paths.References[1] G. Heydt and V. Vittal, "Feeding our profession [power engineering education].," IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38-45, 2003.[2] I. Opriş, D. Gogoașe Nistoran, S. Costinaş and C. Ionescu, "Rethinking power engineering education for Generation Z.," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 287-305, 2021.[3] H. Chai, J. Ravishankar, S. Krishnan and M. Priestley, "Work-in-Progress: A Holistic Approach to Bridging the Gap between Power Engineering Education and Electric Power Industry," IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 2044-2048, 2022.[4] N. Zeybek and E. Saygı, "Gamification in education: Why, where, when, and how?—A systematic review.," Games and
). Atlantis Press.5. Greeves, S., & Oz, M. (2024, January). YouTube in higher education: comparing student and instructor perceptions and practices. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1330405). Frontiers Media SA.6. How many videos are on YouTube in 2025?. Photutorial. (2024, December 19). https://photutorial.com/how-many-videos-on-youtube/7. Berry, S. (2018, November 8). Study shows half of YouTube viewers are there for Education. Videomaker. https://www.videomaker.com/study-shows-half-of-youtube-users-are-there-for- education/8. Claiborne, L., Morrell, J., Bandy, J., Bruff, D., Smith, G. & Fedesco, H. (2020). Teaching Outside the Classroom.9. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved [todaysdate] from https
affectedstudents' experiences and provided a basis for future research on the effectiveness of similarinterventions in educational settings.ResultsThe results of the first phase of the study revealed significant insights into how theintroduction of a coffee break affected students’ stress levels and exam performance. Theanalysis focused on four key phases: the days leading up to the exam, the first part of theexam, the coffee break, and the last part of the exam.Table 1. Students self-report answers about the exam with coffee break. Stages of Exam with coffee the Coffee Student´s feedback on the Coffee Break breakBreak Exam “I felt calm and more relaxed since I
interviews or focusgroups, would further enrich the understanding of student satisfaction.References[1] V. Dhanalakshmi, D. Bino, and A. M. Saravanan, “Opinion mining from student feedback data using supervised learning algorithms,” in 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC), IEEE, Mar. 2016, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICBDSC.2016.7460390.[2] S. Katragadda, V. Ravi, P. Kumar, and G. J. Lakshmi, “Performance Analysis on Student Feedback using Machine Learning Algorithms,” in 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), IEEE, Mar. 2020, pp. 1161–1163. doi: 10.1109/ICACCS48705.2020.9074334.[3] M. Bansal, S. Verma, K. Vig, and K. Kakran
the development ofteamwork behaviors in the first-year engineering context. The overarching research question thatmotivated this review of relevant theory is ‘How might faculty leverage generative AI to providepersonalized feedback to intentionally promote students’ teamwork and feedback literacybehaviors?’ With the research question and chosen theoretical framework as guides, theresearchers worked to develop a codebook for the reflection data. The next section will detailhow the framework was used to develop a codebook.From Framework to CodebookTo analyze the reflection data, the researchers chose to deductively code feedback literacybehaviors. With the five constructs from Dawson et al.’s conceptual framework as a basis (seekfeedback
. Chris Carroll P.E., Saint Louis University Dr. Carroll is an Associate Professor and the Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at Saint Louis University. His experimental research interests focus on reinforced and prestressed concrete, while his educational research interests focus primarily on the use of experiential learning techniques.Dr. Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He then went to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner-Fairbank Highway
operations. Another important objective of the experiment is to emphasizethe importance of good manufacturing practices (GMP) by requiring the use of batch records andstandard operating procedures (SOPs), a practice widely followed and critical in the industry.Additionally, students examine cell growth by following substrate consumption, acetateproduction, and cellular concentration over time. They determine key growth parameters such asthe maximum specific growth rate (μm), doubling time (τ), cell growth yield (YX/S), and apply theMonod equation to predict variations in cellular concentrations over time, comparing predictionswith experimental data. Students are expected to scale up their process based on experimentalfindings, identifying the
] K. Edström and A. Kolmos, “PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 539–555, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.895703.[5] Y. Xia, S. Cutler, and D. McFadden, “Collaborative Project-based Learning Approach to the Enculturation of Senior Engineering Students into the Professional Engineering Practice of Teamwork,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020, p. 34299. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34299.[6] S. Habibi et al., “A Modernized Student- and Equity-Centered Teaching Strategy,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.18260/3-1-1153-36049.[7] S. Howe and J. Goldberg
