involved in confidential company meetings and this precluded allowingstudents to shadow. It was a far better fit to allow students to shadow young alumni. Thisallowed students to see the work being done by entry-level engineers. Shadowing young alumnialso allowed the students to see a role model in an engineering career who is not much older thanthey are. This allowed the students to see becoming an engineer as a realistic, short-term goal.Students Losing Scholarship Eligibility Does Not Mean the Scholarship Program WasUnsuccessfulThree students who received scholarship funding lost their funding due to no longer meeting theminimum academic requirements and continued to be enrolled in the engineering program untilthey obtained an engineering
Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22561 graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. Dr. Borrego is Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli
mentor has given me advice and eased my worries with his words. He’s been a huge help to me in my personal life and academic career.” “I feel the mentor program helps me because I have someone who has experience in the engineering field who can guide me in the right direction, not just academically but in my personal life as well.”A summary of the 2016–17 scholars mentoring experience is given in Tables 3 and 4 Table 3. Which of the following items/topics did you discuss with your mentor (n = 25). Topic Number Study/work skills 22 Your performance in your classes
developed that facilitates integration of these products inexisting civil engineering curriculum. The SHRP 2 Education Connection program serves as anexcellent pedagogical tool to each civil engineering student by providing knowledge of SHRP2products and their impacts on community before they start their careers as transportation engineer.In the first round of SHRP2 Education Connection, faculty members from Rowan University hadsuccessfully integrated (SHRP2) solutions and products in the CEE curriculum (i.e., in fall 2015and spring 2016 semesters). Mehta et al [1] reported that the vertical integration of SHRP2 products from freshman year todoctoral level resulted, not only in an increased understanding of the role of each SHRP2 productin
performanceexcellence) to improve his career growth. On corporate level, competency mapping reinforcescorporate strategy, culture, and vision, and provides a common framework to improve theeffectiveness of training and professional development programs.In aviation industry, competency based workforce development has been implemented in theUnited Kingdom and Australia for pilot training, with the explicit objective of making employeesglobally competitive. Though the results are mixed, there is evidence that this approach appearsto confer considerable advantages in specific areas for preparing pilots to operate aircraft. On theother hand, similar practice has not been established, or well designed for ground crew training.The safety department, for example, has
theireducation, complete their degrees, and prepare for a career and/or graduate studies; 3) toincrease the retention rate and monitor each supported student’s progress to ensure theircompletion of degree requirements within a reasonable time frame; 4) to encouragestudents to graduate and continue their education in graduate school, or obtainemployment in local industry, such as a nearby national laboratory; and 5) to engagescholarship recipients in college activities and encourage college service career options,such as teaching and research.The indicators measuring the effectiveness of the project are: 1) increasing the degreeprogress rate; this means that scholarship recipients will successfully complete aminimum of 12 credit hours towards the degree
children with autism, and each student follows a distinct post-graduation path. Student 1 pursues a faculty career in academia, Student 2 takes a job in industry,and Student 3 becomes a social entrepreneur. Although each student engages with a uniqueexperiential learning activity, each sees the cross-disciplinary nature of EE at an early point intheir curriculum, and the three collaborate on a diverse senior design team to solve a problemwith societal relevance.Figure 2: Three sample student trajectories through an envisioned revised EE curriculum.Integrative Lab and DesignWe are currently developing integrative laboratory and design courses to be taken in conjunctionwith existing foundation courses. These new laboratory and design courses will
professional expectations of engineering as a career and discipline [9], [10]. Someprograms also use these courses to foster engineering ethics, writing and communication skills,teamwork competencies, and to develop community and engineering identity within students toaid in retention of engineering students [11], [12]. In other words, first-year engineering designstudents are typically gaining other competencies beside academic objectives (the what part ofengineering) in addition to learning how competencies are enacted within the engineeringdiscipline.While all engineering programs may structure their first year and design experiences differently[11], engineering education and design literature concurs that the emphasis on authentic andexperiential
-specific course or General Education course to attain academic full-time status.ENGR 2100 is a 2-credit hour first year seminar course taught by a CEAS academic advisor.The course focuses on teaching academic skills and the expectations of a student studyingengineering, and serves as support for students during the transition to college and develop thehabits of a successful engineering student. The course uses Studying Engineering: A Road Mapto a Rewarding Career by Raymond Landis [6]. ENGR 2100 is the anchor class of the EXEPCohort and it serves as a conduit for connecting students to academic and social resourcesprovided through WMU and STEP.ENGR 2100 is currently undergoing a significant redesign to more closely align the course withthe text
, innovative problem-solving skills, team-based leadership,communication skills, and knowledge of post-graduation options that prepare them for graduateschool and professional careers in STEM fields. Out of the nineteen students whose papers wereaccepted, presented, and published in the AIAA conferences, twelve pursued graduate degrees(63%), of which seven pursued PhD degrees (37%) and five pursued Master’s degree (26%).In order to develop a data-driven best-practice model, starting in the Fall 2018 semester, studentdemographic data will be collected by the educational assessment staff from the KU TeachingExcellent to track participation, retention, and graduation of under-represented student groupswithin STEM fields, and compare the institutional
