to Failure," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 547-573, 2019.[3] B. A. Camburn, "Design Prototyping Methods," Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering Dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2015.[4] B. A. Camburn, D. Jensen, R. Crawford, K. Otto, and K. Wood, "Evaluation of a Strategic Method to Improve Prototype Performance with Reduced Cost and Fabrication Time," in DS 80-4 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, July 27 - July 30 2015, vol. 4: The Design Society, pp. 333-342.[5] S. P. Dow, K. Heddleston, and S. R. Klemmer, "The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time
education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01038.x.[2] E. A. Cech and H. M. Sherick, “Depoliticization as a mechanism of gender inequality among engineering faculty,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019, pp. 1–12, doi: https://peer.asee.org/32586.[3] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 311–334.[4] E. A. Cech and W. R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ inequality in engineering
Paper ID #32358Learning from the Voices of Faculty: An Analysis of the Impact ofShelter-in-Place on Faculty at San Jose State University in Spring 2020Dr. Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University Maria Chierichetti joined the department of Aerospace Engineering as a full-time assistant professor in Fall 2019. Her interests lie in the field of aerospace structural design and vibrations, with particular emphasis on developing methodologies for combining finite element analysis and machine/deep learning for structural health monitoring and unmanned Structural inspections in the context of urban air mobility. Maria is
, “Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence: Designing an Institutional Change Plan Using Local Evidence”, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no 2, pp. 331-361, apr. 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20042.[2] G. Zavala, M. Truyol, and A. Dominguez, “Professional Development Program on Active Learning for Engineering Faculty in Chile: First Stage”, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, jun. 2017, p. 28761, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28761.[3] D. Rodríguez-Oroz, R. Gómez-Espina, M. J. Bravo Pérez, and M. E. Truyol, “Aprendizaje basado en un proyecto de gamificación: vinculando la educación universitaria con la divulgación de la
the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #32715UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of theWomen in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli-mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering
hoursConclusions:This paper presents an effort attempting to prepare College of Engineering and Technology faculty for allthe uncertainties and changes they had to face as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The series ofdiscussions organized by faculty across different departments certainly have helped many facultymembers facing the enormous challenges in multiple facets. The ideas collected from these sessionsparticularly assisted in transitioning essential experiential learning to appropriate contexts in order tocomply with capacity limitations, PPE requirements, and social distancing. Experiential learning wasunderstandably one of the most impacted areas of teaching and learning given all of the constraints.The authors wish such a discussion at an ASEE
her an in-depth understanding of the developmental nature of students participatingDr. Krishna Bista, Krishna Bista is an Associate Professor at Morgan State University, Maryland (USA).Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko is currently a Doctoral student and Research Associate in the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore Maryland. Prior to joining the department in January of 2019, Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko was a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) at Tennessee State American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
. A. Cheville and J. Heywood, “Tensions Between Industry and Academia: Policy Making and Curriculum Development,” in The Engineering-Business Nexus: Symbiosis, Tension, and Co- Evolution, S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M. Meganck, and M. Murphey, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 475–498.[25] M. Gauci, A. Perz, S. Purzer, J. Kirkpatrick, and S. McComb, “A Comparison of Nursing and Engineering Undergraduate Education,” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2012.[26] T. Adams and P. H. Sawchuk, “Professional-Organizational Contradictions and Hybridization of Knowledge: Insights from the Study of Engineering and Nursing in Canada,” Vocat. Learn., 2020
these learning objectives throughout our lab sequence, we hope these results willhelp us make informed and intentional decisions regarding the specific domains of learning. Wealso hope this serves as a resource for other educators considering qualitative research to enhanceassessment of engineering education, particularly around curricular changes.References[1] G. Neumann, D. Anastasio, H. Chenette, and T. Ribera, “Work in Progress: Developing aMulti-dimensional Method for Student Assessment in Chemical Engineering LaboratoryCourses,” presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference.[2] G. Neumann, D. Anastasio, and H. Chenette, (2019, November), Using MultidimensionalMetrics to Assess Changes to Student Attitudes and Ability in a Capstone Laboratory
skills forengineering freshmen.References[1] W. Lee, D. Gee, and S. Tiari, “Assessment of self-regulated learning in service-learning project in a first-year seminar in engineering course,” in Proc. 2019 Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE), Oct. 16-19, 2019, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 1-6.[2] Tom Ridge Environmental Center/Research Science Consortium. [Online] https://www.trecf.org/foundation/ research/regional-science-consortium.[3] Ultimate Excel Dashboard – Episode 1. How to Create Impressive Interactive Excel Dashboard. [Online] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKkXtyjleX4.[4] Ultimate Excel Dashboard – Episode 4. Auto-Refresh Pivot Tables and Pivot Charts when Source Data Changes. [Online] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xdq7SE-z-Aw
