Effectiveness of Traditional, Blended and On-line Course Offering ModelsAbstractSeven years’ study on the effectiveness of traditional, blended and on-line course offeringmodels is presented. This study is based on the development and implementation of these threemodels on Electrical Machinery course offering. The traditional way of teaching of Electricalmachinery course for EET and Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) majors has beenconducted for years and therefore provides us with significant statistics on students'comprehension of the subject. The goal of a blended approach is to join the best aspects of bothface-to-face and online instruction: classroom time can be used to engage students in advancedlearning experiences
specially designed multimedia classroom for 54students to teach the introductory physics course for engineering majors. This is an intermediatestep to the full SCALE-UP classes (99 students) that will be taught in Fall 2000 when the largerclassroom is completed. Both classrooms are designed to encourage students to work in groupsof three, provide each group with to a laptop computer that has access to the Internet, and allowinstructors to interact with each student group. Traditional lecture and laboratory are replacedwith an integrated approach using active-learning cooperative group activities. The project isinvestigating several aspects of instruction including classroom design, classroom management,and curriculum materials. The curriculum
studio space on teaching and learning: Preliminary findings from two case studies. Innovations in Higher Education, 33, 217-228.4. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-232.5. Collis, B., de Boer, W., & van der Veen, J. (2001). Building on learner contributions: a web-supported pedagogic strategy. Educational Media International, 38(4), 229-40.6. Kimok, D., & Heller-Ross, H. (2008). Visual tutorials for point-of-need instruction in online courses. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3/4), 527-543.7. Chu. K.C., & Leung, D. (2003). Flexible learning via web-based virtual teaching and virtual laboratory systems. Journal
, making theICT program the largest program in the College.In the meantime, distance education (DE) sections constitute an increasing portion of the studentenrollment of the ICT program. Studies have shown that this trend will continue in the futureyears. To deliver hands-on experience to the online teaching, with a quality equivalent to whatstudents can get from the face-to-face laboratory environment, has been an eminent requirementfor further expanding our DE program.A number of studies on remote computer networking and technology laboratory have been donein recent years. These studies can be classified into four categories.1. Remote access system and remote lab architecture designSome studies1, 2, 3 intend to create remote access methods for
SME. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Enhancing Student Learning and Engagement through Interactive Learning in theEngineering Materials Course of the Mechanical Engineering Technology ProgramAbstract:Teaching at the college level presents challenges due to the ease with which students can accessinformation online. Mechanical engineering professors face the daunting task of impartingessential skills and knowledge while ensuring students remain engaged. They must employcreative teaching methods that captivate their audience to achieve this. Their primary objectivesinclude delivering engineering concepts, facilitating problem-solving skills, and fosteringexperimental learning through practical
, experiential-basedapproach to teaching problem-solving skills to DHH students in STEM fields. The approachdeveloped in this work is based on three distinct pillars: (i) experiential learning through activeand collaborative learning in laboratory environments; (ii) the best practices for teaching mathand science to DHH students; and (iii) the PDCA problem solving method.(i) Experiential Learning: The experiential approach in this effort is rooted in proven learningmethods including active learning and collaborative learning. Active learning, in which studentsperform activities beyond listening to a lecture and taking notes, has been effective in learningand applying course material.8 Essentially, active learning is a learn-by-doing approach thatresults
course, and we elucidate the importantrole the course plays in our engineering curriculum.IntroductionIn the fall of 2003, two faculty members at the Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering beganteaching a new course offering, titled Paul Revere: Tough as Nails. Referred to as a “courseblock” due to the fact that it was twice the size of a typical undergraduate course, Paul Revere:Tough as Nails attempted to accomplish several key learning objectives:• Teach students to pose questions and solve materials science and historical problems in an interdisciplinary manner, using the content, methods, and perspectives of both fields to achieve a greater contextual and qualitative understanding of common topics.• Encourage students to control
