motivated some of this paperoriginally. I would be remiss not to point out how Whitbeck [20] also made this point aboutethical decision-making as design as well.GF: First, thanks for bringing up the Whitbeck [20] article. I agree that there is overlap betweenengineering in ethics and “ethics as design,” inasmuch as both perspectives see ethical ends,judgments, and solutions as contingent upon the exigencies of a problem’s context, namely theconstraints, allowances, and specifications that delineate possibilities. While Whitbeck appearsto come to this conclusion through the experience of engineering design processes and practices,engineering in ethics was initially derived more from a Dewyian theory of experience and ethicalinquiry, as well as an
were: (a) to provide increased curricularflexibility, (b) to motivate and engage students in practice-based engineering experience andhigh-impact practices, (c) to foster the innovation and creativity skills, and (d) to strengthen theprofessional skills (soft skills). The mechanical engineering programs must also ensure to meetthe ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) program criteria [8] and to addressABET EAC student outcomes (1) through (7) in the curricula [9]. Often, the desire forcurriculum revision is also met by other constraints. For example, the California Code ofRegulations Title 5 CCR §40508 mandates that no baccalaureate degree programs shall extendthe unit requirement beyond 120-semester units. An exception can be
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Complete Research: Investigation of Sense of Belonging to Engineering in an Introductory LevelEngineering ClassAbstractThis paper presents the complete research results of an evidence-based practice investigating students’ senseof belonging in an introduction to engineering class. Studies have shown that student sense of belonging inthe classroom, major, and institution can positively impact performance in future engineering classes andoverall retention rates. Sense of belonging has been identified as particularly important to the retention ofunderrepresented minorities and females. This research project explores the effect of embedding smallinterventions designed to improve engineering pre
, process improvement, and technology diffusion.Dr. Dave Yearwood, University of North Dakota Dave Yearwood, Ph.D., CSTM is Professor Emeritus in the School of Entrepreneurship. Yearwood was a Graduate Director in two disciplines and also the past chair of the Technology Department at the Univer- sity of North Dakota. Dave has been teaching in higher education for 31 years at the undergraduate and graduate levels (Community College, Technology Department, and the Ph.D. program in Teaching and Learning). Yearwood’s two research interests are: 1. Electronic Pedagogy—the purposeful use of techno- logical tools in education to enhance teaching and learning; and 2. The study of control or semi-automatic systems for use in
Paper ID #28730Points of Departure. Understanding Gender Differences in FacultyTurnover Intentions at University of XDr. Robin O. Andreasen, University of Delaware Robin O. Andreasen (Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Madison) is Associate Professor of Linguistics and Cognitive Science. She earned her PhD in philosophy and specializes in philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, and in science and policy. A race and gender scholar, Dr. Andreasen is research director and co-PI for UD’s ADVANCE-IT grant.Dr. Shawna Vican, University of Delaware Shawna Vican is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice
Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2018. There, she gained experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engineering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. She also served as a Grad- uate Teaching Fellow for the Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering during the 2016/2017 academic year. Nicole is currently an instructional post-doctoral fellow in the Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory within the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. Through this fellowship, she spent the 2019/2020 academic year teaching and assisting in curriculum development at Shantou University (Guangdong Province
students," Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35-47, 2019.[3] J. Frischmann and K. S. Moor, "Bridging the gap–supporting the transition from high school to college," Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research,, vol. 7, pp. 1-10, 2017.[4] E. Schmidt and U. C. Bureau, "Postsecondary enrollment before, during, and since the Great Recession," U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau, 2018.[5] C. Moller‐Wong and A. Eide, "An Engineering Student Retention Study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 7-15, 1997.[6] American Society for Engineering Education
sophomore year, and ultimate graduation years later. The research question thatmight be addressed is: 1. How do curricular elements of a first year Cohort program impactretention of students through sophomore year and graduation? For now, while more detailedmapping of STRIDE activities to student performance and retention could be interesting,collection of aggregate performance data and reporting of Cohort activities is more practical, anduseful at this stage. It is also helpful to try and identify if there are differences in the impact onstudents from different disciplines. The present paper focuses on the impact on engineeringstudents versus that on non-engineering students.CONCLUSIONSThe engineering students in Cohort 2 of STRIDE – a First-Year
