student can follow to create more in-depth work. We willreflect on the students’ comments about the writing of poetry, the evaluation process of theirwork as helped by ChatGPT, and the sense of accomplishment in what they have created.The true use of ChatGPT as a tool starts with ChatGPT being asked a simple question, “Whatgood is incorporating the teaching of poetry in engineering courses.” The answer came quicklywith the following. ChatGPT is a tool and should be used as a tool.” These learning objectives can be adapted and tailored to suit the specific goals, interests, andlevel of expertise of the students, as well as the broader objectives of the engineering course inwhich poetry writing is being integrated. 1. Enhancing Creativity
Improvement Act of1998, to address the national need to increase the number of American scientists and engineers[1]. S-STEM programs award scholarships to academically talented students who demonstratefinancial need. S-STEM programs are designed to increase the number and diversity of studentsentering science and engineering programs as well as to retain more students in their STEMprograms through graduation and to improve the quality and preparedness of graduates enteringthe science and engineering workforce.The Smith College of Engineering and Technology at Utah Valley University (UVU) wasgranted an S-STEM Track 2 scholarship program for students in Electrical Engineering,Computer Engineering, Computer Science, Computational Data Science, and
skills that arevaluable in addressing complex real-world challenges in any engineering field. When studentsstudy the impact of different energy sources on the environment, they may conclude thatsustainable alternatives such as renewable energy are more viable. Likewise, exposing studentsto cutting-edge technologies fosters innovation in the field, since the field of energy is constantlyevolving, with new technologies emerging to improve energy efficiency, reduce emissions, andharness renewable energy sources.Coming from an industry position, and having attended a few pedogeological workshops, I wascertain that the route to engaging the students was to engage them in Project Based Learning(PBL) and Experiential Learning (EL) [1], [2]. At the same
has shown there is overwhelming evidence that women are underrepresented inengineering and technology [1]. Ample research has been done over the past several decades tounderstand this reality as well as the progress that has been made. In 1954, women made up lessthan 1% of the engineering B.S. degrees compared to 23% in 2020 [2]. This data is encouragingand matches research for degree intentions of freshman students. 2.6% of freshmen women hadintentions to major in Engineering compared to 13.7% for men in 2007 and by 2014, thepercentage of freshmen women intentions increased to 5.8% and freshmen men intentionsincreased to 19.1% [3 -6]. These increases are likely be attributed to many factors. Primary andsecondary education has increased a
broad perspectives and robustapproaches to anticipate the dynamic complexity of engineering design challenges of the 21stcentury. This deficiency is partly rooted in undefined or shifting boundaries around designpractices and educational responsibilities between engineering educational curriculum andindustry [1]. Many postsecondary engineering education programs do not offer four-yearsequential design courses and face challenges in developing pedagogies to assist students inlearning and establishing complex and meaningful design relationships [2], [3].Research suggests that these relationships entail expanding knowledge bases and triggeringfundamental paradigm shifts in current design methodologies [3], [4] - [9]. These findingsadvocate for
understand their own culturalpositioning, each other, and diverse ethnolinguistic marginalized communities that often suffer the mostfrom the deleterious effects of climate change. The paper will present the general design and structureof the six workshops and report the results from a rapid ethnographic assessment of the first cohortwho completed the workshops. Ongoing participant validation strategies were deployed, which thepaper reports from inductive coding and analysis of student class notes, interviews, and workshopplanning.INTRODUCTIONThe worldwide picture for our earth and all of us is grim according to the 2023 Report of theLancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change [1]. The report provides evidence thatclimate change is resulting in an
include Engineering Education, Culturally Relevant Pedagogy, and Socioscientific issues (SSIs) in the Engineering field. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Education and Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Middle School: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature María Pérez-Piza The University of Texas at El PasoIntroductionEngineering is a field that has significant impacts on daily life. For instance, engineering is usedin water supply distribution, medicine, and manufacturing [1]. Engineers' roles are essential inthe water supply process, designing sanitization systems for springs, cities, towns, andagriculture