. Lecture notesare posted on WebCT before class and students are required to come with paper copies of thelecture notes. Lectures are delivered interactively using PowerPoint during class. Meetings takeplace in a variety of locations including the home-base classroom, electrical engineeringlaboratory, and structural engineering teaching and research laboratory (SETRL). The classschedule and course overview as delivered in fall 2010 is provided in Fig. 3 Day Week Monday Wednesday (#) Location Lecture # T
Kettering University), MI. Dr. Jawaharlal is recognized as an outstanding educator for his innovative and engaging teaching pedagogy.Kyu-Jung Kim, California State Polytechnic University-PomonaAngela Shih, California State Polytechnic University-Pomona Page 12.1118.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 DEVELOPMENT OF A HYBRID VECTOR STATICS COURSE TO REDUCE FAILURE RATEABSTRACTA group of mechanical engineering faculty members have initiated a hybrid Vector Staticscourse which involves Macromedia presentations, Hands-on experiments, Online homeworkprogram for collecting homework, and online Multimedia
to be able to correct the process toward normal operation. Thedifferences in these two broad outcomes lead to differences in emphasis and approach toteaching similar topics.Our ATE project involves adapting novel in-classroom laboratory equipment and activitiesdeveloped for teaching engineering to teaching process technology. The equipment beingadapted consists of very low-cost models of common industrial equipment [1-5]. These are itemslike heat exchangers and pipes which are common to both process technology and manybranches of engineering. The emphases are different however, process technology or PTECprograms are concerned with ensuring that students understand normal behavior and how someof the phenomena can be used to cross-check
described by a three-pillar model. Figure 1: Three-pillar modelPraxis-oriented learning includes project and problem based learning, as well as a focus on theapplication of theories and methods learned in core engineering subjects (i.e. mathematics,mechanics, electrics). The main challenges are the coordination of the lectures with regard tocontent and timing, and lecturers’ motivation. Furthermore, project and problem basedlearning demands much more time in terms of supervision than standard lectures. Involvingstudents in industrial projects is not without risks and we have to ensure that such projects arecompleted to the satisfaction of our partners in industry.All departmental staff who teaches engineering
laboratory course,students have been able to fully simulate, build, and test, a two-channel AM system (transmitterand receiver). Students didn’t have any numerical computing experience at the start of thecourse. Moreover, it has been observed that simulation results provide a set of known-good,expected results, which makes debugging analog circuitry much easier.ConclusionsAfter several years of teaching communications courses with a simulation component, we havedeveloped a list of common pitfalls that students face, as well as exercises designed to helpstudents avoid them and learn in the most efficient manner. We have presented a summary ofthese observations in this paper. We believe that simulation will continue to play an increasinglyimportant
processing system using the IR Buddy device. 2) Developing the teach mode procedure for the cup type detector sub-system was a new process for the students. Running the teach procedure was just like many other calibration routines which the students had done many times before. This project required the students to create a calibration routine for an electronic circuit and a process of their own design.The Future:The results of this project have made it clear that more complex workstations and smart palletscan be added to the CIM laboratory assembly line. Multicolor cups will be an added option; amicrocontroller based polychromatic sensor system is being design for this workstation. Theloading station will be upgraded
AC 2011-421: INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN ENGINEERING/SCIENCEVIA NANOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSMaher E. Rizkalla, Integrated Nanosystems Development Institute, Indiana University-Purdue University In-dianapolis, 723W Michigan Street SL160, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5132 Received his Ph.D in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Case Western Reserve University in 1985. He was research scientist at Argonne National Laboratory from January 1985 to September 1986 while he was an Assistant Professor at Purdue University Calumet. He joined the Department of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at IUPUI in September 1986 where is now Professor and Associate Chair of the Department. His research interests include solid State devices
Curricula." Proceedings,1995 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25-28, 1995; Anaheim, CA. pp. 2262 - 2269. [4] Ssemakula, Mukasa E. and Liao, Gene Y. 2003. „Adapting The Learning Factory Model For Implementation In A Laboratory‟ 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 5-8, 2003, Boulder, CO. [5] Ssemakula, Mukasa E. and Liao, Gene Y. 2004. „Implementing The Learning Factory Model In A Laboratory Setting‟ IMECE 2004, International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Nov. 13- 19, 2004; Anaheim, CA. [6] Ssemakula, Mukasa E. and Liao, Gene Y. 2006. „A Hands-On Approach to Teaching Product Development‟ World Transactions on Engineering and Technology
