objectives of the FDS program, and theircontributions are deeply appreciated.References[1] J. Roy and A. Erdiaw-Kwasie, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2022,” By the Numbers, https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/12/Graduate-Engineering-Rankings-December-2023.pdf (accessed Feb. 7, 2024).[2] S. Hurtado, Enacting Diverse Learning Environments. Jossey-Bass, 1999.[3] Santiago, Sotto, and Sylk M. What Gets Lost in the Numbers: A Case Study of the Experiences and Perspectives of Black and Latino Faculty in Academic Medicine. 1 Jan. 2017. Accessed 8 Feb. 2024.[4] Villarejo, Merna, et al. “Encouraging Minority Undergraduates to Choose Science Careers: Career Paths Survey Results.” CBE—Life
concentrated on particular disadvantaged populations, they become aninequity built into societal structure; that is, they constitute a structural inequity. In the case of themarket for used cars, much has been done since the 1970’s to mitigate structural inequity, and wecan certainly learn from them in addressing inequities in the transfer student market.2.1 Expert Verification and HistoryA major contributing factor to information asymmetry in the used car market is the fact that carsare highly complex mechanical structures, making it exceedingly difficult for non-experts to assesstheir quality. One method buyers have for dealing with this is through expert verification, namely,by having a trained mechanic inspect a car prior to purchasing it.We
] "Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT)," V. U. C. f. Teaching, Ed., ed.[3] S. Simkins and M. Maier, Just-in-time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Stylus, 2010.[4] J. L. Riskowski, "Teaching undergraduate biomechanics with Just-in-Time Teaching," Sports Biomechanics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 168-179, 2015/04/03 2015, doi: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1030686.[5] M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.[6] R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and B. A. Oakley, Teaching and Learning STEM : A Practical Guide. Newark, UNITED STATES: John Wiley &
dialoguearound diversity and social justice,” in The Art of Effective Facilitation, L. M. Landreman, Ed.New York, NY, USA: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2013, pp. 135-150.[6] E. A. Cech, “The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization andmeritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices,” in Engineering Educationfor Social Justice. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 10, J. Lucena, Ed. Dordrecht,the Netherlands: Springer, 2013[7] R. Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge,UK: Polity, 2019.[8] S. U. Noble, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York,NY, USA: NYU Press, 2018.[9] V. Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools
. "Using personal learning environments before, during and after the pandemic: The case of “e-me”." Education Sciences 13, no. 1 (2023): 87.[5] Lester, J., Klein, C., Rangwala, H., & Johri, A. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education: ASHE Higher Education Report. John Wiley & Sons.[6] Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (applications and reviews), 40(6), 601-618.[7] Markowska-Kaczmar, U., Kwasnicka, H., & Paradowski, M. (2010). Intelligent techniques in personalization of learning in e-learning systems. In Computational Intelligence for Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 1-23). Berlin
LatePenalties in Programming Assignments.” Western Canadian Conference on ComputingEducation 2006.[7] Wyre S. “An argument for accepting late work”. Faculty Focus. August 21, 2019.[8] Boucher E. “It’s time to ditch our deadlines”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. August 22,2016.[9] Savini C. “Are You Being Rigorous or Just Intolerant?”. The Chronicle of Higher Education.May 4, 2016.[10] Hills M, Peacock K. “Replacing power with flexible structure: Implementing flexibledeadlines to improve student learning experiences”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry. Vol. 102022.[11] Jansen D, Petry K, Ceulemans E, Noens I, Baeyens D. “Functioning and participationproblems of students with ASD in higher education: Which reasonable accommodations areeffective
-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed.[3] "The Engineering for One Planet Framework: Essential Learning Outcomes for Engineering Education," Engineering for One Planet, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringforoneplanet.org/wp-content/uploads/eop_engineering-for-one- planet_framework.pdf[4] C. G. Bocean, M. M. Nicolescu, M. Cazacu, and S. Dumitriu, "The Role of Social Responsibility and Ethics in Employees’ Wellbeing," vol. 19, ed: MDPI, 2022.[5] N. Idoiaga Mondragon, I. Yarritu, E. Saez de Cámara, N. Beloki, and L. Vozmediano, "The challenge of education for sustainability in higher education: key themes and competences within the University of the
