certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR & SHRM-SCP), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. He is a State of Indiana Registered domestic mediator.Dr. Kari L. Clase, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kari Clase is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation in the Polytechnic Institute and the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering in the College of Agriculture at Purdue University. Dr. Clase is also the Director of the Biotechnology Innovation and Regulatory Science (BIRS) Center. The mission of the BIRS Center is to develop global programs to ensure sustainable access
Committee of ENAEE since 2012Prof. Yury P Pokholkov, Tomsk polytechnic university, Association for Engineering Education of RussiaMrs. Kseniya K Tolkacheva, Association for Engineering Education of Russia, Tomsk Polytechnic University Member of the Association for Engineering Education of Russia responsible for AEER international co- operation activities. PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, graduate degree in ”Mathematical Methods in Eco- nomics”. Also holds a Management degree. Her research focus is in Quality Assurance, active learning and international academic mobility. Has experience in coordinating several TEMPUS projects as well as organizing joint international partnerships in educational and research areas, including national
at GD, Senior Engineering Manager at LM, and Advisory Engineer/Scientist at IBM. Dr. Squires is a contributing author and editor to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (sebokwiki.org) and the Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (bkcase.org/grcse). She is certified by PMI as a Project Management Professional, and by INCOSE as a Certified Systems Engineering Practitioner, including in Acquisition. Dr. Squires is a lifetime member of the Beta Gamma Sigma, Tau Beta Pi, and Eta Kappa Nu Honor Societies. She is a Senior Member of the IEEE, a member of and Director on the Systems Engineering Division board of ASEE, and a member of the ASEM, NDIA, INCOSE, and PMI. Degrees earned include a BSEE from
Paper ID #14279The Mechanism of the Engineer’s Cultivation through Combining Trainingwith Scientific Research——Practices and Cases of Training Excellent Engi-neer in National University of Defense Technology (NUDT)Prof. ZhongLi FU, Center for National Security and Strategic Studies (CNSSS) In National University of De-fense Technology (NUDT). FU Zhong Li is deputy director of the Center for National Security and Strategic Studies (CNSSS) In Na- tional University of Defense Technology (NUDT).In this role, he manages NUDT’s Continuing Education reform and leads excellent engineer training research projects. He has conducted
comparison for project-minded professionals. Both groupsshould have very similar attitudes as expected. However significant and interestingdifferences have been found and are discussed in the paper.A strikingly higher emotional discomfort level was found in Indian male participants for crosscultural diversity. In addition this study studied the differences between male and femaleresponses across cultures. Finally the results of these two studies were compared to the resultsof surveys with engineering students from U.S.A., Germany, Poland and Russia fromprevious cross cultural diversity studies conducted by the authors.BackgroundIn the age of global grand challenges, engineers are likely to work in international teams so asto find good opportunities
Paper ID #17509Multination Research Programmes: The UNESCO UNITWIN in Humani-tarian Engineering Outreach Case StudyDr. Jane Goodyer P.E., Massey University Jane Goodyer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering and Advanced Technology at Massey University. Regarded as an expert in manufacturing systems improvement she had led numerous research projects working with organisations, including Aston Martin, Jaguar and Caterpillar. Jane is also the New Zealand Coordinator for the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisa- tion) University Twinning network in Humanitarian Engineering
Perspectives in Science and Engineering Ethics Abstract In 2014 an interdisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Delaware began a 5-‐year project with the Online Ethics Center (OEC) to gather international perspectives on science and engineering ethics, broadly construed.1 We seek instructional and scholarly materials from international institutions and individual foreign scholars and teachers. This paper describes the rationale and outlines the theoretical foundation of this project. The central issue to be addressed here is: if there is indeed a benefit to the “internationalization” of science and
of International Programs in the Shiley School of Engineering. In that role he has developed and directed study abroad programs as well as international research and service learning projects for the School of Engineering.Dr. Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Portland Sharon Jones is the Dean of the Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland. She is a licensed civil engineer with degrees from Columbia University, the University of Florida, and Carnegie Mellon University. Her research interests focus on applying decision-making methods to evaluate sustain- ability policies with emphases on infrastructure, developing economies, and particular industrial sectors. She is also interested in
