Demonstrations 0% 44%Figure 2 Survey results.The survey clearly shows that the majority of engineering and physics students feel that theylearn better by laboratory experiments. They generally prefer classroom activities such as livedemonstrations, discussions, and team works to slide-shows, passive lectures, and readingassignments.Word-processing and computer based presentation tools have significantly changed classicalteaching tools. It is now much easier to prepare extensive written documents to hand out, and usecolorful and animated slide presentations instead of the conventional blackboard "chalk-and-talk" style teaching. Furthermore, many instructors prepare web
and satellite communicationservices, few Engineering Technology (ET) programs incorporate these teachings in theircurricula. This is a concerning issue as we need to produce professionals from our ET schoolswho will be able to work with the current and future technologies with minimal additionaltraining. We can think of several reasons to explain the absence of these subjects in ourclassrooms. First, because these are relatively new services and technologies not all programdirectors or instructors may be familiar with them, especially given the complexity of systemsoperating at microwave frequencies. In second place, it may not be very clear in which ETprograms these topics should be taught. Most of the current Electrical Engineering
got their hands on a physical circuit was in a subsequent course, ECEN 2270:Electronics Design Lab (EDL), in which students build an autonomous car that navigates a routedefined by a line on the floor. While ECEN 2270 is a hands-on laboratory course, the exercises areall directed toward building a product, not exploring the fundamental principles of circuits.When we were asked to teach the ECEN 2250 course for the first time, we believed that it wasimportant to include a hands-on laboratory experience. However, we were constrained in not beingable to change the course from a 3 to a 4-credits, could not change the meeting pattern of three,50-minute sessions per week, and did not have physical laboratory space available for the 138students to
.: ABET, 2002. 7. Aburdene, MF and El-Sharkawy, M, “Integrated Engineering Workstations in Electrical Engineering Laboratories,” IEEE Transactions on Education, v. E-32, p. 404–408, 1989. 8. Kadlowec, J, Lockette, PV, Constans, E, Sukumaran, B, and Cleary, D, “Visual Beams: Tools for Statics and Solid Mechanics,” 32nd ASEE/IEEE Forntiers in Education Conference, Boston Mass., November 6–9, p. T4D-7 - T4D-10, 2002. 9. Felder, RM. “Reaching the Second Tier-Learning and Teaching Styles in College science Education”, J. of College Science Teaching, v. 23(5)p. 286-290, 1993 Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American
Agency National Advisory Committee (NAC), that advises the Administrator of the EPA on environmental policy issues related to the implementation of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. Also, she was a member of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) that advises the President and Congress of the United States on good neighbor practices along the U.S./Mexico border. She has received local and state teaching awards: 2014 UTEP’s CETaL Giraffe Award (for sticking her neck out); 2014 College of Engineering Instruction Award; 2014 The University of Texas System Regents’ Outstanding Teaching Award; and the 2012 NCEES Award for students’ design of a Fire Station. She also received 2018 American
engineering pedagogical content knowledge and engineering engagement, whichled to an overall increase in teaching engineering self-efficacy [19]. Other studies have alsofound that the integration of robotics projects into various disciplines increased the involvedteachers’ self-efficacy around the use of robotics into middle school curriculum [20]. Immersingteachers in laboratory settings and research experiences has also been effective at increasing highschool teachers’ self-efficacy in content areas such as nanotechnology [21], as well as shiftingtheir perceptions of engineering as a field [22]. These examples of professional developmentactivities embody the five principles of professional development and ultimately demonstratedthe effectiveness of
also emphasize teaching excellence over grantmoney and research accomplishments. Each position has its own characteristics that may beviewed as either advantages or disadvantages by different people. Tenure track positions inengineering technology3-7 and at predominantly undergraduate teaching institutions8-10 provideother options for those not interested in traditional tenure-track positions at research universities.Visiting positions,11-12 adjunct13-15 and laboratory instructor positions also provide alternatives totenure-track positions at various institutions.Most graduate students looking for academic positions have come through a traditionalengineering science program and have attended a research university as part of their education.In