/43551172.[4] R. V. Adams, and E. Blair, “Impact of time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, Jan. 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824506.[5] C. Engstrom and V. Tinto, “Access without Support Is Not Opportunity,” Change, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 46-50, Feb. 2008. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40178285.[6] B. Verplanken, and S. Orbell, “Attitudes, Habits, and Behavior Change,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 73:327-352, pp. 327-352, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- psych-020821-011744.Appendix IThe following subsections outline different sections and their purpose and provide a visualreference.Yearly and Weekly Overview
. 94, No. 1, pp. 52-72, 2005.[4] Felder, R. M., “Matters of Style”, ASEE Prism, 6(4), pp.18-23, December 1996.[5] Ghanat, S. T., Brannan, K., Welch, R. W., Bower, K. C.,“Comparison of Direct and Indirect Assessment of a Summer Engineering Economy Course taught with Active Learning Techniques,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015.[6] Linsky, E., Georgi, G., “Teaching Four Different Communication Styles In Freshman Engineering,” Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.[7] Wilk, Richard D., Anderson, Ann M., “Development of Communication Skills Across the Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the American Society for
] Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum. doi: 10.17226/18254.[4] A. Wittig, “Implementing Problem Based Learning through Engineers without Borders Student Projects,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2013, Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076104[5] S. M. Kusano and A. Johri, “Developing Global Engineering Competency Through Participation in ‘Engineers Without Borders,’” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.500.1-26.500.14. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-global-engineering-competency- through-participation-in
by its inclusion in the 2017-2018 biennial report of the NSF’s Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering(13) presented to the U.S. Congress, which states that: “[s]upported by NSF’s Division ofEngineering Education and Centers, this REU site is directed by NSF Faculty Early CareerDevelopment Program awardee […] to provide undergraduate students with Attention DeficitHyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with interdisciplinary research experience in the cyber andphysical security aspects of critical infrastructure resilience. […] This effort is changing theeducation paradigm from deficit–based to strength–based and make engineering education moreinclusive of diverse learning and thinking styles.”The impact of the program on the
. Dorneich, W. Rogers, S. D. Whitlow, and R. DeMers, “Human performance risks andbenefits of adaptive systems on the flight deck,” International Journal of Aviation Psychology,vol. 26, pp. 15-35, 2016[2] B. Seijo-Pardo, I. Porto-Díaz, V. Bolón-Canedo, and A. Alonso-Betanzos, “Ensemble featureselection: Homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 118,pp. 124–139, 2017[3] X. Li, J. Zhang, and J. Han, “Trajectory planning of load transportation with multi-quadrotors based on reinforcement learning algorithm,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol.116, 2021[4] L. Zhang, B. Whiteley, D. K. Sharma, I. Dabipi, W. L. Brown, W. Zhu, and X. Tan, “On theexploration of game-based learning in STEM education with the development and
. 7Song, Wichin, Sung Jieun, and Chang Youngbae. (2011). A proposal to fuse science/technology with humanities/social sciences to solve social problems. Science and Technology Policy Institute, pp. 1-164.Star, S. L., and J. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'Translations', and Bound ary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science 19: 387-420.Whitehead, N. Alfred. (1929). The Aims of Higher Education. 8
coupled with online classes) or completely virtual campus. Similarly, student supportprograms had to adjust quickly.In academic and professional environments, mentors often take the role(s) of advocates, counselors,advisors, and/or friends 6,4 . Ensher et al. 2 enumerated three major support avenues provided bymentors: (1) vocational or instrumental, (2) psychological, and (3) role models. Vocational orinstrumental support is provided when a mentee’s career is enhanced by opportunities such assponsorship, visibility, or providing challenging tasks through the mentoring relationship 2 .Psychological support could be provided through a mentor-mentee friendship, counseling, ormentor’s encouragement 2 . Finally, mentors could also serve as role
