partnerinstitutions. In an effort to look at engineering undergraduate’s experiences over time, this paperincludes evaluation findings from both awards who attended the 4-year undergraduateengineering degree program at UCSB. It is important to note that in ESTEEM 2, some of theseScholars first joined ESTEEM as community college students and continued as Scholars aftertransferring if they transferred into an engineering major at UCSB.MethodsThis paper focuses on a secondary analysis of evaluation reports and data from UCSB Scholarswho participated in ESTEEM from 2011 to 2023, spanning two project funding cycles.Evaluation reports included both quantitative data from tracking surveys and qualitative datafrom open-ended survey questions and focus groups
human topics please see ourprevious work [3]. Figure 4. Q1 GAI-generated topics mapped to human-generated topics (themes) The GAI and the manual qualitative coding approach identified several main topicsrelated to the online learning experience during the pandemic, suggesting alignment in capturingcore student concerns. Both highlighted topics around interactivity/engagement, communication,instructor support, feedback, instructions/resources, flexibility, and teaching methods. Forexample, the "Interactivity and Engagement" topic from the GAI aligned with human codesaround class participation, teamwork, and project assignments - all factors impacting howengaged students felt. The "Feedback" topic also directly matched between GAI
Paper ID #42821From Mind Full to Mindful: Proposing Mindfulness as a Proactive Strategyfor Safeguarding Mental Health in Engineering Education.Vanessa Tran, Utah State University Vanessa Tran is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU). She earned a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Architecture (UAH) and a Master’s in Global Production Engineering and Management from the Vietnamese-German University (VGU) in Vietnam. Her research interest lies in enhancing the well-being of engineering students and educators. She is currently working on an NSF-funded project
: • RQ1: What are the curriculum complexity and study abroad participation rates for the largest majors at Purdue University? • RQ2: What is the correlation between curriculum complexity and study abroad participation at Purdue University? • RQ3: Is there a significant difference in curricular complexity or study abroad participation across colleges at Purdue University?Our project can provide insights to engineering programs seeking to improve study abroadparticipation about the challenges that may arise from curricular complexity and what strategiesmay help address this issue. Background In this section we will first describe perceptions of how challenging it is to study
collaborative research projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student success, as well as the schooling experiences of Mexican-descent youth in the mid-20th century.Jennifer Tygret ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Improving University Postdoctoral Affairs Offices: Viewpoints from Engineering Postdoctoral Scholars of ColorAbstractAn instrumental case study (Stake, 1995) explores the perceptions and opinions of engineeringpostdoctoral scholars of color about ways to improve university postdoctoral affairs offices tobetter
measuredfrom ‘1’= strongly disagree to ‘5’ = strongly agree. In question 8, students were given multiplechoice selections on the average time they spend using AI tools per week. In question 9, studentschoose the main reasons they use them, whether for help with complex topics, research, orwriting. The survey results are outlined in Table 1, providing insights into the current use of AItools by CEE students with implications for educational approaches in engineering.The Institutional Review Board (IRB) has determined that this project, 'Integrating ArtificialIntelligence into Electrical Engineering Education: A Paradigm Shift in Teaching and Learning,'is exempt from review by the IRB for the Protection of Human Subjects.The survey was conducted in a
Paper ID #38681Utilization of Real-Life Hands-On Pedagogy to Motivate UndergraduateStudents in Grasping Transportation Related ConceptsAdebayo Iyanuoluwa Olude, Morgan State UniversityDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi, P.E., Morgan State University Adebayo Olude is a doctoral student and research assistant at Morgan State University’s Department of Civil Engineering in Baltimore, Maryland. Adebayo formerly worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at Eastern Mediterranean University in North Cyprus, where he earned his master’s degree in civil engineer- ing. He also worked as a project Analyst with AgileP3 after graduating with a
the needsof the user. Additionally, including comprehensive tutorials, guides, and instructional resourcesempowers educators, researchers, and enthusiasts to build, program, and use the robot in the mostappropriate way for their needs. Since the entire project follows the principles of open-sourcehardware, it fosters collaboration and knowledge sharing, thereby enabling a global community oflearners and innovators. Finally, there will be a discussion on how open-source robotics, combined with modularityand accessible educational materials, revolutionizes robotics education by providing acustomizable, hands-on learning experience to serve as a valuable resource for diversecommunities, fostering a passion for technology, and
specific goalsrelated to increasing diversity and inclusion in enrollment and degree attainment. The pledgecommits the signatory programs to engage in four activities to promote diversity in enrollment,retention, and graduation rates which will lead to increased diversity in the workforce andengineering faculty. Applicants must be members of the ASEE Engineering Deans Council(EDC) or the Engineering Technology Council (ETC). The program is projected to have threelevels of recognition: Bronze, Silver and Gold. Currently applicants can apply for bronze status,reaffirmation of bronze status, direct to silver status or silver status (for current bronzeinstitutions).Literature ReviewSelection and persistence of STEM majors has been attributed to four
Paper ID #45761A Gender-based Comparative Analysis of Motivations and Challenges in ConstructionEducationDr. Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an associate professor in the Department of Building Construction Science at Mississippi State University. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include community resilience, engineering education, simulation and serious games, project management methodologies, data analytics, creativity and innovation, and emerging technologies.Mr. George D Ford P.E., Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi Stateˆa C™s Building
