to maintain and institutionalize its benefits; to do so, itis often necessary to seek further funding to continue work towards the full integration ofprogram components and ensure that they are sufficiently embedded in the university culture.This case study will outline how the most successful components of an NSF-fundedinterdisciplinary computing program at San Francisco State University (SFSU) - the PromotingINclusivity in Computing (PINC) program - have been expanded and strengthened throughfurther grant-funded efforts to create widespread improvements in Computer Science (CS)education at the university and discuss lessons learned from this process over the last five years.Though our experience may be unique to our university in some ways
Paper ID #26387Resources and Partnerships for Community College Engineering and Tech-nology ProgramsProf. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, CT College of Technology/Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch is the Executive Director and Principal Investigator of the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing, an National Science Foundation Center of Excellence. She is the State Director for the College of Technology, a seamless pathway in technology and engineering from all 12 public community colleges to 8 public and private universities. Dr. Wosczyna-Birch has expertise with both the recruitment
-Riddle Aeronautical University.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from V ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Role of Feedback within Scrum for Engineering Department OperationAbstractOver the past 50 years, there has been little change in how most academic departments in U.S.universities conduct their day-to-day affairs. Many reasons contribute to the
Bio-inspired Design Using C-K TheoryIntroductionThe engineer of 2020 is expected to not only offer technical ingenuity but also adapt to acontinuously evolving environment. The ability to operate outside the narrow limits of onediscipline and be ethically grounded in solving the complex problems of the future will also beneeded. To address the competencies of the future engineer, undergraduate education must trainstudents to not only solve engineering challenges that transcend disciplinary boundaries, but alsocommunicate, transfer knowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries.One approach to train engineers in these competencies is teaching biomimicry or bio-inspireddesign in an engineering curriculum, which offers
several awards for outstanding research and teaching at Penn State, including the 2007 Penn State University President’s Award for Excellence in Academic Integration. He is a Fellow in ASME and an Associate Fellow in AIAA. He currently serves on the ASME Design Education Division Executive Committee and is former Chair of both the ASME Design Automation Executive Committee and the AIAA MDO Technical Committee. He is also a Department Editor for IIE Transactions: Design & Manufacturing and serves on the editorial boards for Research in Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Design, and Engineering Optimization.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Gul E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania
over the course offive semesters. The research is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.The centerpiece of the hybrid powertrain is the planetary gearset, which combines
course would only be sustained if we couldsuccessfully recruit new faculty for the course, who may or may not be interested. Broad-scaleresearch on faculty incorporation of diversity-oriented activities into the curriculum has foundthat even when faculty believe that diversity in a classroom leads to better learning outcomes,belief doesn’t necessarily translate into teaching practices that include diversity-orientedmaterials [4]. However, departmental support is important in integrating diversity into thecurriculum, as faculty who believed their departments emphasized the importance of diversity intheir field and supported the integration of diversity-related content into their courses were morelikely to do so [4], and were more likely to be
program toward new ABETstandards. The methods which were ranked the highest in compatibility with new ABETstandards, based on faculty reports, are increasing computer simulations, application exercises,case studies, open-ended problems, design projects, and use of groups in class [1].Recognizing this reality, this project, while incorporating active learning strategies that werealready shown to be effective in other institutions, has taken an innovative approach in designingthe course through integrating a variety of best practices and instructional activities with anemphasis on providing rich work-related experience for students. The distinctive features of thecourse includes (1) applied software training, (2) lab experiments, (3) fieldtrip to
, NIDRR, VA, DOD, DOE, and industries including Ford and GM. Currently, Dr. Kim is the site director for the NSF Industry and University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) for e-Design. Dr. Kim is an editorial board member of Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. Dr. Kim received top cited article award (2005-2010) from Journal CAD and 2003 IIE Transactions Best Paper Award. Dr. Kim was a visiting professor at Kyung Hee University, South Korea from September 2013 to June 2014. Dr. Kim’s education includes a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Pittsburgh.Carolyn E Psenka PhD, Wayne State University Carolyn Psenka, PhD is a cultural anthropologist with research interests focused on the study
-efficacy” and an instrument to measure it for freshmen and senior engineering students and inassessing how it relates to ethical competency and student background; iii) Implications of theseanalyses in the construction of a three-week professional development program that guides highschool STEM teachers through the development of learning modules on ethical issues related totheir courses; iv) The assessment of the undergraduate engineering curriculum in two majors todetermine appropriate courses for ethics interventions to help students understand how technicalactivities fit within broader social, economic, and environmental contexts; the construction ofthese interventions; and the development of measures to track their success; and v) Initial
