stakeholders, (b) rigorous inclusion of moral philosophy to avoid anti-regulationtactics such as “ethics washing,” (c) standardized reporting to maintain quality control andaccountability, (d) standardized curricula for accreditation and quality assurance, and (e) theinternalization of institutional self-governance. Mitcham and Engelhardt (2019) mention severalof these factors, and additionally suggest evaluating the relation between RCR and engineeringethics education and EAC programs.While the holistic ethics intervention framework centers on engineering ethics education at thecourse level, Martin et al.'s (2021) multi-level framework delves into how faculty, serving asdecision-makers in engineering education, perceive and establish connections
] J. Bauer-Wolf, “Purdue University reinstates admissions test requirements for fall 2024,”highereddive.com. https://www.highereddive.com/news/purdue-university-reinstates-admissions-test-requirements-for-fall-2024/637598/ (accessed 2/1/2024).[5] J. Van Dyken, and L. Benson, “Precalculus as a Death Sentence for Engineering Majors: ACase Study of How One Student Survived,” Int. J Res. Ed. Sci. vol. 5, pp. 355-373, 2019.[6] H. Schluterman, L. Massey, A. Galbraith, B. Crisel, and C. Rainwater, “Exploring therelationship between initial mathematics course in college and engineering graduation rates,”In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, August 2022.[7] J. B. Collins, A. Harsy, J. Hart, K. A. Haymaker, A. M. Hoofnagle, M. Kuyper Janssen
in a newlydefined core curriculum in our undergraduate courses, and a more integrated approach of differentdisciplines that is consistent with sustainable energy technologies.References:[1] Nall, D. H., “An Engineering Approach to Evaluating Energy Technology,” ASHRAE Journal, Vol. 61, Issue 10, October 2019.[2] Pacala, S., Socolow, R., “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies,” Science, Vol 305, Issue 5686, pp. 968-972, 13 Aug 2004. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.1100103[3] The CMI at the High Meadows Environmental Institute at Princeton University https://cmi.princeton.edu/resources/stabilization-wedges/introduction/[4] Winters, J., “ASME’s unique approach to
students.Developed teaching methodology has a potential to make the understanding of complexmathematical models faster for undergraduate students.References[1] A. K. Sony, B. Bhushan and R. Astya, ”Revolutionizing Transportation System Using Artificial Intelligence Technique,” 2023 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), Greater Noida, India, 2023, pp. 1171-1176, doi: 10.1109/ICCCIS60361.2023.10425111.[2] K. Holeyannavar, A. C. Giriyapur and R. P. Tapaskar, ”Artificial Intelligence Based Intelligent Social Humanoid Robot – Ajit 2.0,” 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS), Madurai, India, 2019, pp. 875-878, doi: 10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065883.[3] G
models are few-shot learners,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [3] K. Holstein, B. M. McLaren, and V. Aleven, “Designing for comple- mentarity: Teacher and student needs for orchestration support in ai- enhanced classrooms,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2019. [4] L. Kloub, “Chatgpt in computer science education: Exploring benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations,” ASEE North East Section, 04 2024. [5] R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, and L. B. Forcier, Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson, 2016. [6] A. Meyer, D. H. Rose, and D. Gordon, Universal Design for Learning
Paper ID #34563ABET’s Maverick Evaluators and the Limits of Accreditation as a Mode ofGovernance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional
internationalstudents around the globe. Despite a decrease in the enrollment rate of new international studentsby 34% for undergraduates and 45% for graduates compared to 2019/2020, close to 1 millionstudents still chose to come to the US for their education [1]. More than 80% of these students arepursuing advanced degrees in STEM [2]. Why has the US been able to attract so many internationalstudents into STEM for higher education? Several reasons have been suggested in the literature -the availability of state-of-the-art research labs, opportunities to embark on ground-breakingresearch, the presence of highly qualified researchers, and the benefits of working withintellectuals from other parts of the world [3]. It is humbling to observe from the literature
, recovery, andrepair of waste electronic and electrical equipment or “e-waste” in the country [53]. Specifically,in the province of Buenos Aires, a survey showed that at least 1,046 people transported andcollected scrap metal, 619 melted metals, 728 burned cables, and 448 recycled batteries in 2019(ibid.). In particular, electrical and electronic devices are not designed to be efficiently reused orrecycled, and they contain hazardous materials. The people who collect, dismantle, and recyclee-waste usually work in unhealthy conditions. Furthermore, their practices often result inunintentional harmful chemical exposure to their communities, particularly women and children[54], and also contribute to adverse environmental impacts. For example, from
experiences for scientists and engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Evaluating Peer Coaching in an EngineeringCommunication Lab: A Quantitative Assessment ofStudents’ Revision ProcessesAbstract Communication is a crucial skillset for engineers, yet graduates [1]–[3] and theiremployers [4]–[8] continue to report their lack of preparation for effective communication uponcompletion of their undergraduate or graduate programs. Thus, technical communicationtraining merits deeper investigation and creative solutions. At the 2017 ASEE Meeting, weintroduced the MIT School of Engineering Communication Lab, a discipline-specific technicalcommunication service that is akin to a writing center, but
has been successful in obtaining funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico at UPRM. Currently, she serves as Academic Senator and Faculty Representative at the Administrative Board at UPRM. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effectiveness of engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among bilingual students. She has also
