. Clark, "Progressive Use of Active Learning in Electrical Engineering Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[7] A. Dallal, A. Dukes, and R. M. Clark, "Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classes," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.
Figure 4. Pre- and posttest average scores for the control and experimental groups.When looking at the concept breakdown, majority of the students lost points when describing theenergy transformation between flow work and kinetic energy. This may be due to the conceptbeing less visual, hence why the LC-DLMs would not have aided student understanding; in thiscase, more emphasis would be required in lecture and homework.Due to a miscommunication, the final tier of this study will not be implemented until May 2nd, 2019on the final exam. Having the final tier will allow us to make further conclusions, which will beshared at the 2019 ASEE Conference and Exposition.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation’s
One (Work in Progress). Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2018 (Paper no. 23722; pp. 1-12). Washington, D.C.: ASEE Publications.[14] Ruth, A., Hackman, J., Brewis, A., Spence, T., Luchmun, R., Velez, J., and Ganesh, T. G. (2019). Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) in High Schools: Subtle but Potentially Important Student Gains Detected from Human-Centered Curriculum Design. Education Sciences, 9(35), doi:10.3390/educsci9010035[15] Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Oakes, W. C. (2006). Bernard, M. Gordon Prize Lecture: Integrating Engineering Education and Community Service: Themes for the Future of Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering
- sity. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic thinking. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and re- searchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is the past editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research As- sociation
homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich
the United States of America,vol. 112, no. 40, 2015.[46] H.E. Jun, et al., “Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams.”Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, Fall 2007.[47] J. Mativo, U.Z. George, “Influences of Female/Women Engineering Professionals at theWorkplace, Home, and Community”. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
there wasn’t enough time to ‘speed date’ potential team members in class. - As completed teams left the room, remaining students felt that they needed to ‘hang on’ to their project or be left with no choice.In addition, we observed that student-formed team peer reviews were slightly lower throughoutthe course of the project.Please see [6] for more complete descriptions of the faculty-formed and student-formedprocesses, in addition to data on the effects of these two types of team-forming on the studentexperience in senior project. The rest of this paper presents a new hybrid approach developed toaddress the shortcomings of these two alternatives.Hybrid-formed: In Fall 2019, we implemented a hybrid process, blending the best aspects of
KickStarter Process. As colleges transitioned to sustaining mode, they wereencouraged to continue their participation as KickStarter Alumni. In this sense, they became partof a growing community that continues beyond their direct involvement in the KickStarterProgram.KickStarter CohortsThe four Cohorts of 2-year HSIs that have participated in KickStarter from 2015 to 2019 arelocated across six states, as shown in Figure 4. Ten HSIs were from California, five from Texas,four from Arizona, three from New Mexico, and one from each of Florida and Illinois. Theparticipating institutions varied in their characteristics. Some colleges belonged to large districtsin urban settings, that provided centralized infrastructure for grants and institutional data
, "Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 27-36, Jan. 2008.[7] A. Trauth, T.N. Barnes, J. Buckley, J.A. Enszer, S.I. Rooney, R. Davidson and X. Zhang, "How Granular is the Problem? A Discipline-specific Focus Group Study of Factors Affecting Underrepresentation in Engineering Undergraduate Programs," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun 23, 2018.[8] A. Trauth, J. Buckley, S.I. Rooney, J.A. Enszer, T.N. Barnes and R. Davidson, "Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Engineering Programs," in 2019 ASEE Annual
, pp. 449-465, 2008.[3] V. M. Jovanović, G. McLeod, T.E. Alberts, C. Tomovic, O. Popescu, T. Batts, M. L. Sandy, "Exposing Students to STEM Careers through Hands-on Activities with Drones and Robots." 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019. Tampa, Florida.[4] V. Jovanovic, B. Terzic, M. Erten-Unal, V. Hill, G. McLeod, M. Covi, D. Burdige,[5] J. Alonzo, J. Mason, T. Sanford, C. Tomovic, C. “Improving STEM Recruitment through a Theme-Based Summer Residential Camp Focused on a Sea Level Rise”, 6th IAJC International Conference, 2018. October 11-14, Orlando, FL.[6] V. M. Jovanovic, O. Popescu, C. L. Considine, K. Arcaute, K. Kaipa, S. G. Adams, “Learning in Informal Environments through Engineering
, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Assistant Professor at Iron Range Engineering through Minnesota State University, Mankato in the Integrated Engineering Department. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson University.Dr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University focusing on neurodiversity and identity and motivation. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering Education focusing on motivation and identity for engineering graduate students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP
Engineering Leadership Capabilities and Leadership Labs, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2013, Atlanta, GA June 22-25, 2013.[7] A. Litten and B. Lindsay, “Teaching and learning from Generation Y”. A presentation for ACRL New England annual program; June 1, 2001, Brandeis University.[8] J. Jiang, “Millenials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life,” Pew Research Center, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/02/ millennials-stand-out-for-their-technology-use-but-older-generations-also-embrace-digital- life/, accessed February 3, 2019.[9] B. Brown, “New learning strategies for generation X”. ERIC Digest, 1997, p. 184.[10] B. Davis, Tools for Teaching, Jossey