tostrengthen it and to include industry. The process of “critical doing” actively involved facultyand students in the design of the new curriculum. Details on the process of developing our newcurriculum can be found in Ref. [2].The University approved the changes for implementation in Fall 2019. Additions to thecurriculum included the vertically integrated design course, data acquisition courses, and thesenior design course sequence.1. Vertically integrated design project courses (VIDP). Historically, the program has a strongsenior design course sequence where seniors work in teams on real projects sponsored andmentored by industry for an entire academic year. Senior design provides valuable experiencedoing hands-on engineering with practicing
Paper ID #36863Board 330: Iron Range Engineering Academic Scholarships for Co-Op BasedEngineering EducationDr. Catherine Mcgough Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Assistant Professor at the Iron Range Engineering Bell Program through Min- nesota State University, Mankato. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson UnivDr. Emilie A. Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato Emilie A. Siverling is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering and the Iron Range Engineering Bell Program through Minnesota
Tinto’s (1987) model of retention for the initialProgram design; Tinto’s model suggests both academic and social integration are needed forstudents to be retained at an institution. Given the reason for at-risk status at the University ofPortland, the STEP Retention Program is primarily designed to help students catch upacademically with the traditional cohort that is on track to graduate in four years. This emphasison academic integration is based on the hypothesis that at an institution such as the University ofPortland (private with a high financial need student body and financial aid limited to eightsemesters), persistence in the major is primarily driven by the perceived ability to graduate infour years.In addition to the main focus on
Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau
curriculum for teaching an introductory course on data science in flipped classroom format. An earlier grant dealt with designing the aforementioned visualization software. He has taught various courses in the computer science curriculum, including one that he developed and im- plemented called ”Databases for Many Majors.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Formative Self-Assessment for Customizable Database Visualizations: Checkpoints for LearningAbstractA formative self-assessment opportunity has been added to database visualizations, which aredesigned to introduce students of many majors to fundamental database concepts. Instructors cancustomize the example and
ready for an aerial survey ofthe disaster area in order to gain as much information as possible to plan a potential rescue/aidresponse for a town named ‘Disasterville.’Disasterville: Aerial survey of a disaster areaOur UAV curriculum includes a capstone challenge titled “Aerial Survey of a Disaster Area”. Tocomplete the challenge, students must conduct an aerial survey, using their UAVs with theircameras, of a model town that has been damaged by a natural disaster. The model town, dubbed“Disasterville”, includes buildings made of blocks, toy cars, and figurines of people. Studentscannot directly see the town; Disasterville is hidden from them by an intervening “mountainrange” (a plastic tarp over some chairs). Students must fly their UAV over
workshop. Thus, the workshopshad an asynchronous and a synchronous component.One workshop was devoted to myRIO projects, one to microcontrollers, and the final one to dataacquisition/instrumentation boards. While both myRIO and microcontrollers are embeddedplatforms, they are applied in quite different contexts. The myRIO is a packaged embeddedsystem that uses a graphical programming language that does not require students to know howto program in a traditional language. Microcontrollers require users to know how to program andhow to do more detailed hardware integration. As a result of these distinctions, they are useddifferently in projects and their targeted audiences are unique. The myRIO is a second-generation version of the CRIO, which was
. Teachers were alsodivided into grade-level groups and were tasked with presenting a lesson they would deliver totheir respective grade-level. The final assignment was an individual implementation plan thatrequired the teachers to explain how they would be integrating CS into their curriculum in thefollowing academic year.2.1.3. Saturday WorkshopsThe project included five half-day workshops held on Saturdays across the academic year. Thepurpose of these workshops was to support participants in enacting the CS they learned in the Figure 2. Summer PD program second-week CS pedagogy course schedule.summer, as well as to return to major CS topics (e.g., conditionals, flowcharts, variables, event-driven programming, etc.). An explicit focus of
CoNECD, Crystal City, VA, 2018.[11] N. Mallette, C. Kelly and M. Bothwell. “Work-in-Progress: Developing an Integrated Curriculum-Wide Teamwork Instructional Strategy.” Paper accepted for the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[12] W.R. Penuel, B.J. Fishman, B.H. Cheng and N. Sabelli. “Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design.” Educational Researcher, vol. 40(7), pp. 331-337, 2011.[13] N. Sabelli and C. Dede. “Empowering design-based implementation research: the need for infrastructure”. In B. Fishman & W. R. Penuel (Eds.), Design-Based Implementation Research: Theories, Methods, and Exemplars (Vol. 112, pp. 464-480
. Page 26.549.7During Project Year 2, the project team presented three ARM Microcontroller Workshops.These workshops were held at J.F. Drake State Technical College in Huntsville, AL, Chandler-Gilbert Community College in Chandler, AZ, and Columbia Gorge Community College in HoodRiver, OR. Thirty-two educators attended these workshops. Approximately half of them werecurrently teaching microcontroller technology, albeit not an ARM processor. Over half of thefaculty indicated that they plan to integrate workshop material and/or lab experiments in thecourses that they teach.Assessment is a vital part of any curriculum reform project and helps provide useful informationfor workshop enhancements and determining if the workshop has met its objectives
