courses since 1992. His areas of expertise are computer architecture, networking, database systems, computing platforms and languages. As the director of Infrastructure, Telecommunications, and Networking (ITNet), and later as a Chief Technology Officer, at UT Brownsville, he implemented state of the art networking using campus wide fiber ring with redundant links. He established diskless computer labs to provide uniform computing platform across campus, and modernized classrooms to make them congenial to online learning. He was the PI on NSF funded BCEIL (Beowulf-based Curriculum Enrichment Integrated Laboratory) and Co-PI on NSF funded MCALL (Multimedia based Computer Assisted Learning Lab
and Technology Assistant Professor at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Mechanical Engineering Depart- ment. Teaching solid mechanics related courses. Researches Stem Ed and fracture mechanics in novel material systems.Dr. Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Karim Muci-K¨uchler is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Co-Director of the Experimental and Computational Mechanics Laboratory at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (SDSM&T). Before joining SDSM&T, he was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics from Iowa State University in 1992. His main interest
Paper ID #18161Pop-Culture Learning Technique Applied to ThermodynamicsDr. Laura A. Garrison, York College of Pennsylvania Dr. Laura Garrison received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas and her M.S. in Operations Research from Stanford University. She then worked for AT&T Bell Laboratories and AT&T Federal Systems before deciding to pursue her Ph.D. in Bioengineering at Penn State University in the area of experimental fluid mechanics associated with the artificial heart. After graduating, she worked at Voith Hydro for five years in the area of Computational Fluid Mechanics. For the
members respectively). Two TDGs also includedgraduate students (a total of 4). In addition, project participants also varied in classes they taught.The classes they taught ranged in size (from small classes of less than 30 students to large classesof more than 300 students), type (classes taught included lectures, seminars, and laboratories),delivery format (face-to-face, online, and hybrid), level (undergraduate and graduate), and kind(required classes and electives). We are unable to provide the distributions of the discussed dataacross groups as it may lead to participant identification.Data Sources The data for this study were collected mainly through interviews with projectparticipants. In total, 21 participants (including all group
University of California Davis from 1983 to 1989. His most significant industrial position was at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory where he was a software analyst and technical writer from 1975 through 1979. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Rethinking ABET Accreditation of Computer Science Degree ProgramsAbstractThis paper examines a number of alternatives for improving the Computer Science accreditationprocess. The specific focus of the paper is on the accreditation process sponsored by ABET --the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.The paper considers alternatives for ABET accreditation on a four-level spectrum. The most rad
Paper ID #18862ROS-based Control of a Manipulator Arm for Balancing a Ball on a PlateMr. Khasim Ali KhanDr. Ji-Chul Ryu, Northern Illinois University Dr. Ji-Chul Ryu received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Delaware in 2009. From 1999 to 2004, he was a Research Engineer with several companies, including Samsung, where he developed various types of automated robotic machines. He worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Neuroscience and Robotics Laboratory, Northwestern
, anational and a local, are used to evaluate each student on achieving program objectives(competencies) based on direct observation. The national assessment rubric is designed to gaugethe student performance in achieving the program objectives, and the assessment data is used totake corrective action in terms of curriculum design and implementation. The local assessmenttool is designed to identify student strengths and weaknesses at course sequence level; theassessment data obtained is used to take corrective action at local level (campus) by revising thecourse contents and teaching methodologies at the lecture and laboratory levels. X. ConclusionThis paper described the concept of implementing a “Smart Pantry” system. The system scansfood
Merrill, and Kevin M. Passno, 2014. Humanitarian Engineering at The Ohio State University: Lessons Learned in Enriching Education While Helping People, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Special Edition, pp. 78–96, Fall 2014.Christy, Ann, Andy Ward, Jeff Hughes, Simon Lorentz, and Bethany Corcoran. 2008. An Experiential and Service Learning Capstone design Initiative in South Africa. 2008 ASEE Global Colloquium, American Society for Engineering Education. CapeTown, South Africa, October 2008. Paper # GC 2008-124. 11 p.Christy, Ann D., Julie Weatherington-Rice, and Andy D. Ward. 2000. Use of a Superfund site as a hands-on learning laboratory for engineering design students. Ohio Journal of Science