(Hong, Xuan & Zhang, 2010; Song & Lu, 2008). In the pastdecade, around 37 leading universities have tried organizing different formats ofsummer programs (Liu, 2012). These programs usually adopt advanced methods, suchas problem-based/project-based learning, focus on team work and student-facultyinteractions, etc. In addition, the international dimension of summer programs areoften exhibited in the participations of renowned faculty members from differentcountries or in the implementation of curriculum with a global element. However,students’ learning experience from the programs/courses in China has so far rarelybeen assessed in an empirical manner. This report focuses on understanding students’learning experiences through the assessing
innovation,were introduced to the current World Health Organization (WHO) initiative on local productionof medical devices as a means of improving access, and attended lectures and project-baseddiscussions offered by NU’s GHT program.Visitors were given the opportunity to attend and participate in the following HTM courses: Healthcare Technology Planning and Acquisition; Project Management; Clinical Engineering Practice; Medical Devices and Instrumentation Overview; Asset Management of Healthcare Technology and Infrastructure;These courses expose visiting faculty to the broader context of medical device and healthcaretechnology innovation, i.e., needs assessment, planning, evaluation, operation and life-cyclemanagement
National Education Ministry in projects for distance learning and reducing the digital divide. Taught at the university level for over thirty years in electronics, computing, multimedia and learning technologies. Produced three books about Learning Technologies and Engineer- ing Education, one of which was published by Pearson. Authored 5 book chapters and more than 40 technical papers in refereed journals and conferences. (www.cukierman.name)Mrs. Lueny Morell, InnovaHiEd Lueny Morell, MS, PE, Ing.Paed.IGIP is President of Lueny Morell & Associates and Founder & Director of InnovaHiEd, a world-class team of experts with extensive academic and industry experience offering services to help higher education leaders
and Computer En- gineering at the National University of Singapore early 2015. He is now working as a research scientist in the control science group at Temasek Laboratories. His current research interests lie in vision-based obstacle detection, navigation and the development of UAVs in urban environments.Dr. Richard H. Crawford P.E., University of Texas, Austin Dr. Richard H. Crawford is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He is also Director of the Design Projects program in Mechanical Engineering. He received his BSME from Louisiana State University in 1982, and his MSME in 1985 and Ph.D. in 1989, both from Purdue
laboratories by unified standards.3. Activities through GOLCGOLC is very active in developing collaboration between its members and partnerorganizations, initiating projects and activities that promote online laboratory area, andorganizing and sponsoring professional events (e.g., conferences and workshops). Some ofthe activities include iLAB Alliance, organizing international conferences and workshops,publishing books, developing reference collection systems, and standardizing activities.3.1 iLAB AllianceThe iLab Alliance started as an initiative of several partners who agreed to share their onlineexperiments within this network. It is, in this context, a step toward a broader usage anddissemination of online laboratories and
,University of Dayton and Shanghai Normal University have been developing and operating a3 + 1 joint degree program since 2006 [10]. The first three years of the program are taughtand managed by the university in China, then students transfer to the university in the U.S. toget an undergraduate degree in engineering. On the other hand, Worcester PolytechnicInstitute sends their students to a university in China during a summer for global project [11].As shown in the table, there are variety of programs in terms of types, characteristics andparticipants of the programs. Table 1. Survey of Global Academic Program between the U.S. and ChinaUniversity in US University in China Type of Major(s) Year Remarks
Paper ID #17517AEER accreditation of educational programs: quality assurance aims andrequirementsMrs. Kseniya K Tolkacheva, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Association for Engineering Education of Russia Member of the Association for Engineering Education of Russia responsible for AEER international co- operation activities. PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, graduate degree in ”Mathematical Methods in Eco- nomics”. Also holds a Management degree. Her research focus is in Quality Assurance, active learning and international academic mobility. Has experience in coordinating several TEMPUS projects as well as organizing joint