)-related positions, their scope, and required skills.In this pilot study, we will also conduct a review of publicly available job postings, but we willfocus only on large companies because of their forefront position in adopting new technology.Moreover, in the present study, we analyze which non-traditional positions are being advertised,what they entail and what are the required educational background for them. We are particularlydriven by the following research questions: 1) Which construction 4.0 positions are emerging in the workforce? 2) What are the responsibilities of these emerging construction 4.0 positions?Our findings will assist construction engineering and management programs to prepare studentsfor upcoming changes in the
observationsand conclusions about light can be summarized in one central statement: light will travel instraight lines unless interrupted by an outside object. In the 3rd century BCE, the Greekmathematician Euclid developed the law of reflection, which stated that light travels in straightlines, and will reflect off a surface at the same angle the light hits the surface with. Later in the17th century, it was discovered that light could also refract, meaning it bent when entering anew medium [1]. Studying such tendencies of light can help us better understand the world aroundus and how we perceive our environment. For example, the law of reflection served as the basisof many concepts in physics, such as shadows, mirrors and pinhole cameras. This paper
distinct transformation categories. The studycorrelated these categories with the TROPOS subscales and examines demographic factors.Findings indicate higher TROPOS scores for first-generation students and female studentscompared to their peers.I. IntroductionThe perceptions and belief system of first year engineering students affects their self-efficacy,confidence, sense of belonging, satisfaction and other such constructs which are essential forshaping successful student experiences and outcomes. For example, Hutchison-Green [1] foundthat first year engineering students’ perception of their course success depended on their speed ofsolving problems and the amount of time taken to learn new material in comparison to theirpeers. Further, student
experienceIntroductionMany first-year engineering students at African universities are coming from high schools thatrely heavily on rote memorization practices. This can be exacerbated by the challenge ofinsufficient resources to engage students in more experiential approaches. The dominance ofstudents being directed to read and memorize for tests and examinations has been documentedas a common practice in contexts like South Africa [1], but it extends broadly across thecontinent. The authors see this as potentially leading to negatively affected self-perceptionsabout students’ ability to execute as innovators. If this is the case, the ramifications aresignificant, as technical skills and innovation are needed for the development and advancementof technology in
-generation college students, including those who areprimarily “students whose parents do not have any post-secondary education experience” [1] or“students whose parents have not received a bachelor’s degree” [2]. Although first-generationstudents make up about a third of the U.S. college population [3], they are less likely to beacademically prepared for college, have a prior understanding of the college experience, or knowabout college educational expectations from their parents [4]. To help first-generation studentspersist and graduate from college, institutional retention efforts and support services, includingFederal TRIO programs (Upward Bound, Talent Search, Student Support Services), have beenimplemented and used by many colleges. Despite
new ways to support first-year students and enhance retention. According tothe Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), High-Impact Practices (HIPs)offer significant educational benefits, especially for historically underserved groups, bycultivating substantive relationships, promoting engagement across diverse perspectives,facilitating the application of acquired knowledge, and fostering reflective processes aimed atpersonal development [1]. Students involved in HIPs are more likely to experience positiveoutcomes like academic achievement, persistence, and attainment of goals that prepare a studentto live a rewarding life [2]. It is recommended to integrate HIPs into curriculum in alignmentwith course objectives and
increased integration of teamwork in engineering design education, there areless information on what, how, and when to successfully intervene in team activities to yieldbetter team performance. Psychological safety, which is a team construct established throughdeep interactions and conversations that facilitate how team members perceive their treatmentfrom team members, could possibly elevate the performance of engineering design teams [1].This initiative is a Work in Progress under the GIFTS category. The hypothesis is that a positiveteam experience with an emphasis on psychological safety can enhance a student's academicsense of belonging. Solidifying this tool is the first step to a multi-step research study.Project ApproachThe “Team Safety
Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is involved in the Department of Engineering Education as an Undergraduate Research Associate. Her research interests include sense of belonging in engineering.Sydney Cooper, The Ohio State University 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 GIFTS: Connecting DEI, STEM, and Character Strengths for First Year EngineersIntroduction and OverviewThe VIA Institute on Character identifies character strengths as are the parts of your personalitythat impact how you think, feel, and behave [1]. Many of these individual character strengths canbe found in engineering and STEM more broadly in which a survey was developed
