fulfilling theirobligations to achieve the goals and objectives of their institutions. It comprises of :a) Improved teaching and learning necessary for deep understanding oftechnical information and skills – The effectiveness of teaching learning process is a function of multitude offactors like teacher, student, course curriculum, course planning and assessment. Page 17.41.2Hence, to have effective learning by the student, faculty development is must. 1However, shortage of training opportunities and attention to overall growth of facultyis adversely affecting
dissemination of an Embedded System Course through activeparticipation of students in the virtual environment.The VLES has been designed to deliver technical instruction and course materials in embeddedsystem design course through audio-video based distance learning. The supporting distancelearning curriculum and laboratory modules, using modular instructional materials along withVLES training, will be presented. The curriculum has been tested through summer workshopswhich demonstrated that VLES can be used for real-time teaching and learning hands-ontechnical subjects. A curriculum focusing on embedded system programming and utilizing thedeveloped training system, with lessons focused on Assembly Programming with peripheralsinterfacing modules, will
AC 2008-1633: DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF A BEAM TESTING SYSTEMFOR EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING IN MECHANICS OF MATERIALSRani Sullivan, Mississippi State University RANI W. SULLIVAN Rani W. Sullivan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Mississippi State University. She teaches the core courses in engineering mechanics and maintains a strong interest in developing experiential education. She received her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering in 2003, M.S. in Engineering Mechanics in 1993 and B.S. in Aerospace Engineering in 1989 from Mississippi State University. Her major technical interests are in solid mechanics, and in particular on the time-dependent deformation
Session 2548Generating Low Cost Serial Waveforms For Global Positioning System (GPS) Applications John D. Cremin Parks College of Engineering and Aviation Saint Louis UniversityAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to present a number of techniques for generating serial waveformsassociated with the Global positioning System (GPS) in a laboratory environment. The incentivefor this project was the need for simulating GPS data in a lab environment. The waveforms ofinterest are the output data signals provided by GPS receivers and used
early so that the project and all the clerical type stuff can be taken care of ahead of time. Better organization and less last minute decisions would really help to improve this course.” “The lab course lost value after the trip since we were done with the project” “Course should only be 8 weeks long if there is only one trip during spring break”V. Conclusions, Lessons Learned, and Future Work:Teaching the Global Engineering Laboratory component for the first time was a transformativeexperience that significantly enhanced the first author’s teaching skills. The development of thelaboratory content and structure allowed the refinement of the instructional approach, focusing onthe Inquiry-based learning model. This model, centered around student
predictive microbial growth/death mod- els for food safety risk assessment. Every fall, he teaches a large sophomore-level class on engineering properties of biological materials, which consists of both lectures and laboratory sessions with an enroll- ment of more than 70 students. Every spring, he teaches a junior-level course on principles of bioprocess engineering which has an enrollment of about 25 students. Page 25.511.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Electronic Student Homework Management Systems for Continuous Improvement and Program
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”A technology-based business incubator (ETSU Innovation Laboratory) was established at EastTennessee State University in 2002 as a component of the university’s strategic vision andmission. It is the intent of this paper to review steps taken by ETSU that made the creation of abusiness incubator on our campus a reality and that this information may serve as a mini-casestudy for others wishing to pursue a similar path. Elements achieving the establishment of abusiness incubator include defining strategic intent (senior administration buy-in), establishing auniversity research foundation, risk mitigation procedures, marketing the incubator, utilization ofthe incubator as a teaching tool and
Paper ID #35845Implementing strategies for virtual engineering educationMs. Hashmath Fathima, Morgan State University My name is Hashmath Fathima, a research assistant and a PhD student at Morgan State University. I am currently working on my dissertation, and my research is based on Social Media and Cyber harassment. My interests are ML, AI, and Cyber Security.Dr. Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University Dr. Kofi Nyarko is a Tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Morgan State University. He also serves as Director of the Engineering Visualization Research Laboratory (EVRL