Yellin forserving as internal advisors as part of the Laboratory for User-Centered Engineering Education atthe University of Washington.We would also like to thank the many people who developed the web sites, articles, research,guides, and other teaching-related resources that we have linked to on our web site. Our sitecould not exist without their expertise and hard work.References 1. De Jong, M. and Van Der Geest, T. (2000). Characterizing web heuristics. Technical Communication, 47(3), pp. 311-326. 2. Van Duyn, D.K., Landay, J.A., and Hong, J.I. (2003). Making the most of web design patterns. In The Design of Sites: Patterns, principles, and process for crafting a customer-centered web experience. Addison-Wesley
establishment in 1997, we have focused onmodifying components of a nationally recognized teaching development program, the College ofEngineering TA Development Program, to strengthen a younger program, UndergraduateCooperative Learning Facilitator Training.Since its inception in 1987, the College of Engineering’s TA Development Program has evolvedinto a mandatory, interactive training program. New graduate engineering teaching assistantsare led by their more experienced peers, TA Fellows. The corresponding undergraduate programbegan in 1993 and focused on cooperative learning in math, physics, chemistry and engineeringdesign. Trained undergraduate facilitators teach their peers in small team-based workshops. Tostreamline and augment training of both
who wish to learn more about bioinstrumentation and biosignalprocessing who either have not taken all these foundational courses or do not feel well preparedin these areas. To meet this pedagogical challenge, the authors have incorporated a large numberof demonstrations and laboratory exercises into these courses, based upon our experience that thisgreatly aids learning.8–12 We take advantage of a new and highly flexible tool for educators: thenew ELVIS benchtop platform combined with the latest version of LabVIEW, both now availablefrom National Instruments (www.ni.com). In addition, the authors integrated various BIOPACproducts (available from BIOPAC Systems, Inc., www.biopac.com) with ELVIS in a way notseen before. The results of using
the students to effectivelyconceptualize electromagnetic radiations and be able to relate theory to practice. Students’experiences are also presented to demonstrate what they learned.References1. RF Circuit Design: Theory and Applications, 2nd Edition, Reinhold Ludwig and Gene Bogdanov, Prentice Hall, 2009, pp.1-96.2. Fundamentals of Engineering Electromagnetics, David K. Cheng, Addison Wesley, 1993, pp. 272-330.3. Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, Fawwaz T. Ulaby, Prentice Hall, 2004, pp. 35-924. Lab-Volt, Data Acquisition and Management Software, Antenna Fundamentals Manuals. Lab-Volt Ltd., 1996.5. Khan, Hamid, “Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Laboratory Productivity by Computer
majors at the University ofArizona. The project illustrates the entire control systems design cycle from systemidentification, through analysis and design of dynamic compensators in classical (transferfunction based) and modern (state space based) control theory. Advanced topics such as systemidentification tool box of Matlab, design and testing of an observer/controller pair is alsoillustrated in an intuitive way suitable for undergraduate students. A summary of the mainlearning gains is also presented.The workshop will conclude with a question and answer session as well as individualizedexperimentation with the portable hardware.IntroductionHands-on laboratories are an essential part of the engineering curriculum since its inception.Their
system identification techniques. Her efforts as a PhD candidate at Drexel University include enhancing science and engineering education for K-12 and undergraduate students through development of biologically-inspired educational tools for use at museums and aquari- ums. She has been a teaching assistant for an undergraduate course on product development since 2009. She has mentored teams of undergraduate engineering students through the development of biologically- inspired educational tools. She has also taught science and engineering topics to K-12 students at various workshops and science events since 2005.Mr. John Joseph Carr Jr., New Jersey Academy for Aquatic Sciences Jack Carr is Senior Manager of Public STEM
Paper ID #7987Use of a CPLD in an Introductory Logic Circuits CourseDr. Krista M Hill, University of HartfordDr. Ying Yu, University of Hartford Dr. Ying Yu received the B.Eng. degree from Fudan University in Shanghai, China, in 2000. She received the M.Eng. degree and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Brown University in 2003 and 2007, respectively. Since 2008, she has been teaching as an assistant professor of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Hartford. Her current research interests includes audio and speech signal processing, bowel sound detection, speaker identification and
Paper ID #15694Enhancing Mechanics Education through Shared Assessment DesignProf. Roger G. Hadgraft, University of Technology Sydney Roger Hadgraft BE(Hons), MEngSc, DipCompSc, PhD, FIEAust is Professor of Engineering and IT Pro- fessional Practice in the Faculty of Engineering and IT at the University of Technology Sydney. He is a civil engineer with 25 years involvement in leading change in engineering education, with a particular focus on problem/project-based learning (PBL), at RMIT, Monash, Melbourne and Central Queensland Universities. Roger is an ALTC (Australian Learning and Teaching Council) Discipline Scholar in
