important list that we should include in the collection, and thelist of the journals in Cluster 2 and Cluster 3 as a potential list for revisit if we would encounter a budgetcut in the future. The results reflected variability of the usage pattern while the cost-per-use modelfailed to do so, suggesting additional criteria for the current pruning practice. Figure 10. Percentage of Journal Usage Respectively for Publications, Citations and DownloadsNext, K-Means clustering had two advantages in journal usage analysis compared to a synthesis methodused for the original journal usage report. K-Means clustering was easy to apply because it would simplyfind journals with a similar pattern of how a journal had been used with respect to
for “Did you learn something new during this activity?” Figure 12: Survey results for “Did you enjoy the activity?”Manufacturing Engineering Workshop Figure 13: Survey results for “Did you learn something new during this activity?” Figure 14: Survey results for “Did you enjoy the activity?”The survey results indicate that many girl scouts enjoyed Biomedical, Electrical andManufacturing Engineering workshops. 100% of the scouts learned some/a lot of BiomedicalEngineering and Manufacturing Engineering, while 99.2% of the scouts learned some/a lot ofElectrical Engineering. Scouts also reflected that they enjoyed the experience very much. 86.9%of the scouts really liked Biomedical Engineering workshop
provided to scholars have themost impact, especially in “Scientific Self-Efficacy”, “Science/Engineering Identity” and“Expectations”. Less than 16% of the scholars consider attending conferences or featuring theirresearch on website as having a positive impact. The lower percentages in those two activitiesmay also reflect that not all the scholars have the opportunities to attend a research conference ordo research, also have research results featured on website. Figure 4. Percentages of individual research activities having contributed positively to the five categories. The five community building activities have contributed more in helping studentsintegrate into the program and campus. Illustrated in
-faceformat [9]. Without empirical data, it is difficult to conclude if online professional developmentis as effective as face-to-face methods, and thereby a suitable solution for providing low-cost,convenient professional development for technology instructors.Background Professional development in education can be defined as “process and activities” thatenhance knowledge, skill and attitudes of educators and can include preparation for teaching newcontent, support during the instructional process and reflection for continuous improvement infuture instructional settings [10]. Because there are frequent changes in educational standards,changes to how teacher performance is measured, changes in student outcome assessments andchanges in available
? concepts? learning new ways to get computers to do what you want? Identity Please select In general, being an In general, being a computer the best engineer is an important science student is an important answer on a part of my self-image. part of my self-image. scale from 1 Being an engineer is an Being a computer science to 7 (anchors important reflection of who student is an important in
perceptions may reflect the same. Otherfactors may include feedback from peers.A survey instrument was developed to determine how students and industry members perceivetheir major courses and if their attitude correlates with their self-reported grades. A positivecorrelation would indicate that attitude is a factor in learning. Further by measuring industryperceptions, additional insight will be provided into whether these courses are used aftergraduation. There were no questions as to how the perceptions were formed, although this couldbe the focus of a future study.MethodologyThe study utilized a survey method to identify the importance of structural design coursework andcompared with humanities, writing, calculus, English literature coursework
excited about our program and we got positive feedback from thestudents. Students reflected that they would like to participate more STEM related activities inthe future.Introduction/BackgroundNowadays, more and more scientists, engineers and innovators are needed to succeed in theglobal competitive economy environment. As a result, this requires quality science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. However, few American students pursueeducation and training in the STEM fields. After noticing this challenge, the whole STEMsociety has made great efforts to increase STEM-related activities, which have the potential topromote collaborative learning and inquiry as well as to contribute to the development of the21st century skills
. Consider how your lectures will proceed before recording or transmitting them in order to optimize their length. Are there images or equations that would be just as effective if presented in their final form, or should you plan to develop those as you might in a face-to-face course?. Remember students have a pause button they do not have in a live class where writing and reflective time is important. Shorter videos also ease your burden as there is less cost associated with technical glitches or individual errors that can wipe out a recording in process. 6. Accountability and Engagement. Consider how you can incorporate low-stakes assessments or other activities into your instructional materials to keep