sharing their insights.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.(2128895). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References[1] H.-Y. Chiu et al., “Development of a social cognitive career theory scale for measuring the intention to select surgery as a career.,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e21685, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21685.[2] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Social Cognitive Career Theory,” in Career Choice and Development, Wiley, 2002, pp. 255–311.[3] S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent, “Social cognitive career theory.,” in Career
, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023.[2] L. Espinosa, “Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence.” Accessed: Aug. 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-13330-004[3] L. Foltz, S. Gannon, and S. Kirschmann, “Factors That Contribute to the Persistence of Minority Students in STEM Fields,” Plan. High. Educ. J., vol. 42, pp. 1–13, Sep. 2014.[4] S. Deitz and R. Henke, “Higher Education in Science and Engineering,” NSF - National Science Foundation. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202332/characteristics-of-s-e-degree-recipients#s-e-degrees-by -race-and-ethnicity[5] E. Lichtenberger and C. George
favorof there being multiple cognitive schemas available to a person depending on the specificsituation they are considering, although there can be a preferred schema. Despite the shift intheoretical frameworks, the DIT remained a primary assessment tool for studying moralreasoning, although the interpretation of results changed.The original DIT required test takers to read six stories concerning moral dilemmas and then rateand rank items related to the stories. In the 1990’s, the DIT was revised, producing the DIT-2,with new stories that reflected the changing social context [2].The original DIT used a numerical index, the P-score, that measured the percentage of post-conventional responses to a moral dilemma. The DIT-2 also uses the P-score
-policy-and-procedure-manual-appm-2024-2025/[6] ABET, “Big 10+ Universities Deans of Engineering Letter of Support, Diversity, Equity &Inclusion, Mar. 31, 2021.,” 2021. Accessed: Sep. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/about-abet/diversity-equity-and-inclusion/[7] M. Borrego, J. Froyd, C. Henderson, S. Cutler, and M. Prince, “Influence of EngineeringInstructors’ Teaching and Learning Beliefs on Pedagogies in Engineering Science Courses,”International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, pp. 1456–1471, Jan. 2013.[8] E. A. Canning, K. Muenks, D. J. Green, and M. C. Murphy, “STEM faculty who believeability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in theirclasses,” Sci Adv, vol. 5, no
societal implications if this AI-driven [2] B. Arslan, B. Lehman, C. Tenison, J. R. Sparks, A. A. López, L.system is deployed? Kasneci et al. [6] conclude commentary Gu, and D. Zapata-Rivera, “Opportunities and challenges of usingwith a call for “responsible and ethical” use of AI in generative AI to personalize educational assessment”, Front. Artif.education, advocating strategies like continuous human Intell., vol. 7, art. 1460651, 2024.oversight and critical evaluation. [3] N. J. Francis, S. Jones, and D. P. Smith, “Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and
, the research team has also gathered quantitative data related to how the studentsengage with campus resources and personnel, as well as data on the character and composition ofthe students’ social support networks.Program descriptionThe SEED program was initiated in 2021 with support of the NSF S-STEM program which hasthe goal of recruiting and retaining financially-needy, academically-talented students to STEMcareers. The SEED program is open to students majoring in computer science or an engineeringdiscipline and the financial need requirement is satisfied by eligibility for the federal Pell grant.While not a requirement, students from backgrounds historically underrepresented in STEM areactively recruited to the program. Cohorts of
Evaluation (-PE), which informs program administration. The student survey (S-)consists of four categories of questions, detailed in Appendix A: SSB, SCP, SPC and SPE. Thementor survey (M-) consists of three categories, Appendix B: MCP, MPC and MPE.Responses to questions use either a numerical five-point Likert scale or are open-endedresponse-based. The intern surveys are administered at the beginning, midpoint, and end of theinternship period. Mentor surveys are administered at the midpoint and end. Midpoint surveyshave fewer questions, and mainly serve as a check-in point. The majority of the SB, CP and PCquestions are posed at the beginning and end points of the internship period. Some CP questionsare posed only at the end point. PE questions are
