leadership teams navigate power and privilege within their teams.A Year Later, the Revised Workshop (2019). After another year of learning about power andprivilege and reflecting on our previous workshop, we implemented a revised workshop at the2019 annual NSF RED Consortium Meeting. The 2019 workshop is very similar to the workshopthat is provided in the appendix and described earlier in this design case. Early in the workshop,a participant complimented us as being inclusive by providing a few copies of the handout inlarge print, something Nadia had suggested because she had been involved in a workshop inwhich a participant could not participate because they had forgotten reading glasses.At this workshop, we completely revamped our workshop with
School of Engineering Technology. Her teaching and scholarly interests are in the areas of supply chain management, quality control, and graduate education. She served as Department Head of Industrial Technology from 2007 to 2010. Prior to her appointment at Purdue University in 1993, she spent seven years teaching for Texas A&M University’s Department of Engineering Technology. Dr. Newton has a Ph.D. in Educational Human Resource Development, a Master’s degree in Business Administration, and a B.S. in Industrial Distribution, each from Texas A&M University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 DEVELOPMENT OF CURRICULUM IN TECHNOLOGY- RELATED SUPPLY CHAIN
focused on digital learning innovations that can be developed and refined through rapid prototyping and then promoted throughout the university to maximize collective impact on student success at scale. With over twenty years of experience in both instructional design and teaching, her current research is focused on blended learning, collaborative online learning and internationalizing the curriculum through technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Adapting Mixed-Mode Instructional Delivery To Thrive Within STEM Curricula Ronald F. DeMara1, Tian Tian2, Shadi Sheikhfaal1 and Wendy Howard3 { Department of Electrical and
Completion Project,” Council of Graduate Schools, 2008. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://legacy.cgsnet.org/phd-completion-and-attrition-analysis-baseline-demographic-data- phd-completion-project-0[20] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013, pp. 67–84. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4.[21] E. Cech and H. Sherick, “Depoliticization as a Mechanism of Gender Inequality among Engineering Faculty,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
. Her research has been published in several premier journals, including the Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Higher Education, and Race, Ethnicity, and Education. She is a contributing author to several books published by Oxford University Press and University of California Press. She served as President for the Korean American Educational Researchers Association, including President in 2013-2014, and Chair of the KAERA Board of Directors in 2019-2020.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of Tennessee, Space Institute Jerry Dahlberg is the Director of Research at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. Prior to joining UTSI, he was an Assistant Teaching Professor and Senior Design Committee Chair
received Best Paper Awards at the American Society Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2020. Dr. Liu earned his B.S. in Applied Physics from Caltech and S.M. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, under an MIT-SUTD fellowship and NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Educational Simulation for Understanding Atomic Force Microscopy Image ArtifactsAbstractThe atomic force microscope (AFM) is a fundamental imaging tool used to visualize minutefeatures, often on the scale of fractions of a nanometer. This is achieved by scanning a tip overa surface and monitoring the motions of the tip in response to forces between the tip
students and practitioners are addressing global inequality and the SDGs in career pathways, especially now, when activists are calling for the development sector to implement decolonized and anti-racist structures. Emma graduated from the California Polytechnic with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2019 and an M.S. in Irrigation Engineering in 2020.Prof. Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado Boulder Amy Javernick-Will is a Professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder in the Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering Department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 avigating Transformational Resistance: Exploring Humanitarian Engineering N Students
discussion, there are many possible explanations related to the social factors ofthe learning environment. Table 1. Piazza Participation Semester Online? Number of Posts Number of Contributions Fall 2019 No 131 401 Fall 2020 Yes 385 1287 Winter 2021 Yes 295 1046 Fall 2021 No 257 944Besides creating challenges for student interactions, the online environment also demandedadjustments to administrative processes and coordination among the teaching team. For
Ecology & Evolution, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2019. [3] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997, vol. 34. [4] B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002. [5] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, 2007. [6] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations
Paper ID #25696Supervising Undergraduate Cybersecurity ProjectsProf. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. In 2012, he completed his PhD at the University of Rochester, and now focuses his efforts to further the areas of computer architecture, digital systems, cybersecurity, and computer engineering education.Prof. Raymond A. Hansen, Wentworth Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Supervising Undergraduate Cybersecurity Projects Aaron
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Innovation, Technology, and Teacher Leadership Development through Online Professional Development Courses in Saudi Arabia Nadia Albishi, Peter Cavanaugh School of Engineering and Technology University of Bridgeport Bridgeport, CT I. INTRODUCTIONAbstract - This study investigates the relationship betweenonline professional
% 9% 9% 9% 9% 22% 10% 17% 19% 19% 21% 20% 13% 16% 15% 17% 16% 0 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Domestic Men 1018 968 1005 1028 1160 1213 1160 1106 1002 1195 1179 International Men 1475 1702 1830 1890 2098 2116 2658 2703 2990 3043 3218 Domestic Women 331 324
