scope through scale-‐up of laboratory work to a biodiesel processing plant while incorporating whole systems thinking of sustainability. 2. Introduction: Well-‐designed first year experience courses are mainstays in the curriculum for freshman engineering students, as well as for freshmen in other fields. First year courses are building blocks in helping freshmen navigate through
Paper ID #42467Development of an Introduction to Sustainable Engineering Course as a ChemicalEngineering ElectiveDr. Heather L. Walker, University of Arkansas Dr. Walker is a Teaching Assistant Professor and the Associate Department Head for the Undergraduate Program in the Ralph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her research interests include engineering education, increasing student engagement and student advising.Dr. Edgar C Clausen, University of Arkansas Dr. Clausen is a University Professor in the Ralph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas
especially important since they havethis huge distraction of a computer in front of them.One way to engage the student is using in-class assignments and exercises. We refer to these as“in-class labs” to convey the laboratory nature of these exercises. Essentially, the course revolvesaround the labs and there is very little formal lecture time. There is the occasional introductionto a modeling topic that will take 5-10 or so minutes of time, but even those are punctuated withexamples that the students should or could implement and run. Lecture is more spontaneoussince they arise from “teaching moments” which are instances during class when students realizethey have a problem and now some commentary from the instructor is needed. At those times
AC 2012-3668: REFLECTIONS ON INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE OFSTUDENTS AND PROFESSORS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian P. Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech and his Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Self has taught in the Mechanical En- gineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year, he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating
hand drafting andsketching, (ii) to learn the application of such standards to solid modeling and orthographicdrawings (iii) to understand the basic principle of product design, manufacturing process andinterpret the terminologies in job shop drawings and (iv) to participate in a group engineeringactivity, and understand what it takes to be a team playerAt Georgia Southern University, ENGR1133 is a semester long course (16 weeks) and meets twotimes a week for 50 minutes each meeting with a required 170-minute weekly laboratory. Mostinstructors teach the course using a mixture of short lectures and in-class exercises illustratingthe concepts and applications of the concepts. The laboratory time is primarily used for furtherpractice with free
assigned homework problems to solveby hand to practice these concepts. Instead of solely relying on chalkboard examples, theinstructor asked her students to bring their laptops to class and introduced two software programsto the students to aid them in learning circuit analysis: CATE (The Circuit Analysis Tool forEducation – a teaching and learning tool for linear circuit analysis (see Fig 3) and LTSpice (afree circuit simulation tool). These tools have been used by other instructors for Homework,Quizzes or outside of class practice (CATE) or in a laboratory environment (LTSpice) but haverarely been incorporated directly into the lecture. By incorporating the computer-aided learningdirectly into the lecture, the students had the opportunity to
Page 1.54.2 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings Session 2302modifications without becoming bogged down in the drudgery of numerous calculations and the inevitableerrors that result. They could actually see the forest because they were not focused on the individual trees. During the spring semester of 1995, the Introduction to Aerodynamics course was taught in WestPoint’s Advanced Technology Classroom Laboratory (ATCL). This classroom laboratory was designed toallow instructors to experiment with computer technology and diverse teaching techniques and observe theeffect on student learning. The
Virginia Tech B.S.E.E. program. She continues to be actively involved in the development of mobile hands-on pedagogy as well as research on other topics in STEM education, the synthesis and characterization of nanoscale optical materials, and fermentation processes.Dr. Bonnie H. Ferri, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Deborah Joy Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Deborah Walter is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in circuits, electromagnetics, and medical imaging. Before joining academia in 2006, she was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for 8 years. She worked on several technology
