personalinterests and bias does not affect thecontent development process. It is only their expertise that comes into the picture. If this conditionis not met, the curriculum development process will cease to benefit students and society at large).Relationship ArrayThe curriculum committee discussed, atlength, the relationship of needs andlearning objectives. The weights (1 – 3)reflect the consensual opinions (at thetime) of the faculty body, incollaboration with content experts, aboutthe relationship (weak = 1, moderate = 2,strong = 3, no relation = 0) between theweighted needs and the learningobjectives. Table 5 Relationship array in the Needs to Learning
force in an authentic way. Students carry many misconceptions about how things interact and move, and this (unit) will provide authentic opportunities to correct these (misconceptions).However, in her reflection on the unit, she did note that “the length of time needed for the designproject required significantly more time (over two weeks due to snow days) than is typicallyneeded to cover the topic of friction: 2-3 days.” Teachers continually need to assess whetheradditional time spent on a topic, even if student understanding increases, is worth the investment. Another middle school science teacher taught her students the properties of rocks, minerals,and soils by having them design eco-friendly paint by grinding rocks and
highly valued within the field? Is the recommender able to write a good reference letter (i.e., literate, coherent, topical)While an individual recommender may not meet all of these criteria, someone who meets few orno items on this list may not be the most effective recommender for you.How to Ask for a RecommendationWhen you ask for a recommendation, ask specifically: “Would you be comfortable writing me astrong letter of recommendation?”[4]. While most faculty and supervisors will agree to provide aletter, if you specifically ask for a strong recommendation then you may hear back that someindividuals do not feel they could write you the strongest possible letter for this particularopportunity. This is not necessarily a reflection on you
undergraduate declared female majors in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (2, 2A, and 2OE) by class year and class standing. All data taken from the annual October census (“Number of Women Students”).2It is very important to note that this jump at MIT does not reflect a national trend. In the Spring2017 Term at the Georgia Institute of Technology, women compose only 27.4% of the totalundergraduate mechanical engineering majors (“Enrollment by Major”), while women composed35.4% of undergraduates in the fall term of 2015 (Georgia Institute of Technology). For the2016-2017 academic year at the California Institute of Technology, women compose 40.9% ofthe total undergraduate population (Caltech), but only 34.8% of the total
new weekly table that contained three activities named “Attend”,“View”, and “Read”, and two homework assignments named “Do” and “Write”. The Attend,View, and Read activities disseminated the course content through in-person events, onlinevideos, and textbook reading. The Do assignments were as a quiz or survey that had studentsanswer questions about the weekly activities and reflect on their immediate applicability. TheWrite assignments were one-page essays where we asked students to reflect on the weeklyactivities and to create a personal plan that would set themselves up to “Become a SuccessfulEngineering Student”. Students only received credit for the Do and Write assignments. The fullassignment schedule is attached in the Appendix.The
on student attitudes towards careers and research inSTEM and has increased their awareness of the skills needed for success in STEM careers.However, students seem to be less confident in the skills that they need for a career in STEMafter participating in research work. Further investigation is needed to determine the cause of theloss in confidence.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the Department of Education Minority Scienceand Engineering Improvement Program under Grant No. P120A140051. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Education.BibliographyBauer, K., & Bennett, J. (2003
that themost effective and socially responsible practices combine content, approaches, anddispositions from both the humanities and engineering, so they can navigate their waythrough the integrated space of these disciplines. Now in its second iteration, the courseoffers students opportunities to reflect on social justice and ethical issues whiledeveloping the qualities of compassion, empathy, and curiosity.Background and ContextSanitation is a Human RightInevitably, students and professionals must navigate the ethical labyrinth of imperfectoptions and make difficult human and design decisions. In “Humanitarian EngineeringPast and Present,” students are supported in their ethical decision-making by theknowledge that while sanitation is a basic
thatexamines leadership transitions throughout the career trajectory of engineers. The first phaseinvestigated the engineering leadership transitions that take place during undergraduateeducation [17]. The current phase of research investigates the school-to-work transition ofengineering graduates, while subsequent phases will focus on the transition from technical tomanagerial roles, including the lifetime reflections on career trajectories of engineers who end upin positions of senior leadership.The current phase of the project analyzed the experiences of individuals as nested cases withinfour engineering companies. We used two main sampling criteria to select early career engineersfor the participation in the study: (1) they should have completed
students the opportunity to work withindustrial scale equipment. This experience will potentially help students to develop skill setsneeded for the automation field. Future directions include evaluating instructional effectiveness,identifying which aspects of the experience help students learn, and determining optimal timeframes for completing assignments.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Advanced TechnologyProgram (Award no. 1304843). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Trade in Advanced Technology Products
(PVSC), pp. 2389-2391. IEEE.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underNSF EEC-1560031, as well as by the NSF and the Department of Energy (DOE) under NSF CANo. EEC-1041895. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NSF or DOE.
