, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Capturing attrition decisions in engineering graduate students using longitudinal SMS dataKeywords: Attrition, longitudinal study, SMS (Short Message Service), time series dataAbstractThis research paper reports results from a longitudinal Short Message Service (SMS) text messagesurvey study that captured attrition decisions from engineering graduate students who decided toleave their Ph.D. program or change degree objectives from Ph.D. to M.S. (Master’s-leveldeparture). While past research has investigated doctoral attrition across disciplines to
relationship between engineering education and the provision of orphan devices. In http://www. resna. org/news-events/annual-meeting/annual-meeting-proceedings/annual-conference-proceedings, volume 2017. Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America . . . , 2017.[7] Veronica Mitchell, Benjamin Matheson, Phuong Nguyen, Tye Martin, Vanessa Svihla, Eva Chi, and Heather Canavan. Diverse by design: Increasing the representation of people with disabilities in stem through community engagement. In 2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference, 2020.[8] Barbara Jacoby et al. Building partnerships for service-learning. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.Appendix Question
Visualizing Arguments to Scaffold Graduate Writing in Engineering EducationAbstractMany graduate students come to engineering education research with technical backgrounds inengineering. This can present a challenge for them in learning to write social science research,with new expectations around the structure of academic arguments for the field of engineeringeducation research. Existing research suggests that even graduate students familiar with writingstrategies struggle when entering new communities of practice and disciplines. Although somescholarship has focused on writing, minimal strategies for encouraging argumentation through arhetorical approach have been developed for graduate students. Unlike a focus on writtenproduct
Conference, we discoveredthat both of our studies provide striking similarities in their findings despite having beenconducted without any knowledge of each other’s engagement with similar work. We contendthat our mutual findings are of great significance to the engineering education community.The author of one study (Renata) utilized a mixed methods approach to explore how SHPEmembership influenced the engineering identity development of Latina/o students. Previousstudies show that students who build engineering identities in their college career are more likelyto persist within their engineering programs, thus illustrating the importance of engineeringidentity development to persistence. However, previous studies of engineering identitydevelopment
] hasbeen used as the basis to develop a construct for engineering identity development within theengineering education community. The science identity model advances that science identitydevelops intersectional and over time. Research on engineering identity emerged from variousacademic strands, including psychology and sociology. The definition of identity in this study isviewed through the social lens. Identity is defined as "being recognized as a certain 'kind ofperson' in a given context" [16, p.99]. The given context focuses on individual socialperformances rather than their uniqueness as a person. Our context is this study is specific toengineering and how students self-described and are seen within the context of engineering
fieldsupport the need for universities to find ways to effectively foster professional identitydevelopment. For example, three ways in which the institution can foster identity formation asan engineer are: (1) program admission criteria, coursework, etc. (institutional identity), (2) co-ops and internships (self-identification through exposure to the norms and values held byprofessional engineers), and (3) communities of practice (recognition by other in-group membersas a professional in the field)12,13. Co-ops and internships contribute to students’ desire tobecome an engineer14, retention and work self-efficacy15, and higher starting salaries and thepotential for a job offer by graduation16. However, “lack-of-belonging” has been found to be
elements like trust, role model identity, coursework assistance,fosters belonging, resource access, and mentor skill development. Instructors benefit from and relationship dynamics.current student perspectives, enhancing teaching methods. This innovative method aims toaddress diversity and support underrepresented students in engineering. Preliminary resultssuggest positive outcomes, highlighting improved mentor-mentee relationships andknowledge sharing. This model holds potential for enhancing educational practices and Results & Discussionpromoting diversity in engineering education
activism.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Jocelyn GarciaMaria Oralia Tinoco Alegre, Florida International UniversityMalak Elaouinate, Florida International University Malak Elaouinate is a Florida International University
, particularly as related to innovation, pro- fessional identity development, engineering culture, and supporting the recruitment and persistence of underrepresented students within engineering.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches
their participation in mathematics classes as preparationfor their future career as engineers. Mathematics is both a requirement for entrance into thecareer and a necessary knowledge to pursue the career. Thus, identity in mathematics ismaintained through both imagination and alignment33.4. African American Males Academic Success at Community Colleges AAM students in community colleges can be studied through persistence and academicsuccess literature. AAM students’ academic persistence, graduation, and success rate enteringCCs are alarming. The US Department of Education (2006) reported that a one year persistencerates for AAM students show low rates to continue their academic studies at CCs. AAMs haveapproximately 74% first year
include advanced coursework within thesemajors (Computer Engineering Technical & Elective Class List; Bachelor’s DegreeRequirements).The Precursor of Performance for Recognition Recognition from others as an engineer is a key part of developing an engineeringidentity. A self-study report for Software Engineering lists peer-recognized expertise as the firstattribute that the program expects from graduates (Software Engineering Self-Study Report). In aquestionnaire for software engineering alumni, the program assesses the attainment of aproductive career through students’ ability to name examples of recognition such as professionalawards or recognitions, leadership positions in the creation of a successful product, or a lead rolein peer
