attention cueingin animations. Computers & Education, 55(2), 681-691.[2] de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a frameworkfor attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. EducationalPsychology Review, 21(2), 113-140.[3] de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing asa means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 21(6), 731-746.[4] de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010a). Attention guidancein learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20(2),111-122.[5] Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J
word count for compassion than kindness) and 21 papersalso discussed empathy (6 with higher word count for empathy than kindness). Related termsthat commonly appeared in these 29 papers also included: caring (20 papers), respect(ful) (17papers), ethic(s/al) (15 papers), and altrui(sm/stic) (14 papers). A detailed exploration of notionsof care in engineering was conducted by Strobel et al. [41]. Kindness may be more active andpersonal than care, as in showing kindness to others (or even oneself), and avoids potentialconfusion around notions of care and diligence in conducting accurate calculations. This quickanalysis shows the inter-relatedness of the ideas of kindness, compassion, empathy, and caring,illustrated somewhat more clearly in the
U e I : Mag ifica i Selec ed del D -d elec i Objec P ii i g F ce a d ag ifica i S a , Re e S a /S /Re e M de Se O Figure 4. User Interface design3.1. Model Setup:This step allows the user to define the
- components proposed in the fulfilled (40 points) missing 1-2 items. proposal successfully. Total: 90 points* Creativity track project should accompany a brief written report with student(s) name(s), and 1) thelearning objectives it includes, 2) description of the project, 3) justification of difficulty, 4) explanation offinal deliverable (artwork, videos, etc.), and 5) references (optional).Out of 122 students in Section 1, 69 students submitted the letter of intent, and 51
quantitative methods, descriptive and t-test, to analyze studentconfidence (instead of preparedness).Students provided responses to the prompt “Give a brief description of the experiences you havefound most influential in your career choice(s).” Participants were able to respond to thisquestion up to four times if they had or wanted to list more than one experience. The maximumresponse count was 171 for the first experience listed, which can be argued as possibly the mostimpactful experience on students' professional identity.The responses for the prompt were analyzed using thematic analysis [26]. A single coder initiallyconducted the analysis of the responses, starting with a set of a priori codes that came from thedevelopment team’s vision of the
collection of first-year engineering courses. Some descriptive information about theuniversities, the college of engineering degrees offered, student demographic information, andthe collection of first-year engineering courses are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of Descriptive Information about Three Institutions in Study Uni. Descriptive Information First-Year Engineering (FYE) Course/s 1 University: Medium-sized, private, STEM+Business university 1. Introduction to COE Degrees: Aerospace, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical
computing. She is currently involved with an NSF-funded S-STEM project that awards scholarships to students studying computing at USF. The project implements a suite of community- building activities designed to improve scholars’ self-efficacy and develop computing identity. Sami also co-directed a project that developed system support and user-driven strategies for improving energy effi- ciency in residential buildings. Sami has served in a number of service roles at USF and in her professional community. She was chair of the Computer Science department at USF from 2013-2016. She also served on the editorial board of Sigmobile’s GetMobile Magazine from 2014-2018. She has been involved with the discipline-specific
increases our sample range and will enrich our study by enabling us to understandhow these results might be different and/or similar across different types of institutions. Second,we intend to expand our sources of data to include students as participants in our study. Webelieve this is important for the triangulation of our data. Hence, we intend to interview studentsto understand how they perceive the study abroad program’s marketing materials.References[1] S. Jorgenson and L. Shultz, “Global Citizenship Education (GCE) in Post-Secondary Institutions: What is protected and what is hidden under the umbrella of GCE?,” J. Glob. Citizsh. Equity Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2012, Accessed: Feb. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https
perceptions of their level of engagement with the class and active learning. Thestudents in both sections were asked a series of questions designed by the authors, to elicitcandid responses. The survey was conducted separately from the regular student courseevaluations and was completed before the final course grade postings. Table 7 compares studentresponses on the midterm survey (S = Synchronous, N=41/41 and A = Asynchronous N=19/20).The only significant difference (p < 0.1) found using the Mann-Whitney U test was for thestatement “I felt more engaged during activities than lectures”. Table 8 compares studentresponses on the final survey (S = Synchronous, N=39/41 and A = Asynchronous N=20/20). Theonly significant difference (p < 0.5) found
ProgramsWhile literature examining the term “onboarding” specifically is limited within higher education,programs designed to support newly admitted students are commonly described in first-yearexperience literature [20]. These programs are meant to support students’ transition into collegeand have been around since as early as the 1600’s. In fact, Harvard College implemented anorientation program that connected new students with current students in 1636 [21]. The firstonboarding programs were primarily designed to support the transition of new students into post-secondary education. Today’s onboard programs vary among institutions, but it is common tosee one- or two-day orientation programs, first-year seminars, welcome weeks, and commonbook reading