, designing it to institutionalize the lessons learned as a diversity practitioner and engineering professor. She is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and has been recognized with the PAESMEM award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Toward a theoretical model of a successful WMEP programWith the emergence of engineering education programs, there is at last a structure and approachto train engineering professors for the university and college levels. But engineering diversityadministrators generally learn their job as they do it. The first women in engineering programwas founded at Purdue in 1969, and programs for minority engineers or multiculturalengineering in the 1970’s. The leaders of
: https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802551365.[18] R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 497–529, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.[19]T.L. Strayhorn, “Sentido de Pertenencia,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 301–320, Oct. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192708320474.[20] L.H. Anderman, T.M. Freeman, “Students’ sense of belonging in school,” Advances in motivation and achievement, 2004.[21] C.S. Gattis et al., “ Work in Progress: A path to graduation: Helping first-year low income, rural STEM students succeed,” in 2019 ASEE
/Lecturer of the McNair Scholars Program at Cornell University. He has also worked as the Associate Director of Advising and Diversity in the College of Architecture, Art, and Planning and Diversity Programs in Engineering (DPE) at Cornell University. He completed his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Virginia Tech.Mandy J Wright, Fields Wright Consulting Mandy Wright has a background in the service and hospitality industry, along with 15 years’ experience teaching high school and college language arts, composition, communication. Of those 15 years, she spent 2012 to 2019 at Virginia Tech, teaching, coordinating, and assessing professional and technical commu- nication instruction within three different
, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2015. [9] T. R. Jones and M. E. Cardella, “Informal pathways to engineering: Middle-school-aged homeschool stu-dents’ experiences with engineering (fundamental),” age, vol. 26, p. 1.[10] J. R. Elliott, “The influence of homeschooling on the lives of college graduates: A transcendental phenomenological study,” 2019.[11] M. D. Bramhall and K. Radley, “Promoting learner autonomy in engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2007.[12] N. A. Stahl, M. L. Simpson, and C. G. Hayes, “Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students,” Journal of developmental Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 2–4, 1992.[13] J. J. Sharp et al., “Does higher education promote independent learning? a
Skyline College in San Bruno,CA majoring in Environmental Engineering, planning to transfer to a 4-year university in the Fall of 2019. Her passion for environmental engineering stems from her upbringing in environmental awareness, appreciation for the beauty of nature, and personal interest in math and science. She hopes to use her passion and determination to help protect the environment and promote a sustainable lifestyle.Yardley Ordonez, Chico State University Yardley Ordonez is currently a Junior at Chico State University working on a bachelor’s of science degree in mechatronics. His plan is to become a Robotics/Automation Engineer and have his own consulting business in helping companies to optimize performance
engineering students’ longitudinal development and trajectories.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor and Associate Head of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing teams has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for
Sustainable Development,” United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2019. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/publications/future-now-science-achieving-sustainable-development-gsdr-2019- 24576[52] B. E. Hughes, “Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students,” Sci. Adv., vol. 4, no. 3, p. eaao6373, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6373.[53] T. L. Strayhorn and R. M. Johnson, “What Underrepresented Minority Engineering Majors Learn from Co-Ops & Internships,” presented at the 2016 ASEE International Forum, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Dec. 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-underrepresented-minority- engineering-majors-learn
integrated into contexts of all shapes and sizes in K-12, it is clear that engineeringeducators need to critically evaluate the potential impact of classroom technology integration.Engineering education can look vastly different from one school district to another. For example,some schools may have designated engineering classes while others incorporate engineeringconcepts and practices into computer science, technology education, STEM, and/or STEAM(science, technology, engineering, the arts, and mathematics) pathways. Others focus on Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 1integrating engineering practices into
, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37411[6] J. Ford et al., “Transitioning from Capstone Design Courses to Workplaces: A Study of New Engineers’ First Three Months,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 6B, pp. 1993–2013, 2019.[7] D. Reeping et al., “How are Threshold Concepts Applied? A Review of the Literature,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH: ASEE, 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2--27965.[8] K. O’Keefe, E. Rangelova, S. C. Packer, Q. K. Hassan, and I. Detchev, “WIP: Decoding a discipline-towards identifying threshold concepts in geomatics engineering,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt
