Taxonomy ofEducational Objectives”18 and how it relates to Kolb’s learning cycle7,8 are reviewed.Suggestions for preparing quizzes, tests and exams and grading practices for tests19 and writtenand oral reports are also discussed.20 TFs practice developing test questions that can be used onan ENES 100 quiz or exam.Academic Integrity: Since Teaching Fellows will likely
Community: Faculty should have opportunities to discuss the “business of teaching and learning.” Through their interactions with peers, students and staff, faculty enhance their instructional skills to meet the needs of a diverse student body. 3. Learning Environment: Technology enhanced instruction appropriately used promotes learner outcomes and quality student/faculty interactions. Learning Ø Enhance the educational experience Experience through a focus on student learning Ø Support the faculty, staff, students and other constituencies in this endeavor
DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ASSESSMENT OF HIGH PERFORMANCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Sharon G. Sauer and Pedro E. ArceI. INTRODUCTIONABET EC2000 is looking for positive changes in the engineering curriculum and theteaching process. Instructors should depart from old-fashioned, non-effectivemethodologies (from the learning point of view), and from non-motivating approachessuch the ‘solo performance’ with the back of the instructor to the students and/or with theinstructor writing equations, on overhead transparences, so small that the students seatedin the back can not see them. Ineffective engineering instructional methodologies havebeen the reasons for which, in many cases, very good candidates
. Figure 2 is a picture of students working in groups to generate a list of steps that individuals can take at home to reduce their water heater energy costs. This is not meant to be a laboratory course or a research project. However, peer-to-peer learning is found to be more effective than delivering formal lectures. Activities required for the
: Simulation of real-world processes Exploration of choice and consequence with complex variables Deep understanding of the targeted knowledge Self-directed learning Peer-to-peer teaching opportunities Highly motivated and engaged learning environment Autonomous thinking through meaningful perspectivesHowever, as promising as the use of games and simulations appears to be forlearning environments, there are several major challenges researchers might facewhen developing games and simulations. One of the biggest challenges is likelyto be the integration with traditional learning contents. Furthermore, developing along-term strategy for game and simulation-based learning is one of the mostimportant decisions
, and 3D web player plug-in. The client, which runs ina web browser, provides a student interface that handles input and output (displaying results,simulation). The web server performs actions and computations based on student input by usingXML and JSP language. The application server reads and writes to the databases by JavaBeanand interfaces with external software packages. The content of the course is primarily presentedwith Web pages which are written in HTML. In order to move courses from one system toanother, and extract and/or perform automated processing on the documents, standardizeddefinitions for course structures are necessary. To meet requirements, Extensible MarkupLanguage (XML) is used to develop course structures. In order to
encouragegraduate fellows to pursue a PhD, the program supports fellows to attend both professionalconferences and the NSF GK-12 National Conference to network with PhD students and doctoralresearch faculty. To date, fellows have published three papers6, 7, 8, presented five presentationsat national conferences, and attended twenty conferences. Fellows are also encouraged to formGRE study groups. In addition, seminars on graduate school, how to present scientific Page 15.1103.4presentations, and grant writing are held.Fostering Role ModelsThe IMPACT LA Program places graduate fellows, who are conducting masters-level researchin STEM disciplines, into middle
discussed codes for each interview until we agreed unanimously on all codes to reduceindividual variation in perceptions about students’ statements. Second, after theme development,we conducted peer debriefing where we asked two peers with knowledge of the course redesignproject and of relevant qualitative methods who were uninvolved in the study to debrief with uson our themes from the interviews. Through this process, we uncovered any interpretive leaps wemade during theme development and further refined our themes. Third, we carried out memberchecking by sharing a complete draft of the manuscript with the interviewed students and askingwhether it accurately reflected their experiences in the course. All students approved thepresentation of their
educationadministrators, promotion and tenure committees, and faculty colleagues did not value or knowhow to judge the value of the innovative courseware created or authored by these innovativefaculty members. [6, 13] The faculty members who made up the NEEDS community however,envisioned a future where computer-based, electronic teaching and learning materials would playa much more central role in engineering education; [9, 13, 17] and where evaluating the quality ofcourseware would become an essential practice by and for faculty who would use thesematerials. Peer review criteria were developed for the Premier Award and were used in theyearly judging process for the award. They also served as best practice guidelines for facultydeveloping courseware. [7]The
, peer-, and self-assessments were also performed throughout the course and on final project. Additionally, aSpecific Course Rubric that included technical aspects regarding food product development aswell as abilities of the team to present their product and answering questions raised during oraland poster presentations, and during tasting of developed food products. For this specific rubric,the scale varied from 1 (novice) to 4 (expert).Mean values from Creative Thinking VALUE Rubric assessment of final projects were 2.35 forAcquiring Competencies (attaining strategies and skills within a particular domain), 2.42 forTaking Risks (may include personal risk, fear of embarrassment or rejection, or risk of failure insuccessfully completing
Paper ID #10563Customizable Virtual X-Ray Laboratory: An Innovative Tool for InteractiveOnline Teaching and LearningDr. Yakov E. Cherner, ATEL, LLC Dr. Yakov E. Cherner, a Founder and President of ATEL, LLC, taught science, engineering and technology disciplines to high school, college and university students. He has extensive experience in writing cur- ricula and developing educational software and efficient instructional strategies. Dr. Cherner introduced an innovative concept of multi-layered simulation-based conceptual teaching of science and technology. This instructional approach uses real-world objects, processes and
Session 1615 BUILDING AN ENGINEERING TEAM: PEER ASSESSMENT PROVES A USEFUL INSTRUMENT TO GAUGE PROGRESS Robert Knecht & Jennifer Gale Colorado School of Mines Abstract – Successful team operations rely on several functions that team members assumethroughout the life of a project. The National Training Laboratory in Group Developmentdeveloped a method describing team success based on task and team functions. At the 2004ASEE Conference, we presented findings indicating that undergraduate teams spent the entiresemester developing both a