Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS) Technical Session 5: Lab Design

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick A. Stites, University of Colorado Boulder; Micaela Valentina Bara, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

results collected from a microphone andUSB data acquisition system and discuss any discrepancies. Table 1. We organized the learning objectives into three categories: enduring understanding (EU, highlighted), important to know and do (IKD), and worth being familiar with (WF). Topic Learning Objective Priority Assessment Critique data visualizations and descriptive statistics for HW1, 3, 5-7, 9, 11- EU clarity and appropriateness 13; P1-3; Q Data

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield; Charles Lam, California State University, Bakersfield; Ronald Hughes, California State University, Bakersfield; Stephanie Salomon, California State University, Bakersfield

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

questions about what they learned from the program, if the programchanged their goals/plans, and their satisfaction with the program. The pre-survey also gathereddemographic information and background academic information.Table 2: Questions from the pre-survey administered at the start of each summer program. Pre-Survey Question Question Type Participant identification (Student ID Number, Year, Faculty Text boxes and Lists Mentor) Participant background academic information (Major, GPA, etc.) Text boxes and Lists Participant demographic information (Gender, Race and Ethnicity) Select from lists Q: What interested you about this summer program? Open-ended comment Q

Conference Session

Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession – and ASCE

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janey Camp P.E., Vanderbilt University; Leslie Nolen, American Society of Civil Engineers; Carolyn Sofman, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

teachers may ask students when exploring the Report Card and relatedactivities are as follows: • Q: Which of these infrastructure types do you see and/or use in your daily activities? o Activities:  A discussion with students could include the infographic “How Much Infrastructure Do You Use Before Noon?”  Students choose one category of infrastructure to explore in more detail through creation of a short report, a photo collage of that infrastructure type (younger students),  Teachers lead a field trip around their community and have students identify the different infrastructure components around them

Conference Session

Architectural Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheena Nastasia Marston, The Ohio State University; Fabian Hadipriono Tan P.E., The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; Michael Parke, The Ohio State University; Olga Maria Stavridis, Ohio State University; Lisa Elanna Burris, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

users were also required to judge the realism of the model in comparison toimages provided as well as perceptions on the usefulness of the model.SoftwareEach software package used in this project is presented to provide deeper understanding of theeducational module developed. Choosing the appropriate software for 3-D representation was Q c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 PAPER ID: 18690one of the key factors that aided in the development of the paper. Whereas most 3-D modellingsoftware programs have the capacity to represent the model, not all of them will represent thetrue characteristics of

Conference Session

S6B: Full Papers - One Size Does Not Fit All

Collection

14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference

Authors

Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University; Susie Huggins, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Full Papers

in the sketch.Following the online performance, however, the facilitators, like sports analysts, recap thesituation and ask the student audience to comment regarding how they feel. The students respondusing the Zoom Q&A feature to enter comments and questions which are addressed by thefacilitators. Instead of bringing student audience members into the Zoom team, the actors areinterviewed, on-screen and in character, and asked how they feel about what happened, why theydid what they did, and how they think their actions made the other characters feel. The studentaudience is encouraged to ask questions of the characters using the Q&A feature and to “upvote”questions to help determine which questions have the most audience interest

Conference Session

Pipeline and Performance in BME Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Courtney Lambeth, North Carolina A&T State University; Matthew B. A. McCullough, North Carolina A&T State University; Heather Rae Aschenbrenner, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

0% Content-Specific Questions Yes No Page 26.415.7Content Questions and Keywords used to evaluate responses Questions Keywords Tissue, engineering, creating, regenerating, growing, organic matter, making, cell function, Q-1: What is tissue engineering? building, forming, examining, manipulating

Conference Session

Design throughout the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

democratization of manufacturingand programmable electronics. The design experience in the class provides students an outlet forexercising their creativity at the highest level of Bloom’s taxonomy. ∗A web-based, private beta version was provided to students in the Fall 2015 to assist them with their projects.Figure 5: A few pictures of the projects from the Final Robot Design Project Demo day, Fall 2015;see complete gallery of pictures at https://goo.gl/photos/WhYmy4kxFoStwNQz7References1 Shen, Q., Al-Smadi, Y. M., Martin, P. J., Russell, K., and Sodhi, R. S., 2009, “An extension of mechanism design optimization for motion generation”, Mechanism and machine theory, 44(9), pp. 1759–1767.2 The National Academy of Engineering, 2005, Educating the