engineering practice will produce graduates who can address a wider range ofsocietal problems bringing new perspectives to traditional areas. We highlight examples from arange of engineering courses throughout the undergraduate curriculum. Some of these effortsincorporate modules in traditional engineering classes including Electrical Circuits, MaterialsScience, Operations Research, and Heat Transfer. We have redesigned our User-CenteredDesign class to more explicitly engage with these topics. In addition, we have developedinnovative new courses that integrate a sociotechnical view of engineering throughout the courseincluding Engineering and Social Justice and Engineering Peace. We have also replaced ourexternal evaluator team with an external
Paper ID #6663Incorporating Engineering into the High School Chemistry ClassroomMs. Lisa Arnold, Alma High School, Alma, MI Lisa Arnold has a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from Alma College with emphasis in Mathematics and Natural Science and a Master of Arts from Central Michigan University in Secondary Education with an emphasis in Mathematics. She has also obtained M.A. +30 with emphasis in Curriculum and Instruction. Lisa has been teaching chemistry at Alma High School for the past seventeen years.Mr. Ze ZhangDr. Tolga Kaya, Central Michigan University Dr. Tolga Kaya currently holds a joint assistant professor
undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research
Logic Array (FPGA) architecture and design methodology, Engineer- ing Technology Education, and hardware description language modeling. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Ad- ditionally, Dr. Alaraje is a recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum revision in collaboration with the College of Lake County in Illinois, and a NSF award in collaboration with the University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community College. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college stu- dents about career opportunities in electronics
Mathematical/Computational Methods. He is the recipient of numer- ous teaching and pedagogical research awards, including the NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, NCSU Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor Award, ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Raymond W. Fahien Award, and the 2013 and 2017 ASEE Joseph J. Martin Awards for Best Conference Paper. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, and integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests
methodol- ogy, Engineering Technology Education, and hardware description language modeling. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Additionally, Dr. Alaraje is a recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum re- vision in collaboration with the College of Lake County in Illinois, and a NSF award in collaboration with the University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community Col- lege. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college students about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a member of the American
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Espoused Faculty Epistemologies for Engineering Mathematics: Towards Defining “Mathematical Maturity” for Engineering1. IntroductionWhat role should mathematics play in an engineering student’s education? A typical engineeringundergraduate takes a five-semester course sequence of Calculus I, Calculus II, Calculus III,Linear Algebra and Differential equations (henceforth known as the calculus sequence). Thissequence forms a rigid prerequisite structure for many engineering curricula. A single failinggrade in one of these prerequisite courses can prevent a student from being able to progress intotheir engineering curriculum. Students may have to substantially delay graduation
to both STEM instructors and natural scientists, weselected a framework that helped participants realize how to integrate high-quality researchpractices into all aspects of the research design process, in a way that is intuitive, equitable, andmapped to the intellectual curiosity of the researcher. The framework upon which projectactivities were built is the Qualifying Qualitative Research Quality (Q3) framework pioneered byWalther, et al. [20]. This framework presents qualitative research quality as an essential andcontext-sensitive consideration in every aspect of a study’s design, rather than as a series ofspecific strategies that can be added to a research design to increase quality [20, 21]. Theframework divides research quality into
relative to engineering and honors student recruitment, retention, diversity, international education, innovation and course development.Xochitl Delgado Solorzano, University of Arkansas Xochitl Delgado Solorzano is the director of the Honors College Path Program at the University of Arkansas. In this capacity she oversees all aspects of the Path Program, including recruitment and student success, grant requirements, and fundraising.Mrs. Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas Leslie Massey is an instructor in the First-Year Engineering Program at the University of Arkansas. She received her BS in Biological Engineering and MS in Environmental Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She previously served as a
Engineering Community during their first year and on campus for two years.• Community Building: Group activities and social events outside of class are an integral part of developing a community within STARS. WSU includes a field trip to a local engineering firm as an additional component to the STARS seminar. UW incorporates an obstacle or ropes course. Additional activities like bowling, movie nights, and ultimate Frisbee have also been included.• Career Awareness and Vision: Students receive multiple views of the engineering and computer science fields so they can think about themselves as engineers/computer scientists now and in the future. Activities are designed so that students can picture what their life as an