. The reflection questions toassess SRL strategy use throughout the semester was altered from a previous study assessing theSRL strategies in an Industrial Engineering course3. The interview protocol to examine students’FTP was modified from a previous protocol used to analyze the connection between FTP andproblem-solving, as well as other task-specific, current actions5. This protocol was first tested forvalidity, including a pilot study with four undergraduate engineering students4. A secondinterview protocol was developed to explore the connection between FTP and SRL, as a follow-up to the first interview. Underlying theory and the advice of experts were used to develop thequestions, and the protocol was piloted with an engineering
-based learning wrapped up in Making-Based Learning. We have sharedlearning attributes of making; it could be a useful intellectual exercise to consider how suchvalues are amplified or lessened within an engineering learning culture. The concept of additiveinnovation is mentioned above. Can that be supported in K-12 and undergraduate learningexperiences? Is the current implementation more convergent and less exploratory in nature?The study of Makers, Making and Making-Based Learning is a ripe opportunity for theengineering education community to reflect on our approach to teaching and learning. Making-Based Learning may already fit into some aspects of the engineering curriculum, such as first-year Introduction to Engineering courses and project
based onMessick’s Unified Theory of Validity. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.[12] Spencer, D. (2009). Card sorting: Designing usable categories. Rosenfeld Media.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation award EEC-1564629. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do no necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
location and trajectory of vehicles. Studentsuse these models to calculate the movement of two vehicles over a 5-second period. It isassumed that ∆𝑡𝑡 is 1 second. The instructor emphasizes that animations and transportationmeasures of effectiveness obtained from traffic simulation models are developed according to carfollowing models.Transportation measures of effectiveness (MOEs): In the next step, the instructor and studentsdiscuss indexes that could be used to quantify the quality of travel experienced by road users.Students are asked to reflect on their personal daily travel experiences and mention when theythink the transportation system is or is not working well for them. Through guided discussions,students typically list indexes such as
, at the same time,always students, and modules that reflect rapid technological evolution can be plugged in asappropriate” (Allenby 2011, p. 4).MethodsLiterature review and project selection The authors began this research by conducting an in-depth review of psychology andbehavioral science literature to determine common cognitive barriers and biases that impactdecisions. A useful codex (Benson 2016) was found that groups 175 biases into four categories:too much information, not enough meaning, need to act fast, and what to remember. Using thisand similar lists as a starting point, the relevant literature was compiled into an annotatedbibliography of over 25 seminal works in the field involving recognized cognitive barriers torational
societal considerations, continuous improvement, and lifelong learning.Course ActivitiesThe Integrated Technology Course at Institution X consists of the following activities:Integrated Technology Assessment Report (resume & learning statements)Integrated Technology Assessment (ITA) report development and submission is an importantcomponent of this course, as it engages students in reflecting on their past academic and/or professionalexperiences, as well as the project developed throughout the course. To assist the student to complete thereport in a timely manner, the report is prepared in accordance with the outline listed in the syllabus.Each section of the report is formulated as an assignment posted within the course tools
with a familiar group of peers, whichseems to lead to a greater sense of community, based on reflection by course instructors whonoticed particularly close-knit groups. Administrators from each department worked to developinitial outlines and structures that would facilitate curricular overlap and connection across eachintegrated “trio” of classes. Instructors in each “trio” were expected to collaboratively exploreand implement effective ways of reinforcing and integrating concepts and curriculum from thecourse they were paired with in their own courses. The program was implemented for sixsections of each course during the Fall 2016 semester. Another six “non-integrated” sections ofthe introductory Design Thinking course were taught with the