Conference Session

Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tori N. Wagner, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

engagementwith the instrument. An expert in the field was tasked with taking the assessment to establish abaseline for the amount of time reasonably required to complete the EERI thoughtfully. Thechange in score was calculated for each individual, and histograms, Q-Q Plots and theShapiro-Wilks test were used to evaluate the normality of this data [9]. A paired pre/post t-testwas employed to evaluate the differences in the EERI scores from the first to the fourth year.This test was chosen for its effectiveness in comparing two related samples.ResultsInitially, the P score, which measures postconventional thinking based on universal good, had amean pre-score of 60.62 (SD = 17.59). Over four years, it decreased to a mean post-score of57.24 (SD = 19.37

Conference Session

Developing Quality Experiences that Retain Diverse Engineering Talent

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tizoc Cruz-Gonzalez, University of Michigan; Sarah Rose Sobek, University of Michigan ; Julianna Marie Abel, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

ofresearch, (4) an interactive tour of the conference hardware competition which provides concreteexamples of cutting edge research, (5) a small group Q&A with graduate students engaged inresearch, and finally (6) a panel discussion with diverse research faculty committed to post-secondary engineering education. The challenges associated with this approach to outreach, theadvantages of incorporating a STEM intervention into a technical research conference, andsuccessful methods for locating a group of underserved students are discussed. In addition, thescale and impact of the intervention are evaluated through open-ended and quantitative surveys.The survey results document the positive student reaction to this intervention. The positivestudent

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Retention and Bridge Programs #1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield; Charles Lam, California State University, Bakersfield; Ronald Hughes, California State University, Bakersfield

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

taken) Participant demographic information (Gender, Race / Ethnicity) Select from lists Q: What interested you about this summer program? Open-ended comment Q: What do you expect to learn and experience in this summer program? Open-ended comment Q: How do you expect this program to help your academic career? Open-ended comment Q: Rate your agreement with the following statements: 5-point Likert scale (strongly  I am interested in the field that I am studying. agree = 5, agree = 4, neutral  I am interested in a career in STEM. = 3, disagree = 2, strongly  I am confident that I am prepared

Conference Session

WIP: Enrollment, Instruction and Pedagogy - Focus on Design-Based Projects

Collection

2017 FYEE Conference

Authors

Shankar Ramakrishnan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Deana Delp

Tagged Topics

Diversity, FYEE Conference - Works in Progress Submission

, disciplines, individuals with complementaryValue across multiple levels of activity and engagement. etc. skill sets, expertise, etc. q. Integrates/synthesizes different kinds of knowledgeFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 – August 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-1 Session W1AThe three

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laila Guessous, Oakland University; Caymen May Novak, Oakland Unversity

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

have time to answer them all. I was wondering maybe we should have had a shorter presentation and longer Q & A section. I'm not sure if the students would have enjoyed and learned more with a longer Q & A section.  I think if we were given some more time, we could have had the kids do an activity relating to engineering, which could be beneficial. (Note: this comment referred to the amount of time at the school)  A similar activity, but with local high schoolers, would be a good opportunity to use more interesting/complex experiments.These and other comments show that the REU students not only enjoyed the experience, butwalked away from the outreach activity seeing benefits to both the K-5

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

José Carlos Villalobos, University of Central Florida; Uday K. Nair, University of Central Florida; Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida; Rachel Straney, University of Central Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

,​Introjected​, and ​Identified w ​ ere obtained from further categorization of Extrinsic Motivation.Each subscale is measured by 4 items. Further separation of Amotivation was not done in theoriginal study and so it remains its own subscale with 4 corresponding items. Motivation ismeasured by the Academic Motivation Scale which is created from the aggregation of the sevensubscales. (see Appendix A; Q2: 1-10, Q3: 1-10, Q4: 1-8). Table 1 Academic Motivation (AMS) and Corresponding Items Academic Motivation Scale Intrinsic Motivation Extrinsic Motivation Amotivation Know Q2​: 2, 9, ​Q3​: 6, Q

