andtechnological ventures may be determined by the ability/inability to overcome culturaldifferences. In “Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations,” Hendon et al writes: The way onesucceeds in cross-cultural negotiations is by fully understanding others, using that understandingto one’s own advantages to realize what each party wants from the negotiations, and to turn thenegotiations into a win-win situation from both sides.” Kale in “Universal Code of Ethics inIntercultural Communication” describes the ethical communicator as one “who address people ofother cultures with the same respect that they would like to receive” and as one “who encouragespeople of other cultures to express themselves in their uniqueness.” The ideal communicator is inessence one who
and English more relevant for engineering students, 4. Provide training in management, communications and leadership, 5. Emphasize engineering fundamentals and interdisciplinary study, 6. Adhere to professionalism and ethics, 7. Integrate design into the curriculum, incorporating social, environmental and legal considerations. This curriculum was approved by the faculty and steps have been taken for its implementation. Newcourses have been developed and existing courses are being revised in line with the objectives of the curriculum.The Pilot Program To test and refine the concept, this new curriculum was started as a pilot program with a sample group ofstudents in the fall semester of 1995. Having a small number of
outcomesThe second motivation for the effort described in this paper is the new Engineering Criteria 2000(EC2000) of ABET which states that graduates must attain the following criteria (those thatapply directly to this effort are shown with **):a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb) **an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret datac) **an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityd) **an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamse) **an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering
; Develop Pilot Modules– Team Development + Ethics ≠ Yr 4 – FY11: Release Team Development + Ethics Module V.1; Develop Pilot Modules – Conflict Mgmt
engineering programs by developing a laboratory- and project-based course, which simulates commercial nanotechnology processes in biomedical and energy applications using an in-depth case study approach. 2. Prepare students for employment in the emerging nanotechnology field in areas such as process development; scale up and control; product specification development; and raw material and capital costing including ethical, environmental, and sustainability concerns. Special attention will be placed on a breadth of manufacturing activities with emphasis toward developing an engineering and engineering technology employee with a valuable range of skills and expertise to the employer. 3. Train the students
duration Page 11.1357.67 Selection of research topics Ü Student selection of research topics based on the joint (November) UST and TUM topic list8 Weekly preparatory team Ü Research support requirements meetings Ü Team ethics and team behavior (October – December) Ü Pairing for research and daily activity Ü Work product requirements ‚ Research summary reports ‚ Support documentation
- 1 1 well as to analyze and interpret data from living and non-living systems3. An ability to design a system, component, or 2 3 1 process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints.4. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams - - -5. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve 3 4 1 engineering problems6. An understanding of professional and ethical 2 - - responsibility7. An ability to communicate effectively 1 - 18. The broad education necessary to understand the 1
mathematics, science, and engineering •(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data •(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, • • political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams •(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems •(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility
universities are doing enough proactively to teach studentswhat they need to know to operate in a future environment is an open question11. Clearly, engineersmust complement their technical and analytical capabilities with a broad understanding of so-called“soft” issues that are non-technical. Experience has shown that social, environmental, economic,cultural, and ethical aspects of a project are often more important than the technical aspects but are Page 11.566.3not often emphasized in conventional engineering education.An issue of equal importance is the education of engineers interested in addressing problems specificto developing
program outcomes as articulated by the ABET criteria foraccrediting engineering programs, categories a through k of criterion 3. Specifically,Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain outcomes a-k, listed below.a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineeringb. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret datac. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityd. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamse. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsf. an
, Professional Ethics, andTheory and Practice. A variety of learning modules were created for the final two co-op quarters,to be selected and utilized by each individual faculty member. The students in the InternationalCo-op Program provided a unique opportunity to assess the quality of the language and cultureprogram created to prepare them to work abroad, as well as their ability to utilize their skills todevelop cross cultural competencies during their six-month co-op assignments.The learning modules for International Co-op Program have been used for only one class, thegraduating class of 2006. This is also the first class to use any modules, and they began with theOrganizational Culture module sophomore year. Statistical results of the responses are