Lubbock, specializing in new media communications of science and engineering that benefit environment. His research draws from extensive professional experience in developing new media strategies supporting the role of artisanal economies in environmental sustainability and small-scale economic development in economically challenged zones.Dr. Francesco V. Donato, Texas Tech University Francesco Donato received his Ph.D. in Cognition and Cognitive Neuroscience from Texas Tech Uni- versity after receiving his MFA from Parsons School of Design. His research explores how the brain processes aesthetics and the resulting impact that engaging aesthetics can have on our capacity for cre- ative thinking. As an educator, his
methods tostill convey hands-on laboratories. The definition of the role of MET students had to be revisitedin order to determine whether the solutions presented for the laboratories would meet what isexpected of MET graduates in industry. The MET professional in the area of mechatronics needsto have a thorough understanding of the hardware and software used in the automation space.They should be familiar with all technical aspects in terms of mounting and wiring systems.However, of paramount importance in their role is the ability to design an automated solution.This requires a thorough understanding of EDS. The mechatronic program at NJIT has deliveredEDS education with lectures, face-to-face labs, and the use of simulation software for
confronting issues related to inclusion. The department undergoes annual review byexternal evaluators Inverness Research. The 2019 review revealed instances where students didnot feel included. These situations involved faculty, staff, and students. Since becoming aware ofthe situations, the department has spent considerable time addressing inclusivity. All facultyattended microaggression and inclusion training (see below). Inclusion training has been addedto the new vertically integrated design project courses (see below) that will be required of allstudents. One faculty piloted a syllabus that includes a policy on microaggressions andharassment. The Department has prompted University’s Center for Teaching and Learning tolead the establishment of a
Learning: Research and Practice, 15:2, pp.126-138, 2018.[9] R.M. Felder and R. Brent (2017) Learner-Centered Teaching: How and Why? LearningAbstracts (League for Innovation in the Community College), 20(5), May 2017[10] P. G. Koles, A. Stolfi, N. J. Borges, S. Nelson, and D. X. Parmelee, “The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance.,” Acad Med, vol. 85, no. 11, pp.1739–1745, Nov. 2010.[11] M. L. Epstein and G. M. Brosvic, “Students prefer the immediate feedback assessmenttechnique,” Psychol Rep, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1136–1138, Jun. 2002.[12] E. Haase, B.N. Phan, and H.R. Goldberg (2017), Molecules and Cells: Team-based andMulti-modal Learning Improves Comprehension and Increases Content Retention, 2017 ASEEAnnual
-Milwaukee.Dr. April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh April Dukes (aprila@pitt.edu) is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Inte- gration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. April studied at Winthrop University, earning a BS degree in Chemistry and BA degree in Psychology in 2000. She then completed her PhD in 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh, studying oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and
thermal effects, all at a scale thatstudents can see, touch, or hear the physical phenomena being investigated.Among the research questions that are being addressed several stand out: 1. Which topics have the greatest potential for enhancing educational outcomes through hands-on learning? 2. What is the impact of the experiments on student performance, on student interest and confidence in the subject matter, and on long-term retention of the knowledge? 3. Do these experiments have a positive impact on students from underrepresented groups in terms of performance, student interest, and retention? 4. Since hands-on education is often associated with collaboration and group work, what are the best practices for impromptu
research interest are student learning and persistence in higher education. Her current projects explore student motivation and success in STEM disciplines at the undergraduate and professional education levels.Mr. Harrison Douglas Lawson, Michigan State University Graduate Student at Michigan State University pursuing a M.S. in Chemical Engineering. After graduat- ing, I plan to pursue doctoral studies at Carnegie Mellon University. My research focuses are biology and education. After graduating I aspire to continue working with education programs and join a university as teaching faculty.Dr. Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University Mark Urban-Lurain is retired as an Associate Professor and Associate Director for