scenarios that can be possibly used to teach with for labs usingPELARS technology, methods and equipment. We investigated UCV teachers’ perspectives abouttheir current practice of laboratory sessions and their ideas about how to integrate PELARStechnologies in their teaching practice. The data collection was done in an informal focus groupinterview setting and was audio recorded. Workshops are video and audio recorded and interviewsare audio recorded for future references.Student workshops were planned as follows: - Introduction to PELARS project-Presentation - Research consent forms - Introduction to visual programming platform - Presentation of educational scenarios - Introduction to brainstorming - Brainstorming about the
motivate girls entering the 7thand 8 th grades, early in their life, to select and pursue careers in engineering or computersciences. The students participate on workshops applying scientific and engineeringconcepts, as well as on hands-on experiments in a laboratory environment.One of the most popular workshops in EXITE! is the construction of an electronicdoorbell for the girls’ bedrooms. Girls at this age begin to ask for respect from theirparents when they want to go into their rooms, and most of girls see the doorbell as themean to manage this need. This motivates the participants to be interested in theworkshop.The construction of the electronic doorbell introduces the participants the basics conceptsof electricity, circuits, types of
learning in biomedical engineeringcurricula", in Proc. 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct 2001, Vol. 2, pp. 16-21.10. M. Cline and G. J. Powers, "Problem based learning via open ended projects in Carnegie Mellon University'schemical engineering undergraduate laboratory", Proc. of 27th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov1997, Vol. 1, pp. 350-354.11. P. Van Kampen, C. Banahan, M. Kelly, E. McLoughlin and E. O'Leary, "Teaching a single physics modulethrough problem-based learning in a lecture-based curriculum", American Journal of Physics, Vol. 72, No. 6, pp.829-834, June 2004. Page 25.1066.6
Through Long Leads This project consisted of developing a Matlab-based model to analyze the effects of long cables on PWM inverter-fed induction motors. Another faculty member, who teaches the Page 2.162.3 Electromagnetic courses, was enlisted for this project. An experimental set-up was established in the Energy Conversion Laboratory to verify the results from the Matlab-based model. This research project was sponsored by a motor-drive manufacturer who offered a position to the student after graduation. Unfortunately, the student accepted a better economical offer. Both faculty members
” software so some laboratory computers can not be usedto view the animated illustrations or video clips. Page 2.210.5 5ConclusionWe have identified three of our most helpful tools in teaching a materials course. These toolsrange widely in complexity and cost. As complexity and cost increase so do problems withequipment and availability. Feedback from our students, and the learning improvementsdiscussed by Professor Russ indicate that even more expensive, multimedia approaches may wellbe worth the cost. In any case, it is up to each instructor to
support theresearch and teaching functions of Taylor Ranch, a university facility far from the utility grid.After showing such a system to be feasible, they proceeded to design and build it. Technicalissues and stringent environmental regulations are addressed. The students documented theirdesign and developed instructions for installation and operation. The system was installed andcurrently provides electric power for Taylor Ranch. The first year of operation is brieflydescribed and photographs of the equipment are presented.Introduction Taylor Ranch is a University of Idaho College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Range Sciences(CFWRS) field research and teaching facility. It is in the Frank Church Wilderness of CentralIdaho, 400km southeast of
from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China and Ph.D. degree from University of Strathclyde, UK. Prior to joining UBC in 2008, she worked as a research scientist at Ryerson University on various projects in the area of CFD and heat and mass transfer. Dr. Yan has taught a variety of courses including fluid mechanics, fluid machines, mechanics of materials, calculus, and kinematics and dynamic. She has also developed undergraduate fluids laboratories and supervised many capstone projects. Her interest in SoTL is evidence-based teaching strategies, student engagement, faculty development, and teaching and learning communities. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with APEGBC and has served as reviewer for various international
thefaculty instructor as well as with the lab coordinator and with a teaching assistant. In thisenvironment “lab exercises are more interactive, group-oriented, and targeted toward problemsolving than the associated lecture. It is in the laboratory portion of the course that studentsacquire hand-on experience with the subject matter”28 (96).The same need for practical lab experience to solidify the learning of theoretical knowledgepertains to the communication course: students must have practical experience, in a dedicatedspace, implementing the rhetorical communication principles they are learning. Such experiencerequires that they use the principles in guided problem solving and then reflect on the outcomesof implementing the material they have
