, 2008. All of the academicprograms within the college are now either recommending or requiring the course for theirstudents. Currently two large sections (i.e. 70 students/section) are offered each semester andadditional sections are projected for the future. Many of the elements of the course could beadopted directly as embedded indicators for ABET assessment tools. The level of the outcomespecified in the new class in the areas of leadership, professional and ethical responsibility, andteamwork meets the level suggested in ASCE’s BOK2. When coupled with the total collegeincentives, the level of the leadership outcome surpasses BOK2’s requirements.The topics of this course naturally lead to a great deal of student discussion. The typical
Engineering Education (CAEE). Page 15.344.10REFERENCES1 .Sheppard, S.D., Atman, C.J., Stevens, R., Fleming, L., Streveler, R., Adams, R.S., & Barker, T. 2004. Studying theengineering experience: Design of a longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.2 Clark, M., Sheppard, S.D., Atman, C.J., Fleming, L., Miller, R., Stevens, R., Streveler, R. & Smith, K. 2008.Academic Pathways Study: Processes and realities. In Proceedings of the American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.3 Donaldson, K., Chen, H.L., Toye, G., & Sheppard, S
College ofEngineering, an institution which promised integrated project work in all four years of itscurriculum.3 Before and since, and in many places besides Olin, promising engineering studentshave been enticed to attend a variety of innovative technical education programs that promisereal-world experience, training in widely applicable communications skills, and an impeccablefoundation in the principles of design and professional standards of practice.For example, WPI placed project-based learning at the core of its academic program in the early1970’s when it redesigned its graduation requirements to include two major projects.4 Oneproject undertaken within the student’s major field of study is usually completed during thesenior year. Another
Programs. Effective for Evaluations During the 2009-2010Accreditation Cycle. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. www.abet.org2. Davidson, C.I., H.S. Matthews, C.T. Hendrickson, M.W. Bridges, B.R. Allenby, J.C. Crittenden, Y. Chen, E.Williams, D.T. Allen, C.F. Murphy, and S. Austin. 2007. Adding sustainability to the engineer’s toolbox: achallenge for engineering educators. Environmental Science & Technology. July 15. 4847-4850.3. American Academy of Environmental Engineers (AAEE). 2009. Environmental Engineering Body ofKnowledge. AAEE, Annapolis, MD.http://www.cece.ucf.edu/bok/pdf/EnvE_Body_of_Knowledge_Final.pdf4. Reed, Brian E. 2008. Database ABET Environmental Engineering Degrees. University of Maryland– Baltimore County. Dept. of
recent progress in scientific computing.Many examples from recent research in physics and related areas are given with theprogram listing. Basic computational tools and routines, including the ones fordifferential equations, spectral analysis, and matrix operations, are dealt with throughrelevant examples, and more advanced topics are treated. The broad categories ofcomputational physics studied are simulation, visualization and modeling, numericalmethods, algorithms and data analysis. Simulation and modeling are taught by stressingnumerical techniques and programming language(s) techniques employed. Besideslearning how to solve numerical problems with a computer, the student also will gainexperience writing manuscripts in a scientific journal
0948997. This support isgratefully acknowledged. Page 15.385.10References1 Grandin, J. M. and E. D. Hirleman, “Educating Engineers as Global Citizens: A Call for Action,” Report of theNational Summit Meeting on the Globalization of Engineering Education, March, 2009. Can be accessed at://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol4/iss12 Parkinson, A. R., J. N. Harb, S. P. Magleby, “Developing Global Competence in Engineers: What Does it Mean?What is Most Important?”, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin TX, 2009.3 Jarvenpaa S. L. and D. E. Leidner, “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Organization Science,Vol. 10, No. 6
nose leading edge to main wing leading edge (in)ARVT vertical tail aspect ratioxballast location of coin ballast (in)mballast mass of coin ballast (slugs)Vtrim trim velocity (ft/s)Assumptions 1. Standard Sea Level pressure, density, viscosity for air. 2. Aircraft operates in Steady Gliding Flight: Lift = Weight 3. Horizontal Tail Volume Ratio =1 (Approximation 4. Vertical Tail Volume Ratio = .04 5. Airfoil is a flate plate (Thin Balsa Sheet) thus maximum CL = .81 6. Trim Velocity is constant (Approx 15-20 fps) 7. Drag addition from Coins and tape / extra glue is negligible 8. Aerodynamic Center of the Horizontal Tail is at the quarter chord 9. Aerodynamic Center of the Vertical Tail is at the quarter chord