on 1) collaboration with peers; 2) active learning and exploration.There are many reasons to create a multidisciplinary environment. Previous literature shows thatmultidisciplinary team experiences simulate real world work environments, prepare (especiallyengineering) students for their future careers [10], enhance students’ moral development [11],multicultural competence, and civic engagement [12]. For engineering majors, “an ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams” was listed by The Accreditation Board of Engineering andTechnology (ABET) as one of its desired educational outcomes [13]. A multidisciplinaryservice-learning approach has been used in computer-related academic programs as well todesign for social change [14] and software
of what got them interested in engineering that one or both of their parents wereengineers or had scientific careers. The participants explained that through their parents theywere exposed to the idea of engineering at a very early age. Students also discussed their aptitudeto easily recall prior knowledge or having the ability to draw on past experiences whenconfronted with a topic they have not engaged with for a long time as an academic strength. For the skills category, we found students frequently used an estimation approach as afirst step in problem solving. Students expressed wanting to have a “general idea” about theproblem before getting into complex mathematics. Participants also tended to view equations asa way to
consider the impact of reading these letters.*Collaboration, Reflecting on team membership: After a team project, each student writesProductive relationships about their contribution to their team and the value of the team experience.Personal contributions to Reflecting on complementary strengths: At the beginning of the team serviceeffectiveness of group project, each student writes about how their leadership abilities interact with their teammates’ abilities to help ensure project success. Reflecting on expert accounts of leadership: After guest presentations about leadership in bioengineering careers, students write about
engagement’ in the classroom [4]. While others have explored efforts topromote engagement and foster the development of an engineering career identity by providingstudents with experiential and service learning opportunities beyond the classroom [5]. 1Some studies have shown that developing instruction around hands-on activities can promotestudent engagement and meaningful learning in the classroom [6, 7]. As part of an initiative topromote active learning engagement facilitated using hands-on learning modules in engineeringclassrooms, we have been studying the cognitive and affective affordances of Desktop LearningModules (DLMs) for engineering
effortsto mitigate the dropout of non-traditional students enrolled in engineering degrees by designing acalculus course taking into account important characteristics of the non-traditional students.In Universidad Galileo, Guatemala, most of the non-traditional students who are enrolled inengineering degrees take courses with schedules specially designed for those persons who are notable to pursue a career as a full-time student. Hereafter, we will refer to this subset ofnon-traditional students simply as ”part-time students”. Our experience with the first calculuscourse offered to part-time students is very similar to the scenario described in the previousparagraph, namely that many dropout or fail. Hence, in recent years, Universidad Galileo has
to attaindesignated types of performances” [8] (p. 391). Self-efficacy has been extensively examined inresearch investigating career goals [9], [10] and has been noted as a critical factor for studyingindividual behavior [8], [10]. In entrepreneurship domain, self-efficacy has been contextualizedas entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) or an individuals’ self-perceptions of their skills andabilities related to successfully performing entrepreneurial tasks [11]–[13].Due to its specificity to entrepreneurship practice, ESE has been widely studied inentrepreneurship research when compared to general self-efficacy due to its impact of severalentrepreneurship-related attributes. Specifically, while several researchers have examined ESE asa
programs at its website. In an effort to increaseaccessibility to non-traditional students seeking to advance their career in Electrical EngineeringTechnology, a new online Electrical Engineering Technology program was recently launched.The development and delivery of the lab component of Digital Fundamentals, one of the coursesin this program, is presented. Several research questions were asked prior to and during thedevelopment of the program. These questions were as follows: i) Can online courses be deliveredwhile maintaining rigorous accreditation standards? ii) Can teamwork be encouraged andmaintained in an online setting? iii) Can the integrity of the assessment processes be preserved?And iv) can the pedagogical effectiveness of the lab
learning and active learning methods of teaching .Dr. Randal Wilson PhD, Murray State University Dr. Wilson has over 27 years of experience in higher education at the community college and univer- sity levels in both faculty and administrative roles. His 17 years of leadership experience have been in workforce development and academic affairs. Prior to his career in higher education, he was in the man- ufacturing sector. He is currently an assistant professor and director of the Ed.D in P-20 and Community Leadership program at Murray State University. He has presented at numerous state, regional, national, and international conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
. Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012.Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr
Paper ID #21634BeagleBone Black for Embedded Measurement and Control ApplicationsMr. Stephen A. Strom, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Stephen Strom is a lecturer in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology department of Penn State Behrend, and holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. His career includes over thirty years experience in designing and programming embedded systems and has multiple patents for both hardware designs and software algorithmsProf. David R. Loker, Pennsylvania State University, Erie David R. Loker received the M.S.E.E. degree from Syracuse University in