Engineering Civil 9 4 6 11 6 Engineering TOTAL 69 70 84 137 143 Table 1. UNM STEP students/participants number split by academic major.The data in Table 1 reflects the number distribution for STEP students by major. The distributionparallels the number of student enrollees in each major (i.e. correlates with it). For example,students with large undergraduate enrollment like mechanical engineering have a relatively highSTEP participation. This is not always the case as Electrical Engineering is large in undergraduatenumbers but not participating highly in STEP activities. Another reason for high
2schematics diagram of the active distillation system. Figures 4a and 4b show the detailedconstruction of the solar collector panel. The solar collector panel was constructed of two arraysof nine evacuated solar tubes paired with parabolic reflectors (Fig. 5a) that were overlaid withMylar sheeting. The arrays were constructed using plywood, and were hinged together. Thenine evacuated solar tubes in each array ranin series, and the two arrays ran in parallel. Theevacuated solar tubes, made of borosilicate glass, had double walls with vacuum between thewalls to absorb and trap the incoming energy from solar radiation. Figure 5b shows a schematicdiagram of the operation of the evacuated solar tube. High reflective aluminum and coppercoating was used to
lectures in achieving the learning objectives ofthe Surface Science portion of the lab course was assessed by three criteria: 1) the accuracy ofthe reported values of the CMC, the maximum surface excess just below the CMC, and the areaper molecule of the adsorbed surfactant at this bulk surfactant concentration; 2) theunderstanding of the concepts of surfactant adsorption, micelle formation, surface excess, andadsorption isotherms as reflected by the submitted technical reports; and 3) the level ofunderstanding of these same concepts as reflected by the answers to three quizzes related to theseconcepts.Student performance indicated that the learning objectives were achieved based on both the finalgrade for the lab as well as the individual
working on the link between pigs and infectious diseases on a farm. Theresearch requires analysis of pig waste samples in order to assess the health of each pig farm.”Course gradesIt is essential that the students understand the importance of this course and integrate the safetyknowledge gained into their work. As a result, scoring in the course also reflected these broadgoals. Grades given in the course were based on technical understanding, ability to communicate,ability to contribute to the understanding of the objective, and ability to meet deadlines. Thecourse and final project requirements were communicated at the beginning of the semester andrepeatedly emphasized throughout the semester. The grade breakdown was as follows: In-Class
of a real world problems. This includes an reflective thinking, ability to gain appreciation for solving a real world perspective, making connections, and problem and the connection and problem solving through a student communication required to accomplish reflection, modeled off of the survey and this. rubric of the CTLE.VI. Project SafetyRegardless of the work setting, industrial or laboratory, there are potential risks. Ensuring safework practices is of paramount importance. Operating companies place a strong emphasis onsafety by establishing procedures and methods to identify potential risks, developing andimplementing risk
moststraightforward STS content of any CES course. Finally, the CES component of the capstonecourse requires students to perform a “Real-Time Technology Assessment” of their own project,incorporating sociotechnical thinking into the engineering design process. CES members have reflected a great deal on how to best maintain the critical eye towardtechnology and society that they bring from their STS training while participating in thepractical, day-to-day goings on of an engineering and computer science faculty. In a piece in thejournal Engineering Studies (the inaugural paper in the journal’s “Critical Participation”category), CES faculty described the tensions that result from the position of CES within afaculty of engineering. Locally, the place of
towards tutoring and the impact of serving asa peer educator, and 3) whether level of commitment to group SI correlated with tutors’perceptions of how they were impacted.Forty-one individuals who served as peer tutors at Northeastern University between 2005 and2018 were invited to respond to online surveys. Those who completed the online survey wereinvited to participate in follow-up phone interviews. Subjects were asked about their experienceswith SI, their motivations to provide instruction, their level of commitment to the program,and—as they reflected on their college and post-graduation endeavors—their perceptions of thevalue of their tutoring experience. Statistical comparisons were drawn from the responses of 20female and 9 male tutors to