programs. “Differentiated instruction, oftenreferred to as universal design, is a teaching and learning style that is the result of neuroscienceresearch on how the human brain processes and retains new information”. 1Introduction“Acknowledging that students learn at different speeds and that they differ in their ability tothink abstractly or understand complex ideas is like acknowledging that students at any given agearen’t all the same height: It is not a statement of worth, but of reality”.2 In a differentiatedclassroom and laboratory, the teacher proactively plans and carries out varied approaches tocontent, process, and product in anticipation and response to student differences in readiness,interest, and learning needs. According to Tomlinson
learning stylethat is the result of neuroscience research on how the human brain processes and retains newinformation”. 1Introduction“Acknowledging that students learn at different speeds and that they differ in their ability tothink abstractly or understand complex ideas is like acknowledging that students at any given agearen’t all the same height: It is not a statement of worth, but of reality”.2 In a differentiatedclassroom and laboratory, the teacher proactively plans and carries out varied approaches tocontent, process, and product in anticipation and response to student differences in readiness,interest, and learning needs. According to Tomlinson, our teaching style “can influence astudents’ IQ by 20 points in either direction, that’s a 40
Paper ID #37411WIP: Use of Student-Produced Educational Videos toPromote Learning and Technical CommunicationSabia Abidi Sabia Abidi is a lecturer in the bioengineering department at Rice University and teaches courses in Systems Physiology, Troubleshooting of Clinical Lab Equipment, and Senior Design. Abidi has a doctorate in biomedical engineering from the University of Texas, Austin and completed postdoctoral research at NYU School of Medicine and MIT. Her research interests include experimentation of new classroom methods to encourage student curiosity, engagement and knowledge retention.Laurel Chen
demonstration that the derivative operatoris more than a symbolic mathematical operator and much more than just anotheracademic exercise.We have successfully used winDSK, winDSK6, and the latest version, winDSK8, toprovide demonstrations of any number of concepts during outreach (K-12 events), atfreshman motivational events, and in junior, senior, and even graduate ECE courses.IntroductionFor years, students have struggled with learning the significance of the impulse response.This is especially true given that there is no piece of test and measurement equipment(T&ME) in our teaching laboratories that is capable of producing a true impulse. Manyeducators have written about the benefits of demonstrations to aid student learning,especially for some
, virtual laboratory experiments, and videos were used to teachelectromagnetic theories [4]. Some instructors use visualization tools such as MATLAB toimprove students’ learning in class and assigns software-based projects to enrich the interpretationof fundamentals of electromagnetics [5]. While simulations are helpful to explain theories, studiesshowed that students who can create and analyze simulations, already have a good understandingof the theory [6]. Thus, computer simulations do not help all students in core EMF courses to Fall 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, October 6-7 – Penn State Berksdevelop a deeper interpretation of abstract theories. According to Dale [7], people learn and retain20% of what they hear, 30% of what
Professor of Engineering & Technology at Ohio University, and formerly taught at the University of North Texas. Currently a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology at Georgia Southern University, he teaches courses involving metal forming, plastics/composites, lean manufacturing, and industrial/environmental safety, along with a manufacturing enterprise simulation course for which he co-authored the text and was presented a 2004 Leavey Award for Excellence in Private Enterprise Education. He is faculty sponsor of student chapter S85 of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, has chaired two SME senior chapters and currently is a member of the
for a greater diversity oftraining setups to be utilized in a smaller area.IntroductionIn order to effectively teach instrumentation, mechatronic and robotic courses in an Engineeringor Engineering Technology curriculum, a variety of electromechanical laboratory setups aredesirable. [1] Exposing students to an assortment of technologies is also desirable, to give themas broad an experience as is reasonable. Thus, setups containing different sensors, effectors andactuators and indicators are needed. Quite often, the cost of such laboratory setups (or trainers) ishigh, thereby challenging the desire to have numerous full setups.To broaden the students’ programming capabilities, many programs teach such courses acrossboth microcontroller and
. Page 24.780.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Integrating the Energy Efficiency and Assessment Components into ManufacturingAbstractThis paper reports the current developments and implementations on energy efficiency andassessment studies in an engineering technology program. The developments are basically in twocategories: 1) Web-based teaching modules of Renewable Energy Education have beendeveloped through a funded research project. Instructional Materials, Laboratory Practices andAssessment Exercises have been posted to iLearn (which a Desire2Learn system) and Canvas(which is an Instructure system). Developed materials have been tested by
