web-based dissemination strategy, plans for producing,marketing and distributing content and services will be scalable, cost effective,accessible, and appropriate for the academic setting. The project will enhance the currentstatus of engineering technician education through timely adaptation of content andtechnology, resulting in solid content and pedagogical preparation of AEC associatedfaculty and teachers returning to the engineering technology classroom.3. Project DescriptionBackground - Bluefield State College was established as a Black Teacher’s College byan act of the West Virginia Legislature in 1895 and was integrated after 1954. By the1960's, the college had a comprehensive four-year program of teacher education, arts
overall impact, anevaluation plan was developed by the evaluation Fellow and the Co-Primary investigatorassigned to evaluation. The plan included formative and summative components and was drivenby the goals and objectives of the project.3 The constituents of the grant were identified as thefaculty, Fellows, teachers, middle and high school students, the university, and the state board ofeducation. A sample of the evaluation plan and its components is in Appendix 1. As can be seenin the chart it includes objectives, constituents, key questions, instruments, timeline, person(s)responsible and feedback. This was also organized into a timeline that mapped instruments andmeasures to the goals and objectives. A portion of the timeline can be seen in
Session 2541 Vendor Partnerships With Engineering Libraries Partnering with Knovel: Case Studies in Information Outreach Jay Bhatt, W. Charles Paulsen, Lisa G. Dunn, Amy S. Van Epps Drexel University/Knovel Corporation/Colorado School of Mines/ Purdue UniversityAbstractThe engineering library plays a critical role in initiating and maintaining the conduit betweenvendors of engineering information and the users of that information—faculty, students, andresearchers. Likewise, vendors play a key role in supporting library and faculty efforts topromote engineering
concept study.Bibliographic Information[1]. Ashcraft, M. H., “Math Anxiety; Personal, Educational and Cognitive Consequences,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11 (5): 181-185, Oct. 2002.[2]. Bandura, A., “Self-Efficacy”, in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4: 71-81, V. S. Ramachudran ed., New York, Academic Press, 1994.[3]. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R. eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, Expanded Edition, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000.[4]. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M. Lewis, M., Reimann, P. Glaser, R., “Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems,” Cognitive Science 13, 145-182, 1989.[5]. Choi, J. I., Hannafin, M., “The
Journal of Engineering Education, 20/8, 372-378.11. Verner, I. M. and D.J. Ahlgren. 1997. Fire-Fighting Robot Contest: Interdisciplinary Design Curricula in College and High School. Journal of Engineering Education, 91/3, 355-35912. Carroll, D. R. 1997. Bridge Engineering for the Elementary Grades. Journal of Engineering Education, 86/3. 221-226.13. Poole, S. J., J.L. deGrazia, and J.F. Sullivan. 2001. Assessing K-12 Pre-Engineering Outreach Programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 90/1, 43-48.14. Neubert, J. J., C.G. Widstrand, A.M. Pumper, B. Swanson, and A.B. Ellis. 2001. Integrating Materials Science into the High School Chemistry Curriculum, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
. Recruiting and Retaining Key Sponsors Sponsorship is important for funding the organization of the business plan competition, forfunding prizes to encourage participation, and for raising the profile of the Competition andconferring greater credibility to it. Prizes are a necessary incentive since participation in thecompetition, even by students, is optional. While recruiting sponsors for a newly institutedcompetition has to be based on promise, retaining them is based on performance. The most likely sponsors are alumni who have a sense of affiliation and loyalty to their almamater. The SVBPC’s principal sponsor in 2004 was Wanda Ginner, a Bay Area resident whowas a student at the College of Business in the 1960’s. She was so impressed with the
was your project client? 6. What was the objective of your capstone project? 7. Which portion(s) of the capstone project did you find rewarding? (Circle one or more) a. In Progress Reviews b. Client Decision Brief c. Log Book/Smart Book d. Preparation of Project Report e. Systems Engineering Management Process f. Interaction with Client g. Academic challenge presented by the project h. Techniques and Tools used in the project i. Interaction with advisor j. Organization of Capstone course k. Other: ____________________________________________________________ 8. Which portion(s) of the capstone project did you find lacking