andidentity, and encouraging career-related reflection. This review provides insight into the nuance ofthe breadth of students’ experiences in student organizations to inform future work examining thecontextual influence of experiential learning on engineering students’ professional development.IntroductionEngineering education programs aim to prepare graduates to transition into the 21st centuryworkforce as professional engineers with a breadth of technical and interpersonal skills and a senseof professional responsibility. Multiple competing influences have contributed to engineeringeducation’s current overcrowded curriculum, which largely focuses on technical knowledge [1].This technical focus is increasingly being questioned amidst calls for
course learningoutcomes) rather than direct measures (e.g., work produced by students evaluated against criteriathat reflect the learning outcomes). While beyond the scope of the present study, examiningdirect evidence of students’ learning and development in this course context would be a usefulnext step. Our future work also seeks to understand how students identify their own and others’strengths and their conceptions of the design process. Individual student interviews along withanalysis of student free responses around design and project management will be used to furtherinvestigate these questions. In the present study, researchers hoped for a higher survey responserate to allow for group comparisons across various identities (i.e., race
2014 called Repos (an acronym for Oswaldo Sevá Grassroots Engineering Network).Repos’ intended proposals are: to technically support social movements across the country;provide formative experiences for those interested in GE practices; and reflect on Brazilianengineering syllabuses so as to be able to lobby for an engineering education compatible with theformation of grassroots engineers, and assist universities and/or governments in theimplementation of such formation processes [3], [13].From within Repos, it has been consolidated an understanding – or definition – of whatgrassroots engineering is. That is, “a practice that, through university extension, develops socialtechnology along with solidarity enterprises, based on participatory
engineering macroethics. Even more discouraging is the fact thatthere is insufficient amount of work on integrated approaches to address both micro and macroissues in engineering, that is, linking personal and professional ethics as well as linkingprofessional and social ethics [1]. The micro-macro distinction, however, is not always clear andone might find it difficult to encourage ethical reflection at a micro level without taking macroaspects into account [4]. To understand how microethics and macroethics are related, we will nowdiscuss each in detail.Sensitivity to MicroethicsMicroethics focuses on issues for the most part internal to engineering practice, such as therelationship between individual engineers, or between the engineers and their
: Learning Objectives and Core Activities for Introduction Section Learning Objective Core Activities 1. Learn about other members in the group and 1. Introductions begin building a learning community 2. Reflect on group dynamics and ways to 2. Examining constructive and make the group functional destructive group behaviors 3. Establish ground rules for participation 3. Generate ground rulesThe introductory activities are particularly important because they help participants identifydeeper connections (beyond major or home department) and begin building trust and a learningcommunity. The list of suggested introduction activities that is provided as part of the
education, including how to support engineering students in reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teach- ing decisions, and the application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Look Into the Lived Experiences of Incorporating Inclusive Teaching Practices in Engineering Education AbstractThis research paper contributes to the field's understanding on how to support educators increating a diverse and inclusive engineering education environment. Even with manyconversations around diversity and inclusion, recruitment
2012, S-STEM projects were required to dedicate 85% of budgets to scholarships.Starting in 2012, the NSF solicitation changed to allow increased expenditures for programmatic,evaluation and knowledge generation efforts. S-STEM teams are challenged to implementprograms that reflect best practices and generate evidence regarding successful interventions.1.2 Institutional ContextAugsburg University is a private Lutheran institution with an enrollment of about 3,000 students,approximately two thirds of whom are undergraduates. Founded in 1869, Augsburg has a strongcommitment to providing broad access to a quality education and supporting students fromdiverse backgrounds. As of Fall 2019, 45% of the full-time undergraduates were students ofcolor
-world situations, students find the material more engaging. 2It has been pointed that “improving performance in the STEM subjects and inspiring youngpeople to consider careers in science, technology engineering and mathematics are complexgoals that only can be achieved by a multifaceted, systematics and sustainable initiative [6].” Thekey to success is changing the school culture to one of collaboration with high expectations andcontinual reflection for growth. We propose that given the right environment, schools canincrease the quality of STEM instruction through an integrated and hands-on approach. The P-TECH 9-14 school model aims to create