collaborates with faculty on the Scholarship of Teach- ing and Learning through various research projects. Particular current areas of collaboration include instructional design, evaluation, engineering education and learner support. In addition, Dr. Jackson is an Affiliate Faculty in Penn State’s Higher Education Department.Prof. Karl R Haapala, Oregon State University Dr. Karl R. Haapala is an Associate Professor in the School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at Oregon State University, where he directs the Industrial Sustainability Laboratory and is Assistant Director of the OSU Industrial Assessment Center. He received his B.S. (2001) and M.S. (2003) in Mechanical Engineering, and his Ph.D. in
thedevelopment of the students’ English language skills. To further develop these skills, it wasdecided to select students who did not speak Mandarin as the undergraduate laboratoryteaching assistants. As the course instructor and the lead electronic laboratory staff memberalso did not speak Mandarin, students would have to speak English during the lecture andlaboratory sessions. An invitation was also issued to the English specialist in StudentLearning Services who supports the School of Engineering to talk with the students abouttechniques for writing and making oral presentations during one of the lectures early in thesecond week of the OIP.The undergraduate laboratory teaching assistants also attended the tours with the GCU andUESTC students and
department would maintain their own lab sections, but the topics taught in theclassroom sections would be brought into closer topical agreement. A close review of the labswere undertaken to determine if the laboratory classes could also be combined but there was lessagreement on this so each department will continue presenting their own lab sections.Redesign of the Laboratory ExperienceFollowing this review, the problem of laboratory/course material disconnects was examined, andthe Civil Engineering faculty made the decision to include a design assignment as the terminalassignment in the lecture class. This decision was made after a careful review of relevantliterature regarding current successful practices in teaching design. A common yet
College James M. Northern, P.E., is currently Program Coordinator of Electrical Engineering Technology at Southwest Tennessee Community College. He graduated from Memphis State University with a B.S. in Electrical Engineering in 1970. He also has a B.S. in Psychology and a M.S. in Technical Education from Memphis State University. Mr. Northern worked as an engineer and senior engineer at Allan & Hoshall for 8 years in the area of rural power system analysis and has been teaching at Southwest for 25 years in the areas of instrumentation and electrical engineering technology. Page 11.1417.1
appointment as an Assistant Research Scientist, Dr. Tadd began teaching part time in the Chemical Engineering Department. He has taught the junior heat and mass transfer laboratory course, ChE 360, and the senior-level process design and simulation course, ChE 487. Dr. Tadd officially joined the Chemical Engineering faculty as a full-time lecturer in Fall 2013, teaching the process design course senior design and the junior year separations course, ChE 343. Most recently, Dr. Tadd has been developing an elective course on statistics and applications to industrial quality, including an overview of SPC, Six Sigma terminology and techniques, and basic design of experiments.Ms. Elaine Wisniewski, University of Michigan Elaine
commensurate with his ability and available time. 2. The student must demonstrate mastery of each study unit before going on to the next. 3. The written word is stressed; lectures are used only for motivation and not for transmission of critical information. 4. Use of proctors permits repeated testing, immediate scoring, and significant interaction with the students.A typical PSI course is divided into a series of 10 to 30 study units. A typical unit includes aclear statement of objectives, a study guide, and reading material. It may also include problemsto solve and laboratory exercises. No required lectures are given, and class time is devoted toself-study and taking readiness tests. Each time a student finishes
involved in various teaching activities, such as serving as a teaching assistant in many BME and undergraduate courses, leading a peer group-problem solving session, and serving as a student leader in Tutorial Project.Meera R Bhat, The Johns Hopkins University Meera R. Bhat is an undergraduate student studying Biomedical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. Her research interests include engineering education, senescence, cellular aging, adipose tissue, and neonatal health. At Johns Hopkins University, she currently serves as an undergraduate teaching assistant for several biomedical engineering courses where she develops engineering curriculum for underclassmen students. 15th Annual First-Year Engineering