realindustrial part using CAE in manufacturing.References1. Masubuchi, K, “Analysis of welded structures – residual stresses, distortion and their consequences,” Welding International Series on Material Science and Technology, Vol. 33, 1980, Pergamon Press, Oxford.2. Shim, Y., Feng, Z.L., Lee, S., Kim, D.S., Jaeger, J., Paparitan, J.C., and Tsai, C.L., “Determination of residual stress in thick-section weldments,” Welding Journal, Vol. 71, 1992, pp. 305-312.3. Feng, Z.L. and Michaleris, P., “Evaluation of 2D and 3D FEA models for predicting residual stress and distortion,” ASME PVP Proceedings, Vol. 347, 1997.4. Josefson, B.L. and Karlsson, C.T., “FE-calculated stresses ina multi-pass butt-welded pipe – a simplified approach
Conference Proceedings. 1997.2. DeGoede K, Harding T, Kadlowec J and Lorenz C. ASEE Student Chapters: From Student Members to Faculty. 2001 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 2001.3. Finley C, Logman H, Rijken P, Bueno P, Mahadevan J, Hagenberger M, Hassan A and Barr R. Survival of an ASEE Student Chapter. 2002 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 2002.4. Chan E, Holleran S, McGaughey A and Rasmussen C. ASEE Student Chapters: Avenues for Promoting Future Engineering Educators. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 2004.5. Visco DP Jr. and Cartwright AN. A New Model for ASEE Student Chapters. Journal of Engineering Education. 2001:641-3.6. Mullenax CA and Dee KC. To Be or Not to Be – A Decision Process for Formation of an ASEE Student
the highest level of salariesand wealthy people. These aspects altogether and the willing to do something to foster the Page 10.632.4engineering formation make it feasible and successful. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe formation of fishing engineering of present world requires the development of skills like tomake research in the fields of Ecology, Biology and Genetics. S/he has to be a professional withscientific mind, capable of finding solutions in according to the
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationany other similar domain. These visualization techniques can be valuable aids not only inteaching in the classroom but also an effective self-directed tool for open learning via the web.Bibliography 1. AbouRizk, S. M., & Sawhney, A. (1994). Simulation and gaming in construction engineering education. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education conference. Retrieved Aug 1, 2003, from www.informs-cs.org/wsc98papers/179.PDF 2. Haque, M.E. (2003). Visualization Techniques for Structural Design Education, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2003
collaborative projects are underway. The Memorandum of Agreementwill enhance scholarly and pedagogical activities and faculty and student developmentopportunities.acknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Edward Smith, Interim Director ofthe International Center at Rowan University, and Julio Parada Pizarro, Director of theInternational Office at la Universidad de La Serena.Bibliography 1. Wormley, D.N., Challenges in Curriculum Renewal, Ibid, 20(3), pp329-332, 2004. 2. Pasek, Z.J., Y. Koren and S. Segall, Manufacturing in a Global Context: A Graduate Course on Agile Reconfigurable Manufacturing, The International Journal of Engineering Education, 2(5), pp742-753, 2004. 3. Sin
other Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education types of resources, such as images, videos, sound clips, or additional text, that might be instrumental in explaining and complementing the content of the IS concept map(s). The next level of multidimensionality adopted for IS concept maps involves their possible utilization for better assessment of the two-way transformation between the tacit and explicit types of knowledge within the IS domain. In particular, the main point of interest in this research is evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of the CM methodology as it relates
Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”7 Hambridge, S. and A. Lunde, “DON'T SPEW A Set of Guidelines for Mass Unsolicited Mailings and Postings(spam*),” RFC 2635, June 1999, ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2635.txt.8 Google, http://www.google.com, searched Jan. 4, 2005, using “spam” as search term.9 USPTO, United States Patent and Trademark Office, http://www.uspto.gov, searched trademarks using spam,internet, and email as search terms.10 USPTO, United States Patent and Trademark Office, http://www.uspto.gov, searched patents and patentapplications using spam, internet, and email as search terms.11 ABET, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc, 2004-2005, “Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs
. Up until this time, there was no clear indication about theway such a course should be taught, what should be included, or from where suitable coursematerials could be had. The experiences and materials from the University of Maryland are atleast one answer to these concerns, and the reader is invited to explore what is now available.Any one interested in further information or assistance, including exams and projects, maycontact the author of this paper.Biographical InformationARTHUR T. JOHNSONArt Johnson has been involved with bioengineering since its early days in the 1960’s. He has authored three originaltexts in bioengineering, including Biology for Engineers. He has been President of the Alliance for Engineering inMedicine and Biology