andapproved by the University of California, San Diego in accordance with its conflict of interestpolicies. In addition, a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant was awarded to eGroveEducation, Inc., by the NSF (Award # 1648534).References1) Bairaktarova, D., Van Den Einde, L., & Bell, J. (2019, June). Using digital sketching and augmented reality mobile apps to improve spatial visualization in a freshmen engineering course. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.2) Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of agricultural education, 35(4), 4.3) Delson, N., Qi, H., & Van Den Einde, L. (2023, July). The Impact of Freehand Sketch Training on Engineering
et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.[25] E. Rutz, “Adaptable and Agile - Programs to Meet Emerging Workforce Needs,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/adaptable-and-agile-programs-to-meet-emerging- workforce-needs[26] S. Barker and A. Clobes, “Work in Progress: A Holistic PhD Admissions Rubric--Design & Implementation,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in- progress-a-holistic
regarding their wellbeing. The findings on the lack of perceived support areorganized by departmental and university-level influences. The students also identify areasfor improvement that have posed barriers to their awareness and utilization of universitysupports and services and to their overall wellbeing. The method of soliciting studentperspectives has implications for institutions wanting to examine their own practices andpolicies in order to better support students’ whole selves.Keywords: wellbeing, student support, undergraduate, student experience, studentperception, thematic analysis1. BackgroundHigher education is dealing with a mental health crisis [1]. According to the 2019 ACHA-National College Health Assessment II (ACHA-NCHA II
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Forming Key Partnerships to Enhance Graduate Student ProgrammingAuthors: Emily K Hart, Alexander V Struck Jannini, Alexander J Johnson, Katy PieriAbstractThe graduate chapter of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE@SU) and theSTEM Librarian at Syracuse University formed a collaborative and mutually beneficialpartnership with the goal of enhancing non-curricular educational opportunities for graduatestudents in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (ECS). By combining the expertiseof both organizations, including strategies for event planning, marketing, and outreach, as well asdata garnered through event feedback surveys, significant strides were made toward
problem solvers to problem seekers: The necessary role of tension in engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016- June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26976.[12] A. D. de Figueiredo, “Toward an Epistemology of Engineering,” in 2008 Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, 2008, pp. 94–95.[13] D. Riley, “Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit,” Eng. Stud., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2017, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631.[14] E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, and M. Borrego, “Challenges and promises of overcoming epistemological and methodological partiality: Advancing engineering education through acceptance of diverse ways of knowing
served as the Founding Director of the Innovation, Design and Entrepreneurship Program at Stevens ( IDEaS) and prior to that, as the Director of the Design and Manufacturing Institute, a research center at Stevens. Prof. Pochiraju received his Ph.D. in 1993 from Drexel University and joined Stevens after working as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Delaware. His expertise spans product design, advanced manufacturing, materials insertion, and knowledge-based systems integration. His current externally-funded research is on the design of real-time lightweight robotic systems, high-temperature materials, and micro-/nano-scale devices. He is a member of ASME, ASEE and the American Society for Composites (ASC
construction decision mak- ing, sustainable design and construction, applications of machine learning and AI in construction, and engineering education. Dr. Uddin is also dedicated to serve his profession and the community. He is a member of ASEE, ASCE, TRB and CRC, and serves as the VP of the ASCE Tennessee Section and Sec- retary for the ASCE Holston branch. Dr. Uddin is active with ASEE engineering technology division and served as ETD program chair for CIEC in 2017 and 2018. Dr. Uddin also served as the Editor-in-Chief for Journal of Engineering Technology from 2019 to 2021. Dr. Uddin received outstanding researcher award, outstanding service award and sustainability leadership award from his college.Dr. Keith V
Numbers of Students and Its Effect on Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Mar. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-skills-focused-approach-to-teaching-design- fundamentals-to-large-numbers-of-students-and-its-effect-on-engineering-design-self- efficacy[4] T. P. Carpenter et al., “Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis,” Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2194–2208, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3.[5] A. G. Greenwald, B. A. Nosek, and M. R. Banaji, “Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol
& Analytics. pp. 11–47, 2018.[Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/07/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics- UPDATED-15-July-2019.pdf[2] R. Dzombak, S. Mouakkad, and K. Mehta, “Advances in Engineering Education Motivations of Women Participating in a Technology-Based Social Entrepreneurship Program,” Adv. Eng. Educ., 2016.[3] A. D. Christy, T. G. Wilson, and O. Meehl, “Thermodynamics for Citizenship: Entrepreneurial Engineering through Project-based Learning,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Conference Proceedings, 2019.[4] C. Skokan and J. Gosink, “Gender participation in humanitarian vs. traditional multidisciplinary senior design projects