Wilson-Lopez, A., & Minichiello, A., & Green, T. (2019, June), An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative Research  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32067

\bibitem{asee_peer_32067}
  Wilson-Lopez, A., \& Minichiello, A., \& Green, T. (2019, June), \emph{An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative Research}
  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida.
  10.18260/1-2--32067

Amy Wilson-Lopez, Angela Minichiello P.E., and Theresa Green.  "An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative Research".  2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2019.  https://peer.asee.org/32067 Internet.  17 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_32067}
  Amy Wilson-Lopez, Angela Minichiello P.E., and Theresa Green.
  "An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative Research".
  \emph{2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2019.
  https://peer.asee.org/32067 Internet.  17 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_32067
author = "Amy Wilson-Lopez, Angela Minichiello P.E., and Theresa Green"
title = "An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative Research"
booktitle = "2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2019"
month = "June"
address = "Tampa, Florida"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/32067}
number = {10.18260/1-2--32067}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - In this theory paper, we set out to consider, as a matter of methodological interest, the use of quantitative measures of inter-coder reliability (e.g., percentage agreement, correlation, Cohen’s Kappa, etc.) as necessary and/or sufficient correlates for quality within qualitative research in engineering education. 
It is well known that the phrase qualitative research represents a diverse body of scholarship conducted across a range of epistemological viewpoints and methodologies. Given this diversity, we concur with those who state that it is ill advised to propose recipes or stipulate requirements for achieving qualitative research validity and reliability. Yet, as qualitative researchers ourselves, we repeatedly find the need to communicate the validity and reliability—or quality—of our work to different stakeholders, including funding agencies and the public.
One method for demonstrating quality, which is increasingly used in qualitative research in engineering education, is the practice of reporting quantitative measures of agreement between two or more people who code the same qualitative dataset. In this theory paper, we address this common practice in two ways. First, we identify instances in which inter-coder reliability measures may not be appropriate or adequate for establishing quality in qualitative research. We query research that suggests that the numerical measure itself is the goal of qualitative analysis, rather than the depth and texture of the interpretations that are revealed. Second, we identify complexities or methodological questions that may arise during the process of establishing inter-coder reliability, which are not often addressed in empirical publications.
To achieve this purposes, in this paper we will ground our work in a review of qualitative articles, published in the Journal of Engineering Education, that have employed inter-rater or inter-coder reliability as evidence of research validity. In our review, we will examine the disparate measures and scores (from 40% agreement to 97% agreement) used as evidence of quality, as well as the theoretical perspectives within which these measures have been employed. Then, using our own comparative case study research as an example, we will highlight the questions and the challenges that we faced as we worked to meet rigorous standards of evidence in our qualitative coding analysis, We will explain the processes we undertook and the challenges we faced as we assigned codes to a large qualitative data set approached from a post positivist perspective. We will situate these coding processes within the larger methodological literature and, in light of contrasting literature, we will describe the principled decisions we made while coding our own data. We will use this review of qualitative research and our own qualitative research experiences to elucidate inconsistencies and unarticulated issues related to evidence for qualitative validity as a means to generate further discussion regarding quality in qualitative coding processes.


AU  - Amy Wilson-Lopez
AU  - Angela Minichiello P.E.
AU  - Theresa Green
CY  - Tampa, Florida
DA  - 2019/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - An Inquiry Into the Use of Intercoder Reliability Measures in Qualitative Research
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/32067
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--32067
ER  -