., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard Stamper is the Dean of the Faculty at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He has been teaching in the Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Departments for the past 14 years. Prior to that he was an engineer at General Electric. While at General Electric he spent one year at the Toshiba Appliance Engineering Laboratory in Yokohama Japan as part of an exchange program between Toshiba and General Electric. Page 21.13.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 An Interim Report of a Four-Year Joint Global
Engineering (AOTULE). In addition, he teaches technical communications for graduate students, researches biomass liquification and biosensors, and analyzes Japan’s energy policy. In 2013, Jeffrey received the Tokyo Institute of Technology ”Best Teacher” award and the School of Engineering ”Teacher of the Year” award.Prof. Kikuo Kishimoto, Tokyo Institute of Technology Dr. Kikuo Kishimoto is currently a professor of the Department of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering and Dean of School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology. He received his B.S. degree in 1975, M.S. degree in 1977, and Doctor of Engineering degree in 1982 from Tokyo Institute of Technology. He worked as a Research Associate and Associate Professor
field.Dr. LeAnn E Faidley, Wartburg College LeAnn Faidley is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science at Wartburg College in Waverly, IA. She teaches the freshman engineering sequence, the mechanics sequence, the design sequence, and materials. She is interested in a number of pedagogical research questions including how students can be helped to better formulate questions, the development of scenario based laboratories, and the use of service based learning in the engineering classroom. Page 23.984.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Problem Framing
, institutionsmust change in response to students’ needs and other developments. Many universities areresponding by implementing programs to improve retention of entering STEM students. Forexample, two campuses in the University of Wisconsin system, Madison (research-oriented) and Page 23.1001.2Platteville (teaching-oriented), have made attempts to improve the retention of students whoenter first-year engineering. Platteville’s project, entitled “Improving Student Success through a Model ‘Introduction Engineering Course,” consisted of designing a freshman orientation coursewhich addressed five objectives: community building, academic success strategies
obtained a B.S. in Mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for
by enhancing students’logical and critical thinking through the use of visual programming tools such as RAPTOR inintroductory computing courses. RAPTOR is a visual programming development environment based onflowcharts. Students can build simple procedural programs without learning the details of a language.These features of RAPTOR has helped us in providing an Interdisciplinary Integrated Teaching andLearning experiences that integrates team-oriented, hands-on learning experiences throughout theengineering technology and sciences curriculum and engages students in the design and analysis processbeginning with their first year. The objective of this paper is to discuss our experiences with the use ofRAPTOR in various science and technology
interests are in the area of power electronics which includes advanced converters for power supplies, power quality issues, active power filter development, utility interface issues, power conditioning systems for fuel cells, wind and solar energy systems. She holds one US patent with industry collaboration. She is an IEEE Senior member and is actively involved in funded research projects while engaged in teaching, research and consulting in the area of power electronics, motor drives, power quality and clean power utility interface issues.Mr. Radhakrishna Kotti, University of Houston (CoE) Radhakrishna Kotti received his B.TECH degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (J.N.T.U), India in 2010. Currently he
stimulating way to approach the complex problems in teaching and learning today. She has partnered with researchers in chemistry, chemical engineering, astronomy, and seismology.Dr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Dr. Margot Vigeant is an associate professor of chemical engineering and associate dean of engineering. She is interested in chemical engineering pedagogy, first-year programs, and international education.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell UniversityMs. Ana Gabriela Aguilera Silva, Bucknell University Ana Gabriela Aguilera Silva 14 is a currently an undergraduate at Bucknell University. She is study- ing Educational Research, International Relations and Economics. She has presented the in Sigma Xi Summer
Paper ID #6094The Most Misunderstood ABET Criterion - Criterion 3bDr. K.S. Krishnamoorthi, Bradley University Dr. Krishnamoorthi is a professor of industrial engineering in the IMET Department at Bradley University and teaches mostly engineering statistics, quality engineering and engineering economics. He has a BS in ME from University of Madras, India, MA in statistics and PhD in industrial engineering from University of Buffalo. He has published in the areas of quality costs, process control and statistical thinking for engineers. He has been a consultant to industry in process improvement using statistical methods. His
. 2. Prince. M. (2004). “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Engineering Education: 93(3) 223-31. 3. Berret, D. (2012). “How Flipping the Lecture Can Improve the Traditional Lecture.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857/. 4. Mazur, E. (2009). "Confessions of a Converted Lecturer: Eric Mazur." Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwslBPj8GgI. 5. Berger, C., N. Kerner, et al. (1999). “Understanding Student Perceptions of Collaboration, Laboratory and Inquiry Use in Introductory Chemistry.” Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston MA
