we are constructing the dimensions of the column. Using less material will decrease the overall cost of constructing the column(s) while maintaining a strength that conforms to the necessary specifications. While other materials, especially the A36 Steel, are comparable in price considering the material that would be needed, high-strength concrete maintains a good balance between GWP, cost, strength, and amount of material necessary to withstand the applied load.Responses, such as above, demonstrates that the student team gained an understanding of thetrade-offs in material selection by considering multiple factors (GWP, cost, and materialproperties). They use data-based reasoning to justify their choice
the risk of flooding and improving water quality. native plants, rain gardens, trees and green roofs. Acquisition Students will know… Students will be skilled at… how BMP solutions can satisfy the design Quantifying BMP solutions and their cost. requirements. Stage 2 - Evidence Evaluative Criteria Assessment Evidence Completed Site plan PERFORMANCE TASK(S
techniques.References1. USC Center for Excellence in Teaching: CET Classroom teaching observation checklist2. Robin K. Morgan: Exploring the Pedagogical Effectiveness of Clickers; InSight -A Journal of Scholarly Teaching (2008)3. Yljing Stehle: Integrity Independent Lab into Project: a Modification Made to the Materials Science Lab Curriculum; American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Conference4. K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, R. Johnson: Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices, Journal of Engineering Education, 1/20055. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/ : Students Engaged In Active Learning Think They Learn Less, 12/25/20246. Ashley Mowreader: Why Students Recommend College Professors to Peers
Production, vol 18, pp. 275-284, 2010 7. https://www.iso.org/sectors/environment/climate-change 8. Rodriguez J. “An elective course in Green Chemical Engineering and Sustainability.” 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference, 2024 9. The open source Life Cycle and Sustainability Assessment software https://www.openlca.org/ 10. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/carbon-footprint-calculator 11. Bielefeldt A., T. and S. Wilkinson. “Introducing and stimulating sustainable engineering in first-year civil engineering students.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. pp. 14.800.1-14.800.15, 2009 12. Kagawa, F. “Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability.” International
evaluate their understanding of the topic. The CMR questionsconsist of two parts. Students first answer the question and then select from a list of reasoningstatements that most closely align with their thought process [3]. These reasoning statementsinclude correct answers and common misconceptions, created based on student answers fromprevious Dynamics exams. This two-step style of questioning requires students to answer thequestion and identify their reasoning, which allows specific gaps in students’ understanding to beidentified [4].Adaptive Logic and Supplemental InstructionBased on the identified gaps, students are directed to the appropriate Supplemental Instruction(SI) video(s) tailored to their misconceptions. Depending on their previous
-arvoon – analyyseja tasa-arvobarometrista 2017 [Perspectives on gender equality – analysesof the Gender Equality Barometer 2017], M. Teräsaho and J. Närvi, Eds., Helsinki: NationalInstitute for Health and Welfare (THL), 2019, pp. 80–100.[8] M. Teigen and L. Wängnerud, "Tracing Gender Equality Cultures: Elite Perceptions ofGender Equality in Norway and Sweden," Politics & Gender, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 21–44, 2009,doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000026.[9] S. Aapola-Kari, "Nuorten näkemyksiä sukupuolten tasa-arvosta oppilaitoksissa jayhteiskunnassa [Young people's views on gender equality in educational institutions andsociety]," in Näkökulmia sukupuolten tasa-arvoon – analyyseja tasa-arvobarometrista 2017[Perspectives on gender equality – analyses of the
in the next section.Table 2: This table shows the activities throughout the module and the week they occur within a15 week semester. Lectures show the week they occur and assignments include the week they areassigned and due. It also describes the learning outcomes for each activity. Activities are listed inchronological order. Learning Outcome(s) (in parentheses are the associated Activity Week Occurred ABET Student Outcomes) Personal and - Describe and reflect on current state and desired future Professional Assign: Week 1 states as a person, student, and professional. (SO7) Interests & Due: Week 2
, exploring the world of craft cocktails, and making a fuss over her Boston Terrier, Gatsby. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Understanding Gen Z’s Declining Engagement with WE@RIT, a Woman in Engineering ProgramIntroductionAround 2016-2017 we began noticing sharp declines in current student engagement with ourwomen in engineering program, WE@RIT, within Rochester Institute of Technology’s KateGleason College of Engineering. The program itself was launched in the early 2000’s during theMillennial era, and the programming playbook was one of large, one-off events spearheaded byone full-time Director, and a handful of student employees. That
competition either as part of student teams or asfaculty advisor. The competition website includes competition guidelines, evaluation rubric,submission files to be part of the design proposal, winning packages, resources to help studentteams, and deadlines [1].Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) conducts an annual airport design competitionfor university-level students in which U.S. student teams propose innovative designs to solvechallenges facing U.S. airports [1]. Undergraduate and/or graduate students are eligible toparticipate in the competition either as part of a course or as an independent project with facultysponsor(s). The students, either individually or in a team, prepare a 40-page design packageproposal addressing innovative