future role of generative AI in creativity and design, how you might utilize what you have learned in the course, and reflections on what you are learning in the course and the creative process. You should plan on writing at least a few paragraphs in this section every week.Figure 2. Descriptions for the sections that constitute the Foundational Creativity part of the Creativity Portfolio. Part 2: AI + Creativity Now is the time to use AI. For this section, please use your preferred generative AI tool (examples include Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and ChatGPT) and write down which one(s) you used. Please record every prompt and output (yes, these sections will be long). Make sure your prompts are
persistence and engagement. The program’smethods offer a replicable model for addressing the underrepresentation of economicallydisadvantaged students in engineering, contributing to a more diverse and inclusive workforce.AcknowledgementWe would like to acknowledge the support of the NFS SSTEM (NSF 22-527) for their Award ID2221623 which has created the opportunity for this work.References[1] Tonso, K. L. (2006a). Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 25.[2] Tonso, K. L. (2006b). Student Engineers and Engineer Identity: Campus Engineer Identities as Figured World. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 273-307.[3] Corcoran, S., Birkner, J., & Brooking, G
engagement, conceptual understanding, andacademic performance. Preliminary observations of selected artifacts indicate that additional datapoints are needed to further validate these perceptions. These findings support the broaderadoption of active learning in engineering education to better prepare students for the complex,interdisciplinary challenges of the field.References[1] S. A. Abdul‐Wahab, M. Y. Abdulraheem, and M. Hutchinson, "The need for inclusion of environmental education in undergraduate engineering curricula," International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 126-137, 2003.[2] K. Jahan, J. W. Everett, R. P. Hesketh, P. M. Jansson, and K. Hollar, "Environmental education for all
is indicative of a potential answer to RQ2 but further work isneeded to both demonstrate the lack of understanding of centroids across the wider student body,and to trial mechanisms for promoting metacognition during problem solving.AcknowledgementsSupport for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation under Award No.2301341. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Research work was conducted under institutional IRB protocols, IRB#1965654.References1. Bransford, J. D. & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of
.2022.102906.[3] O. El-Anwar, S. M. Asce, ; Khaled El-Rayes, M. Asce, A. Elnashai, and F. Asce, “Optimizing Large-Scale Temporary Housing Arrangements after Natural Disasters,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 110–118, 2009, doi: 10.1061/ASCE0887-3801200923:2110.[4] C. Calle Müller and M. Elzomor, “Origami Housing: An Innovative and Resilient Post- Disaster Temporary Emergency Housing Solution,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 04024025, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1809.[5] S. A. Saeed and S. P. Gargano, “Natural disasters and mental health,” International Review of Psychiatry, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2022, doi: 10.1080
). Anthropology's comparative value (s). American Ethnologist, 51(1), 17-23.Lerman, L. and Borstel, J. (2023). Critique is Creative. Wesleyan Publishing.Marino, E. and Fass, A. J. (2020). Is vulnerability an outdated concept? After subjects and spaces. Annal of Anthropological Practice, 44(1):5-15.McNair, L. D., Davitt, M., & Batten, G. P. (2015). Outside the ‘comfort zone’: Impacts of interdisciplinary research collaboration on research, pedagogy, and disciplinary knowledge production. Engineering Studies, 7(1), 47-79.McNair, L. D., Nicewonger, T., & Fritz, S. (2023). Housing insecurity in Alaska, 2020-ongoing. NSF Public Access Repository. https://arcticdata.io/catalog/view/doi:10.18739/A2BK16R1BNicewonger, T. E. (2015
/0013189X033008003.[2] M. S. Garet et. al., "What makes professional development effective?: Results from a national sample of teachers," American educational research journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 915-945, 2001, doi: 10.3102/00028312038004915.[3] A. Kodey, J. Bedard, J. Nipper, N. Post, S. Lovett, and A. Negreros. "The US Needs More Engineers. What’s the Solution?" https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/addressing-the-engineering-talent-shortage (accessed 1/14/25.[4] D. Collins, J. D. Olson, M. Kotche, E. Taylor, and J. Mendez, "Transforming Science Teacher Practice through an Intentional Summer Research Opportunity: A Case Study of two Urban Science Educators," presented at the American Educational Research