Engineers, 1(1), 23-29. 5. Helyer, R., & Lee, D. (2014). The role of work experience in the future employability of higher education graduates. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(3), 348-372. 6. Iborra, M., Ramírez, E., Tejero, J., Bringué, R., Fité, C., & Cunill, F. (2014). Revamping of teaching–learning methodologies in laboratory subjects of the Chemical Engineering undergraduate degree of the University of Barcelona for their adjustment to the Bologna process. Education for Chemical Engineers, 9(3), e43-e49. 7. Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150. 8. Mohan, A
of required software does not tell the whole story for computer engineering. Acomputer engineering degree is not an electrical engineering degree with a minor in computerscience. There are differences in the hardware courses and the courses that mix hardware andsoftware between electrical and computer engineering. Likewise, many programs teachhardware and software to computer engineering students by way of laboratory projects andexperiments. We have made no attempt to distinguish computer engineering courses in this areaand we leave this to future studies.References1. http://www.abet.org/ABET2. "Computer Engineering Curricula 2016" was issued by the Joint Task Group on Computer Engineering Curricula from the Association for Computing
grown to include24 institutions from seven countries across the world 4.Across these different institutions, there is a multitude of intents and approaches as a LEED Labparticipant. Some, such as the Catholic University of America and the authors’ institution,involve students in actually submitting a campus building for LEED-EBOM certification. Othersgo through parts of the process to expose students to the requirements and procedures, and somefocus more on preparing students for one of the accreditation examinations. Colorado StateUniversity at Pueblo utilized both lecture and laboratory components, with the intent ofsimultaneously certifying a building and preparing students for the accreditation examination 5.The LEED Lab program is flexible
majors, where the students in this case may not have a solid background in coreconcepts related to engineering (e.g. physics) and may even have negative affect towardsengineering or low self-efficacy (i.e., enter with the attitude of ‘I am not sure I can do this’). Forexample, in the first lecture of the course, using online polling, the instructor asks “What do youexpect to be the greatest challenge in this class?”. Partial responses are shown in Figure 1, whereit is seen that “physics” comes up often, as do other anxieties. Although not shown, “math” isanother popular response, as are the laboratory components of the course.Although math and physics does play a role in the class, this is subordinate to learning whatstructural engineers ‘do
. Washington, D.C.: The Education Trust. Jackson, J.F. L., & Moore, J.L., III. (2008). Introduction: The African American male crisis in Education: A popular media infatuation or needed public policy response? American Behavioral Science, 51(7), 847-853. Doi:10.1177/0002764207311992 Levin, H. M., Belfield, C., Muennig, P., & Rouse, C. (2007). The public returns to public educational investments in African American males. Economics of Educational Review, 26, 699-708. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.004 Maltese, A. V., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2010). The effect of high school physics laboratories on performance in introductory college physics. The Physics Teacher, 48(5), 333-337. McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A
Health, January, 2016Hunt, L. et al., “Assessing practical laboratory skills in undergraduate molecular biologycourses,” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 861–874, 2012.Harris, Mark, and Patten, Karen, Using Bloom’s and Webb’s Taxonomies to IntegrateEmerging Cybersecurity Topics into a Computing Curriculum. Journal of Information SystemsEducation, Vol. 26(3) Summer 2015Miller, J., “Case study in second language teaching,” Queensland J. Educ. Res., vol. 13, pp. 33-53, 1997.Popil, I., “Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method, “ NurseEducation Today, vol. 31, pp. 204-207, 2011Swart, A.J., “Does it matter which comes first in a curriculum for engineering students—Theoryor practice?,” Int. J. Elect. Eng
Department of Energy’s Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. An active member of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), he has a strong interest in creating new student-centered, engaging approaches to STEM education. As an Innovation Advisor to Elsevier’s Academic Engineering Solutions Library Advisory Board (AES-LAB), he has been the lead content developer for the 2016 Elsevier Engineering Academic Challenge and the 2015 Knovel Academic Challenge.Mr. Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Jay Bhatt is responsible for building library collections in engineering subject areas, outreach to fac- ulty and students, and teaching information and research skills to faculty and students in