utilizing the visual abstractions is in reducing thecognitive load and reliance on prior knowledge to understand the circuit ’s operation. A validargument could be made that this positive contribution is enough to justify the use of these typesof visual aids. However, there are still significant advantages to utilizing an animated visualabstraction. Page 10.1279.5Since the visual aids are actually interactive, they can be used dynamically in classroomdiscussions. With a quick alt-tab key sequence, the instructor can seamlessly switch to the actual Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
Recruitment and Retention Strategies through ‘Design4Practice’ Curriculum Enhancements,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2005. 6. S. Scott Moor, Polly R. Piergiovanni, Matthew Metzger; ”Learning Process Control with LEGOs®,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2004. 7. MAX3100; http://www.maxim-ic.com 8. SPI; http://www.mct.net/faq/spi.html 9. Basic Stamp; http://www.parallax.comJERRY M. HATFIELDJerry Hatfield is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Northern Arizona University. He is a graduateof the University of California (BSEE) and of the University of Southern California (MBA) and is a registeredprofessional engineer. His areas of interest include freshman programs
the bits in multiple memory locations. To rotate theblocks, the student created a simple Sine/Cosine lookup table to switch the coordinatesystem back and forth from polar to Cartesian and vice-versa—polar coordinates to rotateand Cartesian to move blocks left, right, and down. The student created a matrix thatsaved every fallen piece. To avoid meshing, the future position of any part of the movingblock was checked for vacancy before allowing the move. Pulling a number off the68HC12’s free running timer generated a number with sufficient randomness for eachnew block.DiscussionThe final project of the second microcontroller course offers an opportunity for studentsto design and implement a microcontroller-based embedded system. The instructors
below.Attribute 1, Goals - 1Attribute 2, Support - 1Attribute 3, Peer Support - 3Attribute 4, Access to Technology - 3Attribute 5, Support of “Godfathers” - 1Success Environment Measure – 9Conclusion: low probability for success.Case 2In the early 1990’s, the Industrial Engineering Department of Central South University wasstruggling to survive. Enrollment was declining. Two of the ten full time faculty members had left.Contracts and grants were lower than other departments and were declining. There was talk of mergingthe department with Mechanical Engineering, which both departmental faculties were against, or closingdown the department entirely. The Dean agreed to a plan developed by the IE Department. The planincluded hiring a new faculty member with
attempt to decompose theprocess of addressing new components, aiding students in applying knowledgepreviously learned both in lab and in class. This strategy provides the student with aroadmap when faced with the uncertainty of applying a new component to a system, evenif the student lacks complete knowledge of the component.3.1.1 Identify, Interface, IntegrateAt a certain level of proficiency and experience, an engineer is able draw upon certainskills, strategies, and intuitions that allow him or her to successfully grapple withproblems and components that s/he is unfamiliar with. Certain “functionalunderstanding” in electronics, programming, etc. are necessary pre-requisites to thisability. Given this understanding, the proficient engineer has
: CNS 3220, Visual Basic Software Development CNS 3250, Java Software Development CNS 3260, C#.net Software Development CNS 3370, Advanced C++ Software Development 2. MCT 2240, Interaction Design I (3.0 CR) Uses a systems approach in designing interactive multimedia products to create user experiences that enhance and extend the way people work and communicate. Stresses an iterative process of design and evaluation based on theory and good practice are needed to create usable products. Prerequisite(s): MCT 1210 3. CNS 2520, Database Theory (3.0 CR) Introduces theory, concepts, architecture, and use of Database Management
that may discourage widespread adoption. Freescale“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, & Exposition Copyright, © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”indicated that they intend to publish a collection of training material produced by instructors.These materials would be made available to any for use in their courses. Provided that additionalmaterials are developed, the investment on these boards is worth the investment.Bibliography1. Montañez, E & Ruggles, S. “Getting Started with the Microcontroller Student Learning Kit (MCUSLK)”, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., August 2004.2. “MCU Project Board, Prototyping Board with Microcontroller Interface
& Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”of three-dimensional modeling and rendering programs are used to produce images of the partsinvolved in the example problems so that students gain a better understanding of the object beinganalyzed. Animation sequences are used to demonstrate how parts deform under the appliedload(s). Displays are produced that illustrate how the resulting stresses are distributed on cross-sections, or over the surface of the part. A simulated “pencil-on-paper solutions” portion helpsto demonstrate and reinforce the desired problem-solving methodology skills that studentsshould develop in the course. Each of the example problems includes a voice-over
to problems,experiences of faculty, and student learning experiences will all be made available on the GlobalClassmates Community network.For more information on Global Classmates, please contact the authors.Bibliography[1] Patro, S. and White C. (2004), “Expanding Horizons Through Hosting International Conferences,” Proceedingsof the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.[2]USP 2003 International Conference, hosted by Kettering University, Dearborn, MI.[3] Roundtable Discussion of Universities Using Cordys (2004), Cordys Cordial International Conference, Putten,The Netherlands[4] Warner, Jane (2003), Keynote speech, USP 2003 International Conference, hosted by Kettering University,Dearborn
upper level classmates who missed the sweeping changes brought about by the vacuumcleaner presentations.Bibliography1. Williams, B., Blowers, P., & Goldberg, J. (2004). Integrating Information Literacy Skills into Engineering Courses to Produce Lifelong Learners, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.2. Nerz, H.F., Weiner, S.T. (2001). Information Competencies: A Strategic Approach, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Arnold, J., Kackley, R., & Fortune, S. (2003). “Hands-on Learning for Freshman Engineering Students”, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 37. [Online] Available: http
numerical example the students tested theirunderstanding of all the steps that the FAM algorithm undergoes.Fuzzy ARTMAP has an interesting geometrical interpretation and we felt that it was necessary toemphasize this interpretation to the students. The templates ( w aj ' s ) of nodes in the categoryrepresentation layer of Fuzzy ARTMAP can be represented as hyperrectangles (rectangles in 2-D). The meaning of this hyperrectangle is that it encloses within each boundaries all the inputpatterns that chose this node (template) as their representative node (template) and were encodedby it (see Figure 2). This hyperrectangle starts from its trivial size of 0, corresponding to the casewhere it has encoded a single pattern and it grows as more patterns are
, J., “Selecting Simulation Software,” AUTOFACT ’95 Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, Chicago, Illinois, November 13-16, 1995.[5] Nikoukaran, J., Hlupic, V., and Paul, R.J., “Criteria for Simulation Software Evaluation,” Procedding of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 399-406, 1998.[6] Hlupic, V., “Simulation software selection using SimSelect”, Simulation 69 (4), 1999, 231-239.[7] Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., and Shah, S., “Simulation Software Selection for Manufacturing: A Review,” Proceeding of Decision Sciences Institute, 2002, 2013-2016.ERICK C. JONES is an Assistant Professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the Department of Industrialand Management Systems Engineering Department.JAYAKUMAR NARASIMHAN is a graduate
Piston 2 Force 0.000 0 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 Time (s) Figure 2: 4-cylinder automotive engine simulation data.The third group designed and modeled a simple suspended roller coaster using the model to testfor desired motions and safe velocity and acceleration limits. This project was moderatelysuccessful and exciting for the students. Rather than testing a hypothesis the students sought
. Giddlings, and J. C. McRobbie, “Evolution and Validation Form of an Instrument For Assessing Science Laboratory Classroom Environments”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), pp.399-422, 1995.2) M. Barak and Y. Doppelt, “Promoting Creative Thinking Within Technology Education”, Paper presented at the International Workshop for Scholars in Technology Education, WOCATE, George Washington University, Washington DC, September 1998.3) N. D. Perkins, Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage?, T. M. Duffy & H. D. Jonassen Eds., “Constructivism and Technology of Instruction: A Conversation”, ;;.45-55, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992.4) S. Waks, “Lateral Thinking and Technology Education”, Journal of Science
connection between the two subject areas.Bibliography1. Schmaltz, K.S., Byrne, C., Choate, R. and Lenoir, J., “Integrated Professional Component Plan from Freshmen Experience to Senior Project,” Proc. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.2. Schmaltz, K. “Design Of Experiments Plan With A Capstone Experimentation Course,” Proc. of 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA.3. Throne, R., “Modeling, Simulation, and Control of a Real System,” Proc. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.4. McIntyre, C., Mehta, S. and Sellnow, T., “A Program For Faculty Peer Review of Teaching at North Dakota State University, ” Proc. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.H. JOEL LENOIR is the