of a faculty instructor,a graduate teaching associate, and undergraduate teaching assistants. The classrooms arearranged to encourage groupwork, with students seated at four-person tables with individualcomputers and a collaborative workspace [33]. These four-person groupings extend to thelaboratory experience, where students rotate groups approximately weekly. The facultyinstructors take primary responsibility for delivery of the classroom experience, while thegraduate teaching associates develop and lead the laboratory component under the guidance ofthe instructors.The first course in the honors sequence provides instruction in problem solving, computerprogramming, engineering design, and technical communication. The classroom portion of
Immanuel Selvaraj is an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Evansville, IN. He holds a PhD degree from Auburn University and a licensed professional engineer. His research interests are in pavement design and analysis, pavement management, pavement instrumentation and engi- neering education. At the University of Evansville, he teaches courses such as transportation engineering, soil mechanics, geotechnical engineering, advanced pavement design and management, and surveying.Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay, Bucknell University With degrees in both Bachelor of Science and Master of Science from the University of Arkansas, and a doctoral degree from the University of Kentucky, Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay is
Paper ID #33040A Curriculum on Naval Science & Technology for a Midwestern UniversityDr. James Buchholz, University of Iowa James Buchholz is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Iowa. He received the Bachelors and Masters degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alberta, and the Ph.D. degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton University. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics and conducts research in unsteady aerodynamics and hydrodynamics.Dr. Jae-Eun Russell, University of Iowa Dr. Russell serves as the Director of Research & Analytics Office of
lectures and smaller weeklylaboratory sections that are led by teaching assistants. Introduction to Engineering is a twocredits first semester freshman course that includes lecture and laboratory. When the projectbegan, the Introduction to Engineering course was divided into tracks containing students fromsimilar engineering majors (e.g. electrical engineering, computer engineering, and computerscience). The course has been revamped; therefore, an alternative approach for integrating thegame into the course will be determined in the future. PlanetK will be implemented in asophomore-level Logic Circuits course in the ECE department at Prairie View A&M Universitywhich teaches digital systems material. Texas A&M University- Corpus Christi
face-to-faceopportunities for students to collaborate with others, such as peers and teaching assistants.Harris et al[27] also incorporated pedagogical practices to boost active and inclusive teachingconcepts that intended to be beneficial for all students, and especially those from minority orunderserved groups. Making online classes both active and inclusive will aid student learningand will also help students feel more connected to their learning, their peers, and their campus.This approach will likely help with performance, retention, and persistence of students.Habib et al[28] reported that the “limitations of online learning were also discovered andrecognized with laboratory and hands-on courses, many of which could not be taught with
analyses. An ELA for ethicseducation is presented. This approach should lead to more effective teaching of ethics inour programs. IntroductionMost programs for teaching ethics are based on behavioral approaches1,2. Students arenormally presented with a case study and a code of ethics, and are told that specificactions violate specific sections of a code. Very frequently, the results of the case studyare included, so the students are not given the freedom to participate in the decisionprocess. A prepared case study leads to the laboratory procedure, and the conclusionsstated as part of the case study corresponds to the results that the students must get ontheir laboratory computation sheets. Such case studies
AC 2008-2791: INTRODUCTION OF GIS INTO CIVIL ENGINEERINGCURRICULARonaldo Luna, Missouri University of Science & Technology Ronaldo Luna is an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Missouri University of Science & Technology. He received his PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1995. His research interests include: engineering education, geotechnical and earthquake engineering, and hazard mitigation.Richard Hall, Missouri University of Science & Technology Richard Hall is a professor Information Science & Technology and Co-Director of the Laboratory for Information Technology Evaluation at the Missouri University of Science & Technology. He received