affiliated with high schools and colleges including vocational schools. The followinglist provides the accomplishments made by this coalition: • Multi-institutional AM collaboration in teaching, laboratory practices and research [3], • Framework developed to measure the attainment of ABET Student Outcomes through AM curricular practices. [4], • Smart phone accessible AM laboratory platform for multi-institutional collaboration [5], • Up to date skills required of AM technicians [6], • TTS: studio-based AM training [7], • Using AM as an innovation tool to enhance the student learning and success [8-9], • Up to date MOOC AM
Session 1392 Women’s Manufacturing Workshop Series that Supports Inclusiveness and Skill Building in Undergraduate Engineering Education Beverly Louie, Daniel W. Knight and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan Women in Engineering Program/Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory and Program College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Colorado at BoulderAbstractDuring the past six years, pre-semester assessments of student skills have revealed a lack of hands-on experience by women students in the First
engineering collaboration have been proposed [18, 19].Previously, we reported on educational innovations to teach students of engineering aboutdevices with biomedical applications [20, 21, 22]. These teaching efforts included thedevelopment of devices in the laboratory [23], the deployment of these devices to the field (inthis case, the community environment) [24], and the ongoing improvement of devices to promotehuman health [25]. These efforts incorporated high school teachers as well as historicallyunderrepresented student populations to learn about and become involved in device development[26]. These prior efforts targeted long-standing problems of sustainable development includingsecure access to safe supplies of food and water [27, 28, 29, 30
Paper ID #25660Work in Progress: Building the Mechatronics and Robotics Education Com-munityProf. Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Michael A. Gennert is Professor of Robotics Engineering, CS, and ECE at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he leads the WPI Humanoid Robotics Laboratory and was Founding Director of the Robotics Engineering Program. He has worked at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, the University of California Riverside, PAR Technology Corporation, and General Electric. He received the S.B. in CS, S.B. in EE, and S.M. in EECS in 1980 and the Sc.D. in EECS in 1987 from MIT
design –an inexpensive Stirling engine that can be implemented at their schools. The project serves as an integrating exercise that combines the necessary hard skills in manufacturing (i.e., technical drawing, material selection, manufacturing process, and metrology) and soft skills (i.e., design methodology, teamwork, schedule planning, documentation, and communication). c) Clicker assessment. Daily clicker assessment summarizes and highlights key points in lectures and laboratory practices. It also helps to retain new knowledge while providing teaching materials for the participants at their respective schools. Much improvement has been observed among participants after the successful
the handling of corn/grain on a large commercialfarm.Class time not used for any of the above activities will again consist of a mixture of lectures andactive-learning components with each class linked to earlier classes and connected withinformation from other courses such as chemistry and physics. The variety of teaching methodsand styles incorporated by the instructor include traditional lectures, class activities, discussions,Socratic questioning, Powerpoint presentations, student instruction, cooperative and problem-based projects, demonstrations, discovery laboratories, online interactive simulations, etc. Byrotating though methods which appeal to visual, auditory, and tactile learners, every student isexposed to both their preferred
personnel.Our innovative approach capitalized on the facts that about 90-95% of BAE students have PCsand Internet access from their residence, and that our teaching test apparatuses are accessible andcontrolled through networked PCs. Thus in Spring 2002 and using the ENGR-4540/6540 course(Applied Machine Vision) as a starting point, we had designed a computer system, consisted of aWeb/FTP server and 2 completely equipped test stations, that allows students to access the teststations from anywhere in the Web to perform their laboratory assignments in spectrometry andmachine vision techniques without having to be physically present in the laboratory, but withoutloosing the touch and feel of actual hands-on experimentation (Thai2). This system is
students install the VPN client and has limited editing feature when using the free software. Screen capture of MS PowerPoint presentations using MS Expression or CamStudio produced good results, but produces a single voice track that is difficult to edit. Encoding video capture files can take a long time for some file formats. Adding narration and animation to PowerPoint and converting them to Adobe Flash format requires the least amount of development time. Editing the slide stack is easier than editing the audio and video files produced by other means. Pre-lab presentations review key laboratory concepts and present procedures before students execute course experiments. Graduate teaching assistants (TA’s) covered this content at the beginning