, 2019, p. 12.[8] I. M. Hasbun, H. M. Matusovich, and S. G. Adams, “The dissertation Institute: Motivating doctoral engineering students toward degree completion,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2016, vol. 2016-Novem, p. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757508.[9] R. L. Kajfez and H. M. Matusovich, “Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness as Motivators of Graduate Teaching Assistants,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 245–272, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20167.[10] C. G. P. Berdanier, A. Tally, B. Ahn, and M. F. Cox, “Aligning engineering education with disciplinary expectations: A strategic blueprint for doctoral competency assessment,” Int. J
. Page - 2 For instance, the initial question we developed was “Can we use available institutional data toidentify differences in pass rates between student subgroups and can we predict time to declare successfor these different groups?”. We hypothesized there would be no detectable differences, and found wedisproved that null theory. For academic years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, 3,286frosh students came to the concerned Californian university to study engineering. Of that entire group,2,514 (77%) were able to successfully meet course requirements and declare engineering major by theend of their second year. However, of the 539 URM students and the same 5-year period, only 332 (62%)met course requirements and
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for
Education Review, (2020), 8(1), 180-193.[4] M. G. Eastman, M. L. Miles, & R. Yerrick, Exploring the White and male culture: Investigating individual perspectives of equity and privilege in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2019, 108(4), 459-480.[5] E. O. McGee, Interrogating structural racism in STEM higher education. Educational Researcher, (2020), 49(9), 633-644.[6] D. H. Nguyen & L. Ward, A colorblind discourse analysis of higher education race-conscious admissions in a post-racial society. NDL Rev., (2016), 92, 551.[7] A. E. Martin & T. R. Fisher‐Ari, “If We Don't Have Diversity, There's No Future to See”: High‐school students' perceptions of race and gender representation in STEM. Science
Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021 chair of the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational cli- mate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. She was awarded the 2020 WEPAN Founders Award
highlight students’ reflections on the skills and courses that are most relevant to their seniordesign experience. Data from surveys conducted in senior design courses were analyzed toexamine students’ perceived confidence and importance of various design skills while cross-analyzing these perceptions with the courses they have found to be relevant in their preparationfor their design capstone course. Overall, this study is guided by the following research question:How do the perceptions of mechanical engineering students’ design skills evolve throughout thecourse of a senior design course sequence?Site and SampleThis research is currently being conducted at a large public Minority Serving Institution (MSI) inthe southeastern United States. In 2019
, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA in 2007, and his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, in 2013 and 2017, respectively. He is currently an Assistant Professor at Northeastern University in Boston, MA. His research interests include Engineering Education, Wireless Communications, satellite and mobile communication Systems, vehicular networks, wireless network connectivity, and interference modeling. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 gruepr: An Open Source Program for Creating Student Project TeamsAbstractThis complete, evidence-based practice paper presents a study on
://profiles.asee.org/ • Campbell University is not in ASEE. Their engineering population is found on: https://engineering.campbell.edu/our-purpose/accreditation/ Each of the panel organizers crafted several questions. Then, they deliberated carefully and jointly to modify, tweak, combine, delete, and re-write those questions. This process produced afinal set of 5 questions which are shown in Exhibit 3. This list was shared with the Panel early inDecember 2019, with instructions to respond by December 20, 2019. An extension was grantedto one individual and all responses were collected by the first week in January 2020.This paper summarizes responses from the Panelists, and interjects information and insight froma few relevant articles on the subject
Paper ID #29977Student Perspectives on Navigating Engineering PathwaysDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for
, pp. 14–29, 2023.[4] E. O. McGee, P. K. Botchway, D. E. Naphan-Kingery, A. J. Brockman, S. Houston, and D. T. White, “Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on Black STEM doctoral students,” Race Ethn. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 487–507, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137.[5] M. L. Miles, A. J. Brockman, and D. E. Naphan-Kingery, “Invalidated identities: The disconfirming effects of racial microaggressions on Black doctoral students in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1608–1631, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1002/TEA.21646.[6] M. Bahnson et al., “Students’ experiences of discrimination in engineering doctoral education,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug. 2022, pp. 1–13.[7] D. R. Jones
, “Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114.[5] T. Boyd and D. Mitchell, “Black Male Persistence in Spite of Facing Stereotypes in College: A Phenomenological Exploration,” TQR, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3124.[6] K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 2, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.[7] B. Smith et al., “Faculty Characteristics that Influence Student
. Cooney, L. Russell, and E. Schott, “Engineering Technology Undergraduate Students a Survey of Demographics and Mentoring,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[35] A. M. Lucietto, and L. A. Russell, “STEM Educators: What They Believe,” Journal of STEM Educators, no. Summer 2018, 2018.[36] J. Y. Yoon, and M. R. Riley, “Grand Challenges for Biological Engineering,” Journal of Biological Engineering, 2009.[37] L. G. Huettel, M. Gustafson, J. C. Nadeau, D. E. Schaad, M. M. Barger, and L. Linnenbrink‐Garcia, “A Grand Challenge-Based Framework for Contextual Learning in Engineering: Impact on Student Outcomes and Motivation.”[38] K. Larsen, and J. Gärdebo, “Retooling Engineering for Social Justice