serious lack of teaching material. When the authorfound himself in this situation, it was soon apparent that there was more than a series oflectures, endless laboratory experiments, two weeks off at Christmas, one week of SpringBreak, and the entire summer off. The author was about to discover how difficult thoselectures and laboratory experiments are to invent and organize, as his sense of realitysoon had him attempting to remember old formulas, theories, lab experiments and such,and trying to formulate lectures and laboratory experiments – all while keeping thestudents interested in the material. There was also a student branch of the Institute ofElectrical and Electronic Engineers1 (IEEE) to manage.Fall 1999While searching for useful and
researchuniversities, 1998. State University of New York-Stonybrook, Stonybrook, NY. [6] Wyckoff, S. Changing the culture of undergraduate science teaching. J. Coll.sci.Teach.29:409-414, 2008 [7]Roppel, T. A., Hung, J. Y., Wentworth, S. W., and Hodel, A. S. An interdisciplinarylaboratory sequence in electrical and computer engineering: curriculum design and assessment results.IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 43, issue 2, 2000. pp. 143-152 [8] Biernacki, Joseph J, and Wilson, Christopher D. Interdisciplinary laboratory in advancedmaterials: A team-oriented inquiry-based approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001 [9] Iyer, Rupa S. and Fitzgibbon, William. Building the future biotechnology workforce: AUniversity of Houston Model. Journal of
externaldevices. At the end of the course students will complete a final project that makes use of allmodules and all capabilities previously demonstrated in lab. This project provides students aglimpse of what microcontrollers are capable of.II. Course OverviewThe course has a close relationship between the lecture and the laboratory. In lecture studentslearn how the MC68332 operates and in the laboratory students apply this understanding to gainpractical applied knowledge. During the first few weeks of the semester, the students are taughtthe architecture and the operations of the CPU while the laboratory teaches students, assemblyprogramming, debugging, and how to communicate with the MC68332 through the use of aresident debug program. Following
the RET was to enhance the ability ofselected high school teachers to teach ENGR 101 - Introduction to Engineering in their schoolsfor college credit. This project was designed to increase the teacher’s content knowledge andinquiry skills through a complete engineering research experience, from experimental design tofinal reporting. The participating teachers also developed several laboratory modules that werederived from their research and could easily be taken back and used in their classroom. The participants were recruited from a pool of 14 high school science teachers who hadpassed the University of South Carolina’s course ENGR 701 - Introduction to Engineering forTeachers. This course qualifies them to teach ENGR 101 in their
to give theelectrical engineering technology program immediate relevance, ECET 196 “Introduction toECET and Projects” has been designed to incorporate the teaching of these communication skills.This paper focuses specifically on my efforts to incorporate these features into this course andinto our undergraduate laboratory courses.IntroductionThe ability to communicate effectively is expected of all college graduates. The ability tocommunicate technical concepts well, distinguishes an outstanding technologist from an averageone. Students seeking to become engineering technicians or technologists often lack the basiccommunication skills. It has been written many times, that employers regard goodcommunication skills as a necessary element of
corporate foundations and state and federal agencies, and has numerous publications in refereed journals and edited books. Her research interests include communities of practice, gender, transformative learning, and identity.Dr. Peter Golding CPEng, University of Texas, El Paso Director, Center for Research in Engineering Education and Provost Faculty in Residence at the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning at The University of Texas at El Paso. Page 24.242.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Building Capacity for Preparing Teacher-Engineers
support theirinstructional needs.The specific objectives of the project include:1. Strengthening the educational infrastructure for computer science and engineering by incorporating advanced technology into courses and curricula2. Improving the delivery of laboratory and lectures3. Enhancing learning and teaching efficiency using computerized assessment platform4. Deepening students’ understanding of abstract concepts and enhancing students’ comprehension skills from theory to practice5. Promoting active learning and stimulate students’ interests in computer science and engineering subjects6. Developing support materials to assist faculty in the use of technology to support their instructional needsIn the sections below, we describe