, June 20076. Matthew W. Ohlund, Sheri D. Sheppard, Gary Lichtenstein, Ozgur Eris, Debbie Chachra and Richard A. Layton “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp 259-278, July 20087. C. Roberts, D. Morrell, R. Grondin, C.-Y. Kuo, R. Hinks, S. Danielson, and M. Henderson, “Developing a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program at Arizona State University’s East Campus,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, June 20058. Marcia Mentowski & Associates, Learning That Lasts: Integrating Learning, Development and Performance in College and Beyond, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
packages were used for the video-conferencing activitiesincluding Skype and Elluminate (for synchronous conferencing). Panopto and various video-editing packages (for archiving video modules) have been recently used in the project. For somesynchronous video conference sessions, two LCD projectors were operated, one to display theslides for the presentation (previously downloaded file to achieve high resolution with images)and a second to display a full-screen image of the face(s) of the partners at the other university.The new video conference activities included a sand castle building competition that had strictrules for construction activities (e.g., only 3 people at a time could be speaking or touching thesand). The Soils Magic show was
individual converter topologies. The UPS system extendsthe learning opportunity to cover integrated subsystems and provides features to study systemperformance, protection and control, as well as energy storage device characteristics.REFERENCES[1] J. Platts, J. S. Aubyn, “History and Market Growth” in Uninterruptible Power Supplies, Stevenage, UK: IET, 1992, ch. 2, p.9.[2] A. Smit, D. Heer, R. Traylor, T.S. Fiez, “A Custom Microcontroller System Used as a Platform for Learning in ECE,” presented at the ASEE 2004 Annu. Conf. and Expo., Salt Lake City, UT, Jun. 2004.[3] L. Schuch, W. Priesnitz Filho, C. Rech, H.L. Hey, J.R. Pinheiro, “Integrated Software to Assist the Design and Study of UPS’s,” presented at the IEEE Power Electron. Educ
reasoning in order to make decisions within the project.Once identified, the full mathematical expression or model descriptor is added to the ModelRepresentation. Quantitative Model Components, those characterized by mathematicalequations, are placed inside squares while Qualitative Model Components, those characterizedby descriptive mechanisms and responses, reside in circles. Additionally, a model componentcan be designated as either statistical or empirical in nature by an ‘S’ or ‘E’ in the modelcomponent box. Figure 2 shows the different types of model components and an example ofhow they could appear together in the Model Representation. Figure 2. Primary and Secondary Model Components. Part (a) shows both qualitative (circle) and
needed to betterdetermine optimal methods for utilizing this tool.References1 Camtasia Studio Software, Copyright 1999-2009 TechSmith Corporation, http://www.techsmith.com2 Campbell, C., “On-Line Video-Based Training for Matlab, Mathcad and Maple”, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education (2006).3 Jackson, A., Jackson, S., and Mehta, M., “Applying the Six Sigma Process when Creating A Modular Six SigmaGreen Belt Program”, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society forEngineering Education (2009).4 Brown, C., Lu, Y.-H., Yale, M., Bennett, D., “On-Line Examinations for Object-Oriented Programming”,Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual
AC 2010-2293: UASPP: THREE YEARS OF HELPING MIDDLE SCHOOLTEACHERS DEVISE THEIR OWN HANDS-ON ENGINEERING AND SCIENCEACTIVITIESShannon Davis, University of ArkansasCarol Gattis, University of Arkansas CAROL S. GATTIS Dr. Gattis is the Associate Dean of the Honors College and Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She formerly served as Director of Recruitment, Retention, Honors and Diversity for the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. In this latter role, she directed and developed new programs for the college-wide efforts in recruitment, retention and diversity.Bryan Hill, University of Arkansas BRYAN W. HILL
thatstudents are making progress toward achieving the learning outcomes of the capstone project,and by extension progress toward degree program outcomes? This is a serious and difficultquestion often raised as “how do I assess the individual working within the project team?” [2][7].But it is more than how to arrive at a grade. For the instructor, s/he wants to provide formativefeedback early and often during the project to help the student understand the larger context of aspecific issue and how it applies in the real world. For the student, gaining an awareness of thecause-and-effect of her/his choices and actions within a team, and how those judgments translateto the real world is important. For example, consider a project that is falling behind