visible and less visible identities as they form their professional identity, specifically at the intersection of their racial/ethnic, sexual orientation, gender, and engineering identities. H´ector’s research projects range from autoethnographic inquiries that investigate culturally informed collaborative qualitative research spaces, neurodivergence and disability in engineering, and examining the structural factors that impact student experiences in computer engineering courses. H´ector has taught various engineering courses and is invested in showing learners he cares about them and their future success. He creates a space where learners can feel safe to experiment, iterate, and try different problem-solving
equity-oriented teaching.Author ContributionsDuring the project, Mann and Golecki conceived of, developed and delivered the workshop andco-facilitated the CoP. Hajj, Cvetkovic, Chang, and Ansari were CoP members and contributedto all CoP activities. Wright and Althaus are project co-PIs and conceived of and organized theoverarching DEEP Center workshop and CoP structure. All authors contributed equally to thewriting.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2308531. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. F. Cabrera, A
engineers’ engagement with public-welfare related, human-centred designing frameworks.Dr. Frederic Boy, Swansea University Frederic Boy is an Associate Professor in Digital Analytics and Cognitive Neuroscience at Swansea Uni- versity’s School of Management and an honorary Senior Lecturer in Engineering at University College, London. Previously, he did his PhD in Grenoble University and trained in Cardiff University, where he held a Wellcome Trust VIP fellowship. His research interests include brain science, cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence and biomedical engineering. He is working on a range of multidisciplinary projects at the intersection of neuroscience and engineering, digital humanities and, more
components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses; that work resulted in Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2018). His current research grant project explores how to foster and assess sociotechnical thinking in engineering science and design courses.Dr. Ann D. Christy P.E., The Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She earned both her B.S. in agricultural engineering and M.S. in biomedical engineering at OSU, and her Ph.D. in environmental
and interest include NationalGirls Collaborative Project, Girls in Tech, Association for women in science and Society ofWomen Engineering (SWE). There are so many examples of the populist attitude in the modernworld that extensive justification is not needed. It shows that society not only wants its youngpeople to learn this knowledge, but it needs them to, in order to sustain and progress the humancondition.The Open Source CommunityThe Open Source Community (OSC) may at first seem like a Marxist organization demandingthe distribution of knowledge and intellectual property. However, the opposite is true. It putsforth a radical free-market ethos, in that it asserts the protections afforded to large multi-million-dollar companies should be
pre-service teachers. In addition to her professional role, Ms. Hayes is also a doctoral candidate in the Higher Education Program at the University of Maryland. Her research focuses on community college students and transfer student success.Ms. Danielle Melvin Koonce, University of Maryland Danielle is a 3rd year PhD Student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Maryland studying race and social movements. Danielle is primarily a qualitative researcher and has worked extensively on survey data and conducting interviews for several projects including a campus climate survey, the Women’s Resistance marches as well as Black Lives Matter.Ms. Christin Jacquelyne Salley, University of Maryland, College
Postsecondary Education at Western Michigan University. Recently, Dan has been involved with the Broncos FIRST FITW project and has developed ongoing research with stakeholders from Kalamazoo Promise and the Upjohn Institute. One of Dan’s most recent articles employed ma- chine learning techniques to model sentiments surrounding the previously announced tuition-free college program Americans College Promise - the article can be found in the Journal of Further and Higher Edu- cation. Dan is adept at quantitative and qualitatively methods and is currently finishing up a data scientist certificated fixated on Big Data, Geospatial Data, and Data Visualization. c American Society for Engineering
than either the ASI or Neosexism scale [85], [86], [87], two of the original fourscales used in the pilot study, so the SATW replaced both as a measure of explicit sexismIn order to include data on implicit bias, two items were added to the collection instrumentdirecting respondents to complete the online Project Implicit association tests for Gender -Science (IAT-GC) and Gender - Career (IAT-GS) and to report their final scores on each, asreported to them by the instrument [88]. Data were converted to a 5-point response scale forstatistical analysis. Notably, the validity of the IAT scores is dependent on data that reside in theProject Implicit database, so internal consistency of the reported scores for the Gender – CareerImplicit
. In the mid-1970s, David Kolb published works thatcategorized human learning styles and how they respond to various types of experientiallearning.2 At least three out of Kolb’s four learning styles benefitted most through “concreteexperience” and “active experimentation.”2 Furthermore, Schumann, et. al., reported that manystudents who leave engineering do so because of a lack of interest in the topics.3 In 2010, in aneffort to increase retention rates among engineering programs, the National Science Foundationsponsored a project called “Engage.”4 One of the three objectives of this project is to increaseretention by “Integrating into coursework everyday examples in engineering (E3s).”4 Also, asampling of recent papers that studied the
managed a European Social Fund Project in Women in Engineering contributing to widening participation and inclusion of women engineers, developed and ran world-class innovative aca- demic practice methods in Career Development, Employability and designed and managed staff workload models. Since 2014, Jo˜ao developed and led transnational education partnerships in several countries in south East Asia and led a group of institutions under the group Star Education based in Singapore as Executive c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #28870 Dean and Senior Vice President. His