demonstrate equal technical proficiency as men, preventing stereotypesand misconceptions regarding women [5]. Figure 1 describes the GPA of male and female highschool graduates in math and science, for a period of 15 years, in USA; Figure 2, the number ofwomen being awarded engineering degrees, proving that engineering is not a sex segregated fieldof work nor a male orientated field of education (Youn and Choi 2015). Highlighting STEMwomen’s devotion to their careers, their mathematical abilities can be beneficial to theiradvanced confidence (Oh and Lewis 2011). Regarding professional performance, (McIlwee andRobinson 1992) stated that both genders display equal desires and wishes when it comes to getinvolved in strategic projects, applying practical
management techniques. A total of 18 hours arerequired to complete the minor, including a required course in “Challenges in GlobalEngineering”. The curriculum outline is shown in table 3.The foundation of the minor is the Challenges in Global Engineering course. Upon completionof the course students gain a broader perspective of global challenges facing engineers today,including specifics of managing international engineering projects, engineering standards,economic, legal, and environmental issues. Students have an understanding of the role of culturein engineering design and problem solving and global trends in engineering. They are exposed toengineering work in various countries through projects that focus on real-world casepresentations and case
, and a project. The final examination is an oral presentation, a written report and a 3-minute film. • Students: The student base is the 40 Swedish students from the Technology Management program (20 from LUSEM and 20 from LTH) together with approximately 40 Chinese students (20 from SoM and Page 19.7.4 20 from the technical departments (ID and CSE). • Teachers: Teachers from both Sweden and China and from Engineering, Design (LTH, ID and CSE) and Management (LUSEM and SoM) are involved in the lectures. A minimum of two teachers with different aspects of the subject are present
and established system of training,not focused on current scientific and technological requirements of the industry [2]. Lack of staff holding competencies in the field of technology of production, processing,transportation, which will be able to rapid response to market conditions and rapidly changingeconomical situation, assess the conditions and consequences of their organizational andmanagement solutions, project management in the field of high technologies, marketingresearches, develop business plans of production and realization of products is one of themost urgent problems of modern high-tech industries in innovatively developing enterprisesof petrochemical complex. An effective way to solve this problem is implementation of
backgroundto become more formalized and easily shared with other universities.Apparently good results have been achieved through the following practices: step-by-stepcollaboration plans with selected top universities in the USA, Europe and Asia; focusedFederal Government funding for joint projects (research, guest lecturers and jointconferences) with top world scientists in approved development priority areas; success inAsia through personalized activities carried out by the University’s Honorary Professors fromChina, South Korea and other Asia-Pacific countries; training hundreds of University facultyin the top US and European universities; networking with regional, national and globalacademic and business partners. Another focus is given to the best
, established new models of study abroad including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students. Maria started working at Texas A&M in 2005 as Assistant Director for Latin American Programs and in 2009 she was promoted to Program Manager for South America in the same office. During her time at the Office for Latin America Programs she created, managed and developed projects to enhance the presence of Texas A&M University in Latin American and to support in the internationalization of the education, research, and outreach projects of the university. She was charged with the development and implementation of a strategic plan for
engineering programs among UUMs, ranging from49% for Females to 62% among African Americans.2-4Many strategies are currently being employed to reduce this disparity. These efforts include first-year seminars, internships, learning communities, and capstone projects.2, 5 Study abroad,however, has not been seriously considered as a high impact retention activity. The researchshows that UUMs struggle in mathematics and science intensive programs such as engineering,not simply because of academic under-preparation per se, but more importantly, due to feelingsof not belonging and lack of confidence in their ability to learn coupled with low self-efficacyand self-direction.6-8 In fact, the common theme among successful high impact retentionstrategies is
the French International Engineering Program and Professor of French at the University of Rhode Island. His research focuses on scientific and professional literature of eighteenth- century France. In addition, he has published on the teaching of French and on the role of experiential education in the language curriculum. His work has appeared in journals including French Review, Aus- tralian Journal of French Studies, Online Journal of Global Engineering Education, and Symposium. His current project is a textbook on French for engineering.Ms. Silke A. ScholzAnette Geithner Page 19.20.1