, “Experiences and Perceptions ofSTEM Subjects, Careers, and Engagement in STEM Activities Among Middle School Studentsin the Maritime Provinces,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and TechnologyEducation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 153–168, Feb. 2016.[12] P. R. Aschbacher, M. Ing, and S. M. Tsai, “Is Science Me? Exploring Middle SchoolStudents’ STE-M Career Aspirations,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23,no. 6, pp. 735–743, Jun. 2014.[13] A. J. Hayter, Probability & Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 4th Edition. CengageLearning, 2005.[14] J. Saldana, The Coding Manual for
allies programs to support and promote gender equity in Academia,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24242.[7] L. Abrams, S. G. Shoger, L. Corrigan, S. Y. Nozaki, M. Narui, and A. Jayakumar, “Empowering male students as allies for gender equity within an engineering college,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2016, vol. 2016- June, doi: 10.18260/p.26945.[8] E. E. Liptow, M. H. Bardini, N. R. Krigel, M. L. Singer, and C. Carrigan, “Engaging engineers in inclusive cultural change through a new method, articulating a succinct description
Number of Target Time period Event Event description participant Participants s Training of in-service teachers from Lauderdale Lakes Middle Teachers’ August, 2019 STEM Teachers and Lake Worth Community 12 training High school for NASA-STEM content
National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is
technical, professional, and personallearning outcomes can result, regardless of whether the activity is embedded within courses asservice-learning or conducted by students for pay or as volunteer activities.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] Jeffers, A.T., A.G. Safferman, S.I. Safferman. 2004. Understanding K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130 (2), 95-108.[2] Yowell, J.L., M.S. Zarske, D. Knight
Department of States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2015. 4. J. S. Nye, Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1990. 5. N. J. Cull, Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London, England: Routledge, 2008. 6. V. C. Turekian, P. D. Gluckman, T. Kishi, and R. W. Grimes, “Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside,” Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, no. 5., 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective. [Accessed April 12, 2021].7. D. B. Oerther, “The Fulbright program at 70 years old,” Environmental Engineer and Scientist, vol. 52, no
).Iversen, E. (2016). "Arab women make a charge into engineering." Start Engineering. 10 06. Accessed 01 19, 2017. http://start-engineering.com/start-engineering- now/2016/10/6/arab-women-make-a-charge-into-engineering.Kantor, J. (2016). "To grow their participation In STEM, women need to come together ." Entrepreneur Middle East. 08 30. Accessed 01 20, 2017. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/281567.Karlin, S. (2008). "Qatar University opens EE doors to women." IEEE Spectrum.Koushki, P. A., Al-Sanad, H. A. and Larkin A. M.. (1999). "Women engineers in Kuwait: Perception of gender bias." Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (1).Mannan, M. (2016). "Middle East female STEM graduates turning their backs on the
theirorganizations, Ibarra 12 used the term “provisional selves” to talk about the experimental phasesof identity formation as one adjusts to new expectations and sometimes even new organizationalcultures. He witnessed several forms of experimentation that advancing professionals use,including imitation, efforts to remain true to one’s self and ideals, and use of internal andexternal feedback mechanisms to evaluate their developing “provisional selves.” Ibarra definedthese strategies as “the degree of congruence between what one feels and what onecommunicate[s] in public behavior about one’s character or competence”12 (p.778). With itsfocus on personal-professional identity alignment, this autoethnography employs the secondform of experimentation, “true-to
what type of intervention(s) you would recommend.Our preliminary findings indicate a strong grounding in collaboration for all teams andindividuals; strong evidence of empathy among some (but not all) teams and individuals; andvarying degrees of learning that integrates the humanities and engineering. We summarize ourfindings below.Collaboration: All teams and individuals appeared to be engaged. Individuals seemed to haveroughly equal contributions in terms of time on task and specific contributions. All teamsdemonstrated appropriate teamwork. People listened to each other, responded to each otherappropriately, and seemed to value others’ contributions. There was little or no domination byany single person or pair of persons, no
transition to academic writing moreeasily so that the costs of the transition do not undermine them.References1. D. L. Peters and S.R. Daly, “The challenge of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school,” in 2011 Proc. ASEE.2. W. Schilling, “Issues affecting doctoral students returning to engineering education following extensive industrial experience,” in 2008 Proc. ASEE.3. D.L. Peters and S.R. Daly, S. R., “Why do professionals return to school for graduate degrees?” in 2012 Proc. ASEE.4. D.L. Peters and S.R. Daly, “Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 244-268, 2013.5. J.S. Eccles, “Subjective task
.” Answer questions 1c and 1d with complete sentences. c. (25 points) Identify the public institutions(s) and private organizations responsible for managing air quality, and explain each entity’s role. d. (10 points) Identify the criteria pollutants that are being managed.Scoring Rubric:Excellent: All answers are complete and correct. Student demonstrates knowledge of allappropriate organizations and their role in managing air quality. All criteria pollutants beingmanaged are correctly identified.Acceptable: Most answers are complete and correct. Student shows partial misunderstanding ofroles of institutions. At least one of two criteria pollutants is correctly identified.Marginal: Student has no answer or is completely incorrect about most of the