belonging was not indicated as a significant predictor of second-year retention.Our study also noted a lack of significant difference between white students andunderrepresented minority students in terms of second-year retention. Our study underscores theneed for early academic interventions with respect to math placement and calls for further studyto examine the strength of motivating factors related to persistence.Introduction and BackgroundUniversities, particularly land-grant or other public institutions, are increasingly coming underpressure to demonstrate the value of an undergraduate education to society [1]. The escalatingcost of student loan debt and the perceived increased cost of an undergraduate degree haveintensified pressure on
early in their college careers, they have the time to strategically tailor their experiencesover the next 8+ semesters.During Semester 1, students learn from an industry representative who provides them withemployer insight into what makes a good job candidate for hire. Starting with “is engineeringright for me,” the students are given several metrics by which they can self-assess if engineeringis a good fit. Students then analyze a sample resume to determine what makes a strong resume,which leads into an analysis of how to tailor the next several years toward building a strongresume. Outside of class students create a resume and a 4-year+ plan (based on SMART goals),which are assessed by instructors. Finally, students participate in Mock
the University of South Carolina. Prior to becoming Faculty Director, he served for eight years as the faculty advisor for the USC Engineering and Computing Living and Learning Community. He has taught a variety of high-school and first-year introductory and professional development courses over the last two decades. Dr. Gatzke also leads a two-week Maymester study abroad trip to Germany covering energy topics. 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 WIP: Surprises Found in Student Stress and Academic Support Survey Rawle D. Sookwah1, Bob Petrulis2, and Edward P. Gatzke1* 1
are navigating whatit means to be in a university environment - to live and work more independently, whichchallenges growth in areas such as socialization, study habits, and time management. It is nosurprise that successful first year experience (FYE) programs also include a mixture of co-curricular activities ranging from academic support to community building, and personaldevelopment initiatives to facilitate students’ professional and personal growth [1].The purpose of this Work in Progress study is to validate a survey that will be used to investigatethe effects of social and navigational capital of first-year engineering students on three importantaspects of the entrepreneurial mindset (EM). This is done for two reasons: 1) construct
First-Year SeminarsIntroductionBeing a woman in engineering is associated with numerous visible and invisible challengesincluding a chilly climate, lack of support, and the absence of role models [1, 2]. Thesechallenges persist through every stage of a woman’s engineering career, starting from theireducational experiences, and extending well into their professional life, whether in industry or inacademia. In the most recent national survey by American Society of Engineering Education [3],women make up 25.5% of the enrollment and 24.1% of the degrees awarded in engineeringprograms. A chilly climate [4] is often thought to be contributing to the lack of engineeringidentity within women in engineering, resulting in lower persistence, interest, and
necessary as it ensuresstudents understand these principals early on. Recent pedagogical innovations also stress uponthis. Researchers like Cech [1] and Foor & Walden [2] have noted the disconnect betweentechnical training and social responsibility. The education system they propose may bridge thisdisparity. Cech [1] sees a culture of disengagement where technical skills are valued more thansocietal concerns, while Foor and Walden [2] cite resistance to diversity efforts, highlighting thenecessity for early and proactive DEIB involvement in education. These findings encourageestablishing a curriculum that is technically adept and ethically and socially aware. These ideas'practical applications, as reported by [3], [4], [5], [6], reflect our
including gender, race, ethnicity, and background using CATME Team-Maker tool. Research questions focus on the comparative performance of diverse and non-diverse teams,optimal team composition for maximizing performance, and the potential for developing universalmetrics for assessing team effectiveness in engineering education.Evaluation methods include quantitative analysis correlating team grades with diversity metrics andqualitative assessments through student surveys, providing insights into the impact of diversity on teamdynamics and academic achievement.1. IntroductionDiversity and inclusion are fundamental cornerstones in modern engineering education. Adopting a widerange of backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives enhances the learning
