] 2 Overview According to the CSU Office of Institutional Research, Effectiveness, and Planning [11], the 2018‐2019 Enrollment Statistics for CBE were: 322 Students Enrolled 33% Females and 67% Males 17% Pell Recipients 21% First Generation 36.6 % Minority and International Statistics and figures for all departments in Walter Scott Jr. College of Engineering available in [11].Weber and Atadero. 2020 Annual CoNECD Conference. 3Minority includes students who self‐report a minority status; nonminority
, effectivesupport that can enhance the international engineering doctoral students’ perceivedbelongingness. The literature review on the conceptual structure of belongingness will advancethe current knowledge about a sense of belonging in engineering education, and the findings ofthe review indicate the need for understanding sense of belonging as an independent andtheoretical concept.Reference [1] E. Lee, J, Bekki, A, Carberry, and N. Kellam, “Understanding international engineering doctoral students’ sense of belonging through their interpersonal interactions in the academic community.” In 2019 The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD), Crystal City, VA, USA. April 2019. [2] National Science Board
the NRP for annual support and advancement of the chapters, and (iii) a fully-integrated evaluation framework for certifying NILA attendees and internal continuousdevelopment of the curriculum. However, the curriculum evaluation metrics did not showdiscernable outcomes as a transformative leadership intervention experience for the attendees.Moreover, the curriculum underlying education paradigm was based on historical best practicesand not rooted in educational leadership theory and models. At the start of organizing NILA 2019 (held in Phoenix, Arizona), SHPE leaders and stafforganizing NILA developed a simple leadership concepts framework that could be integrated witha leadership model in the literature. By then, the curriculum was
. He has work experiences in automotive electronics (Delphi Automotive Systems) and consumer products (International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Gender differences in the functionality of regret on academic performanceIntroductionDespite increases in female enrollment levels in engineering programs, the gender gap is stillsignificant. Women accounted for approximately 23% of first-year students who desire to majorin engineering programs in 2014 in the U.S. [1], and the actual female
Paper ID #32203What’s Next? From Analysis to ActionDr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Agnieszka Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washing- ton, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Dr. Miguel’s professional interests involve image processing, machine learning, and engineering education especially active learn- ing, diversity, equity, and inclusion, retention, and recruitment. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, and digital image processing. She is an ASEE Fellow and a member of the IEEE, SWE, and Tau
Paper ID #28475Creating a Bridge to SisterhoodDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor of Engineering and Education, is also the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place at NC State University. She has been working in the field of engineering education for over 30 years. She is dedicated to conveying the joint messages that engineering is a set of fields that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee.Ms. Crystal R. Emery, URU The Right to
., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)),identity (i.e., Black Greek Letter Organizations (BGLOs), or both (i.e., National Society of BlackEngineers (NSBE)) [3]. Martin, Revelo, Stefl, Garrett, and Adams investigated the impact ofparticipating in ethnic professional organizations (NSBE and the Society of HispanicProfessional Engineers (SHPE)) at the undergraduate level [4]. However, the focus was solely onengineering related professional organizations and students who attended a predominantly Whiteinstitution (PWI).The purpose of this study is to identify counterspaces utilized by Black engineering students andthe associated values of engaging in these spaces. This study stems from a larger NationalScience Foundation (NSF) funded study
Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and
diversity-focused nature that promotesresearch collaboration across different types of institutions. ICTAS expects the partnerships toresult in research proposals and the hope is that collaborative partners at Virginia Tech andHBCUs/MSIs maintain their working relationships beyond the duration of funded partnership.During the last three years (2016-2019), 50 awards of $10k were made to help build and fostercollaborative efforts between Virginia Tech faculty and HBCUs/MSIs partners. As a result,twenty-three different HBCUs/MSIs and at a minimum of 38 distinct collaborative pairs wereinvolved in the program. Within Virginia Tech, six colleges and four centers/institutes wereinvolved with the ICTAS D&I Investment, with most of the awards
and their retention over time is represented in the table below: N 2nd Fall 3rd Fall 4th Fall 5th Fall 6th Fall Retention Retention Retention Retention Retention % N % N % N % N % N 2014 28 93% 26 79% 22 64% 19 57% 16 46% 13 2015 30 93% 28 80% 24 80% 24 73% 22 2016 50 90% 45 70% 35 66% 33 2017 43 91% 39 84% 36 2018 42 98% 41 2019 43 TOTAL 208 179 117 76 38 13 AVERAGE
leadership teams navigate power and privilege within their teams.A Year Later, the Revised Workshop (2019). After another year of learning about power andprivilege and reflecting on our previous workshop, we implemented a revised workshop at the2019 annual NSF RED Consortium Meeting. The 2019 workshop is very similar to the workshopthat is provided in the appendix and described earlier in this design case. Early in the workshop,a participant complimented us as being inclusive by providing a few copies of the handout inlarge print, something Nadia had suggested because she had been involved in a workshop inwhich a participant could not participate because they had forgotten reading glasses.At this workshop, we completely revamped our workshop with
., "Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion.," Washington, DC, 2015.[3] N. Curtin, J. Malley and A. J. Stewart, "Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students," Journal of Research in Higher Education, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 714-738, 2016.[4] J. Gordon, Haynes, C. and May, G., "Impact of mentoring and enrichment activities on the academic careers of underrepresented STEM doctoral students," in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[5] J. Mondisa and S. A. McComb, "The role of social community and individual differences in minority mentoring programs," Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 26
., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 15 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational climate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Who benefits most from a holistic student
increase its members’ trust, comfort, and performance in that setting [27].MethodologyContextDuring the first year of the E4USA project, nine high school teachers were recruited to teach theE4USA course in local high schools. Each teacher attended one of two five-day PD workshops ata large U.S. university during the summer of 2019. Instructors were university professors, manyof whom had helped design the curriculum. To address implicit biases and stereotype threat, acontinuing issue within engineering education, teacher participants were tasked to read the firstthree chapters of the book “Whistling Vivaldi - How stereotypes affect us and what we can do”[17] before attending the PD. Through personal stories and research results, the author provides