Conference Session

Strategies for Success and Sanity for Academic Parents

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

or are considering becoming parents.Summary of ideas to be explored and discussed:Raising children is one of the most challenging and opportunity-filled experiences most peoplewill take on in their lives. Raising children as a member of the Academy brings an additionallayer of complexity. This panel will present challenges and opportunities encountered by thepanelists while raising children and trying to succeed in the Academy. The panelists will alsoprovide concrete, achievable strategies that have worked for them to overcome those hurdles andhow they have leveraged opportunities available to them. The session will allow time for Q&Aduring which audience members can share their own challenges and success strategies with thebroader group

Conference Session

Academe/Industry Collaboration

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy K. Sundheim, Saint Cloud State University; Aaron J. Barker, St. Cloud Technical and Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

g r a m s .T w o - a n d f o u r - y e a r s c h o o ls h a v e e x p lo r e d v a r io u s c o n n e c tio n s . In S a m u e l, e t. a l. [ 9 ] th eu n iv e rs ity g a v e th e tw o - y e a r s tu d e n ts a c c e s s to th e ir e q u ip m e n t. T h is c o lla b o r a tio n a ls o h a din s tr u c to r s jo in tly c r e a te a m o d u le to b e u s e d in b o th c u r r ic u lu m s . H o w e v e r , th e s tu d e n ts o n lyw o rk e d w ith o th e r s tu d e n ts in th e ir p r o g r a m . T h e s tu d e n ts d id n o t w o r k to g e th e r a c ro s s s c h o o ls .A C a lifo rn ia c o lla b o ra tio n [1 0 ] re v is e d s e v e ra l c o u rs e s a t b o th th e c o m m u n ity c o lle g e a n d th eu n iv e rs ity to in c o r p o r a

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tolulope Ibilola Ogundare; Rebecca Kassa, University of Kansas; Omar Maali, City of Lawrence, Kansas; Brian Lines, The University of Kansas; Jake Smithwick, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Kenneth Timothy Sullivan, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

industry. The repeated cycle of training new hires due to labor turnover may affectorganizational and project performance. Construction firms should seek tactical human resourcesinitiatives to attract new hires, develop old hires’ skills, and retain talent in their workforce. Thisstudy investigates the differences in human dimensions of individuals engaged on construction jobsites. The aim of this paper is to identify distinctive human dimensions of skilled trades workers,essentially required for job transition within the construction industry. This study adoptedHEXACO personality inventory, Emotional Intelligence, and Q-DiSC behavioral diagnostics todetermine personality trait differences and peculiarities between 133 project managers workingfor

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Engineering Alignment with Core Curriculum (Physics)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luke D. Conlin, Stanford University; Doris B. Chin, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics, Pre-College Engineering Education Division

  1.0   0.5   0.0   Incorrect  WT  Pre-­‐Video  Q   Correct  WT  Pre-­‐Video  Q   Marble  Machines   Wind  Tubes   Figure 8. Performance on Wind Tubes related posttest items, clustered by condition and performance on WT pre-video question. Wind Tubes tinkerers performed the best, if they got the pre-video question correct.Data analyses on the marble-related posttest questions showed a similar trend, but were lessclear-cut (see Fig 9). ANOVA revealed a

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mehdi Lamssali, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University; Olivia Kay Nicholas, RAPID; Alesia Coralie Ferguson, North Carolina A&T State University; Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; Angela M. White, NC A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

or deductive coding. This manual theming was supplemented using theNVIVO software to identify common words and phrases leading to any additional or missedthemes. Throughout this process, discussions and checks were conducted with the research teamfor agreement on final themes. Table 1: Interview questions with faculty Question Question No. Q.1 Tell me about yourself. Q.2 Explain how and why COVID pandemic impacted the functioning and behavior of your STEM students. Q.3 Explain how and why COVID pandemic impacted the performance of your STEM students. Q.4 Explain how and why you responded to changes in STEM student

