-class time to write a memo in whichthey must: 1) Compare how their solution compares to the: a. Objectives identified in Assignment 1 b. Functions identified in Assignment 2 c. Specifications identified in Assignment 3 2) Summarize project progress and team performance. Items to address are: a. Is the team on schedule? Why or why not? b. What are the main challenges in completing the project?In addition, a third point must be addressed by each individual on each team. 3) Reflect on your own individual role in the project.Assignment five is not accompanied by formal lectures, but rather is meant to induce individualand group meta-analysis of the design process. The aim is that by identifying
Page 14.149.10with the help of the University Career Services and Alumni Relations to contact formerstudents. Notice that these measures are not collected every year, because the collectionof this data still takes significant amount of time to analyze.The Student Rating of Instruction (SRI) used here is an early student feedbackmechanism prior to student graduation. This is a 20 question instrument with eachquestion rated on a 1-5 scale with 1 as “Strongly Disagree” and 5 as “Strongly Agree”.Items 1-18 are intended to be formative in nature and are based on contemporary “bestpractice” models derived from higher education research and reflection. Items 19 and 20are intended to elicit responses from students as to their overall assessment of
, thespecific plans for the upcoming week, the issues facing the team, and a summary of the hoursspent on the project for each team member. The first few times a team produces the weeklyreport presents challenges to the teams as this is their introduction to Gantt charts and weeklyreports. After two or three weeks of practice producing the charts and incorporating constructivefeedback, the student teams produce the charts within ten to fifteen minutes. More importantly,the teams begin to use the charts to plan and manage their projects. The Gantt chart presented inFigure 2 is a high-level chart prepared early in the project by a student team. The gap in thecalendar reflects the team’s realistic view that no work would be accomplished during the
consistent with the program educational objectives.The big change in this component is the requirement to apply knowledge of one additional areaof science consistent with the program educational objectives. As the ASCE Commentary on theABET Criteria indicates, The requirement for “one additional area of science” reflects ASCE’sintent that civil engineering graduates develop greater breadth in the basic sciences beyond thetechnical core subjects of physics and chemistry.5 The statement “consistent with the programeducational objectives” allows tremendous latitude on the part of the program director to identifyan additional area of science. In the case of USMA, our graduates are commissioned as officersin the US Army. During their term of service
training program in preparation for the accelerated growth that is scheduled for theproject.Evaluating Student Learning University students have played an integral part in the Wisconsin OLPC project and alesser but notable presence in the Paraguay deployment. The university students involved in theproject covers a range of majors, focusing mostly on engineering and computer science. Thistrend is seen as a reflection of the project’s nature as well as the choice of academic departments Page 14.1342.8that were chosen to house the XO projects in their respective universities. The Wisconsin OLPCproject is based out of the UW-Madison Engineering
student success rates (as reflected by criterion referenced testing) in science and math, including the disaggregated performance of underrepresented minority children within the classes of the participating teachers. 4. To help narrow the typical 15-25% gap in middle school student success rates between African American, Hispanic, and Native American students and their Caucasian classmates in the classes of the participating teachers.The SPIRIT Initiative’s MethodologyFrom 2006 through 2008, math and science middle school teachers were recruited from theOmaha Public School (OPS) systems, and several other Omaha-based school districts (to a lesserextent) to participate in the SPIRIT project. OPS served as a strong K-12
. Page 14.583.7 The 94% strong agreement with the networking statements, whether student or faculty, indicate that students felt that these elements had strongly influenced their success in the first semester. In addition, 94% of the students felt that the industry visits helped them to understand engineering. Perhaps most significantly, 88% of the students felt that ESCape had provided them the motivation to succeed in engineering. The survey had three open-ended questions: 1- List all the ways ESCape helped or positively impacted you that you can think of, 2-What was the best thing about ESCape, 3-What would you change for ESCape next year? Some of the answers to these are reflected in the statement/response questions
the opportunity to engage seasoned entrepreneurs.In the reflection of the faculty mentor and advisor, he believes this type of learning must beintegrated into building an entrepreneurial mindset. Students in engineering entrepreneurialprograms must be involved in activities which take them outside the classroom. These activitiesprovide an opportunity to learn from real world problem solving. Creativity, innovation,leadership, and group dynamics are important skills that are necessary for success as anentrepreneur or as a corporate entrepreneur.It was recommended that faculty engagement is requirement for our students and we encourage Page
. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.If you would like more information, contact:Michael K. Swanbom, Ph.D.P.O. Box 10348Ruston, LA 71272-0046mswanbom@latech.eduOffice (318) 257-3908FAX (318) 257-4630References1. Splitt, F.G., “Systemic Engineering Education Reform: A Grand Challenge.” The Bent of Tau Beta Pi, Spring 2003.2. Sheppard, S. and Jenison, R., “Examples of Freshman Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 13 (4), 1997, 248-261. Page 14.56.163
measuring changes in student achievement based on thesethree elements. The weightings of the original metric were refined to reflect the linearcombination that maximally separated two groups of biomechanics students based on their levelsof adaptive expertise15.The resulting metric (AE = 0.14F – 0.36C + 1.27T) is a starting point for quantifying adaptiveexpertise in physiology in this study. However, there are limitations in quantifying a concept likeadaptive expertise. The qualitative data collected in this study will allow examination of theweighted elements of the metric as well as other factors that might contribute to adaptiveexpertise in physiology. The collaborative, challenge-based activities in this study provideopportunities for