engineering and physics courses. Likewise,coaxial cables are ubiquitous in today’s world and this experiment can illuminate studentunderstanding of this important technology and its limitations.AcknowledgementsThe views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policyor position of the United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or theDepartment of Defense or U.S. Government.References[1] Simoni, M., Fayyaz, F., & Streveler, R. A. Data Mining to Help Determine Sources ofDifficulty in an Introductory Continuous-Time Signals and Systems Course. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education conference and exposition. Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[2] Fawwaz T. Ulaby, Fundamentals of Applied
estimations for practical designs. b) Cool Roofing New technologies are now becoming available to finish roofs that can divert incoming solar radiation that heat up the top floors of buildings. Conventional asphalt and tar shingle roofs are being replaced with ‘green roofs’: rooftop gardens that absorb sunlight and moderate rooftop rainwater runoff. However, green rooftops may not be appropriate atop all buildings, particularly those with steep roof slants, or where regular maintenance is problematic. Group B proposed the use of a ‘cool roof’ coating, which is a pigment or coating that reflects sunlight and insulates the top floor of a building from heat that would otherwise be transmitted to the upper
creates a focused exposure to thecredential’s ascending skill acquisition expectations. This ET degree provides a statewide modelof industry credentialed curriculum plus the checks and balances provided within the FLDOEeducation structure. Both attributes assure the quality and consistence of manufacturingeducation in Florida.Table 2 summarizes an example of a single college's approach to a stacked credential pathway.The information was acquired from program documentation generated by Lorain CountyCommunity College in Elyria Ohio. The pathways presented reflect the options within weldingcareers and are representative of credential included curriculum programs. Additionalinformation about welding credentials is available from the NSF-ATE Center
themotivation behind those decisions. An audit trail also provides an avenue for me to reflect onand communicate my role throughout my qualitative dissertation research. Qualitative researchis inherently interpretive 6,7, and my use of first person, active voice is intentional as itcommunicates the direct role the researcher plays as an “instrument” in qualitative research 4,7,8.My goal in writing a research audit trail as a conference paper is to communicate the “messiness”of qualitative research by using my own work as an example by which others can learn. Myintention is to be straightforward about the steps I took and decisions I made during my study asa way of restoring order to the messy research process. This level of transparency with
environment. When the lab environment is enjoyable, learning is accelerated.In Fig. 2 on statement 1, 44% of students were neutral and 38% agreed that the lectures wereuseful. This could signal that more demonstrations would be helpful. On statement 2, while 25%of the students strongly agreed on the usefulness of the lab instructions, 31% equally mentionedas agree or neutral. This somewhat reflects our objective of having minimal “recipe” instructionsthat require significant student attention. Statement 3 on interactive learning and discussionsduring the lab, students strongly agreed and agreed by 63% and 31%, respectively. Indeed, this isgreat news. For statement 4, 38% of students responded as strongly agree and 50% of students asagree about their
= StronglyAgree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their perception of experiences in STEM majors atthe HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons for student departure asoutlined in Talking About Leaving and the experiences of senior leaders on the project, each ofwhich having years of experience at HBCUs.7 To ensure the survey focused on the intendedareas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each survey item wasaligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. To account fordifferences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were created for eachgroup.Data CollectionData were collected from students (Group 1) and faculty (Group 2) using surveys. The
approach may be to articulate credit based uponrank for enlisted military personnel and veterans. ACE performs occupational reviews, similarto program accreditation reviews, which recommends credit based upon rank. Ford, et al (Ford &Ford, 2015) described the disparity in the number of credit recommendations for the enlistedranks. “The amount of credit recommended by ACE increased with rank. Many of the JSTs for senior NCOs reflected work in multiple occupational fields during their military enlistment. JSTs of senior NCOs in the sample contained substantial hours of credit recommendations: averaging over 150 semester hours. Much of this credit was recommended in military specific areas such as Military Science