class by effectively learningchemistry concepts through additional reading material required for quizzes.I first experimented with the idea of adding online quizzes in my courses in the previoussemester. Student verbal feedback was positive for that pilot project. It encouraged me topursue this project more actively with a motivation to understand if there is indeed arelationship between these two factors. If administered properly, we also hypothesise thatonline quizzes will be able to save time for instructors in the long run, which is a significantadvantage in this age of ever increasing expectations from an academic citizen. In addition, itis expected that with the use of the online quizzes, significantly more class time will beavailable for
suggestions for designing similar engineering leadership programs in the future.IntroductionFast-paced technological transformation and innovation demands not only technical expertisefrom future engineers, but also multiple soft skills, in particular leadership [1]. Crumpton-Young indicated that engineering leadership is the influence and ability to lead otherengineers and technical staff to design, create, innovate, implement and evaluate and assessservices and products [2]. MIT-Gordon engineering leadership program describes engineeringleadership as a set of capabilities and values that enable a person to accomplish a multi-disciplinary complex project by leading teams instead of functioning as an individualtechnical contributor. Engineering
psychologyAcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by an Innovative Education Grant from Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity in 2015-2016, a National-Level Practical Innovation Project Grant (IPP8160) in 2013-2014, an Innovative Education Grant from Purdue University in 2016, and a leave from teachingfor Rockwell Clancy from the University of Michigan-Shnaghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute duringthe Spring 2016 semester. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the support ofprofessors Yu Hui, Jian Yang, Liu Wenjing, and Yang Yang, who allowed them to administerthe surveys for this study in their courses, and Wang Yuchen and Leng Xubo, who worked asresearch assistants to help translate and administer the survey, as well enter data intospreadsheets.IntroductionThis
graduates.The Plant Machinery Maintenance Technology program in this South American institute offers acurriculum in the field of mechanical engineering technology. The graduates of the program areprepared to work in a mechanical design, maintenance management, or project managementwithin industry. The program educational objectives are as follows: Graduates analyze, design, implement and supervise modern mechanical systems; as well as manage maintenance of industrial plants. Graduates identify problems and opportunities for improvement, and they implement solutions applying modern technologies and appropriate procedures. Graduates manage resources and work with effectiveness, initiative, creativity, and within teams
becauseCIE is not the accreditation organization in Taiwan. When CIE was nominated as thementor of Myanmar for accreditation system of engineering education under FEIAP, IEETwas inevitably called again to help CIE in this endeavor. Under this project, IEET hasinvested a significant amount of time and human resources in helping FEIAP setting upthe FEIAP Engineering Education Guidelines, and it also helped on the mentoring effortof MES in establishing the engineering education accreditation system. The Ministry of Education played an important role in this endeavor because itprovided CIE and IEET with millions-dollar financial support. FEIAP has not providedany financial support so far. Without the Ministry of Education’s funding, CIE and IEETwere
seminars,internships, learning communities, and capstone projects compared to only two anecdotalreferences to study aboard.This paper postulates that ABET’s Student Outcome 3(h) “the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context” and Student Outcome 3(i) "a recognition of the need for, and an ability toengage in lifelong learning" are not mutually exclusive but rather interdependent and mutualisticin nature. Outcomes by their very nature describes what students should know or can do by thetime of graduation. The implication is therefore, that lifelong learning and a global perspectivemust originate within the 4-year engineering curriculum/program. The
can be the increase in library, technology and knowledge resources andmore access to increased expertise. Page 19.21.4 In some cases higher education institutions, from developing countries, may attempt to establishcollaboration with universities of other countries in order to project an image of an institute thatis very well connected with the rest of the world13. It is worth mentioning that such collaborationmay not lead to any financial gains however, it may result in enhanced research exposure andcapabilities as well competitive advantage14.Another form of collaboration is based on teaching method, called Blended Online Learning(BOL) 15