focuses on the development of scientific discourse among k-12 students in a context of perpetual STEM reform. He conducts sociocultural research to examine learning in science classrooms, with a particular emphasis on engaging students with histories of academic failure. He also researches teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) innovations and their impact on the youth of today. His research has demonstrated that transformative and culturally relevant pedagogy along with mobile technology, live data collection, and citizen science approaches can engage marginalized students for improved STEM expertise. Among other projects, he has investigated how engineers in higher
faculty director for a scholarship program to recruit and support high-performing, low- income civil engineering students. Dr. Watson is also interested in understanding and assessing students’ cognitive processes, especially related to sustainable design. Dr. Watson is the proud recipient of seven teaching awards and six best paper awards.Dr. Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel Dr. Simon Ghanat is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel (Charleston, S.C.). He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Arizona State University. His research interests are in Engineering Education and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. He previously
bringingtechnology to bear on the needs and problems of human beings. Baker’s assertion about “isolation”may be somewhat overstated, but her essential point bears consideration. In the face of “algorithmsthat radicalize youth, platforms that amplify misinformation, facial recognition software thatperpetuates racial bias, and systems that exacerbate inequality in the courts and hiring practices [2],”it is difficult to avoid the sense that the modern STEM professions (or at least those engaged inalgorithm design) have underemphasized their commitment to build technology first and foremostfor human flourishing.Yet, this need for socially responsible tech professionals raises complex and subtle questions. Is itentirely a technology designer’s fault if
engineers and their projects in collaboration with space agencies.(2) Principal design challenges of microgravity and partial gravity, cosmic radiation, micrometeoroids, lunar dust, and extreme temperatures.(3) Design for extreme environments which will be useful for designing for extreme environments on earth as well.(4) Human factors in extreme environments.(5) Local materials and suitable structural systems and concepts for space.(6) Survival, well-being, and space medicine.An OSA specialization in an architecture or AE program may be best offered as a combination ofdesign studios and seminars. The teaching model would be based on intensive research on:planetary conditions, relevant architectural applications, structural systems and
objectives [1]. Overthe last year, the U.S. electricity generation from renewable resources has doubled from 19% to38% by 2050 [2]. Decreasing the overall energy consumption became a crucial goal for thebuilding industry. Researchers, developers and practitioners, dedicated to improving the builtenvironment [3]. This paper disseminates the lessons learned and best practices from a verticalcourse that focuses on Sustainable Design and the LEED initiative. Where the curriculum isaimed at advanced understanding of the theory and principles relating to design, energyconservation, and research methods applicable in different climatic regions throughout the world.The methodologies include climate responsive design, energy conservation, passive solar
projects at Cal Poly Pomona. TheREU site has so far hosted a total of 31 diverse group of students for 8-10 weeks of summer searchduring the three year period, with the projects focusing on research on the Dynamics and Controlof UAVs, Collision Detection and Avoidance System for UAVs, Artificial Intelligence, ComputerVision, Navigation in GPS-Denied Environments, and Flight Test experience. Another goal is toattract students from community colleges to STEM programs at 4-year institutions and encouragethe participants to pursue their studies for graduate degrees.The paper discusses the effectiveness of the Program in meeting its goals and objectives and onstudent success. The Program has been tracking the participants. Most of the participants are
response tothe growing need by academic researchers, medical device and healthcare industries andregulators. These programs have been independently developed, housed in different departmentsor schools, and with curriculum content ranging anywhere from a general focus on a broadspectrum of regulated product, to a specific focus on one type of product technology. In 2010 arepresentative from the University of Southern California invited other representatives fromsixteen regulatory programs across the globe to come together and discuss issues of sharedconcern. This became the first international meeting for graduate regulatory programs aimed atfostering better communication among the variety of programs. Participants agreed to developand share best
Multnomah County Partnership for Education Research (MCPER) in the School of Education at the University of Portland in Portland, Ore- gon. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design from the University of Washington. An elementary school teacher at heart, she now teaches educational research and STEM methods to undergraduate and graduate students. Her research fo- cus involves bringing active learning strategies to STEM, best practices of research-practice partnerships, and applied research in partnership. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Implementation of real-world class activities in an