it integrated into undergraduate curriculum, longer times incountry, and the provision of similar type projects for Bolivian students in the US.The graduate student feedback implied that students 1) learned how to mentorundergraduate students in research projects, 2) better understood how to partner withscientists and engineers located outside the U.S. after participating in the program,and 3) saw how to integrate international experience into graduate level research afterparticipating in the program. Some reflections of the influence of the researchexperience on their professional goals after graduation are:“Before participating in this project, it was hard to imagine how this kind of researchcould be organized and conducted, given
controllersomewhere. This challenge required students to think deeper and more creatively. They had todevise their own control architecture and test it conceptually and implement it. Students had todo a lot of tinkering, in a good constructive way. As will be described in a forthcoming article,learning measures related to this exercise were the ones in which we observed mostimprovement.Reflections “Learning is a cycle of probing the world (doing something); reflecting in and on this action and, on this basis, forming a hypothesis; reprobing the world to test this hypothesis; and then accepting or rethinking the hypothesis.”This is one of several fundamental learning principles, proffered by Gee5, for which the mediumof video games may be particularly
authentic engineering situations. The first case study, “The Pendergrass Circuits E-mail,” is a one-page story that literally puts students into the narrative as a character, requiringthem to read, analyze, discuss, and reflect on the story’s details before deciding what sorts ofactions and written documentation are necessary. The second case study involves close analysisof the space shuttle Challenger disaster, in particular the written and oral communication thattook place prior to the disaster itself. As this paper shows, using case studies as described herecan provide students with valuable exposure to the types of decisions they might have to make intheir professional careers while also providing engineering programs with a sound method
participants to see the studentpopulation.The housing for the participants, the reception, and banquet was arranged in theProximity Hotel in Greensboro, NC. This hotel is currently one the top five Americangreen buildings and was built to get the US Green Building Council (USGBC)Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) platinum rating. This hotel waschosen to reflect the futuristic vision for research partnerships that this workshop soughtto provide. Page 14.290.2 1 PROGRAMThe final program largely resembled the program outlined in the proposal to the NationalScience
conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation. References1. National Academy of Engineering, Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. 2008, Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.2. Pearson, G. and A.T. Young, eds. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. 2002, National Academy of Engineering.3. International Technology Education Association, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. 2000, Reston, VA: Author.4. National Center for
werecomputed for the time period of spring 2004 to spring 2008 inclusive (9 semesters total). Werecognize that this data does not actually reflect the size of courses taught during the time thatthe winners received an award; however, this is the only data available from the Registrar. Thus,only general trends and patterns can be considered.Table 1 shows that 8 of the 28 unique winners are from Science and Engineering but that none ofthem are women. For winners, the average number of undergraduate students taught by thewinners was 343 + 254 (mean + standard deviation) during the 9 semester period and the averagenumber of undergraduate students taught per semester by the winners was 56 + 44. Eighty-eight(88) non-winners were selected at random from the
know points areassociated with sketch preparation and quality. Many students will take pride in their work andmake an effort to prepare quality sketches. A few students will consistently put minimal effortinto their course work and their sketches will usually be poor, reflecting their poor attitude Page 14.717.14toward their studies. The author also believes that providing examples of good (and maybe bad)sketches helps students understand assignment requirements and instructor expectations.Conclusions and RecommendationsFor many practicing civil engineers, hand-drawn sketches are still an important part of theengineering analysis and
process. Initial observations of the students who took the network security class using the described 10 laboratory exercises, support the same result. Linux-based security tools are freely available in the Internet and they can be easily installed in many of the Linux distributions. So, there is a minimal cost in terms of software related items. With the tools-oriented labs, students have a chance to learn how theoretical lecture topics (e.g., asymmetric encryption, digital signatures, etc) are reflected and utilized in real world applications. Students have a chance to configure certain files in order to accomplish some of the tasks required in the labs. This experiential learning
can be downloaded at the project website Page 14.600.20www.me.ua.edu/ExcelinME.Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE-0633330. The authors gratefully acknowledge support from this NSF award.DisclaimerAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesASHRAE, (2005), Handbook of Fundamentals, http://www.ashrae.org/Chappell, J., Taylor, R. P., and Woodbury, K. A. (2008) “Introducing Excel-based Steam
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Huguet, Jesse and Keith Woodbury. Development of Steam and Ideal Gas Property Functions for Use in Thermodynamics Curriculum, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.2. Woodbury, K. A., Taylor, R. P., Huguet, J., Chappell, J., Dent, T., and Mahan, K., “Vertical Integration of Thermal Mechanical Curriculum using Excel,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, October 31 – November 6, 2008, Boston, MA3. Excel in M.E. Project Website.2009. University of Alabama. January 23 2009 from: .4. Microsoft Developer Network. 2009. Microsoft HTML Help