Conference Session

Practice III: Multimedia Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University; Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine University; Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; Chitra R. Nayak, Tuskegee University; Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

the student population responded that they are more satisfied with KACIE incomparison to other courses. The other half had the opinion that they are satisfied with KACIEjust like any other course. Finally, nearly all responded that KACIE sheets were useful for betterunderstanding and learning the concepts. TABLE IV STUDENT SURVEY DATA TABLE Completely Somewhat Disagree (%) agree (%) agree (%) Q.1 The supplementary videos provided helped to 50 50 0 understand the course material in better manner Q.2 These videos equipped

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 1: Gendered Impacts of Code Critiquers on Self-Efficacy in First-Year Engineering Students.

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Mary Benjamin, Michigan Technological University; Laura Albrant, Michigan Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Leo C. Ureel II, Michigan Technological University; Laura E Brown, Michigan Technological University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University; AJ Hamlin, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

sample sizes increase, the distribution of the sample mean differencesapproaches normality, even when the underlying data is not perfectly normal (Ghasemi &Zahediasl, 2012).To ensure the data met this assumption, the Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to assess normality.The Shapiro-Wilk test is frequently used in real-world applications across various fields,including educational and psychological research, to evaluate whether data significantly deviatesfrom a normal distribution (Razali & Wah, 2011). This approach helped ensure the validity of thesubsequent t-tests, providing confidence that the assumptions of the statistical models wereadequately met.Figure 4: LAESE Factor scores - Histograms and Q-Q plotsfigure 5: CPSES Factor scores

Conference Session

Unique Pedagogies for Mechanics Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Rodriguez, The University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

showedan increase in student engagement. However, it was inconclusive whether the homeworkcompletion grade was affected by the pedagogy. The results also showed that the homework hada weak positive correlation with exam performance.The present paper further aims to assess the efficacy of the pedagogy by examining studentengagement and student performance across multiple cohorts of the course. Learningmanagement system tools, like chat and polling, were previously shown to be effectivequalitative methods for overcoming the passive learning behavior exhibited by EFL students.Thus, a comparison by cohort and in aggregate were performed for the following: studentparticipation at each synchronous Q&A session using the chat feature, student polling

Conference Session

Track 4: Technical Session 1: Report of a Survey of Early Career Latinx Engineers: Trends across 3 Years in Perceptions of the Workplace, Social Cognitions, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intentions

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Lisa Y Flores, University of Missouri - Columbia; Rachel L Navarro, University of North Dakota; Jinkoo Lee, University of Missouri - Columbia; Bo Hyun Lee, The Ohio State University; Han Na Suh, Georgia State University - Perimeter College; Sarah Lynn Orton P.E., University of Missouri - Columbia; Pat Garriott

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Method: Measures search * high scores represent high levels of the respective variables Ø Perceived Support-Organization (6-point Likert Scale), Supervisors, Coworkers, Family (4-point Likert Scale) Ø Perceived Organizational Climate (5-point Likert Scale) Ø Workplace Incivility (5-point Likert Scale) Ø Workplace Microaggressions (6-point Likert Scale) Ø Work-family Conflict (5-point Likert Scale) q Engineering Task Self-Efficacy (6-point

Conference Session

Aerospace Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University; Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

-agree (or True) or D-disagree (or False) is given in front of each question.Q#4: I would rather bet 1 to 6 on a long shot than 3 to 1 on a probable winner. (A)33% of Freshmen and Sophomores agreed to the statement while 77% of Juniors and Seniorsagreed with this statement (p < 0.0002)Q#5: The way to understand complex problems is to be concerned with their larger aspects insteadof breaking them into smaller pieces. (A)32% of Freshmen and Sophomores agreed to the statement while 77% of Juniors and Seniorsagreed with this statement (p < 0.0002)Q#6: I get pretty anxious when I am in a social situation over which I have no control. (D)58% of Freshmen and Sophomores disagreed to the statement while 27% of Juniors and Seniorsdisagreed with this