) System (15 slides) NASA STS Stress & Strain (21 Field Joint Design, Solid Rocket Statistics, Graphs, Engineering-Management Conflict 51-L (61 slides) Booster, Engineering ethics, Charts, Tables (36 resolution, Statistics (39 slides) slides) Aeronautics (60 slides) slides) In Hot Water Nuclear science, Plant efficiency, Nuclear energy, Graphs, Charts, Decision making, Risk, Financial (27 slides) Temperature, Water Convection, Evaporation, Enthalpy, Algebra (14 slides) assessment, Project management, Cycles (19 slides) Power Cycle (14 slides
andpersonal success at RIT. FYE instructors promote the development of personalresponsibility and ethical decision making in both local and global contexts.Colleges are allowed to customize the FYE curriculum and some of the ET programsworked with the FYE instructors in 2005-06 to do this customization. This work willcontinue in the spring and summer of 2006 in the ET programs.North Star CenterA central component of this center’s missions is the recruitment, retention, andgraduation of African-American, Latino American, and Native American (AALANA)students at RIT. The center’s philosophy focuses on the importance of promoting adeeper understanding of what it takes to live in a rapidly changing and highlyinterdependent world where science and
higher self-reported improvement in the ability to work on multi-disciplinary teams and understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility. The students who worked on the EWB independent studyprojects reported less gain in the “ability to design and conduct experiments”, with the exceptionof the student with who also wrote funding proposals and conducted significant laboratoryexperiments. Other responses, such as presentation skills, reflected differences in the specificexpectations of the experience (REU students were required to give an oral presentation at theend of the summer; independent study students generally write a final report but do not orallypresent their research findings).Table 4. ABET outcomes of the undergraduate student
action report fromthe National Innovation Initiative.14 The adoption and acceptance of information technology (IT)in our corporate and industrial culture, has resulted in the social construction of IT in themarketplace. Since the IDeaLaboratory stems from the Graphic Information Technologyprogram in the Department of Technology Management at Arizona State University, it stands toreason that the IDeaLaboratory embraces technology-based solutions with ethical considerationsfor industry-based problems.The lab is dual in purpose and target market. It has the dual role of being a university design,technology, and usability research laboratory, and a media design unit. It examines the role ofhuman factors on innovation, design, and technology through
University (ECU),freshmen are introduced to engineering topics that include solid modeling, mechanicalengineering, electrical engineering, and design engineering. Robots inherently integrate all thesedisciplines. At ECU, student teams are used in a cohort learning environment to build robots.The robot building project serves as a platform for experiential learning in engineeringdisciplines and also serves to develop problem solving skills, interpersonal skills, and ethics. Arobotics competition is embedded into the introductory class work to increase levels ofparticipation, interest and challenge for the freshmen. During classroom and laboratory exercisesleading up to the competition, students build mobile robots to compete in a treasure-huntinggame
experience and studying the ethical behavior of engineers. He holds the Ph.D. in Operations Research from the John Hopkins, and the BSEE from the University of Cincinnati. Page 11.331.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Combining Graduate Studies, Research and International Experiences in SustainabilityAbstractA new challenge facing engineering educators is how to train graduate students to routinelyinclude sustainability as important design criteria. Equally important is the need for engineeringstudents to both broaden their perspective and learn to function collaboratively in cross
and havedevaluate the importance of their ethical responsibilities as engineers. [7]There are multiple and varying definitions of social justice; for our purposes, we chose tounderstand social justice as something that stresses the importance of equity and accessibility inresources, and the protection of human rights. This description of social justice carries a mandateto analyze and acknowledge the structural and social inequalities present in society, and work toempower those most marginalized by these systems of inequality. The work to fulfill the mandatemay come in many forms, from actively changing institutions–whether that be government,academic, or economic–policies, and systems that actively cause violence for marginalized
literacy is more problem break down, understanding and critical use of facts ideas without getting too much into technical detail g. The difference is in dealing with technology and engineering process and how to use and relate the dimensions of knowing, capability, competency, and decision making h. Ethics should be discussed in both with great examples since people are involvedExhibit 4. A summary of the major ideas in the technological literacy classThe above exhibit provide a list of mostly identified characteristics and highlights of howdifferent people in different fields think and deal with the concepts of engineering andtechnological literacy. However, we are will be collecting more
, electricity, management study environment, learning Processes fluid flow, diffusion, resistance, Ethics 2 Professionalism, registered series/parallel resistors engineer, canons, ethical theory Engineering Accounting Problem 2 Techniques, decomposition, Basic 2 Defining a system, open/closed, systems, solving process, constraints, algorithms, concepts intensive/extensive quantities, state/path flow charts quantities, Universal Accounting Equation, conservation, steady stateEngineering Science