andorigin of categories, common traits exist in the learning style identified for the majority ofengineering faculty. This learning style is then reflected in the teaching style of the faculty andleads to predominance of a single teaching style for much of engineering curricula. In thisregard, engineering is generally taught using exclusively technical and mathematical modes.However, student learning occurs using a broad variety of learning styles.Educational research indicates that active student participation in the classroom experience isbeneficial to learning effectiveness. Novel use of technology has been demonstrated to be highly Page
accumulate the results over time so that the statisticalanalysis of the results will become better reflective of the sample space, the student population atSanta Clara University.Finally, we have used the results to recommend alternate pedagogical methods for presenting thematerial in the Linear Systems course.In future work, we will analyze the SSCI DT Test results and compare with those of the SSCICT Tests in prior course. We will also track the performance of the students from the CT courseto the DT course.In summary, we met the goals of our study:(1) To determine how much conceptual understanding the students have developed by the end ofthe class (compared to the beginning of the class).(2) To correlate the performance on the end-of-term exam
respectively directed at performance of single and multiple hulls and at the development of improved propulsion systems. • FAU/UT/UCB Faculty / CISD personnel campus visits and seminar programsSpecific emphasis of the program has evolved to reflect the thrust at CISD. For example, for2004 – 06, ship systems specific to development of the Seabasing concept and associatedtechnologies were considered. The Seabase is envisioned as a collection of mobile Navy ships atsea conducting operations that enable forces to mobilize ashore without a large logisticsfootprint. A Seabase has strategic advantages that include unconstrained maneuvering andreconfiguration, scalability to match operations, rapid deployment, reduced vulnerability toattack, local
student surveys show that this courseis more versatile than physical implementation type courses because it permits architecturalstudies for optimized implementations, performance and delay analyses, and hardware andsoftware partitioning easily.AcknowledgementThis work supported in part by the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Educationand Human Resources (EHR), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) under GrantNumber CCLI-0737530. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theational Science Foundation. Fig. 10: Virtual prototyping through VHDL code – part 2
the vision of a multidisciplinary engineering study. The course modeldescribed in this report can be emulated elsewhere to pave partnerships between variousengineering departments and disciplines. Nevertheless, teaching an interdisciplinary courserequires a committed, motivated faculty who are creative and willing to change. Cultivating amultidisciplinary course such as Dynamic Modeling and Control is a growing experience for thefaculty as well as the students, but the rewards are worth the additional time required to make itinteresting and relevant to the students.AcknowledgementThe views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not purport to reflect the position ofthe USMA.Bibliography
design and development. The team proceeds to develop detailed contentsof the courses selected and much attention has been paid to form a serial of questions andanswers for each course module. Such questions need to be designed and given to the students ina progressive manner, and answers should be flexible enough to reflect different thinking angles.Video clips are often used as hints in modules. Four different databases were identified and builtpreliminarily, which is flexible enough such that it can be easily used by all course modules. Inaddition to the development of the course modules, the assessment tools are under investigationas well, through which the GIVE system is expected to be evaluated in the coming fall semesterof 2009.This paper
this case, the student Page 14.87.5 must prepare a two-page report outlining: ≠ Summary of previous experience, including dates and locations ≠ Description of the student experience (typically a reflective paper, though not restricted to this) ≠ Contact information of faculty/sponsors involved in the global learning experienceThe effort described in this paper directly applies to the “Global Learning” criterion of theEngineer of 2020 program. More details on the complete Engineer of 2020 program at WichitaState University can be found in11. IV. Linkage to ABET
, learning-intensiveclassroom activities can be chosen appropriately.2. DESCRIPTION OF OLI ENGINEERING STATICS COURSEAs judged for example by design instructors, students often fail to utilize Statics adequately inthe analysis and design of mechanical systems and structures, which they confront subsequently[15]. A detailed critique of traditional Statics instruction was presented by the authors [11],including the observation that mathematical analysis had come to overwhelm physical reasoningin Statics instruction. As a remedy, a more deliberate, sequential, object-centered, concept-driven approach to Statics was proposed [11]. This rather substantial reorganization ofinstruction in Statics was devised to reflect conceptual difficulties exhibited by
institutionalizing change21-24. Theseinclude barriers to faculty, students, and administrators25. According to Gumport andSnydman26, the organization of universities is both programmatic and bureaucratic. As they seeit, “…universities and colleges both reflect and reconstitute classifications of knowledge and inso doing establish categories of expertise and knowledge worth knowing”26. The popularity of anew idea may also be at issue, as innovations that are well-liked are more likely to be Page 14.683.3 2integrated27. The first step to overcoming
than one third of the world’s population, have become important players inglobal markets and technology development. Across the world, free trade barriers havedropped, and the influence of multi-national corporations has increased.3As a result of these changes, product design and manufacture often cut across nationalboundaries. It is not uncommon for companies to develop products with teams that includemembers located throughout the world. These teams may reflect high cultural and nationaldiversity. The products they design will often be for sale in numerous countries and thereforemust address customer needs in those countries. Products may be manufactured abroad, withraw materials or sub-assemblies coming from various parts of the world