pursuing engineering programs at the university, who can shineas good role models to the tribal college students attending the PEEC summer camp.Education aspects of the camp were over seen by the faulty, and graduate students andundergraduates acted as student support staff. There were two roles that the graduate studentsfilled. The graduate students were essentially teaching assistants of the surveying course at thesummer camp. Along with that, they conducted various learning courses to keep the students inan academic mind set. Meaning, outside of the surveying course the graduate students wereteaching various session on pertinent math courses to help with the surveying course, statistics,MATLAB, and AutoCAD. Supplement education was just one
. Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition andexpertise in the era of the computer. Free Press, New York.16. Dym,C.L., Agogino,A.M., Eris,O.,Frey,D.D.,& Leifer,L.J.(2005). Engineering design thinkingteaching and learning. Journal of Engineering Education.17. Fish, J., &Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind’s eye: sketching and visualcognition. Leonardo, 23(1), 117-126.18. Fricke, G. (1993). Empirical investigations of successful approaches when dealing with differentlyprécised design problems. International conference on engineering design ICED93, Heyrista, Zürich.19. Fricke, G. (1996). Successful individual approaches in engineering design. Research in EngineeringDesign, 8(3), 151-165.20
forces, moments, and normal bending stresseshelp resolve the business problem presented in the case study.2. Case Study Method InstructionEngineers working in business require the ability to solve relevant engineering problems “inuncertain and even currently unknowable environments.”5 The pedagogical goal of the casestudy method is to create this environment in the minds of students while they learn newconcepts and solve important problems. The case study method is widely used in businessschools to explore “the ‘wicked’ problems that potential managers will face in an uncertainworld”6 and encourage the “development of critical thinking and sense making abilities.”7 Overtime, the case study method has become a popular teaching tool because its
Entrepreneurs” or “Intrapreneurs.” According to Morris et al., “CorporateEntrepreneurship” is a term used to describe entrepreneurial behavior inside established mid-sized and large organizations2. The term “Intrapreneur” was first introduced by Pinchot in 1985as any dreamers who take hands-on responsibility for creating innovation of any kind within anorganization3. The entrepreneurial mind creates inventive solutions to complex problems. It alsorecognizes the importance of identifying entrepreneurial opportunities.Lawrence Tech has a strong commitment of fostering the entrepreneurial mindset. The Collegeof Engineering has taken a leadership position in implementing the University’s vision ofdeveloping students with a global view and an
Paper ID #10303Pedagogy Including Differentiated Instruction That Enables Student Learn-ingDr. John Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Departmental Internship Co- ordinator at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Applied Automation Engineering, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning.Dr. Carl Nelson Blue, University of Southern Maine Associate Professor of Technology, in the Department of Technology - Technology Management Program / Information and
rewarding. Women do not seemto mind the medical field’s long years of study, hard training and difficult working hours. Nor dothey ponder, at least in the case of the UAE, the nature of the work environment in which menand women are expected to work together for long hours and under a lot of pressure. Themedical field has idealized their profession by focusing on the noble goal of serving humanityand treating the sick. This very notion has been lost on engineering and the sciences. In a similar Page 23.1374.6manner, when recruiting students from high schools, the focus of the PI presentation is on thesofter aspects of engineering such as
agreements, and other related agreements with industrial partners. Jim is a registered Patent Agent and holds a B.S. in Environmental Engineering, an M.S. in Civil Engineering and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Michigan Technological University.Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University Ms. Mary Raber is the director of the Enterprise Program at MTU. In this role, she secures funding and projects from external sources, oversees day-to-day operation of the program and teaches various instructional modules in the curriculum. Prior to Michigan Tech, Ms. Raber worked in the automotive industry for 14 years, holding various positions in engineering and management. Mary holds a B.S.M.E
of the Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND) of the American Association of Engineering Education (ASEE). He was the treasurer of MIND from 1996 to 1998, and the MIND Program Chair from 1999 to 2000. He has collaborated in the creation and direction of numerous faculty development workshops that have been held through out the country. Dr. Walser is the recipient of several faculty awards including the faculty of the year award from the Eta Kappa Knu engineering honor society. He has given numerous workshops and lecture demonstrations at grades schools, high schools, universities and community centers, introducing young people to engineering and science
Paper ID #22424Faculty, Student, and Practitioner Initial Conceptions of LeadershipDr. Kenneth Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Kenneth is an Associate Professor at Cal Poly Pomona and a licensed Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, storm water, and waste water systems projects. He holds degrees from the University of Nevada Las Vegas (BSCE and PhD) and from Norwich University (MCE).Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he
Paper ID #26653Designing and Enacting Weekly Micro-reflections as a Means of ProfessionalDevelopment of Early Career Educators: Voices from the FieldMs. Taryn Shalini Bipat, University of WashingtonMiss Yuliana Flores, University of WashingtonDr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the Univer- sity of Washington. She is interested in all aspects of engineering education, including how to support engineering students in reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teach- ing decisions, and the