. 22–31, Oct. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.ece.2022.09.002.[6] L. Theodore and J. P. Abulencia. Open-ended Problems: A Future Chemical Engineering Education Approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.[7] P. C. Wankat and L. G. Bullard, “The Future of Engineering Education--Revisited,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2016.[8] E. S. Vasquez, Z. West, M. J. DeWitt, M. J. Elsass, and D. A. Comfort, “Work in Progress: Implementing an Open-Ended Laboratory Experience in the Unit Operations Laboratory with an Alternative CSTR Reaction,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2019, pp.1-7. https://peer.asee.org/33626[9] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, “Applying Authentic
. Krause, “Undergraduate Students’ Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 560–584, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20150.[12] L. K. Berland and B. J. Reiser, “Making sense of argumentation and explanation,” Sci. Educ., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 26–55, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1002/sce.20286.[13] S. Michaels, C. O’Connor, and L. B. Resnick, “Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life,” p. 15.[14] T. O. B. Odden and R. S. Russ, “Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct,” Sci. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 187–205, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/sce.21452.[15] J. M. Kittleson and S. A. Southerland
of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. He is a fellow of ASEE and NSPE.Paul Leidig Paul A. Leidig is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and a member of the instructional team for the Engineering Projects In Community Service (EPICS) program at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. He received his Bachelors of Science in Architectural Engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Masters of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Mr. Leidig is licensed as a Professional Engineer in the state of Colorado and has six years of structural engineering consulting experience
are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to acknowledgesupport from the Center for Socially Engaged Design and extend our thanks to pilot interviewparticipants whose insights helped improve our study design.References[1] Palmer, B., Terenzini, P., McKenna, A. F., Harper, B. J., & Merson, D. (2011). Design in context: Where do the engineers of 2020 learn this skill. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/design-in-context-where-do-the-engineers-of-2020-learn-this-skill[2] Ro, H. K., Merson, D., Lattuca, L. R., & Terenzini, P. T. (2015). Validity of the
. Liu serves as the Immediate Past Chair of Energy and Fuels Division of American Chemical Society and Officer at the Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society (TAMU Chapter). She has been elected as Fellow of the International Association of Advanced Materials (FIAAM), Fellow of Vebleo (Science Engineering and Technology), and the Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry, DEBI faculty fellow at the US Air Force Research Laboratory. She has been awarded the Chartered Scientist and Chartered Chemist in March and May 2019, respectively. She was awarded the “2012 to 2014 Annual foreign experts and talent from overseas project” supported by the State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs, P.R. China (3 consecutive terms
work? a review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004. [3] G. P. Wiggins, G. Wiggins, and J. McTighe, Understanding by design. Ascd, 2005. [4] S. Sundararajan, L. E. Faidley, and T. R. Meyer, “Developing inquiry-based laboratory exercises for a mechanical engineering curriculum,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 25–432, 2012. [5] J. J. Biernacki and C. D. Wilson, “Interdisciplinary laboratory in advanced materials: A team-oriented inquiry-based approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 637–640, 2001. [6] N. Smith, “Scaffolded laboratory sequence: Mechanics lab,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020. [7] M. M
Safety Coordinator, and lead for the SAFEChE (Process Safety Across the CHE Curriculum) modules as well as the Visual Encyclopedia of Chemical Engineering Equipment. Currently, he serves as a Director for the ASEE ChE Division.Dr. Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University Joanne K. Beckwith is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis Janie is a Senior Lecturer in Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Her PhD is in chemical engineering from Purdue University. Research focus areas include laboratory courses, process safety, and chemical engineering pedagogy.Prof
previously served as Director of Research and interim Director of the Georgia Tech Research Institute, and before that had a successful career in the aerospace industry for Lockheed Martin. While at GTRI he led a period of successful growth that doubled GTRI’s revenues and impact, and led the creation of GTRI’s cybersecurity, systems engineering, and autonomous systems research programs. His Lockheed Martin career culminated as the F-22 Raptor Avionics Manager where he led the team to Raptor 4 avionics first flight. He leads research and teaches in the areas of engineering leadership, systems thinking, and socio-technical enterprises. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Orleans, LA, Paper ID 15726, 2016.26. Sarper, H., Landman, D., Jaksic, N., Stuart, B., and Vahala, L.,” Impulse Calculation of Model Rocket Engines from Experimental Data”, Proceedings of 2019 National ASEE Conf., Tampa, FL, Paper ID 25051, 2019.27. Stine, H. “The Handbook of Model Rocketry”, 7th edition, J. Wiley, 2004.28. Stine, H., “Forty Years of Model Rocketry – A Safety Report”, NAR, 1997.29. Sutton, G. P. and Biblarz, O., Rocket Propulsion Elements. Wiley, Hoboken, N.Y. 2017.30. https://estesrockets.com/wp- content/uploads/SDS/Estes_Model_Rocket_Engines_Motors_Greater_Than_30.pdf31. Weiss, M., et al., “Using a Model Rocket-Engine Test Stand in a Calculus Course”, The Mathematics Teacher, 95, 516-519, 2002.