, presentations, and web materials to support numerous initiatives related to graduate student professional development, graduate assistant training, and other enrolled student services.Dawayne WhittingtonJuanda Johnson-Taylor ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 NCLSAMP Bridges to the Doctorate: Preparing future minority Ph.D. researchers (PFMPR) through a holistic graduate student development modelIntroductionWhile there are initiatives, such as the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate(AGEP) embedded in universities across the country that focus on preparing the next generationof science, technology, engineering, and math scholars who are prepared to enter the STEM
investigate the ways that peer mentorship affectssense of belonging and discipline identity for students from varied matriculation points.IntroductionAs higher education institutions foster increasingly diverse undergraduate populations, it isimperative that student success initiatives purposefully develop students’ sense of belongingwithin an institution, a campus, a peer community, and an academic discipline. Belonging is acritical dimension of student success affecting a student’s degree of academic adjustment,persistence, and post-graduate aspirations, while also contributing to institutional benchmarkslike retention and degree completion [1]. Additionally, the decline in the number of traditional-age college students after 2025, a result of the
experience in the workforce before pursuing graduate school. Lewis Ngwenya has been working with Dr. Dodson to research how humanitarian engineering projects impact professional formation and views of diversity, equity, and inclusion.Ms. Hannah Grace Duke, Lipscomb University Hannah Duke is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Hannah is studying mechanical engineering and plans to continue on to graduate school, following the completion of her undergraduate degree, to ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Creating Inclusive Engineers through Humanitarian Engineering: Quantitative Results from a
QuestionsGiven the success of the WP program in other disciplines, the beneficial aspects of servicelearning that address some of the identified causes of attrition, and the need to providemeaningful STEM education experiences to K-6 students, the WP program was implemented inan engineering course at Sacramento State. Through this service learning experience, collegestudents (1) gain more knowledge about what civil engineers do, (2) engage with the communityand embrace their identity as college students and future civil engineers, and (3) practice theirtechnical communication skills with a non-technical audience. Elementary students (1) areexposed to civil engineering, (2) practice their writing skills, and (3) interact with a diversegroup of college
thatsalient STEM identity development can contribute to persistence in these fields. Promotingengagement in mentoring opportunities, like summer camps, could aid in increasing andsustaining URM STEM majors.IntroductionIn order for the nation to continue its prominence in a global market, many scholars have deemedthe need to increase the participation of underrepresented minorities (URM) in engineering andother STEM related fields imperative1. This push to increase the participation of URM haslaunched efforts at the K-12 through graduate level2-8. Within the K-12 space the nationalacademies have deemed the need for equity and diversity in science and engineering a priorityfor the nation, labeling it a “democratic ideal worthy of focused attention”9
Paper ID #15322First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingnessin EngineeringHank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno Hank Boone is a Graduate Research Assistant and Masters Student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on First Generation engineering college students’ engineering identity, belonging- ness, and how they perceive their college experience.He is also on a National Science Foundation project looking at non-normative engineering students and how they may have differing paths to success. His education includes a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nevada
Paper ID #16964Leadership in Practice: A Model for Building Strong Academic Foundationsin a Residential Learning CommunityMs. Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona Noel Hennessey is the Coordinator for Outreach, Recruitment and Retention in the College of Engineer- ing at the University of Arizona. She is responsible for first-year experience through residential education, student development and retention, and designing outreach activities and events for undergraduate recruit- ment. Noel earned a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education from the University of Arizona in 2015 and is currently pursuing a
Paper ID #35634Increasing Academic Success for Underrepresented Minority PhD GraduateSTEM Students Through Self-Advocacy EducationProf. Carmen M Lilley, The University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Lilley’s research interests in engineering education focus on professional development of engineering students at the undergraduate and graduate level. In particular, she is interested in the nuances of how the intersection of race/ethnicity with gender affects professional development in the area of leadership and the long term career trajectory of an individual. Her other research interests are focused on syntheses of low
with the WFU Program for Leadership and Character and many colleagues across the university. With inclusion being a core value, she is proud that the WFU Engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Her areas of expertise include engineering identity, complex problem solving across cognitive and non-cognitive domains, recruitment and retention, PBL, engineering design, learning through ser- vice, character education in engineering contexts, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the