collaboration, and (v) the following steps if they want to participate. Once interestedEEP teams approach the instructors, and then the teams are selected as potential sponsors basedon three primary criteria:(1) Need of the ECE skills to create the product for the EEP team’s product idea.(2) Scope of work and technical feasibility for ECE SD team to finish in one year,(3) Quality of EEP team’s market & customer study and business plan.Selecting the ECE team as design and implementation engineers (Second semester)Selected EEP team/s are invited to participate in the “pitch your project” event with all otherexternal sponsors in the following spring semester to the ECE SD class. ECE SD team membersare provided information about the EEP team (but not
emerged [1].As technology advanced and grew, society’s problems and needs became more complex andspecialization areas became more specific, allowing more engineering disciplines to take shape.Examples of engineering disciplines taking shape more recently in the past few decades includeusability engineering [5], web engineering [6], and mechatronics [7]. In some cases, additionaland more specific disciplines are considered ‘branches’ or ‘sub-disciplines’ of the ‘original’disciplines that many consider to be the primary engineering disciplines: civil, mechanical,electrical, and chemical [8]. For example, in Dixit et al.’s [3] book describing the history ofmechanical engineering, he also explains production engineering, industrial engineering
]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2016-2017/.[3] C. Gonzalez, “Decision-Making: A Cognitive Science Perspective,” in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science, no. April, S. E. F. Chipman, Ed. Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 264–270.[4] D. H. Jonassen, “Engineers as problem solvers,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 103–118.[5] E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, N. J. McNeill, Z. T. Malcolm, and D. J. Therriault, “Moving beyond formulas and fixations: Solving open-ended engineering problems,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 627–651, 2012, doi
Board. Graduate education, enrollmentand degrees in the United States. S&E Doctoral Degrees. [Online]. Available:https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/561/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering.pdf. [5] R. S. Sowell, N. Bell, S. N. Kirby, and S. Naftel, “Ph.D. completion andattrition: Findings from exit surveys of Ph.D. completers,” Washington, DC: Council ofGraduate Schools, 2009.[6] H. Okahana, J. Allum, P. Felder, and R. G. Tull, “Implications for practice and researchfrom Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion,” Washington, DC: Councilof Graduate Schools, March 2016 [Online]. Available:https://www.cgsnet.org/sites/default/files/2016.03%2316-01%20Discussion%20on%20DIMAC.pdf .[7] G. Crisp and I
Multi-domain projects • Advanced Computer Skills • Large scale M&S • Basic Computer Modeling & • System simulations • Domain specific M&S • Specialized Skills • Basic data analysis • Big data processing domain specific Simulation • Simple tools and • Modeling languages • Virtual system analysis M&S simulations • System/physics models • CAD/Mech analysis
approaches (adaptingitems from existing instruments) to the development of the two survey instruments: (1) a facultysurvey to identify engaging strategies, and (2) a student survey to evaluate these strategies in aself-reported Likert format along with open-ended questions. This paper primarily presents thedevelopment of the two surveys and the validation of the student engagement survey usingexploratory structured equation modeling technique. It only briefly presents students’ evaluationof the engagement strategies as this is not the primary focus of this paper.Background and Motivation:Distance learning has been a staple of educational systems around the world since the 1700’s [1],but has only become a major topic of research in recent decades
do you manage your time to Deadline Evaluate classes/schedule complete assignments? Complete assignment Weekly calendar Due Date Provide how you like to Microsoft Teams App(s) communicate in a team? GroupMe Discord TextingLeadership: Students identified leadership abilities as individuals whom exhibit confidence,knowledge, organization, and delegation of work. Students considered a leader as the projectmanager and did not separate the leadership role from the actions of leadership [17].Additionally, many students answered the question by restating
review mainideas or common misconceptions about engineering.Activity Description: Each student will be provided stickers/sticky notes (if you want to doresearch with this activity put a number on them), and will be prompted to individually thinkabout up to 7 prompts about engineering. Students will place their sticker on a line somewherebetween strongly disagree and strongly agree to correspond with their response to the prompt.Intended Age: Upper elementary - lower high school Time Needed: 30 minutes - 1 hourActivity Steps: Prompts: 1. Provide students with stickers or 1. Engineering is in every community and sticky note(s) for the activity. makes a
response x What did you enjoy most about this trip? Categorical x Explain the aspect(s) you enjoyed most Free response x Rate experiences for (1) educational benefit and Likert x (2) team building / networking: Transportation Friday evening activities Ski lift tour Snow making tour Open ski time Saturday evening events Rate Trip overall Likert x Final Comments Free response xResults / DiscussionThe pre and post surveys reveal that the participants on the field trip gained both educational andteam
learningavenues and career choices. References[1] “Zoom Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing,” Zoom Video Conferencing , 2020. [Online]. Available: https://zoom.us/. [Accessed: 29-Dec- 2020].[2] Unknown. "Common Core State Standards." US Department of Education. https://www.ed.gov/k-12reforms/standards (accessed 2021).[3] S. Murphy, “Participation and achievement in technology education: the impact of school location and socioeconomic status on senior secondary technology studies,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 349–366, 2019.[4] C. Maiorca, T. Roberts, C. Jackson, S. Bush, A. Delaney, M. J. Mohr