integrated. This report will include all the information used to define thetopics, and the actual content in the proposed modules. It is expected that such development willaddress the limited exposure to fluid power subject that current students of engineering andengineering technology programs have, thus allowing them to consider careers in the hydraulicfluid power industry.IntroductionFluid power, hydraulic and pneumatic, is an industry that has had multiple applications in themanufacturing segment all across the globe, being close to $20 billion industry. This industry isparticularly an important component for the U.S. economy (i.e., basically 25% of market share),with a ten-fold downstream economic impact for the top ten industries utilizing
to develop career aspirations (Blackhurst et al., 2009). Sax & Harper(2007) suggest that “the source of gender differences extends back into the pre-college years,when women and men develop different values, confidences, aspirations, and patterns ofbehavior” (Sax & Harper, 2007, 690). In order to understand the gender gap in STEM fields, it isimportant to understand the factors contributing to college major selection that begin to developwell before college enrollment. A large body of research has focused on the pre-college factorsand experiences that influence this gender gap in STEM. The majority of these influences fallwithin three main categories: academic and nonacademic experiences (Goldin et al, 2006; Grantet al, 2000; Whitt
% of Students agree or strongly agree Related Survey Questions S, 2014 F, 2017 My research has made me more confident in my 75% 90% ability to conduct research During my research experiences, professor became 70% 75% more confident in my ability to conduct research My research has made me more confident in my 70% 83% ability to succeed in future coursework/career. Doing research increased my motivation to reach 75% 82% my school and career goals. My research experience has made me more knowledgeable about product design and 80
. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 14 years in industry designing automated equipment.Prof. Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University Dr. Kaul is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western Carolina University. His re- search interests include Fracture Diagnostics, Structural Dynamics and Control, and Motorcycle Dynam- ics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Promoting Innovation in a Junior-Level, Multidisciplinary
quality of life of the communities. Finally, the risks, challenges, and problemsevidenced by the community are exposed as well as the opportunities that can be used by thePEAMA in the future. The main results highlight the community's feeling of perceiving theuniversity and the PEAMA program as a key player in the territory, beyond just the academicdimension, the community's interest in increasing the careers offered by the program, alsoexpresses the need for the community to be informed about the projects developed inside theUniversity.Keywords: Humanitarian Engineering, Sustainability, Community Development, SustainableHuman Development, 1. IntroductionHigher quality education in Colombia has historically been concentrated in big
. Table 1 Survey Statements Completing the Research Project Video project has helped me to… Communication Skills Std. Dev. be more comfortable with using video editing software. be more comfortable with using video cameras. be more comfortable with publishing video online for others to see. consider video to be a valid form of professional communication. be a better communicator in my future life and career. Student Interest/Engagement Std. Dev. increase my interest in learning about the subject of construction technology. work hard at being knowledgeable on my topic of research
[4] and OpenLDAP [5] in an enterprise environment. Students learn tointegrate directory services with other commonly-used applications, i.e., email. Directory services are also used to provide single sign-on to allow users authenticate once and gain access to the resources on multiple systems in a mixed network. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the design of the CNSA curriculum. In Section 3, wepresent the course implementation, including schedule, topics and lab setup. In Section 4 we discuss the course assessment. Theconclusion is in Section 5.2. THE CNSA CURRICULUM The CNSA program aims to prepare students to work in some of today's most challenging and exciting career choices: computer
the 50 items.The median percentage was 2.2%. That is, half of the items had fewer than 2.2% negativeresponses (i.e. responses of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, or Slightly Disagree). Only sixitems had a proportion of negative responses greater than 10% (Table 4).Table 4: Highest rates of negative responses Negatively-scored Item responses (%) pc9: I feel called by the needs of society to pursue a career in 19.5 engineering pc8: The needs of society have no effect on my choice to pursue 15.0 engineering as a career pc4: Community
Anthony Pezza P.E., Old Dominion University An adjunct assistant professor in the CEE Department, Old Dominion University. Retired in 2010 from U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters as Deputy Chief, Engineering and Construction after a 37 year career as a design engineer in geotechnical and coastal infrastructure. Also, a fellow and life member of ASCE and board certified Diplomate in ASCE’s Academy of Geo-professionals.Dr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
skills in the development of engineers, so that they are prepared to enter theworkplace. One critical component of this thread is exposing students to ethical considerationsthat they may encounter in their professional careers and preparing the students to deal withthem.This paper discusses the process by which we have identified how to deconstruct the componentsof a traditional delivery of ethics education and integrate them throughout the instruction oftechnical content. A well-established method to raise the perceived relevance of ethics educationin engineering is to provide discipline-specific case studies and industrial scenarios [1], [2]. Bycrafting case studies to the technical material that the students are currently studying, we aim