)developed by Pintrich, Smith, García, and McKeachie in 1991 was used to measure keyconstructs associated with students' success, such as motivation, epistemic and perceptualcuriosity, and self-efficacy. Signature assignments were developed to measure student successoutcomes from adopting the pedagogy. The results of the MSLQ administered to 44 studentsimpacted by the pedagogy reveal a significant increase in the students' key constructs associatedwith success. The pedagogy reveals better knowledge gain and classroom engagement than thetraditional teaching approach.IntroductionHistorically, concepts in engineering fields have been taught using traditional methods ofinstruction [1]. In this method, the instructor is the sole provider of knowledge
ManagementSystem (LMS) to conduct program student outcome assessment.The study concluded that Canvas is superior for evaluating student outcome levels of attainmentand SearchLight for reporting and continuous improvement. SearchLight seamlessly generatedgraphs and reports to allow programs to drill down on student performance by course, outcome,and performance indicators. While Searchlight greatly improved the assessment process, it hastwo major limitations: (1) it is cost prohibitive, and (2) assessment scores were inputted in aggre-gate at the end of the semester with the guidance of using one or two signature assignments todetermine the score. Conversely, Canvas allows faculty to assess and grade simultaneously, thusclearly showing how course-level
translate to many types of academic institutions, including creatingresearch opportunities with community college students. Our team has developed materials for mentortraining, recruiting students, and long-term funding strategies using templates for faculty grants. In ourfirst course offerings students have demonstrated a strong increase in research identity as observed instudent journal prompts and survey results.IntroductionThis research project is focused on developing and supporting equitable pathways to STEM graduateeducation for Women and Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students. Nationally, only 20% of undergraduateengineers and computer scientist degrees are awarded to women, and only 6% are women of color [1].Black/African American
are relevant to students’ futurecareers through online courses thus empowering future professionals in the future career.Introduction and BackgroundOnline learning pedagogy offers students an alternative to traditional face-to-face courses,allowing them to progress through the material at their own pace and have a more accurateperception of the effectiveness of their learning [1]. However, engaging students in online coursespresents unique challenges compared to traditional face-to-face classrooms. Online course deliveryrequires upfront course design, effective time and resource management by both students andfaculty and various methods to foster communication and interaction [2]. Additionally,implementing teaching tools effectively can be a
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Leveraging Familia: Equipando Padres Academy Program Pilot for Hispanic Parents and Caregivers of First Generation-to- College Engineering StudentsBackground and MotivationParental support plays a crucial role in the academic success of engineering students, particularlyfor those who are first-generation college students. Parental support significantly influences theacademic achievement and persistence of engineering students. Research finds that parentalinvolvement, including emotional support, encouragement, and guidance, positively impactsstudents' confidence, motivation, and academic performance [1]. Parents who actively engage intheir children's
accessibility into thecomputing curriculum effectively. This synthesis not only contributes to academic discourse butalso serves as a guide for improving digital accessibility in computer science education,ultimately aiming to foster an inclusive academic environment for all students.Introduction/MotivationOnline courses and digital resources have revolutionized education, providing students withunprecedented flexibility and access to educational content [1], [2]. Amidst this digitaltransformation, a significant challenge endures, one that strikes at the very core of educationalequity: ensuring that these digital resources are both accessible and usable for all students,regardless of their abilities or disabilities [3]. In the contemporary educational
intrinsic to the activity (e.g., time and resource constraints, a competitive context, and costs),yet, that many students’ reflections contained ideas for mitigating such pressures through enhancedcritical thinking and team collaboration. Though program-level evaluation of ethics learning is ongoing,we conclude by sharing lessons-learned from this module’s development, identifying implementationconsiderations for other programs wishing to explore similar forms of ethics experiential learning.IntroductionUndergraduate Engineering Leadership (EL) programs frequently describe ethics education as a keyfacet of their curricula (e.g., [1 - 5]), a movement aligned with contemporary engineering accreditation 23 4criteria
. in Educational Policy and Planning from UT Austin. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Navigating the Personal and Professional: How University STEM Mentorship Programs Support Women in Austria and Germany IntroductionThe underrepresentation of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) fields isn't just a statistic – nor a debate – it's a persistent global issue [1]. Althoughsignificant progress has been shown to promote gender equality in society, women holdingpositions in the higher echelons of predominantly male-centric STEM fields remain a rarephenomenon [2]. Recent statistics support these findings, shedding light on the stark reality ofsuch