research. Transdisciplinary research focuses on societalproblems. Therefore, the research process must take into account the ethical and social factors ofthe problem. Finally, the last category suggested by the developers in the framework isEffectiveness. As Legitimacy focused on the fairness and ethical aspect of the project in regardsto societal needs, Effectiveness of transdisciplinary will determine how the research will make apositive change in its context.Unlike Rubrics 1 and 2, this paper only presents a framework and a prototype rubric. The valuein the proposed Transdisciplinary Quality framework is that it can be used to determine whetheror not the selected project is meeting its research goal. While the researchers tested theframework on
in Education Conference, 252-258.[4] Matthews, M. R (2000). Time for Science Education. How Teaching the History andPhilosophy of the Pendulum can contribute to Science Literacy. New York. KluwerAcademic.[5] Davis, M (1998). Thinking like an Engineer. Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. NewYork. Oxford University Press.[6] Edels, H (1968).Technology in the sixth form. Trends in Education. No 10. London.Ministry of Education.[7] Vardy, P and Grosch, P (1994). The Puzzle of Ethics. 1st edition. London. Font/HarperCollins. p 17.[8] Yokomoto, C. F and Bostwick, W. D (1999). Modelling: the process of writingmeasureable outcomes for Ec 2000. ASEE/IEEE Proceedings Frontiers in EducationConference, 2B-1, 18-22.[9] Bloom B et al (eds) (1956
-learning 4.01 4.20 4.49 4.56 4.34 Critical thinking 4.21 4.38 4.19 4.40 4.31 Ethical judgment 3.95 4.15 3.98 3.99 4.01 Innovation/creativity 3.69 3.81 3.68 3.71 3.73 Technical writing 3.55 3.46 3.83 3.46 3.55 Technical presentations 3.29 3.01 3.39 2.94 3.11 Management skills 3.16 3.19 2.94 2.83 3.00 State Local National Local Skill/Qualification
efforts. This support of student internships is critical, as thenational trend is for increased student participation in internship or cooperative educationprograms. “In 1980, about one out of every 36 college students completed an internship prior tograduation. This increased to three out of four by the year 2000.” (Hurst 58)Prior to fall 2014, most divisional internship and co-op records were paper based. Work isunderway to streamline recordkeeping through the use of electronic databases. This has alloweddepartments to better evaluate student and employer success. The following graphs representemployer feedback for the following questions: 1. Did the internship student recognize professional, ethical and societal responsibilities
accountability for managing independent and group projects in a professional environment. I have seen these experiences pay off outside of CEDC, and I already know that the leadership skills I have acquired will continue to make a positive impact on my future. Leadership in CEDC has been a huge contributor to my development as a leader. It forced me to take ownership of a project and be a driving force within it. This sense of ownership is key to taking on more responsibilities.DiscussionUnlike typical students in the CEDC program, CEDC interns not only have an objectively higherlevel of responsibility for the ethical considerations and successful execution of projects but alsodevelop the aptitude to lead a team of
, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability). e) Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. h) Broad education to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. i) A recognition of the need for, and have the ability to engage in life-long learning. k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.This means that a program will need more than one indicator (summative measure) for eight ofthe eleven SOs. Sample performance
. Be the faculty sponsor for the student chapter of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME). [Teaching/Advising Role] 4. Work with professors from the Materials Science Dept. on an NSF research project focusing on materials processing and manufacturing research (a topic of interest to all 5 of these faculty members). [Research Role] 5. Work with 2 other faculty members to develop a new Intro to Engineering freshmen course. Course to focus on interdisciplinary nature of engineering and emphasize ethics & societal values. [Teaching/Advising Role]Respondents were also provided brief biographical information about five faculty members whohave varying years of experience. All five of the bios indicate strengths
part of WPSI). The specific ABET outcomestargeted by this course are (c) “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”, (f) “an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility”, (h) “the broad education necessary to understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context”, and(j) “a knowledge of contemporary issues”9.The purpose of this study is to begin to assess the effectiveness of the course and course structurein helping students learn the course topics. This first study will focus on two topics in
adopted in ET curricula spanning variousdisciplines by many institutes. 1, 2, 3 Prolific literatures discussing numerous projects successfullycarried out by students with various engineering and technological backgrounds have beenpublished with technical details. 4, 5 Since ET programs focus more on the application oftechnologies, emphasis on developing projects with industrial partners is becoming a trend andstudies have shown great success in many cases. 6, 7 Teaching methods and assessing mechanismsemphasizing different aspects that modern engineers and engineering technologists are facingsuch as time management, team work, communications, and ethics have also been developedand incorporated in these courses to resemble experiences in practical
be morechallenging. However, the two paper authors co-teach a module on Engineering CorporateSocial Responsibility. As a result of the Great Expectations Project, the learning objectivesassociated with this module have been amended so as to better emphasize the need forindividual and organizational social and ethical awareness. The assessment for this modulehas been altered to encourage graduate students to use their engineering and analytical skillsto work with non-profit heritage sites within the UK.In considering the individual and employment related drivers, one of the paper authors hasdeveloped and introduced a new graduate learning strategy which has been disseminatedacross the School of Engineering. Within this strategy, priority is