AC 2010-646: DESIGNING ROBOTIC SYSTEMS: PREPARATION FOR ANINTERDISCIPLINARY CAPSTONE EXPERIENCEWilliam Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. William R. Michalson is a Professor in the ECE Department at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute where he performs research and teaches in the areas of navigation, communications and computer system design. He supervises the WPI Center for Advanced Integrated Radio Navigation (CAIRN) where he is developing a Public Safety Integration Center focused on the integration of communications, navigation and information technologies for public safety applications. His research focuses on the development, test, and evaluation of systems for both
capabilities). Dr. Wicker’s current research interests are in the areas of advanced manufacturing (focused on layered manufacturing), tissue engineering (including scaffold fabrication, polymer synthesis, and in vitro and in vivo testing), and experimental fluid mechanics (with recent emphasis on cardiovascular flows). Dr. Wicker has published in excess of 100 refereed articles, provided more than 50 technical presentations at conferences and meetings, and managed more than $8 million in funded projects from agencies such as NSF, DoD, DoE, NASA, Sandia National Laboratories, and others, including a variety of corporations. Courses taught include topics in the thermal sciences.Rong Pan, Arizona State
Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Incorporating a Milestone-Based Project Based Learning Method in a Foundry Course AbstractThe objective of this study was to investigate the impact of a milestone-based project-basedlearning (PBL) methodology incorporated in a metal casting (foundry) course. The course, whichcontains a hands-on laboratory portion, was designed as a full semester learning experience forstudents, which integrates a PBL pedagogy to facilitate learning. The students worked in teamsthroughout the semester, constantly contributing to the completion of their projects. Theintervention of this teaching
in the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering Technical Communication Program. He regularly teaches first-year, intermediate, and senior writing courses for students in all engineering disciplines, but especially Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science Engineering. His research focuses on the interplay between identity, experience, and agency in language and literacy practices in technical and workplace communication contexts through translingual and linguistic justice frameworks. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Mechanical engineering reasoning diagram: How can modeling engineering thinking support learning in writing intensive labs?The
authorities, faculty and undergraduate students about their perceptions of the school’sapproaches to teach ethics. Second, we designed a quantitative instrument to measure students’ability to recognize ethical and professional issues, to accept personal responsibility, to be awareof ethical codes, and to obtain learning benefits from different ethics training activities.Significant differences were found in individual ethical reasoning to identify issues by genderand socioeconomic status. Implications regarding improvement actions in the research site werediscussed. Additionally, considerations for adopting the assessment approach by otherinstitutions were also presented.Introduction Engineering solutions have a long-term impact on society, as
an effective and efficient learninggroup of students.In a paper he presented at the 2004 ASME Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering SummerConference at Westin Charlotte & Convention Center, Charlotte, North Carolina (July11-15, 2004) the author raised five questions : 1. What should be counted as appropriate goals in an undergraduate engineering course that has a significant laboratory component ? 2. Are the teaching practices utilized by the instructor in this course providing reasonably acceptable paths toward accomplishing the specified learning goals ? 3. What do students actually accomplish in the course and the laboratory exercises and how does the instructor’s teaching methodologies
Arthur F. Thurnau Professor and Associate Professor of Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. His Ph.D. is in Engineering and Cognitive Psychology from the University of Illinois. His research and teaching interests include cognitive modeling, cognitive ergonomics, cognitive psychology, engineering aesthetics, human factors, and human-computer interactionVirginia Soto, University of Michigan Virginia Soto Pinto is an undergraduate student in the department of Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. Page 11.610.1© American