Paper ID #29250Career Development Impacts of a Research Program on Graduate Studentand Postdoc MentorsNicole McIntyre, University of California, Berkeley Nicole McIntyre serves as the Education Director of the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF funded Science and Technology Center. She is also the Director of the Transfer-to-Excellence program, a summer research program for community college students. Nicole holds degrees in Psychol- ogy and Social Welfare from the University of California, Berkeley, and a graduate degree in Educational Leadership from the University of San Francisco. She is committed
Paper ID #38035Board 155: Broadening Participation and the Mission of Engineering forUS All (e4usa) through Design Projects That Engage Students withDisabilities as Stakeholders (Work in Progress)Dr. Jennifer Kouo, The Institute for Innovation in Development, Engagement, and Learning Systems (IDE-ALS) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education Dr. Jennifer Kouo is an Assistant Research Scientist at the IDEALS Institute. Jennifer’s areas of expertise include Universal Design for Learning, technology integration, assistive technologies, and serving stu- dents with a range of disabilities, particularly autism spectrum
development. As such, SHPE provides educational programs thataim to narrow the Hispanic and Latino representation disparity in STEM education and careerfields. Demographic-specific professional societies, like SHPE, play a crucial role in providingunderrepresented students with a sense of community and support throughout their academiccareers in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). They offer a welcomingand inclusive environment where students from diverse backgrounds can connect with peers andmentors who share similar experiences and challenges. By facilitating networking opportunities,mentorship programs, and conferences that celebrate diversity, these societies helpunderrepresented students build a strong sense of belonging
from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 I Never Played the “Girl Card”: Experiences and Identity Intersections of Women Student Veterans in EngineeringAbstractTo improve opportunities for women student veterans in engineering (WSVE), our qualitativestudy contributes to the body of knowledge about women SVEs and female gender identity inengineering. Our exploratory research presents information about WSVEs’ pathways intoengineering and begins to unpack the factors related to WSVEs’ gender, military and engineeringidentities.The research was guided by three main questions:1. Why do WSVEs
treatment in stored grains and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biologicaland Agricultural Engineering students. She is also a Member of the Engineering Education Faculty, In-stitute for Engineering Education and Innovation, Food Science Graduate Faculty, and MultidisciplinaryEngineering Graduate Faculty groups at Texas A&M University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Abstract Effective mentoring is critical to the success of graduate students; however, manymentors lack the skills and resources necessary to provide comprehensive support. To addressthis issue, the STAND model offers a framework for faculty mentors to guide and support theirstudents through five main actions: setting
tocomplex crises, and recognize the importance of sustainability to future national competitivenessand growth.1,2,5–7 Educators and students are similarly rallying for changes to better address andforestall environmental and social challenges through sustainability. Engineers are poised to helpcreate this sea change because they impact nearly every industry and everything human-made.Through their design and execution decisions, engineers directly and indirectly influence thecreation of everything from consumer goods to hardware and software products to buildings andmodes of transportation, thus their decisions make positive or negative impacts on the planet andits people, today and into the future.5 For engineers to contribute in a positive and
Precision Health and Integrated Diagnostics Center, the Stanford Center for Digital Health, the Stanford Diabetes Research Center, and the Stanford Enhancing Diversity in Graduate Education Fellowship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 “How You Got Me Messed Up”: A Critical Analysis of Doctoral Engineering Education through the Lens of Black PhD Candidates Crystal A. Nattoo, Crystal E. Winston, Rachel A. G. AdenekanAbstract Engineering graduate education has been the machine keeping research and developmentafloat for decades. There have been recent efforts to increase the number of students from under-represented backgrounds admitted to doctoral
broad range of clients from the healthcare to medical device manufacturing industries. Over the last 30 years, Dr. Nowak has led product and technology development programs spanning ideation through commercialization; field use and application in areas including robotic systems, au- tonomous underwater vehicles and medical devices; and entrepreneurial ventures in formation, pre-seed, and seed stages that have been successfully transitioned to industry. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: The Community-Engaged College: Grand Valley State University’s Industry and Community Partnership ModelBackgroundThis Work-In-Progress
measured by college entranceexaminations. Upon completion of high school, a smaller percentage of Black and Hispanicmales are ready for college and they earn fewer college degrees than their white counterparts.According to a 2015 report [2], the number of college degree holders among Black and Hispanicmales varies from 12% to 21%, versus 38% for white men. Nationally, initiatives are underwayto develop the STEM pipeline through out-of-school time activities via partnerships betweenhigher education, school districts and community organizations [3].Figure 1: Black and Hispanics are underrepresented in the science and engineering workforce compared to their representation in the general
highlights the importance of resilience and adaptability. I remember my experiences and learnings... applying Black feminist and womanist theory held me through to graduation."QUESTION 2: Why do you choose to be a member of ASEE, and describe how you’veserved the organization and engineering education community over the years?In response to the question regarding their membership and contribution to the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE), the Authors share a range of experiences and motivations.Meagan Pollock recounts joining ASEE as a natural step in their doctoral journey, eventuallybecoming deeply involved in leadership roles, including a significant position on theCommission for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Their journey