Australia. ANUwas successfully with 10 scholarships from the only round of the AsiaBound program, whichwere used for the first three Summits in January, June and July 2015. An additional 20scholarships from the first NCP round will support students for the 2016 Summits and 40scholarships have been secured from the second NCP round to support students on Summitsfrom 2017 through to mid-2019. In 2014 ANU and EWB-A were successful with a jointcompetitive education grant to develop a dedicated later year humanitarian engineeringcourse called Engineering for a Humanitarian Context (EfaHC) course, which was the first ofits type in Australia12. This was aimed at students in the second half of their four-yeardegree, and in particular those who had enjoyed
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ Ethical Decision-making and Implications for Engineering Ethics EducationAbstractRecent research in moral psychology suggests that people often rely on emotion and intuition tomake moral judgments, rather than reasoning, which engineering ethics education has mainlyfocused on. In parallel with such findings, studies in the scholarship of engineering ethics haveemphasized the importance of emotional capacities of engineers and considered how toincorporate emotional factors into the ethics education of engineering students. Despite growinginterest in the importance of emotional aspects of engineering ethics education, however
part of the learning process. Pre and post surveys will be used tohelp us evaluate student learning and comprehension during the summer semester.References1. Wilkerson, S. A., & Forsyth, J., & Korpela, C. M. (2019, June), Project Based Learning Using the Robotic Operating System (ROS) for Undergraduate Research Applications Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/287682. Wilkerson, S. A., & Forsyth, J., & Sperbeck, C., & Jones, M., & Lynn, P. D. (2019, June), A Student Project using Robotic Operating System (ROS) for Undergraduate Research Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27515
National Center for Families Learning (NCFL), Federation for Community Schools and Chicago Symposium Series. Evelyn earned a Bachelor’s of Arts in Journalism from Columbia College Chicago. She is currently receiving her Master’s in Business Administration from St. Xavier University concentrating in Business Management and Project Management. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The STEAM Conference: An event to promote youth to explore STEAM-related fields and potential careers (RTP).IntroductionThe STEAM conference is a student-led conference developed as part of the collaborationbetween Columbia College Chicago and Northeastern Illinois University (NEIU) and their Out
,California, USA, Nov. 15-21, 2013.[12] C. Pantaleon, and A. Ghosh, “Taylor series expansion using matrices: an implementation inMATLAB”, Computers & Fluids, Volume 112, 2 May 2015, Pages 79–82, 2015.[13] R. C. Hibbeler, Engineering Mechanics – Dynamics, 13th Edition, Pearson, 2013.[14] A. Ghosh, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019 (in preparation)
Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities (Springer, 2013), and Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice (with Jon Leydens) (IEEE-Wiley, 2018) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Recognizing engineering students’ funds of knowledge: Creating and validating survey measuresAbstractThis research base paper examines students who are the first in their families to attend college.Our research seeks to understand the role students’ funds of knowledge makes in first-generationcollege students’ undergraduate experience. Funds of knowledge are the set of formal/informalknowledge and skills that students learn through
, Canada, 2019.[19] D. I. Hanauer, J. Frederick, B. Fotinakes, and S. A. Strobel, "Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences," CBE-Life Sciences Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 378-85, Winter 2012.[20] A. Haapasaari, Y. Engeström, and H. Kerosuo, "The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention," Journal of Education and Work, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 232-262, 2016.[21] V. Svihla, J. R. Gomez, M. A. Watkins, and T. B. Peele-Eady, "Characterizing framing agency in design team discourse," in Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exhibition: ASEE, 2019.[22] J. P. Gee, An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method
. 13Litzinger, T., Van Meter, P., Firetto, C., Passmore, L., Masters, C., Turns, S., Gray, G., Costanzo, F., & Zappe, S. (2010). A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 337–337.Lutz, B. D., Ironside, A. J., Hunsu, N., Groen, C. J., Brown, S. A., Adesope, O., & Simmons, D. R. (2018). Measuring Engineering Students’ In-Class Cognitive Engagement: Survey Development Informed by Contemporary Educational Theories. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/30795McCord, R. E., & Matusovich, H. M. (2019). Naturalistic observations of metacognition in engineering: Using observational methods to study metacognitive
to come by in many courses. Our main conclusion is that in the absence of allaspects of the MSU implementation, the learning outcome gains may not be achievable.AcknowledgementsThis research was conducted under local IRB protocol number 1907008977. Dr. Erika Mudrakfrom Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit provided valuable assistance with the statisticalanalysis.References [1] R. Averill, G. Recktenwald, and S. Roccabianca, “Effect of Assessment Methods on Performance in Mechanics of Materials,” In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [2] R. Averill, S. Roccabianca, and G. Recktenwald, “A Multi-Instructor Study of Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses,” In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [3] R