develop entrepreneurially-minded engineers, EEPs oftenleverage student-centered teaching practices (e.g., project-based learning, group discussion, pitchcompetitions, mentorship, and experiential learning) to instill entrepreneurship practices such asopportunity identification, customer discovery, validation and pivoting [6], [7].The growth of EEPs has also fueled research in the area. Researchers have explored a variety ofEEP aspects such as their impact on student career choices, attitudes, and retention [8]–[10];assessed learning outcomes [11]; and have presented different models for EEPs [12].Cumulatively, these studies have provided empirical support for the benefits of entrepreneurshipeducation in the professional development of
Business Venturing, 21(5), 704–725.Mann, L., Alba, G. D., & Radcliffe, D. (2007). Using Phenomenography to Investigate Different Ways of Experiencing Sustainable Design. In Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu, HI.Marshall, S. P. (2009). Re-Imagining Specialized STEM Academies: Igniting and Nurturing Decidedly Different Page 26.504.26 Minds , by Design. Roeper Review, 32(1), 48–60.McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research / Susan E. McKenney, Thomas C. Reeves. New York : Routledge, 2012.Miemis, V. (2012
Paper ID #12577Teaching Outside the Discipline: A STEM-Related Course in a Non-STEMCurricular AreaDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Education Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learn- ing in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with
fromengineering”. 2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skillsfor Complex Global Environments.[5] Kriewall, T. J., and Mekemson, K., 2010. “Instilling the Entrepreneurial Mindset intoEngineering.” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 1(1), pp. 5-19.[6] Gerhart, A. L. and Melton, D. E., 2016. “Entrepreneurially minded learning: Incorporatingstakeholders, discovery, opportunity identification, and value creation into problem-basedlearning modules with examples and assessment specific to fluid mechanics.” ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition.[7] Erdil, N. O., Harichandran, R. S., Nocito-Gobel, J. Carnasciali, M. and Li, C. Q., 2016.“Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop and
AC 2010-1212: FREEHAND SKETCHING AS A CATALYST FOR DEVELOPINGCONCEPT DRIVEN COMPETENCIESDiarmaid Lane, University of LimerickNiall Seery, University of Limerick Page 15.601.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Freehand sketching as a catalyst for developing concept driven competenciesAbstractAt a time when concept driven competencies are perceived to be critical in redefiningeffective technological education, the introduction of Design and CommunicationGraphics at senior cycle in Irish high schools has broad implications. Students nowhave the potential to explore applied geometries, integrated with conceptual thinkingin addition to
disciplines. They are encouraged to meet outside the class hours(during the lab hours) with their team members from the paired courses. The hope is to mixvisual artists, analytically minded engineers, and venture-oriented business students together insmall teams to catalyze innovation, with anthropology students as ethnographers and moderators.Since they have to form teams, we have a common assignment by the second week to post theirbios at a common Blackboard community site. They will have the next three weeks tocommunicate with each other and determine the team make-up. We get involved if they areunable to form teams on their own; we help them make up their minds. During the lab hours (seebelow) the engineering and arts professors teardown our
after taking the exams, arguing that the stressand worry made their minds unclear, and they forgot the knowledge acquired [2] . Inconstruction majors, exams are mostly taken in the traditional way, that is, individually,with limited time and without the help of notes or didactic material; this being the case inexams at all academic levels [3] Stress occurs not only when students do not remember aconcept or are insecure about their knowledge, but also when students have the knowledgebut a state of concern is triggered that prevents correct reasoning and application of theknowledge acquired [4].The traditional exam evaluation method is applied within engineering and architecturemajors throughout university life and throughout the world [5], even
. Involvement in research,for either students or faculty, addresses the need to develop curiosity and the ability to ask theright question. This paper will emphasize the importance of research to the economy and highereducation. It will then introduce the importance of research to student formation and reinforcethe importance of exposing students early to the concepts of research. This paper will then showthe connection between research and Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML) and describethree projects, supported by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) and theKern Foundation, intended to expose undergraduates to research early in their academic careers.The first project was part of KEEN’s initial “EML through Research” workshop given
Powered by www.slayte.com Using a Knowledge Mapping Tool in Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: A First ExperimentAbstractA recent comprehensive national survey in the U.S. reveals that lack of time to prepare classesand ways to motivate students in the class have been the challenges faced by academic librariansin information literacy instruction sessions. Another similar survey conducted in Israel alsoechoes the issue of lack of students’ engagement. There are some publications about the benefitsor potentials of knowledge maps such as concept or mind maps in engineering education andacademic libraries. Publications show that the maps are primarily used for online assessment,student engagement
2006-1312: FEATURES OF A CONSTRUCTIVIST MICROCLIMATE SITUATEDIN A BEHAVIORIST LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AT A UNIVERSITY-BASEDENGINEERING RESEARCH CONSORTIUMGiri Venkataramanan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Giri Venkataramanan received the B.E. degree in electrical engineering from the Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, India, the M.S. degree from the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. After teaching electrical engineering at Montana State University, Bozeman, he returned to University of Wisconsin, Madison, as a faculty member in 1999, where he continues to direct research in various areas of electronic power