instructor. In high enrollment courses that have both lecture and laboratory components, studentratings of the lead faculty instructor may have two components: student attitudes about thecourse based on perceptions of the lead faculty person, and student attitudes about the coursebased on perceptions about the student’s teaching assistant (TA). It could be conjectured thatthese two sources of attitudes about the course merge in the perception of a student, and that animportant factor in the rating a student gives to a faculty person is the rating the student gives tohis TA or vice versa. Certainly, anecdotal evidence is available that if a student is unhappy witha TA, the same student may be unhappy with the course in general, and with the
. The design process takes a student throughdifferent phases of “real world.” The "team" approach is appreciated by the students. Theretention rates show that this approach has been quite successful.References[1] R. Pendse and E. Johnson, “Big Bang Small Bucks: Effective Use of Low-Cost CAD Packages,” Frontiersin Education Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, November 1996.[2] R. Pendse, "Effective Laboratory Teaching-- What Works for Me," ASEE Midwest section conference,Wichita, Kansas, March 1995.Biographical InformationRAVI PENDSE is an assistant professor in Electrical Engineering Department at Wichita State University. Hisresearch interests include Computer Architecture, Rehabilitation Engineering, and Digital Design.EVERETT JOHNSON
resources can be more effective in engaging students andimproving student performance than those provided by textbook publishers38.The online Graphics class at Cañada College was developed by an engineering instructor whohas been teaching the face-to-face version of the class for about 20 years, and has been teachingonline lecture courses (Statics, Dynamics, Circuits lecture, Materials lecture) deliveredsynchronously for the past several years. The online Graphics class is the first asynchronousclass to be developed by this instructor. Online course materials that have been developedinclude PowerPoint lectures, lecture videos, video tutorials, laboratory exercises, and homeworkassignments. Most lecture videos and video tutorials were created and
-to-face section offered in the same semester. For the Fall 2015 pilot implementation, Table 1 showsa comparison of the online section and the face-to-face section of the Engineering Graphicscourse. The online section was taught by the engineering instructor (Professor A) who developedthe online course. The face-to-face course was taught by an adjunct instructor (Professor B) whowas teaching the graphics class for the first time. The two instructors used the same PowerPointlectures to deliver content to students. For the online class, the PowerPoint slides were presentedin pre-recorded lecture videos, while the PowerPoint slides were presented by the instructorduring class time for the face-to-face section. The same laboratory exercises with
-determined “bundles” of assignments [18].The last several years have seen an increase in the use of specifications grading in highereducation courses in STEM, including examples in chemistry [19], biology [20], physics [21],mathematics [22], first-year engineering [23], [24], engineering computer applications [25],engineering mechanics [26], thermodynamics [27], fluid mechanics [28], biomedical engineeringstatistics [24], a chemical engineering laboratory [29], a biomedical engineering elective course[30], and capstone design [24].This paper will describe the implementation of specifications grading in two offerings of anundergraduate fluid mechanics course, one with lecture and laboratory components and a lecture-only course the following year
)investigating licensed, proprietary, industrial network software. A PLC will be present in all theworking testbeds since the factory PLC is available in the teaching laboratory. Testbeds were createdboth at our laboratory and at a local industry site. Use of the industry site allowed testing of someproprietary software that is not present in our class laboratory.II. Site Hardware and Licensed SoftwareThe hardware used for the work varied somewhat by location. At the industry site, RS 500 softwareand MicroLogix 1100 PLCs were used. In our class laboratory, CompactLogix PLCs are used. In eachlocation, Ethernet switches carried the information to and from devices on a Local Area Network(LAN). In each location, Windows-based PCs were used. Because the
the lab. Following introductions, the 15 students were split intotwo groups: Group A (8) engaged in the laboratory experiment first while Group B (7) was takenon the engineering tour first. This arrangement was mirrored at the 1 ½ hour mark. Thelaboratory experiment was led by a university-trained undergraduate teaching assistant. Studentswere told that they should try to complete at least one of the experimental exercises, but wereencouraged to attempt as many as possible. Student learning was self-regulated: trying first anddiscovering the results. The tour was led by a trained undergraduate university student tourguide.The Student Laboratory Experience: Results and Feedback from the ParticipantsOf the 15 student participants, 87% started