Engineering Education, 2019 Call it what you want: Blending project-based learning and the flipped classroom model in a Civil Engineering courseAbstractBoth project-based learning and flipping the classroom have gained recent popularity inengineering education. These techniques change the classroom environment by placing theresponsibility for learning on the students. Through a change in the traditional lecture model,students develop a higher investment in their work and have more agency in the learning process.For this study, a senior level civil engineering class structured around the project-based learningformat and focused on geotechnical foundation design was changed from a traditional lecturedelivery format to a flipped
presentations in global engineering ed- ucation at several national conferences. Scott is an active member in the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) both locally and nationally, as well as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Dr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published
Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Dr. Miguel’s profes- sional interests involve image processing, machine learning, and engineering education especially active learning, diversity, retention, and recruitment. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, and digital image processing. She is a member of the IEEE, ASEE, SWE, and Tau Beta Pi. Cur- rently, Dr. Miguel is the Chair of the ASEE Professional Interest Council I (PIC I), and a Vice President of PICs which gives her a seat on the ASEE Board of Directors. Dr. Miguel has held several other officer positions across the ASEE including: Division Chair and Program Chair of the ECE and New Engineer- ing Educators Divisions, and ASEE Campus
conflict management to engineering students,” In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June, 2023.[5] K. A. Jehn, “A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups,” Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 530-557, 1997.[6] X. Zhang, and J. G. Roberts, “Integrate a conflict resolution session into the freshman engineering problem solving course to improve students’ ability to solve interpersonal team conflicts,” 2020.[7] M. Sollitto, & M. Mehrubeoglu, “Incorporating Conflict Negotiation Training in a Senior Engineering Project Management (Capstone Projects I) Course” Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2
S. Cheng, “Using natural language processing tools on individual stories from first year students to summarize emotions, sentiments and concerns of transition from high school to college,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019.[16] Hjelmstad, K. D., & Baisley, A. (2020, June), A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment in Sophomore-level Mechanics Courses Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2—34028[17] Kearney, S., “Improving engagement: The use of ‘Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 875–891, 2013.[18] Baisley, A., & Hjelmstad, K.D
-based grading to facilitatelearning,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.[11] B. Bloom, “Learning for Mastery Instruction and Curriculum. Regional EducationLaboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1.,” Eval.Comment, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 1968.[12] C. Perez and D. Verdin, “Mastery Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Courses: ASystematic Review,” presented at the American Society of Engineering Education, 2022.[13] Dweck, C.S., Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. 2000:Psychology Press[14] Dweck, C.S., Mindset: The new psychology of success. 2006: Random House[15] E. Dringenberg, A. Shermadou, and A. Betz, “Reactions from
Imperative in Higher Education,” Cent. Stud. High. Educ. Res. Occas. Pap. Ser., no. CSHE.11.10, p. 7, Sep. 2010.[2] R. Rousseau, L. Zhang, and X. Hu, “Knowledge Integration: Its Meaning and Measurement,” in Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram, Eds., in Springer Handbooks. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 69–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_3.[3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Integrating Serious Illness Care into Primary Care Delivery: Proceedings of a Workshop. 2022. doi: 10.17226/26411.[4] N. Fields et al., “How Can Interdisciplinary Teams Leverage Emerging Technologies to Respond to Transportation Infrastructure Needs
-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Feb. 11, 2023).[4] L. D. McDowell, “The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self- regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies,” Int. J. of Science Educ., vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 2524–2541, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584.[5] C. Jannette, “Lifelong learning in the 21st century and beyond,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 613-622, 2009, doi: 10.1148/rg.292085179.[6] K. Colthorpe, J. Ogiji, L. Ainscough, K. Zimbardi, and S. Anderson, “Effect of metacognitive prompts on undergraduate pharmacy students’ self-regulated learning behavior,” American J. of Pharmaceutical Educ., vol. 83, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.5688
, 46(1), 32-40.5. Muci-Kuchler, K. H., Degen, C. M., Bedillion, M. D., & Lovett, M. (2019), Extending Systems Thinking Skills to an Introductory Mechanical Engineering Course. ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. 10.18260/1-2—32826.6. Muci-Kuchler, K. H., Birrenkott, C. M., Bedillion, M. D., Lovett, M., & Whitcomb, C. (2020), Incorporating Systems Thinking and Systems Engineering Concepts in a Freshman- Level Mechanical Engineering Course. ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. 10.18260/1-2— 34813.7. Lalley, A., Bedillion, M. D., Langerman, M., & Korde, U. A. (2015), Early Incorporation of Design for Manufacturing in the Engineering Curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA. 10.18260/p.23902.8. Bedillion, M. D