; Exposition, Salt Lake City,Utah, June 2018.[8]. C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M. Carnasciali, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Assessingthe Growth in Entrepreneurial Mind-set Acquired through Curricular and Extra-curricularComponents,” in Proceedings of 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida,June 2019.[9]. S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. McKenna,“Development of the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA),”Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. n1, 2018.[10]. W. J. Schell, A. Kwapisz, K. Aytes, S. E. Bryant, B. J. LaMeres, and E. B. Varnes, “UsingEntrepreneurial Mindset Constructs to Compare Engineering Students and Entrepreneurs,” inProceedings of
from industry, the R&D community,government, the armed services,” students, and faculty inthe pursuit of meeting the technological challenge. Thispaper highlights the projects and activities happeningthrough the Center. Continuous improvement needsnurturing to cause desired CART activities.(CART) is up and running well. In the first two years ofoperation, we have continued to develop new appliedresearch projects and technology services to betterrepresent the School of Engineering Technology andComputer Science and Bluefield State College. KeepingCART’s vision and mission in mind, we worked diligently to meet the goals of our ambitiousbusiness plan. We have stayed within our project budgets without expense to the School or theCollege and
entrepreneurshipprograms and minors aimed at engineering and other technical professions seems to support thehypothesis that engineers who are more entrepreneurially minded are essential to the futuretechnical competitiveness of the country. Many institutions with already packed engineeringcurricula are struggling with how to better develop the entrepreneurial mindset in their technicaland engineering students.Intercollegiate entrepreneurship education is well underway at The University of Detroit Mercy(UDM). Through support from the Kern Family Foundation (two grants), the LemelsonFoundation (administered by the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance), FordMotor Company, and the Jesuit 100 Association, we have already piloted four new courses
the expense of other topics. Try to address the topics found on theFundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. Add value to each class period.1 Be decisive,confident, and knowledgeable on the subject being taught.2Design assignments, projects, and exams to be both rigorous and fair.3 Gear the lectures to theassignments, and gear the assignments to the exams. Keep the audience in mind, and be mindfulof the scholastic background and maturity of the students in your course.2 Do not make thecourse easy in an attempt to please students, as a course without some difficulty is ultimately adisservice to the students and yourself.Problems can arise when there are multiple sections of the same course taught by differentfaculty members. In these situations
2006-1215: ACTIVE LEARNING THROUGH TECHNOLOGY (ALERT!):MODERN PHYSICSGerald Rothberg, Stevens Institute of Technology Gerald (Jerry) Rothberg is a professor of physics and a professor of materials engineering in the department of chemical, biomedical and materials engineering. grothber@stevens.edu Page 11.156.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Active Learning through Technology (ALERT!): Modern PhysicsI. Introduction Large, conventionally taught lecture classes typically suffer from poor attendance and weakstudent performance. This is the situation at Stevens and throughout the United States
a technological decision is not theonly important element. An organization’s human capital –– open-minded creative team playersand risk takers –– should be valued.One team member stated that he believed it was a “bad trend” to require students to apply fortheir final two years of a 4-year design or technology degree. Students who are not accepted intothe last two years would have to begin another degree program. Another said that the ComputerScience Engineering curriculum needs to include more physics and mathematics to better preparefuture employees.The most important lessons learned from higher education, which led to the career success of thesurvey participants, was how to deal with ambiguity, how to move forward in the face ofadversity
Machining handbooks Systems automation. Manufacturers catalogs Specification sheetsTable 3 Competencies Required by the Various Courses in the Engineering Technology ProgramThe basic goals of adopting a constructivist approach are very simple. The goals are retention,understating, active use of knowledge and skills, hence the integration with other classes isessential to this strategy. Engineering Technology curriculum should be designed to direct towardsa more attentive approach in valuing knowledge integration [17], bearing in mind that from
Engineering Network (KEEN) and provided by the University of New Haven(UNH), a KEEN partner institution. KEEN promotes engineering education by fostering anentrepreneurial mindset in students: “… beginning with curiosity about our changing world,integrating information from various resources to gain insight, and identifying unexpectedopportunities to create value. An engineer equipped with an entrepreneurial mindset is able tocreate extraordinary value within any type of organization. KEEN schools identify, nurture, anddevelop entrepreneurially minded engineers who will contribute to our national economicprosperity and secure individual fulfillment through a lifetime of meaningful work.”(engineeringunleashed.com)The UNH KEEN modules are intended to
groups to uncover their own thought and biases before discussing difficult orcontroversial topics surrounding engineering innovation with the class as a whole. While thecourse is taught specifically with engineering design in mind, the course has attracted studentsfrom varying majors which has fostered collaboration and creativity in idea generation. Thecombination of critical thinking methodology with innovation concepts has led students to notonly expand their knowledge of potential applications of engineering, but has lead severalstudents to initiate communication with faculty members regarding their ideas for researchopportunities, innovation competitions, and initiated their own projects via applying forUniversity Innovation Fellows
Paper ID #22908Curious About Student Curiosity: Implications of Pedagogical Approach forStudents’ MindsetDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based