An Evaluation of the Teaching Approach for the Interdisciplinary Course Electrical Engineering for Non Majors S. A. Zekavat1, C. Sandu2, G. Archer1, and K. Hungwe3 1 Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan Tech University, Houghton MI 49931, 2 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, 24061, 3 Dept. of Education, Michigan Tech University, Houghton MI 49931.AbstractThis paper presents an evaluation on the teaching approach for the interdisciplinary course“Introduction to Electrical Engineering (EE) for non-EE majors” performed by surveying threegroups from the
development of the GUI interface using C- programming in Visual Studios, and the CET student oversaw the project management.- Project motivation: The topic was proposed by one faculty teaching the thermodynamics course. In the MET program, there are two mandatory thermodynamics courses. The second course in the thermodynamics sequence is Advanced Thermodynamics, a 4ch course, and comprised of a 3ch lecture component and a 1ch laboratory component. Like any course with a laboratory component, there is always a strong need to expand the learning experiences the students have in labs. Sometimes the resources in the labs are limited. In the case of gas power cycles, there are several hands-on experiments on the market, including an
Paper ID #19679Engaged Student Learning Project: Challenges and Lessons LearnedDr. Rambod Rayegan, Prairie View A&M University Rambod Rayegan is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department at Prairie view A & M University. He has a strong background in conducting research in building energy efficiency and renewable power generation for buildings. He served as a Visiting Assistant Professor in Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering at University of North Texas before joining PVAMU. He oversaw the research in the Zero Energy Laboratory at UNT and worked as a researcher at UNT in the
improvement”, Crosstalk:The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, January, 2004.18. P. Runeson, “Experiences from teaching PSP for freshmen”, Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T'01), February 2001.19. M. Sebern, “Iterative development and commercial tools in an undergraduate software engineering course”, Proceedings of the 28th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM Press, 1997.20. M. Sebern, “The software development laboratory: incorporating industrial practice in an academic environment”, Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T'02), February 2002.21. M. Sebern and T. Hilburn
output devices include indicating lamps and mimicpanels (provide visual and graphical information), relays (to control output loads),electric motors and motor starters (switches heavy loads), and solenoid directional controlvalves (widely used, controls fluids). Page 13.566.7After the PLC overview, we proceeded to the programming software. The best methodfor teaching the software is via lab activities that require the students to develop ladderlogic programs designed to control a process. The six laboratory activities that weutilized are the: Industrial start cycle with an automated stop function; Conveyor systemwith indicating lights; Timing six
for The Journal of Technology Studies. Dr. Bannatyne is also very active in international work and has spoken extensively throughout the United States, Israel, and Russia on the subject of technology's impact in society, the historical aspects of social change due to technology, and computer education courses in the republics of the former Soviet Union.Dan Baldwin, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Dan Baldwin is an Assistant Professor of Computer Graphics Technology at IUPUI. Before joining the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology Dan worked as an award-winning freelance illustrator and designer. Dan currently teaches courses in illustration, graphic design, and
undergraduate teaching assistants. Finally, we would like tothank the reviewers for their helpful comments and Mary Lindblad for her editorial advice.1 Bjedov, G. and Anderson, P.K., Should Freshman Engineering Students Be Taught a Programming Language?,Proceedings of the 26th Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996, pp. 90-92.2 Azemi, A. and Pauley, L.L., Teaching the Introductory Computer Programming Course for Engineers UsingMatlab, Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008, pp. T3B-18—21.3 Huettel, L.G. and Collins, L.M., A vertically-integrated application-driven signal processing laboratory, ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (2005), pp. 15613 – 15623.4 Huettel, L.G., et al., Work in
students have participated in the development of the new course underthe supervision of two faculty members. Students who participated in the software andhardware development have done an excellent job in the course projects. Their confidencein the course materials has led the department to assign them as teaching assistants for thenewly developed course.2.2 MEMS / NEMS software and hardware developmentIn the MEMS / NEMS module of the course, students use Technology Computer-AidedDesign (TCAD) to learn design software for the device fabrication process. The devicesare then made in the school laboratories. The students gain new experiences with the useof apparatus systems, including thin film fabrication, Characterization System, ScanningElectron