developing nation after the onset of a natural disaster. Studentsworked individually in various laboratories and were provided access to a variety of materials,tools, and supplies while engaged in the challenge. Students were also provided with a turbiditysensor, connected to a computer interface, which allowed them to evaluate how well their deviceremoved potential contaminates from a water sample. On average, the participants completed thechallenge within one hour, 21 minutes, and 16 seconds. Prior to assessment, all identifiableinformation was removed and student portfolios were assigned a letter. Traditional Assessment. While designing a solution to the design challenge, eachstudent utilized an engineering notebook to document information
practiced educational methodology used in many highereducational institutions [1]. Instructors usually assign their project components as part of theirclass assessment component before the semester ends. Students usually work in a group andcomplete the deliverables of the assigned projects. Senior Design Projects or Capstones (as part ofan ABET [2] or ATMAE accreditation [3]) are advanced versions of this practice and their tasksand expectations are usually larger than the project based learning expectations.Summer long research projects are usually referred to as Research for Undergraduates (REU) andthey last between eight and ten weeks. Research students work on their assigned projects inintensive research meetings, trainings, laboratory
Environmental Fellowship for leadership in the environmental field. She was awarded the I.W. Smith Award for Outstanding achievement in creative mechanical engineering within 10 years of gradu- ation (2011) and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation Early Researcher Award (2012). She is the Director of the Thermofluids for Energy and Advanced Materials (TEAM) Laboratory working in fuel cells, electrolyzers, and subsurface geology. In 2014 she became a Fellow of the Canadian Soci- ety for Mechanical Engineering and in 2015 was awarded an Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship for Experienced Researchers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Female vs Male Secondary
Structural Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineer- ing at Auburn University, AL, USA in 2007. He obtained his master’s degree in Structural Engineering from Korea University, South Korea, in 2000 and his Bachelor’s degree was in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Korea University, South Korea, in 1998. Prior to entering PhD study, Dr. Kang worked as a Senior Civil Engineer in Hong Kong site and Seoul Headquarter of Hyundai Engineering and Con- struction Co., Ltd. during 2000- 2002. After his PhD study, he had taken many projects supported by ALDOT and Air Force Research Laboratory as a research associate at Auburn University during 2007 – 2011. Dr. Kang had been an assistant professor in the Department of
Paper ID #20137First Steps with Tooling U as a Support to the Mechanical Engineering Tech-nology Flipped ClassroomProf. Julia L. Morse, Kansas State University, Polytechnic Campus Julia Morse is Associate Professor and Program Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Kansas State University Polytechnic Campus. A Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE) and a Certi- fied Enterprise Integrator (CEI), she teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of computer-aided design, manufacturing and materials, and automation systems. Prof. Morse earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from the University of
Paper ID #17858Flipping an Engineering Thermodynamics Course to Improve Student Self-EfficacyDr. Karim Altaii, James Madison University Dr. Altaii holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, and received his doctorate from The City University of New York. He is a registered Professional Engineer. He holds five patents in solar energy applications and in irrigation system. He is the director of two international summer programs. He is the Co-Director of the Advanced Thermal-Fluids laboratory. His primary interests are in renewable energy applications, fluid-thermal sciences, and international education.Dr. Colin J. Reagle
brought practical applications from con- sulting design and construction to the classroom that students’ have found invaluable upon graduating. Serving as Experiential Learning Option advisor for multiple students’ portfolios, Dr. Lester has success- fully evaluated proposals from past work experience to grant course credit for distance students. He has served as the Civil-Site design option evaluator for Senior Design projects each semester as part of his normal teaching responsibilities. Dr. Lester has developed new courses in Civil Engineering Technology to better distribute the student load in Fluid Mechanics and the accompanying laboratory. Dr. Lester has also taught the Professional Engineering preparation