Paper ID #7765Introducing a Business Acumen into an Engineering CurriculumDr. John J. Burke P.E., Western New England University John Burke received the B.S.E.E. degree from Northeastern University in 1984, and the M.S.E.E. de- gree from University of California at Los Angeles in 1986, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 1993. Dr. Burke joined the faculty of Western New England University (WNE) in 2000 and since 2004 he has been an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering. Dr. Burke’s primary teaching inter- ests are Electromagnetics, Physics of Semiconductor Devices
Professor and Research Faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). He served as a Technical Advisor for the senior design project at UNLV. He teaches CAD, cap- stone design, and solid mechanics courses at the undergraduate and graduate level. He has been involved with the capstone design program at TU since his tenure in 2008. His course design projects are sponsored by industry and government laboratory which include GM, JOHN DEERE, AFRL, and NUCOR. He is the Lead-Faculty Contact for the Advancement of Collaborative Engineering Education (PACE) at TU. Page
Electrical and Computer Engineering from The University of Calgary, and a Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from the University of Waterloo. He is currently pursuing a Post-Baccalaureate Certificate in Technology-Based Learning from Athabasca University, Canada.Dr. Rui Hu, CEISMC, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Connelly Hunter Connelly, Google, Inc. Daniel is a software engineer at Google, working on Chrome and Chrome OS in Munich, Germany. He previously studied for an MS in computer science and a BS in applied mathematics at Georgia Tech, worked at MIT Lincoln Laboratory, and taught math at a charter school in metro Atlanta.Mr. Nathaniel William Tindall IIIMs. Neva Rose, Georgia Institute of Tecnology - CEISMC Ms. Neva Joyce
, andcreates opportunities for undergraduates to pursue nanotechnology related research activities. Inthe first NanoCORE project, we focused on introducing nanoscale science and engineering intothe undergraduate curriculum through short teaching units, which we refer to as “nanomodules,”within existing courses. Students also had opportunities for more in-depth nanotechnologytraining by enrolling in technical electives and participating in undergraduate research. Theprogram has made a noteworthy impact on our undergraduate educational content andexperience.2 With the NanoCORE II project, we have extended the program by expandingstudent-learning opportunities to include additional hands-on and laboratory activities. TheNanoCORE II topic areas and
completely in library instruction sessions in the future. Sarah Clarkand Susan Chinburg3 created a model for comparing groups of students who received differingtypes of research instruction within a single large-scale course, allowing others to adopt theirmodel to compare a set of students receiving library instruction with a control group that did not.Finally, Virginia Young and Linda Ackerson8 developed a program to conduct bibliographicevaluation of large numbers of student papers by trained staff members, allowing a larger samplefor evaluation than a single librarian or instructor could manage individually. Collaboration between librarians and teaching faculty The professional literature in librarianship clearly illustrates both the need to
administrative and lab staff who are dedicatedto the educational success of nearly 440 matriculated and non-matriculated students in itsprograms. Over 600 students have completed Institute programs and have been awardedUniversity of Washington undergraduate and graduate degrees.The vision of the Institute derives from its unique public-private partnership in higher education,one charged with serving as a catalyst for generating energy and interest in computing &engineering disciplines. Its goals include developing and enhancing faculty teaching and researchwhile increasing students’ communication and collaboration skills; expanding and diversifyingstudent enrollment; continuously developing, assessing and improving its program offerings
with some measurement noise in the speaker’s signal. Students will identify the frequency components of the noise and try to remove them by filtering. Each student is given a distinct pair of speaker and listener signals in the project. Data set 3: Measurement signals in the gearbox of a wind turbine from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The data is recorded by a number of sensors at the gearbox, as shown in Figure 3, to monitor the operation of the turbine and to detect signs of possible failure (especially if a turbine is more than 20 years old). The data was provided by WSU faculty in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Although a
Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pierrakos is the director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through ser- vice, problem based learning methodologies, assessment of student learning, as well as complex problem solving. Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 en- gineering outreach. Dr. Pierrakos is a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science
advection flows induced by surface waves or bed forms M.S. Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2004 M.S.S. Software Engineering, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, 2003 B.S. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, Nanjing University, China, 1994 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Assistant Professor, (06/2008 – Current), Lamar University, Civil Engineering, Beaumont, TX • Research Associate (01/2008 – 05/2008), University of Minnesota, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL) • Civil Engineer (08/2007 – 01/2008), HZ United, LLC, Plymouth, MN • Research/Teaching Assistant (01/2003 – 01/2008), University of Minnesota, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL), Department of Civil Engineering • Lab Assistant (02
Paper ID #7906Influence of uncertainties and assessment of significant digits in thermody-namicsDr. Randall D. Manteufel, University of Texas, San Antonio Dr. Randall Manteufel is an associate professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at San Antonio. He teaches courses in thermodynamics, fluid mechanics and heat transfer. He is the fac- ulty advisor for the student chapter of American Society for Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers at UTSA.Dr. Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio
, categorizing, applying, inventing and updating knowledge. A truly practical aerospaceKBS implementation is still absent in the current aerospace engineering design community. TheAVD Laboratory at UTA makes the very first effort in developing an industry-relevant thuspractical aerospace KBS dedicated to the strategic conceptual design phase. Methodology and ImplementationIntroduction AVDSIZING Knowledge AVDDBS Base Data Flow Control
Paper ID #7189Engaging Early Engineering Students (EEES): A Fourth Year Report froman NSF STEP ProjectDr. Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University Jon Sticklen is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education Research at Michigan State Univer- sity. Dr. Sticklen is also Director of Applied Engineering Sciences, an undergraduate bachelor of science degree program in the MSU College of Engineering that focuses both on engineering and business. He also is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen formerly led a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task
also asked threeopen-ended questions: 1) What aspects of the teaching or content of this course or laboratorysection do you feel were especially helpful? 2) What changes could be made to improve theteaching or content of this course or laboratory section? 3) Additional Comments. Representativestudent comments are given in Table 7. In the TC offering, students liked computer lab demosand how course content related to real-world applications; 7 of the 14 comments that suggestedimprovement asked for more lab time. In the 2011 IC course, 14 of the 20, and in the 2012 IC, 12of the 22 comments relating to what the students liked in class pointed to the usefulness of theonline videos. In the 2011 IC course, 10 of the 20, and in the 2012 IC 7 of the
University and taught biology at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Mike Ryan, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Jeffrey H Rosen, Georgia Tech - CEISMC After fourteen years in the K-12 classroom teaching mathematics and engineering, Rosen took a position as program director at CEISMC. Since starting, Rosen has published numerous papers on using robotics as tool for instruction and on how to manage robotics competition to increase student interest and en- gagement in STEM. Rosen contributed a chapter to the book Robotics in K-12 Education on the FLL program model we developed that provides a benefit to student involvement in STEM. Rosen is involved in two NSF-funded research projects that use engineering design
Paper ID #6943Developing and Assessing Student’s Principled Leadership Skills to Achievethe Vision for Civil Engineers in 2025Dr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel Dr. William J. Davis is a professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Tech and is a registered professional engineer. His research interests focus on transportation infrastructure planning and design, highway safety, and active living by design. Courses he teaches include transportation engineering, highway design, concrete and asphalt design, and professional
her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt Univer- sity, her M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt University, and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering at Tuskegee University. Her research interests include assessment of instructional methods, laboratory design, collaborative learning, and retention and recruitment issues in engineering education. Page 23.165.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 An Examination of the Relationship of Intellectual Development and Learning Preferences in Electrical and Computer Engineering
University. Dr. Smith’s work experience includes being a contract employee at AT&T Bell Lab- oratories, performing surveying work for the Jackson Electric Membership Corporation, and summer internships at the Atlanta Gas Light Company and Sandia National Laboratories. In addition to Georgia Southern, he has taught at Texas A&M, Prairie View A&M and Tuskegee Universities. His research inter- ests include fuzzy logic, control system design and intelligent systems. He is a member of ASME, ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi and Pi Tau Sigma. Page 23.531.1 c American Society for Engineering
students into chemical engineering over chemistry.Some marginal effects were identified for students majoring in chemistry in terms of scienceclassroom practice. They more often worked on labs and projects, were given the conceptsbefore equations, and worked on small group activities (all p<0.05). These students also had astronger desire to be an expert in a single field (p<0.01) and were less rigid than their chemicalengineering counterparts in their attitudes (p<0.05). Chemistry students' confidence in a scienceclassroom or laboratory may explain why some students who would succeed in chemicalengineering choose chemistry as their major.Chemical engineering students showed a significantly higher interest and confidence in theirphysics
Clarkson physics student DaeganGonyer, now an MS student in Engineering Science.Student teams raised Phase I and Phase II fundingfor the project in 2009 and 2010 from the EPAthrough their People, Prosperity and the Planet (P3)student design competition for sustainability. Theyalso conducted laboratory and feasibility studies anddid all of the design, construction and operationaspects of the greenhouse and its systems. Page 23.293.3 Figure 2: Aeroponic system concept (top) and actual system (bottom
Technology and Design Education,Volume 17, Number 1 (2007), 23-35.10 Menary, G. and T. Robinson (2011). Novel approaches for teaching and assessing CAD. International Conferenceon Engineering Education, Belfast, N. Ireland, 21-26 August 2011.11 Rynne, A., and W. Gaughran (2012). Cognitive Modeling Strategies for Optimum Design Intent in ParametricModeling. Computers in Education Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 55-68. Page 23.31.912 Branoff, T.J. (2004). Constraint-Based Modeling in the Engineering Graphics Curriculum: Laboratory Activitiesand Evaluation Strategies. Proc. Midyear Conf. Eng. Design Graphics Division of the Am. Soc. for Eng