the students’ own community can better support students to develop relationships andaffect with the community within limited time and resources, so they can better learn and dosociopolitical engineering. For future work, I plan to study how other elements in the learningecology (e.g., Ashford city, students’ families) impact students to do and learn engineering.Besides their acquisition of knowledge and skills, I would also like to study how therelationships and affect impacted the students’ identity development and how they seethemselves related to engineering in the long term.References[1] E. Reddy, M. S. Kleine, M. Parsons, and D. Nieusma, “Sociotechnical Integration: What Is It? Why Do We Need It? How Do We Do It?,” in 2023 ASEE
disclose what has been done to themduring their employment.State lawsOver 20 states have approved laws either banning NDAs or making them unenforceable undervarious conditions, such as sexual assault, sexual harassment, retaliation, or discrimination, andmultiple bills are in legislative process. Washington’s Silenced No More Act, sponsored byRepresentative Liz Berry and referenced below, is exemplary, and requires the party trying toenforce an NDA to pay a $10,000 fine and cover the other party’s legal expenses. Listings andbrief descriptions of state laws are published by Lift Our Voices [18] and Can’t Buy My Silence[19].Lack of awareness of state and federal lawIn 2019, New Jersey passed one of the first laws restricting NDAs, S. 121, which
: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:[PR Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley,(eds.: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 503.[3] NSF, "STEM Education for the Future," 2020, Available: https://www.nsf.gov/edu/Materials/STEM%20Education%20for%20the%20Future%20- %202020%20Visioning%20Report.pdf.[4] NSF, "Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering " in "National Center for Science and Engineering
attendance of a PA or FA to ASCE PFATW.BackgroundBenefit for studentsIn the current climate of higher education student success is a key conversation topic. Asstudents participate in activities beyond the classroom, they have a stronger educationalexperience and higher institutional satisfaction [11]. Student success can be attributed to theconnection and access students have to faculty advisor(s) and other student members [12], [13].These students develop practical competencies (i.e. soft or power skills) and build leadership thatmay not be included in their academic curriculum [14]. These skills can be practiced throughstudent organizations. These organizations provide an opportunity to grow future leaders byoffering opportunities to balance
UniversityResearch and Evaluation and Assessment Services, which we especially acknowledge.References[1] K. L. Meyers, S. E. Silliman, N. L. Gedde, and M. W. Ohland, “A Comparison of Engineering Students' Reflections on Their First‐Year Experiences.” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 169-178. 2010.[2] L. Santiago, Retention in a first-year program: Factors influencing student interest in engineering. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013. pp. 23-1045.[3] I. V. Ramteke, and J. Ansari, “Stress and Anxiety among first-year and final-year engineering students.” Stress, 3(4), 17-21. 2016.[4] Q. Tahmina, “Does Peer Mentoring Help Students be Successful in an Introductory Engineering Course?” In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
a description of how the budget will be used. a. For continuing project proposals: How does your project build on last year’s project? (Recommended: use your previous project’s evaluations, outcomes, and/or impact.)4. Project Rationale: How does your project support broadening participation in engineering?5. Project Audience: Faculty, Staff, Undergraduate Students, Graduate Students, Community Partners, etc.6. Project Category: E.g., improved support of graduate or undergraduate education, departmental culture, understanding areas for improved student support, mentoring practices, and student recruitment practices7. Research Question(s): What question(s) do you seek to answer with this project?8. Metrics
improveoperations, reduce waste, and enhance innovation. This study highlights the power of decisionscience in manufacturing, helping firms make informed, strategic choices in a complex,competitive industry.References1. KEEN. (n.d.). Curiosity. Engineering Unleashed. https://engineeringunleashed.com/curiosity2. Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015). The psychology and neuroscience of Curiosity. Neuron, 88(3), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.0103. Walden, D. D., Shortell, T. M., Roedler, G. J., Delicado, B. A., Mornas, O., Yip, Y. S., & Endler, D. (Eds.). (2023). INCOSE systems engineering handbook (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd4. McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2023). Framing the frame: How task goals determine the
or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. We would like to express gratitude to the research groups whoparticipated in this study and for their willingness to open their meetings to us and providefeedback on the initial drafts of this paper. Finally, we would like to thank the members of theENLITE research team who gave feedback on the drafts of this paper.References[1] Van den Beemt, A., M. MacLeod, J. Van der Veen, A. Van de Ven, S. Van Baalen, R. Klaassen, and M. Boon, “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508-555