insights into the potential importance of socioculturalinterventions within engineering classrooms to improve the engineering climate, engagement, andretention of women and Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous (BLI) students. INTRODUCTION This research paper investigates predictors of engineering identity at the beginning of afirst-year engineering course as part of a larger project to understand continued enrollment inengineering courses. Retaining interested undergraduate students in engineering tracks requires aclear understanding of the predictors and influences on continued enrollment in engineeringcourses. Particularly, the retention of women of all races/ethnicities, and students who identify
, foster motivation and psychological growth. These psychological needs areautonomy, competence, and relatedness. Autonomy involves being and acting in harmony withone's integrated sense of self and values as well as feeling that one has ownership over one’sactions. In educational environments, autonomy is visible when learning environments offerlearners opportunities for choice, self-direction, and flexibility rather than imposing strict or rigiddirection and demands. Learners are thus motivated when they have choice in their academicpathways, courses, learning topics, classroom projects, etcetera based on their interests andaspirations. Competence involves mastering tasks and learning new skills and involves a sense ofaccomplishment derived from
M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. His research interest includes decision quality, resilient design, set-based design, engineering and project management, and engineering education. During his time at the University of Arkansas, Eric has served as Principal Investigator, Co-Principal Investigator, or Senior Personnel on over 40 research projects totaling over $6.6 Million, which produced over 50 publications (journal articles, book chapters, conference proceedings, newsletters, and technical reports). He is an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) where he has served in
What’s Next? From Analysis to ActionAbstractThis paper describes how data-driven examination of barriers to successful completion ofundergraduate engineering degrees amongst female-identifying and under-represented minority(URM) students at Seattle University has shaped the development of new policies and programswithin the College of Science and Engineering to better support students from underrepresentedor marginalized groups. This study is a continuation of a project in which we first analyzedgraduation data to extract characteristics that differentiate students who do or do not successfullycomplete degrees within engineering. We followed the data analysis with a survey to betterunderstand the experiences of students from underrepresented or
society through investigating community-based leMr. William Cohen, Ohio State University William Cohen is a Lecturer for the Fundamentals of Engineering program at The Ohio State University: a 2 semester course sequence for first-year engineering students focusing on programming in MATLAB, computer aided drawing in SolidWorks, and a semester long design-build-test project. William has also received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Ohio State.Dr. James Edward Toney, Ohio State University James Toney earned the Ph.D. in physics from Carnegie Mellon University in 1998 and the B.S. in electri- cal engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1984. He is a Senior Lecturer in the
registered professional mechan- ical engineer with 15 years experience as a practicing engineer. She earned a BSME degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a MSME degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at USU. She is Principal Investigator for Online Learning Forums for Improved Engineering Student Outcomes in Calculus, a research project funded by the NSF TUES program. Her research interests include engineering student learning, distance engineering education, and alternative pathways to engineering education.Dr. Joshua Marquit, Pennsylvania State University, Brandywine Joshua Marquit is an Instructor in the Psychology Department at Penn State
TechnologyDr. Eric J. AlmDr. Alison F Takemura, US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Alison loves wading into a good science story. Her first was her MIT doctoral thesis project, unlocking the gastronomical genome of a Vibrio bacterium. For some of the Vibrio’s meals, she collected seaweed from the rocky, Atlantic coastline at low tide. (Occasionally, its waves swept her off her feet.) During grad school, Alison was also a fellow in MIT’s Biological Engineering Communication Lab. Helping students share their science with their instructors and peers, she began to crave the ability to tell the stories of other scientists, and the marvels they discover, to a broader audience. So after graduating in 2015 with a
that most of the papers with a focus onstudent engagement (139 in total) that were published between 2003 to 2023 reported howvarious educational interventions, such as use of distinctive pedagogies (e.g., project-basedlearning [2]; service learning [3]; game-based learning [4]), could enhance student engagement.While these studies contribute to identifying effective pedagogical approaches to enhancing theengagement of students at large, they were not designed to investigate who were more, or less,engaged in the educational practice; therefore, they do not inform how those students who wereless engaged in learning could be better supported to achieve optimal learning outcomes
to four-year universities to studyengineering bring a diverse range of experiences and perspectives, which greatly contribute to thefield of engineering and help national and regional workforce development. However, thesestudents face specific challenges, referred to as the vertical transfer penalty, when they transfer tofour-year universities. This can lead to lower completion rates for community college starterscompared to students who start at four-year universities. The issue seems to be related to factorsregarding the students' experiences, institutional characteristics, and geographic location. Thisstudy marks the initial stage of a comprehensive research project aiming to compare historicaltransfer student data over the past two