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Identifying Core Engineering Virtues: Relating competency and virtueto professional codes of ethicsAbstractThis work focuses on a single question: “Which virtues ought to be emphasized in the formationof engineering and computing professionals?” The authors assume that the ethical codesproposed and maintained by various engineering and computing (E/C) professional bodiesrepresent reasonable assertions as to the types of ethical considerations expected of E/Cprofessionals. It then attempts to bridge what the profession(s) assert to be good (e.g., within thevarious codes of ethics) to observable virtues/dispositions that can be connected to studentformation. This
Kokomo 2300 S. Washington St., Kokomo, IN, 46902 Abstract IntroductionThe arrival of the Internet of Things (IoT) into our The growth of the Internet, in the past decade, hasdaily lives in various forms such as home appliances enabled exponential growth of over 26.66 billionand wearable devices has dominated Internet usage. connected devices in 2019, approximately a 57.81%This dominant behavior left network practitioners increase compared to 2015 [1]. This number iswith many questions to be answered related to IoT expected to grow significantly in the coming years
Interactive Multidisciplinary Curricula in a Residential Summer Program (Evaluation) Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26782 2. Cottrell, D. (2007, June), Outreach Initiative for Recruiting Women To Engineering: Doing A Good Deed For Girl Scouts Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--2807 3. Michaeli, J., Jovanovic, V., Popescu, O., Djuric, A., & Yaprak, E. (2014). An Initial Look at Robotics-based Initiatives to Engage Girls in Engineering. Technology Interface International Journal, 14(2). 4. Demetry, C., & Sontgerath, S. (2013, June), Does a Middle School Intervention for Girls
as 90%. Overall, the research from the studentperspective would address perceptions of the BIM applications course, especially constructionmanagement students’ opinions related to BIM implementation, and help implement into thecurriculum from student feedback.References[1] S. Glick, D. Porter and C. Smith, "Student visualization: Using 3-D models in undergraduateconstruction management education," International Journal of Construction Education andResearch, vol. 8, (1), pp. 26-46, 2012.[2] P. Meadati et al, "Enhancing visual learning in construction education using BIM,"International Journal of Polytechnic Studies, vol. 1, (2), 2012.[3] J. Irizarry et al, "Exploring applications of building information modeling for enhancingvisualization and
el ut od O M s es on
]. Estimation can help students learn the connection between the mathematical formulas they use in class and the real-world applications around them [2].Stephany Coffman-Wolph References: Ohio Northern University [1] Raviv, D., & Harris, A. J. (2016, June), Estimation as an Essential Skill in Entrepreneurial Thinking Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26739Kimberlyn Gray [2] Bourn, R., & Baxter, S. C. (2013, June), Developing Mathematical Intuition by Building Estimation
/resource/resmgr/Voice/csta_voice_03_2016.pdf[5] Wing, J. M. (2006, March). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.[6] Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The LinkMagazine, Spring. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Retrieved fromhttp://link.cs.cmu.edu/article.php?a=600[7] Rich, K.M., Yadav, A. and Larimore, R.A., 2020. Teacher implementation profiles forintegrating computational thinking into elementary mathematics and scienceinstruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), pp.3161-3188.[8]Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. NY: Basic Books.[9]Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of
like scores and statistical data, occupying another column of agradebook. And, a textual representation can be parsed by scripts for additional analysis. The main tradeoff is losing the graphical benefit of showing time simply as a bar with width representing time spent.3.1 Basic develop and submit runsAs an initial attempt, we tried a compact version of the log file for a given student: dev dev dev dev sub(0) dev dev dev sub(2) sub(5) dev dev sub(10)While enabling a quicker view than a detailed log, we realized the short words weren’t needed. Instead,we could use single letters, and eliminate spaces. We used d for each develop run, and s for each submitrun followed by the score on that run. The student below did 4 develop runs, then
Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 448–462, 2014.[4] J. S. Cole and S. W. T. Spence, “Using continuous assessment to promote studentengagement in a large class,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 5, pp.508–525, 2012.[5] J. Poza-Lujan, C. T. Calafate, J. Posadas-Yagüe, and J. Cano, “Assessing the Impact ofContinuous Evaluation Strategies: Tradeoff Between Student Performance and Instructor Effort,”IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17–23, Feb. 2016.[6] D. Nicol, “E‐assessment by design: Using multiple‐choice tests to good effect,” Journal ofFurther and Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–64, Feb. 2007.[7] S. Baghdadchi, Z. Nemerever, P. A. Hadjipieris, S. G. Serslev, and C. L. Sandoval, “CreatingEnvironments
, “Entrepreneurship Education, and Training: A Survey of Literature,” Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 1s, 2014. 2. The Kern Family Foundation, “Engineering Unleashed,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/, 2021, (accessed January 2021). 3. A. R. Peterfreund, E. Costache, H. L. Chen, S. K. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, “Infusing innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering education: Looking for change as seen by ASEE Members,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 2016. 4. W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement of productivity in higher education,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, 15–23, 2013. 5. S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R