] Springer, M. L., & Schuver, M. T. (2015). The New Professional Working Adult Learner – The Next Generational Cohort. ASEE 2015 Annual Conference Proceedings. Seattle, WA.[17] Scott, M. & Nightingale, D. (2018). The Education-Jobs “Mix-Match”: How Much Opportunity is There for the College-Educated Workforce in America’s Metropolitan Areas? Urban Institute. Washington, D.C.[18] Springer, M. L. (2019). Project and Program Management: A Competency-Based Approach. 4th ed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal Processing, Communications, and Education Societies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Design-based Evaluation as a Novel Evaluation Approach for Faculty Development Programs in Engineering EducationIntroductionIn this theory paper, the authors introduce design-based evaluation (DBE) as a novel evaluationapproach for the engineering education research community. Many projects and programs
use their agency to engage in broadening participation in engineering activities. Cynthia received her B.S. in Biological Systems Engineering from Kansas State University and will receive her M.S. in Management Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2019.Dr. Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is Dean of the Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. From 2011-16 she served was Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of
innovation processes, through studying experi- ences of individuals and teams that lead to innovative thinking and through integrating that knowledge into organizational change. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Exploration of Course Design Heuristics Identified from Design Meetings, Design Artifacts, and Educator InterviewsIntroductionThis research paper investigates differences between course design heuristics used in engineeringthat have been identified from three distinct data sources: course design meetings, course designpapers, and educator interviews. Heuristics are used in the daily practice of many diversedisciplines, including industrial design [1], orienteering
education. In particular, she is interested in engineering identity, problem-solving, and the intersections of online learning and alternative pathways for adult, nontraditional, and veteran undergraduates in engineering.Theresa Green, Utah State University Theresa Green is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration and improving diversity and inclusion in engineer- ing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25908An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative
the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices for Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: Perspectives of Academic LibrariansAbstractInformation literacy instruction (ILI) has long been an important part of undergraduate education.Subject librarians, together with undergraduate
oxide membranes and teaching reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. She is now a Teaching Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at CSM. Her primary research focus is in pedagogy, specifically in utilizing tablets and other technology and different teaching methods to increase student engagement and reduce/eliminate lecturing in the classroom. She likes to play with her kids, play racquetball, run, bike, swim, and play pool in her free time.Dr. Jason C. Ganley, Colorado School of Mines c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices in Teaching unit operations: the “Field Session” Lab Experience at
academic administration and leadership. She currently serves on the ASEE Engineering Deans Council Executive Board, the ABET Academic Affairs Council, and chairs the ABET Task Force on Diversity and Inclusion.Dr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college transitions and retention of underrepresented students in engineering and also research about engineering global preparedness and engineering innovation. She also has research expertise in STEM K-12 and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Eva Schiorring, Canada College Eva Schiorring has almost two decades of experience
Education Design Principles to Broaden Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. San Diego, CA: BEST, February 2004. Available: http://www.bestworkforce.org/sites/default/files/research/downloads/Bridge%20for%20A ll%20Higher%20Ed%20report.pdf [Accessed March 3, 2019].[8] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, “A Model of Co-Curricular Support for Undergraduate Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 406–430, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20123[9] M. Anderson-Rowland and C. Ruben, (2008). “Academic achievement and retention in a minority engineering program” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008. https
, Blog, March 13, 2018,http://newleafedu.com/2018/03/13/rubrics/[10] R. Averill, “Compass,” New Leaf Education, Blog, April 17, 2018,http://newleafedu.com/2018/04/17/compass/[11] Ronald C. Averill, “The Seven C’s of Solving Engineering Problems,” ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 16-19, 2019.[12] H.L. Roediger III and A.C. Butler, “Testing Improves Long-Term Retention in a SimulatedClassroom Setting,” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 514-527, 2007.[13] B. Rogerson, “Effectiveness of a Daily Class Progress Assessment Technique inIntroductory Chemistry,” Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 80, pp. 160-164, 2003.
Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2001.[4] Ohio State University College of Engineering, “Annual Statistical Report,” 2019.[5] B. Morin, K. Kecskemety, K. Harper, and P. Clingan, “The Inverted Classroom in a First- Year Engineering Course,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Confernce & Exposition Proceedings, 2013.[6] M. Kuhn and K. Vaught-Alexander, “Context for Writing in Engineering Curriculum,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 392–400, 1994.[7] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[8] L. Davidovitch, A. Parush, and A. Shtub, “Davidovitch, L., Parush, A