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 3: Advancements in Teaching Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Namhee Kim, Western Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

equations are converted to a set of algebraic equations using a weighted integral statement (e.g., weak-form Galerkin and least-squares formulation). For example, a weak-form Galerkin formulation of the governing equations, Eq. 1–2, can be stated as: find the solution {u, p} ∈ S h such that for all {w, q} ∈ V h the following equation is satisfied: Z ∂u w· ρ + ρu · ∇u − ρg − (∇ · w)p dΩ Ω ∂t Z − ∇q · u dΩ + (suitable stability terms) ZΩ = {w · (−pI + τ ) · n

Conference Session

Self-Advocacy, Sense of Belonging, Measuring Authentic Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and Construction Management Education Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Maria Lilley, The University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

historically minoritized groups. Both the surveyquestions that were used to study emerging themes of self-advocacy in the graduate students, andfocus group questions have been presented to the engineering education research community atconferences and one-on-one meetings to get feedback from the broader community on thethemes of self advocacy and the questions. The focus groups will be conducted in Summer 2023and all students in the GREATS program will be invited to participate.Table 1. Focus group questions Question 1: Q.1 Can you describe your graduate-program trajectory story? Why did Background, you choose to pursue a graduate degree in science/engineering? Why Motivation, and did you choose and/or apply to the

Conference Session

EE/NEE Joint Panel Discussion: Ideas for an Enjoyable and Productive Sabbatical

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean M. Andino P.E., Arizona State University; David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks P.E., University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON), New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

, industry or government collaboration, and/or travel.Discussion topics will also include process requirements of applying, conducting, anddocumenting the outcomes of the sabbatical.The suggested layout of the panel session is: • 5-minute introduction of panel topic and panelists • Overview of each panelist’s sabbatical activity (5 minutes each) • Brief whole group Q&A session to engage audience and panelists • Small group activities with documentation of Q&A: o What resources did you find helpful in planning your sabbatical? o What was the timeframe of planning, applying for, conducting, and documenting your sabbatical? o What were the requirements of your sabbatical

Conference Session

Social Justice: Pedagogy, Curricular Reform, and Activism

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joseph Valle, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor; Israa Ali, University of Michigan ; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Donna M Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Technical Session 3c

Collection

2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Maria Pantoja, California Polytechnic State University san Luis Obispo; Drazen Fabris, Santa Clara University; Aaron Melman, Santa Clara University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section

”To achieve the second goal, we implemented a Q&A forum inside canvas and used Pizza featuresto manage it (Fig. 3). Students are encouraging to participate in the forum, but no grade is assignto this to avoid competitiveness. All participants can vote for the best answer and the highest-ranking answer will show always on top. We create a forum for each one of the mainlabs/assignments on the course, this way student can quickly find help on the project they areworking on. Fig 3 Q&A ForumResultsTo evaluate the benefits of this project we used some of these educational technologies indifferent classes. Introduction to Programming in the Computer Engineering Department, aNumerical Analysis class in

Collection

2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic Section Spring Conference

Authors

Peibo Guo, Conestoga High School; Kail Jialang Yuan; Zuyi Huang, Villanova University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

(Equations (1)-(3)) in Simulink,and the last one for the introduction of the MFC model; 3) the project problem statement showingthe detail of the MFC models and the model parameters. All these materials were sent to studentsvia email, and the videos were uploaded onto YouTube for students to watch. dc A q = (c A,i - c A ) - kc A (1) dt V dT w (-DH R )k UA = (Ti - T ) + cA + (T - T ) (2) dt rV rC rVC c k = k0 exp(- E / RT

Conference Session

Engineering Physics Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

xj= 0.49 𝜇m The total amount of dopant introduces into the substrate Q(t) is given by √4𝐷𝑡 Qt = Cs= 2.9 * 1015 atoms/cm2 √𝜋 Example 2.3.2 Drive-In Calculate the junction depth xj of the sample in example 2.3.1 after Drive-In at1100°C for 4.5 hours. 𝑄𝑇 −𝑥 2 C(x,t)= exp( ) √𝜋𝐷𝑡 4𝐷𝑡 2𝐶𝑠 √𝐷𝑡 5.18∗1015 Qt =( )predep = √𝜋 √𝜋 5.18∗1015 Where Cs’(t) = = 2.5*1019/cm3 𝜋√(𝐷𝑡)𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒−𝑖𝑛