motivating related to leadership) were mapped to it. Typical of outlinesprinciples behind the redesign involved integrally from older, introductory texts, the course was structured toconnecting the presentation and practice of both technical present a great breadth of topics. When reflecting andand professional engineering skills, introducing exercises commenting on the course, students expressed frustrationperceived as real-world and relevant, and refocusing the with a “lack of accomplishment” and “jumping around”—course on skills and principles common to engineers of all indicators of low self-efficacy beliefs. Further analysisdisciplines. This paper details a restructured curricular revealed that although many
concept-mapping approach both reduces the cognitive load, andimproves learning achievements of the students. Triplett et al. 18 propose Concept-in-Contextmaps (CCmaps) to link a wide array of different types of information that reflect the organizationof content within a topical area in an introductory materials course.While concept maps are deemed to be a good tool to portray knowledge structure and diagnoselearner’s misconception, we are more interested in their integration with generic learningparadigms and in this regard, our research shows the combination of active learning strategy withconcept mapping has led to plausible results for student oriented learning. Tembe and Kamble 19have studied 414 concept maps from 207 basic school students
ways of thinking)” (p. 2). Theyimplemented a studio requirement each year, where project based learning, community service,and reflection are highlighted. Kellam et al.8 drew from student reflections and focus grouptranscripts in their evaluation of this long-term integration. Guthrie et al.6 used quantitativestudent self assessment and collected student comments to gauge the effectiveness of theirinterdisciplinary capstone design course. Rhee et al.9 in “A Case Study of a Co-instructedMultidisciplinary Senior Capstone Project in Sustainability” discussed a senior capstone coursewhere students engage together with specific shared projects, share classroom space and meetingtimes. Mentors from several engineering and non-engineering disciplines
International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, wasfounded. This journal is exclusively devoted to publishing works on the impact of servicelearning in engineering education. One issue in particular, Special Issue: University EngineeringPrograms That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, focused on communityimpact. Schools such asThis increase in project based and service learning has led to a need for students engaged in theseprojects to understand and address stakeholders who do not have a technical background.Zoltowski and Oakes (Carla B. Zoltowski, 2014) discuss this need as well as the need to developand maintain relationships with community partners. Additionally, the difficulty ofunderstanding conflicting priorities of
; Douglas, 2008; Walther, 2014; Walther, Sochacka, & Kellam, 2013). There aredangers, however, that as qualitative research becomes more common the ways in which itis used fail to reflect quality approaches. One early work critiqued inconsistencies betweenespoused and practiced epistemologies in qualitative papers (Koro-Ljungberg & Douglas,2008). Other authors have critiqued interpretive methods, such as thematic analysis, forresulting in superficial descriptions of phenomena that do not provide meaningful insight(Jackson & Mazzei, 2012; St. Pierre, 2000; St. Pierre & Jackson, 2014) Another concern isthat the qualitative approaches described in papers and textbooks can become seen aschecklists that must be followed, rather than
scheduling S-STEM Scholar events where attendance to our S-STEM Scholars programs had to take into account that many of these students would haveexternal obligations that would conflict with organizing group activities. Additionally, many of our S-STEM Scholar participants came from both an older part-timestudent population, and/or commuter student population that reflected the increasingly largerportion of the overall student body. It was understood that these students have a higher rate ofattrition from college than their more traditional (4-year) counterparts. However as documentedresearch has determined, the reasons for the drop-out rate is not as well understood unless wereview some of the potential causes [8]. According to the National