. JRC120911). Adopted at the 3617th European Union Councilmeeting. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONSIL:ST_9009_2018_INIT&from=ENJackson, D. (2014). Factors influencing job attainment in recent Bachelor graduates:Evidence from Australia. Higher Education, 68(1), 135–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9696-7Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2019). Employability in engineering education: Areengineering students ready for work? In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M.Meganck, & M. Murphy (Eds.), The Engineering-Business Nexus (Vol. 32, pp. 499–520).Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_22Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral
• Should you use =, is, or == to calculate the answer? • This predicate is only meant to be used in situations where you know the first two pa- rameters. Do not call it with variables as either of the first two parameters in the call. • You will likely need to write more than one rule named add. • You may need to test the type of one of the parameters to know whether to use a rule with + or a rule with string concat. • Do not worry about calls to add like add(3, 3.14) or add(3, “hi”) for this assignment. Autograder test cases test case fail response(s) add(3, 4, 7) Doh! Your results were: results. add(3.2, 4.6, 7.8) Doh! Your results were: results
Paper ID #38510First-year Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging: Impact of COVID-19and Efficacy as a Predictor of GraduationBreanna Graven, University of Louisville PhD candidate in curriculum and instruction with focus on informal science education. Graduate research assistant for the First-Year Engineering department studying ways to improve student retention.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the
. “Learning by Doing” is a common training process which is a well-known theory ofeducation popularized by philosopher John Dewy in the 1930’s [5].Conclusions and RecommendationsIt is important to understand that these projects are missions that for engineer leaders are vehiclesfor training in preparation for any possible deployment. Engineer leaders and craftsmen on theground focus on skills critical to successful project planning and management. LearningObjectives 8 through 12 are consistently a focus during training events. Is the military missing anopportunity to better incorporate sustainable design (LO 13), data collection long term impactanalysis (LO 6), and stakeholder history and cultural education to develop military engineers intoglobal
still exist betweenmale and female students, especially in STEM. Given these findings, we intend to extend thisstudy by investigating why LCDLMs fostered similar forms of engagement for males andfemales. LCDLMs are inexpensive miniature prototypes of industrial equipment; participantsinteract with the LCDLMs without fear of damaging the equipment. Researchers [17]hypothesize that men are more likely to take risks than women. Although preliminary, we predictthat the female participants in our study were as comfortable using the LCDLMs as the maleparticipants because the modules are inexpensive. Future studies will carefully examine thishypothesis.References[1] E. S. Pietri et al., “Addressing Unintended Consequences of Gender Diversity
. Kazemersky and D. Alp, "An alternate learning approach for the engineering management program at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga," in 2000 Annual Conference Proceedings, 2000.[4] S. Motavalli, H. Zong, F. Ganjeizadeh and D. Bowen, "Development of a new masters degree program in engineering management," in 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings, 2005.[5] R. Dusseau, "History of the online master of engineering management program at Rowan University," in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2014.[6] N. Cherbaka and J. Lavelle, "Proposing an Engineering Management program at North Carolina State University," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009.[7] L. Stauffer, "A model for the graduation
. References[1] Tan, L., Main, J., Darolia, R. (2021). Using random forest analysis to identify studentdemographic and high school-level factors that predict college engineering major choice. Journalof Engineering Education, 110 (3), 572-593. [Accessed: March 28, 2022].[2] Sarma, S. Grasp. New York: Doubleday, 2020.[3] Astra Nova. Astra Nova, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://astranova.org. [Accessed: March28, 2022].[4] Dahn, J. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 28, 2022).[5] Dahn, J. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 28, 2022).[6] Frank, C. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 27, 2022).[7] Frank, C. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 27, 2022).[8] Young Engineers. Young Engineers, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://youngengineers.com
Paper ID #36481The Women of Color in Engineering CollaborativeDr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Roberta Rincon is the Associate Director of Research with the Society of Women Engineers, where she oversees the organizationˆaTM s research activities around issues impacting girls and women from ele- mentary through college and into the engineering workDr. Rochelle L Williams, National Society of Black Engineers Rochelle L. Williams, Ph.D. is Chief Programs Officer at the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) and is responsible for supporting the strategic outcomes and implementation of NSBE programs from