punctuations of studentengagement in the form of discussions and activities, such as limited laboratory experimentation[2]. And while this approach has historically been sufficient for most students, it has been proventhat a more active and engaging learning approach works better for some students [3]. It isbecause of this that MTSU’s active engagement program is designed to offer active learningopportunities that are intended to develop skills that are directly related to real-world engineeringscenarios as they apply to transportation.Let us consider how the principals of energy conversion and conservation apply to anautomobile. Set aside all of the various sundry systems and let the focus rest solely on theprimary purpose of this machine which is to
1993, pp. 70-77.3. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K., and Williamson, K. J., Teaching Through the Cycle: Application of Learning Style Theory to Engineering Education at Brigham Young University, 2nd Edition, Brigham Young University Press, 1995.4. Ortiz, L. E. and Bachofen, E. M., “An Experience in Teaching Structures in Aeronautical, Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Applying the Experimental Methodology,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2526.5. Abdulwahed, M. and Nagy, Z. K., Applying Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education, Journal of Engineering Education, July 2009, pp. 283-294.6. Wyrick, D. A. and
high school [15].ENGR 102 HS was modeled after the on-campus ENGR 102: Introduction to Engineeringcourse. The survey course introduces the undergraduate student to various fields of engineeringthrough a main lecture and laboratory sections. The primary project in the university course isthe iterative design, test and build of a solar oven. This framework is foundational to the highschool version of ENGR 102.A core curriculum, including the solar oven project, excel training and design of experiment(DOE) activities are presented to high school students in much the same way as the universitycourse. This core content takes about 12 weeks to deliver in the high school classroom andassures continuity across the two programs. The key difference
founder and director of the Surface Engineering and Nanofluids Laboratory (SENL) with the state-of-the-art nanofluid characterization and testing capabilities in the College of Engineering and Architecture. He has held administrator roles such as the Graduate Program Director in Mechanical Engineering and the Interim Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education at Howard University.Dr. Claudia Marin-Artieda, Howard University Dr. Marin joined Howard University in 2008. She received her Master’s degree (2002) and her Ph.D. (2007) from the State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo. Dr. Marin’s current research focuses on theoretical and experimental studies on the dynamic interaction among structures
. Courses taught include undergraduate finite elements, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and engineering economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical me- chanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Dr. Bradley Davidson, University of Denver Dr. Bradley Davidson is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Denver and Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Virginia Tech–Wake Forest
program on at-risk youth. Adolescence, 37(148), 717.[10] Campbell, T. A., & Campbell, D. E. (1997). Faculty/student mentor program: Effects onacademic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 727-742.[11] Santos, S. J., & Reigadas, E. T. (2002). Latinos in higher education: An evaluation of auniversity faculty mentoring program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 1(1), 40-50.[12] Smink, J., & Reimer, M. S. (2005). Fifteen Effective Strategies for Improving StudentAttendance and Truancy Prevention. National Dropout Prevention Center Network.[13] Railsback, J. (2004). Increasing Student Attendance: Strategies From Research and Practice.Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory NWREL.[14] Crisp, G., & Cruz
choosing and sizing proper machine elementshaving certain final design specifications. This involves having a working knowledge of machineelements such as linkages, bearings, gears, springs, screws and fasteners, shafts, and columns.Over the years, the machine design course has been improved with efforts to introduce project-based learning [3], hands-on machine design laboratories [4] and finite element analysis projects[5]. Despite advances in overall curriculum, junior-level machine design course delivery hasnot changed much from authoritative lecture style in the classroom, together with homeworkassignments that only reinforce analysis concepts by solving problems through pluggingexplicitly given parameters in the problem statement into
. He has taught a variety of courses in the ChE department and currently focuses on the Unit Op- erations Laboratory, Mass and Energy Balances, and Separations. He completed the National Effective Teaching Institute course (NETI-1) in June, 2016. Dr. Clay is married to Dr. Kristy Clay, a veterinarian, and has three children, Luke (15), Natalie (15), and Meredith (12). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integration of Industrially Relevant Examples in ChE Courses Energy Balance on an e-Cigarette DeviceAbstractIdentifying industrially relevant and/or real-world examples is an excellent technique to enhancethe