, General Motors, and General Electric andmanufacturers in general [11] [12] [13]. The issues regarding the Boeing 737 Max are apowerful backdrop for faculty to highlight the distinction between perceived operating efficiencyand true productivity.2.0 Evolution of Operating Efficiency MeasurementIt may interest manufacturing engineering students that the root of operating efficiency has itsbeginning largely with the industrial revolution which began in England. As early as 1791Benjamin Franklin understood the need to contribute something of value to society each day withthe question, “What good shall I do today?” This was but one of Franklin’s 13 virtues. Hissentiment is reflected and shared by the Engineering Creed as well as the
based on our past experiences, cultural perspectives, innocuous misconceptions, orsubjective biases. Measuring these different mental models poses a unique challenge sinceconceptualizations are held in the mind and any description of them is simply a representation ofthe mental model and not the mental model itself; in other words, we are seeing a reflection ofthe mental model through a dirty mirror. In this work, the previously published instruments usedto elicit undergraduate students’ mental models [1-3] are deployed without intervention to makeprogress on validation of the instruments for future research studies, therefore cleaning thatmetaphorical mirror. Despite the impossibility of perfectly representing a mental model, thiswork takes a
at home.Some of the opportunities reflected more accurate conceptions of the work of engineers thanothers, but students often described key people who served as informal mentors in engineeringby inviting them to help with projects. Notably, these key individuals were often male familymembers: fathers, grandfathers, and uncles. No student provided an example of doing somethingthey saw as engineering with a female family member. Although boys referred to theseexperiences more often, they were not exclusive to boys. For example, one girl said, “Well, mygrandpa would do some of that [engineering] stuff too, and my dad, and so I would help themwith my dirt bike or my snowmobile and stuff. Because I’m like a tomboy, but I’m also a girlygirl too
on research [18] [19] [20].Women also are more likely to use student-centered teachingpractices [21] [22]. Moreover, women show greater commitment to community service in theirfaculty roles [23] and are more likely to pursue service as scholarship [24] [25] [26]. Park notesthat some responses to this gendered division of labor problematize women [17]. For example,women are often advised to become better at saying no to service requests in order to prioritizeresearch. She argues that such advice reflects sexist attitudes pervasive in our society thatundervalue nurturing tasks (child rearing, teaching, advising, mentoring) and communal servicetasks (departmental and institutional service) often undertaken by females. Moreover, Parkargues that
scalesrepresenting academic challenge (higher order learning, reflective and integrative learning,learning strategies, and quantitative reasoning) and two scales representing experiences withfaculty (student-faculty interactions and effective teaching practices). The subscales associatedwith the latter set of indicators (experiences with faculty) are similar to faculty support andstudent-faculty interaction scales used in other research efforts. In contrast, the four subscalesassociated with academic challenge reflect what students actually do in their academic endeavorsby measuring time on task associated with the various skills that students use and develop duringtheir college experience [15].Studies which focus on the emotional aspects of engagement are
experiments, and draw conclusions from the evidence. Inaddition, most of the students in the class indicated little or no previous exposure to PBL-basedlabs, which also contributed to this perception. However, the open-ended responses regardingwhat the students did or did not like about the labs reflected a consistent theme that students feltPBL provided a highly engaging, hands-on experience and that the lab activities were morerelevant to real-life problems. In terms of the time commitment required to complete each labmodule, some students stated that they preferred the modified lab structure (a multi-week labtask) to a weekly lab, because it provided them with a greater degree of flexibility in schedulingwith other team members to complete the lab
. Given that engineering starts and endswith people, it may be helpful to have students reflect on the impacts of their design work onstakeholders and the environment at different phases within the design process. Lastly, this resultalso highlights the need for the broader engineering design curriculum within senior design andpossibly earlier required courses to examine how to better support students’ thinking about theimplications of engineering and its relationship to society.The lack of deep consideration for stakeholders seen in the preliminary results of this work inprogress is consistent with previous studies of students from a large public institution.Researchers found that learning activities focused on stakeholders supported students