produced specimens. Once the usable specimens wereproduced, the students proceed to the testing station.The samples were tested on a Tinius Olsen H10KT tensile testing machine. They were extendedat 0.02cm/s and the test continued until the failure (fracture) of the specimen. The students notedthe elongation to break (strain) and ultimate strength (Mpa) of the specimens. Given that thethree groups had to begin at various stations to make the laboratory time effective, samples weregiven to the initial testing group to test. The group that began with testing moved to thesimulation station next.Once the three groups had completed the three different exercises at the three stations, they metand discussed their results and finding. The goal was to have
incorporate the need for the students to consult and comply with engineering standards and to address numerous realistic constraints.Evaluation of Current Curriculum vs. BOK2 OutcomesCurrent BSCE program outcomes for [University A] (Table 1) were ‘mapped’ against the BOK2baccalaureate outcomes published by ASCE, and an initial assessment was conducted to identifylikely action(s) needed to bring the [University A] program outcomes into better agreement orcompliance with BOK2 outcomes. Table 3 presents a very brief summary of the effort. Thistype of exercise is limited by the nature of existing [University A] outcomes – which typically donot specify a “level of achievement” – versus the BOK2 approach of stating outcomes withdefinitive achievement
; Guidelines for the Future. (2004). theAmerican Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.4. Z.P.Ye and P.Hua Jin. (2007). A Review of Studies on Practice Teaching of Engineering Education in China.Apr, 2007. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, China.5. Paul Kirschner and Peter Gerjets. (2006). Instructional Design for Effective and Enjoyable Computer-SupportedLearning. Jan, 2006. Computers in Human Behavior.6. John E. Brough, Maxim Schwartz, Satyandra K. Gupta , Davinder K. Anand, Robert Kavetsky and RalphPettersen. (2007).Towards the development of a virtual environment-based training system for mechanical assemblyoperations. Mar, 2007. Springer.7. P. Long, S. Liu, Y. Wu and the FDS Team. (2007). Design and Testing of the Fusion
, and national levels. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education, a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers India, and a Fellow of the Acoustical Society of India. He is a member of the Acoustical Society of America, Institute of Noise Control Engineering and the International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration He is the Editor in Chief of the Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research (www.jstem.org) and serves on the Editorial Board of the Annals of Research in Engineering Education published by the National Academy of Engineering.Chetan Sankar, Auburn University Chetan S
is more coherence in the tellingthan in the living.” But, s/he added, “still you can’t create a thread if there isn’t one.”2 In the context of the dominant image of education for global competitiveness, the key issue inorganizing research strategies for this project lay not in the extent they would make visiblecontingencies and complexities or call attention to continuities, although both are important andthe differences among them are significant. The key issue also lay not in a goal of providing orapproaching some sort of complete account of what is now taking place in international andglobal engineering education. Rather, it lay in what specific strategies promised to make visibleor risked hiding in the identities of international and
ABET. Engineering criteria 2000. Baltimore, MD: Author.5 National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising Above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.6 Galloway, P. D. (2008). The 21st Century Engineer: A proposal for Engineering Education Reform. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers Press.7 Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. & Sullivan, W. M. (2008) Educating Engineers: Designing the Future Page 15.844.15 of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.8 Duderstadt, J. J. (2009). Engineering
assessment. Pelligreno, J., Chudowsky, N. and Glaser, R. (eds.) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.3. National Research Council (2005). How Students Learn. Donovan, M. & Bransford, J. (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.4. Aspy, D.N., Aspy, C.B. & Quimby, P.M. (1993). What doctors can teach teachers about problem based learning. Educational Leadership, 50, (7), 22-24.5. Duch, B., Groh, S. & Allen, D. (2001). The Power of Problem-Based Learning: A Practical “How To” For Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publication.6. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs
previously mentioned,this may have caused communication, mutual respect issues. Without the team members havinginsight into their cognitive diversity this gap may not have been managed with the needed skilland coping behavior. Team 1 had one person also skewing the score, however, there teamdifferential was more than half of team 4’s differential – again working to their benefit. Table 4: Map Density Team concepts Links Concept:Link AI score 1a 18 26 0.692307692 78 1b 13 18 0.722222222 101 1c 9 11 0.818181818 94 average
engineering: 2004, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/89/1d.pdf.7. Goldberg, J. & Sedlacek, W. (1996), Summer Study in Engineering for High School Women, Maryland
which the student works provides the following: Page 15.288.2≠ The student works on GE Transportation project(s) 19 hours per week during the academic year and 50 hours per week during the summer. During a full year, the student works on projects a total of approximately 1500 hours.≠ The project areas include traction, control, cooling systems, remote diagnostics, propulsion equipment, diesel engines, power electronics, software development, noise and vibration, wind energy, and structures.≠ The graduate tuition, fees, and books for the student are paid by GE Transportation (about $16,000-$17,000).≠ The student is an
leader of character who can understand, implement, and manage technology;and to inspire cadets to a career in the United States Army and a lifetime of personal growthand service.The Department mission statement includes educating and inspiring, which align along a set ofcommonly accepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy, which is based on theseminal work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom. The committeeestablished a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affective andpsychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and has beenidentified as, “arguably one of the most influential education monographs of the past halfcentury.”3 The taxonomies are a language
Modulus Strength (g/cc) (GPa) (GPa) (GPa) (MPa) S-Glass 2.59 86 4.14 Epoxy 3.12 75.8 Kevlar 49 1.45 131 3.62 Polyester 3.4 55 Carbon-PAN 1.75 230 3.24 PEEK 3.24 100 Figure 13: Modulus and ultimate strength of a few commonly used fiber materials.Composites are anisotropic heterogeneous materials, which simply mean material properties Page 15.1201.13depend not only on directions but also on locations. Micromechanics is a branch of physicalscience, which studies the
Sources 170 (2007) 1–12, April 20072. T. Lopes, E. Antolini, F. Colmati, E.R. Gonzalez, J. Power Sources 164 (2007) 111.3. E. Antolini, J.R.C. Salgado, E.R. Gonzalez, J. Power Sources 155 (2006) 161.4. S. Rousseau, C. Coutanceau, C. Lamy, J.-M. Leger, J. Power Sources 158 (2006) 18.5. D. Zhang, Z. Ma,G.Wang, K.Konstantinov, X.Yuan, H. Liu, Electrochem, Solid State Lett. 9 (2006) A423.6. F. Colmati, E. Antolini, E.R. Gonzalez, Appl. Catal. B: Environ, 73 (2007) 106.7. S.S. Gupta, J. Datta, J. Electroanal. Chem. 594 (2006) 65.8. D.M. dos Anjos, K.B. Kokoh, J.M. L´eger, A.R. de Andrade, P. Olivi, G. Tremiliosi-Filho, J. Appl. Electrochem. 36 (2006) 1391
engineering ethics in a service learning design course.Where We Began Our goals from the beginning were to satisfy the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology(ABET)’s requirement that students havean “understanding” of ethical issues.But this is only a start, and since our program works so closely with the community, we mustalso go well beyond ABET, helping our studentsusetheir understandingof ethical issues to thenapply a process of practical moral reasoning, a process through which they can arrive at ajustifiable and feasible response to ethical dilemmas in their project work. Our goals are notsimply academic. Nor do we want to teach only ethics. Rather, we have aimed our efforts atteaching engineering ethics to students who must
. At the beginning of 2010, cooperative education programs exist in 80 post-secondaryinstitutions in Canada with an enrolment of over 80,000 students.3 It is interesting to comparethe experience in North America with that in Japan where cooperative education was not Page 15.836.3introduced until the 1990’s and then initially at the graduate, rather than undergraduate, level.4However, there was a rapid expansion of cooperative education and internships and by 2005, atotal of 100,000 students participated in internships over a one year survey period.4What defines, or constitutes, cooperative education? According to Hodges and Coolbear5, “In