Graduate Education, Commission on the Future of Graduate Education in the United States, 2010. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeast Section Conference2 National Research Council. (2015). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19007.3 Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. Report No.: 99.4 Ferraro, C., Jordan, R., Kopp, R. E., Bond, S. L., Gong, J., Andrews, C. J., ... & McDonnell, J. Training Students to Improve Coastal
; Mantzavinou, A. (2018) Design thinking in development engineering education: a case study oncreating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world. Development Engineering, 3, 166-74.11 Wurdinger, S., Haar, J., Hugg, R., & Bezon, J. (2007). A qualitative study using project-based learning in a main-stream middle school. Improving Schools, 10(2), 150–161.12 Boaler, J. (1998). Alternative approaches to teaching, learning and assessing mathematics. Evaluation and Pro-gram Planning, 21(2), 129–141.Marjorie Letitia Hubbard, PhDDr. Marjorie Letitia Hubbard is a member of the engineering and research faculty at the NorthCarolina School of Science and Math (NCSSM) in Durham, North Carolina. As an engineeringinstructor at NCSSM, Dr
MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and AGEP, S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Ms. Andrea Stancescu, NC State University Hello, My name is Andrea Stancescu and I am a junior in the undergraduate applied mathematics and statistics program at NC State. I have been working with Dr. Brawner since August of 2021 on collecting and analyzing the survey results from the AGEP-NC project. I am looking forwards to working with everyone!Dr. Maureen Grasso, NC State University Maureen Grasso former Dean of the Graduate School at North Carolina State University and the Univer- sity of Georgia has over 16 years as a dean in
in space and earth system sciences as well asprecision agriculture and environmental stewardship are aligned with the NASA and USDAeducational and research objectives, the land grant mission of University of Maryland EasternShore(UMES), workforce development undertakings, and the goals of the “Smart Farming” and“AIRSPACES” projects ongoing on campus for the past several years. Since their inception, theseprojects have embraced the experiential learning paradigm within a multidisciplinary verticallyintegrated project framework [1, 2]. Undergraduate engineering and computer science students, aswell as other STEM majors, have worked alongside graduate student(s) in the doctoral program inFood Science and Technology (FDST) to advance the project
/09585192.2013.826714 [6] P.K. Matsuda & T. Silva. “Cross-cultural composition: Mediated integration of US and international students”. Composition Studies, 27(1), pp. 15-30, 1999. [7] M. Rowlings & E. Sue. “Preparedness of Chinese students for American culture and communicating in English”. Journal of International Students, 3(1), pp. 29-40, 2013. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v3i1.516 [8] S. Wang, X. Sun & C. Liu. “Intercultural analysis of communication anxieties encountered by international students in the United States”. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(2), pp. 217-234, 2010. https://www-s3-live.kent.edu/s3fs-root/s3fs- public/file/16SongWangXiujieSunChangyuanLiu.pdf [9] Education for
funded in 2014-2018 under grant EEC-1359137, in 2010-2013 under grant EEC-1004915 and in 2006-2008 under grant EEC-0552737.References1. E. Seymour, A.-B Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, T. "Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: first findings from a three-year study," Sci. Educ., 88, pp. 493-594, 2004.2. A.W. Astin, What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass., 1993.3. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T., How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., 1991.4. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for
Classroom in the Online Environment of Covid? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022. 30(2): p. 517-531.5. Morgan, J., E. Lindsay, C. Howlin, and M. Bogaard, Pathways of Students' Progress through an on-Demand Online Curriculum, in ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.6. Tsai, Y.-S., D. Rates, P.M. Moreno-Marcos, P.J. Muñoz-Merino, I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, H. Drachsler, C.D. Kloos, and D. Gašević, Learning Analytics in European Higher Education—Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education, 2020. 155: p. 103933.7. Mavroudi, A., M. Giannakos, and J. Krogstie, Supporting Adaptive Learning Pathways through the Use of Learning Analytics: Developments, Challenges and Future