ledto each university implementing a varying approach, these factors include: the software systemsutilized, computing/laboratory resources available, current and expected student profiles, as wellas the overall expected competencies.The software used at each university was based on instructor experience as well as industrysupport. Even though each university uses varying software, the interesting similarity is thenumber of software systems being used. Each course emphasizes process-oriented teaching,focusing on the process rather than the product [6]. The instructors all value the use of multiplesoftware tools rather than a singular platform to teach the different processes. Each instructorstrives to mirror the AEC industry trends and software
laboratory experi- ments. He is currently doing a collaborative research funded by NSF on Smart Grid energy routers design. Dr. Osareh can be reached at osareh@ncat.eduDr. John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University Dr. John Okyere Attia is Professor of the Electrical and Computer Engineering at Prairie View A&M University. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in Electrical and Computer Engineering in the field of Electronics, Circuit Analysis, Instrumentation Systems, and VLSI Design. Dr. Attia earned his c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #17045 Ph.D
meet weekly in lecture and in a laboratory setting found that project managers spend a minimum of 20% of minimal incentive for the lab managers to learn from these videos.• BMED students are randomized and placed into groups of five students and each their time dealing with conflicts. The watch rate of the videos ranged from 28% to 44%, indicating that group is assigned to an upperclassmen undergraduate BME student mentor, a the module videos did not have a substantial effect on the lab “lab manager”(LM), through the Effective Teaching
. This course has been developed and is taught by faculty from bothdepartments. The course includes the use of discrete components and FieldProgrammable Gate Arrays (FPGA). A set of custom hardware components have beendeveloped that can be interfaced to an FPGA and a microcontroller. Instructional videoshelp students prepare for laboratory exercises and the course concludes with a finaldesign-build project.The overall goal of this project is to teach students how to work in multi-disciplinaryteams and to make it easier for students to switch between AS and AAS programs. ACapstone Design course is being developed where small teams comprised of PrecisionMachining, Engineering Science, and Computer Technology students will solve asemester long
convenience. They are not just intended to replace handcalculations like some textbook specific programs but to learn various analysis procedures instep-by-step interactive tutorial fashion and to conduct large-scale design simulations for open-ended design problems. A couple of pilot studies were conducted with students at various levelsto test the effectiveness of the toolboxes in teaching and learning the fundamental mechanicscourses. It is suggested that use of such toolboxes in laboratory setting would be most effective.This paper will present experiences how the toolboxes have been developed and how they areefficiently used in teaching and learning the fundamental mechanics courses.Introduction The fundamental mechanics course sequence
teaching methodologies so as to better prepare tomorrow's engineers.The co-authors participated in the program in 1997 (Kumar) and 1998 (Eberhardt). Uponleaving the program each participant had to present what was learned and what new goalswill be set after leaving the program. There is no long-term follow-up of these goals. Inthis paper the co-authors will provide their long-term achievements resulting from theWelliver program.IntroductionThe Boeing Company initiated a program in 1995 called the Boeing - A.D. WelliverFaculty Summer Fellowship program (WFSF), in honor of the former chief engineer,Bert Welliver. This program is a product of a series of joint workshops organized byindustry and academia to identify effective measures that promote
amandatory problem-solving laboratory once a week. The department that the course was taughtout of as well as the status of the instructor (full or part time and length of time teaching thecourse) was collected. The instructor was contacted for textbook and syllabus information. Thedata collected is shown in Table 1. Note that the number one denotes "Yes", the number twodenotes "No", "R" denotes required, and "TE" indicates technical elective. Timing describes theapproximate time the course engineering economy is taken, with one being the first semester ofthe freshman year and eight being the second semester of the senior year. It should be noted that the semester during which engineering economy was taken is notnecessarily the same as when