- rienced graduate students. Jansons serves as the Director of Early Engineering Programs, administering the core group of STEM courses common to the various engineering academic programs.Dr. Jeffrey Potoff, Wayne State University Dr. Jeffrey Potoff is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, and the Associate Dean for Academic for the College of Engineering at Wayne State University. Potoff received his PhD in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University in 1999, and his BS in Chemical Engineering in 1994 from Michigan State University. Prof. Potoff is interested on improving the engagement of engineering students in their coursework through the implementation of evidenced-based teaching practices
representatives through guest lectures, sitevisits, and direct mentoring as part of a case study assignment. Students all take four shortquizzes throughout the semester. Graduate students have one additional assignment, whichconsists of developing a research paper, with support throughout the semester of the courseinstructor. Table 2 highlights the software systems utilized for each teaching module.Table 2 – UT-Austin’s Teaching Modules Software SystemsTeaching Module Software System(s) Utilized(1) Model-Based Cost Estimating Assemble, Revit, RS Means Online(2) Scheduling and 4D Simulation Revit, MS Project, Navisworks, Synchro(3) Design Coordination BIM360, Navisworks(4) As-built modeling
alsoinvestigated in the class by coupling different types of analysis to tackle challenging engineeringproblems. Students learn how to work on a multiphysics design project in a team through offlinemeetings, synchronous, and asynchronous communication tools (i.e., Slack and Blackboard).Two third of classes are held in a computer lab of the Department of Mechanical Engineering atHoward University. Some basic concepts/physics and CAE examples are covered during theclasses and students follow the examples on their workstations to practice. And one third of theclasses are performed based on distance learning class. All the learning materials for each classare provided online (e.g., online articles, online tutorials, lecture notes, etc.) for students’ self
cases, it lacks many best practices of student learning. We have no rubrics, nohomework or tests. We do not have a pre-conceived approach, structure, or answer for theproject at the beginning of the course. Individual faculty and PM teams may structure details ofthe project design and execution in different ways. Yet, the course has endured and has beensuccessful in training both undergraduate and doctoral students to address the complex problemsthey will face in their careers. Alumni point to the course as a defining moment in theirundergraduate experience, a fulfilling course to round out their technical path. “Every day of mywork now is an EPP Project,” is a common refrain. Doctoral students are thankful for theopportunity to practice
institution and spend as much time on campus as possible. 8. I practice good study skills in areas such as note-taking and preparing for and taking tests. 9. I am aware of the best methodologies for reading for comprehension and practice those methodologies during my learning process.10. I recognize the importance of goal setting and I have clear academic goals.11. I am effectively managing the various aspects of my personal life, such as interactions with family and friends, personal finances, and outside workload.12. I am highly motivated through a clear understanding of the rewards graduating in my chosen major will bring to my life.13. At my university, I know other students in my classes and feel part of an academic learning
interdisciplinary team that focuses on helping STEM instructors integrate writing into their courses, and that helps departments integrate writing across under- graduate curricula.Megan Mericle, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Megan Mericle is a PhD student in Writing Studies. She is a member of a research team focused on writing in STEM, where she works with faculty to develop and implement learning objectives for writing in undergraduate science and engineering courses. In her own work, she focuses on disciplinary identity as well as communication practices in citizen science.Nicole Turnipseed, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Nicole Turnipseed is a PhD candidate in the Department of English and the Center
, and other relevant algorithm bias topics serve as startingpoints for discussions and development of a more formal instructional module on algorithm bias.A more open-ended discussion early on in an instructional module can enable educators andstudents to develop a shared understanding of algorithm bias and its impact on future computerscience professionals. Although discussing what is and is not algorithm bias for students vs.computer science experts (professors and researchers) is foundational, we also suggest that, inaddition to creating a shared working definition, engaging students with ethical considerations(e.g., search engine bias, regulations, community values and practices, and costs) in computerscience assignments and challenges