policy stated that the Society “supports the concept of the master’s degree as the FirstProfessional Degree for the practice of civil engineering at the professional level.”1 Chargedwith implementing Policy Statement 465, the ASCE Committee on Academic Prerequisites forProfessional Practice (CAP3) determined that any consideration of academic degree requirementsshould derive from a more fundamental analysis of the profession’s BOK.The concept of a formalized professional BOK is well established in the sociology ofprofessions. According to Eliot Freidson, one of the principal defining characteristics of aprofession is an officially recognized BOK that is based on abstract concepts and requires theexercise of discretionary judgment.2 In Andrew
engineering departments, 89% of the respondentsreported teaching sustainable engineering courses.IntroductionSustainable engineering interest has been growing rapidly in the past decade. Numerousengineering schools offer courses or programs in this general area, often with local variations toreflect faculty and schools’ specialized interests and knowledge. A survey of administrativeheads for nearly 1400 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditedengineering programs conducted by the Center for Sustainable Engineering (CSE) found thatmore than 80% of the respondents (representing roughly 20% of the 1400 engineering programs)reported some level of sustainable engineering content in existing courses (CSE 2008)1.While there is
new topic by solving problems inteams at the board. After a topic is introduced and a short problem solved as a class at the boardwith the instructor, students break into small groups at the instructor’s call to arms, “To TheBoards!” It has been well documented through course assessment surveys that studentsappreciate and value the time they have to work problems during class, to discuss solutions withtheir classmates, and to ask questions of the professors.1 A common critique from theseassessments is the lack of time students have to copy their work from the board into their notes.While some groups finish early and have ample time to copy their solution, many do not finishthe problem before the instructor briefly reviews the solution and
. High quality digital images can be obtained of the microstructureduring loading or during environmental changes, such as fluctuations in temperatures ormoisture. Tomographic studies on geomaterials conducted during the past two decades(1, 2, 3, 4)indicate that x-ray CT technology provides a viable means for nondestructively observing,measuring, and quantifying the internal microstructure of geomaterials.X-ray computer-aided tomography (CT) provides an alternate approach for measuring soilmicrostructure. An x-ray CT scan consists of two processes: 1) data collection and 2) imagereconstruction. During the data collection stage, a specimen is digitally photographed frommultiple angles as it is exposed to x-ray beams. X-rays are invisible, high
evaluations (Fig. 1).4 Figure 24 shows the delta in improvement over six years,and current data shows very consistent results. Interestingly, a fair number of the ASCE Page 22.1645.3ExCEEd Teaching Workshop participants are seasoned faculty who are still needing tolearn how to teach effectively. ExCEED 2007 Long Term Self Assessment Feedback Overall Assessment Lesson Organization Presentation of Material
analogies to the need formultiple assessment measures would be the need for multiple camera views during themaking of a movie or multiple camera views during instant replay calls in sports ormultiple identical tests during research. Each view or test provides critical insight into theconclusion before making the decision for a call reversal, research publication, orchanges to a program.Some of the common assessment methods used around the country are: External Exams,Internal Exams, Capstones, Surveys, Embedded Indicators, Course Assessments, andIndustrial or External Advisory Committees.1 External Exams are the most desired since Page 22.1294.2they
of 4.0 (4.0 being thehighest/best rating) to the two survey statements that “Soils Magic was fun” and “Soils Magicwas interesting”. Both groups of authors reported that the most effective “Soils Magic”demonstrations were the ones where students were actually physically involved or assisted withthe experiments.The primary purpose of the current study presented in this paper is to investigate whether theperformance, and follow-up discussion, of soil behavior demonstrations (from the book SoilsMagic) in the lectures of an introductory, undergraduate soil mechanics course will 1) increasestudent thinking about soil behavior and 2) improve student understanding of the soil behaviorsillustrated by the experiments. A secondary purpose of the study
credit hour requirements oftoday’s bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and closely related fields. While this paper doesnot address any historical trends, it does provide a comprehensive description of today’s degreerequirements. This include both total credit hour requirement for degree as well as a breakdown Page 22.1531.2of the credit hours required in the traditional ABET categories of mathematics and basic sciences,general engineering topics, and general education [2].Description of Survey and RespondentsA short and focused survey was developed which requested the following information: 1. Total credit hours required in “engineering
engineering topics, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) is theLead Society for ABET’s Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC). Under ASCE’s LeadSociety responsibilities, there are 227 civil engineering programs (226 bachelors and 1 mastersprograms), 17 architectural engineering programs, 11 construction engineering programs, andthree “other” engineering programs. Also under ASCE’s Lead Society responsibilities forABET’s Technology Accreditation Commission (TAC), there are 55 civil engineeringTechnology programs, 19 architectural engineering technology programs, 28 constructionengineering technology programs, and seven “other” engineering technology programs.Enrollment DataAll student enrollment and degree information provided in this
disciplines are not obviously aligned. The common engineeringteaching paradigm divides complex problems into many pieces which students are then taught tosolve independently, all the while anticipating that eventually, they will “be able to develop asolution by combining them…Eventually...the effort involved in learning about the small piecesis so overwhelming that we can longer synthesize the original problem–the parts become moreimportant than the whole.”1 Further, the engineering curricular focus on solving “one problem ata time,” assuming a singular answer or solution, stands in direct contrast to “the history ofmodern technology and society in all its vital messy complexity.”2 As Charles Vest, formerPresident of MIT writes, “There are two
engineeringstudents are expected to possess, the efforts made toward requiring graduate-level education forprofessional licensure and the resulting change in the program criteria used by ABET to evaluatecivil engineering degree programs.Technically-intensive civil engineering degree programs traditionally tended to require more credithours to graduate than other bachelor-level programs. A 1996 survey, however, revealed “a reformmovement in undergraduate CE education” with one theme being “a decrease in the number ofcredit hours for the undergraduate degree.”1 This trend is not singular to civil engineering and Page 22.1632.2continues as recently as fall
project management experience,or capstone sequence, for the Department of Civil Engineering (Department) at LawrenceTechnological University occurs over two terms: ECE4021 CE Design Project 1 (CE Project 1), a one-credit course offered in the fall, and ECE4033 CE Design Project 2 (CE Project 2), a three-credit course offered in the spring.Students form their own teams of three to five members and develop a project where theygenerate a conceptual design and project management plan. The capstone represents theculmination of the students’ undergraduate education, providing them an opportunity to integratevarious curricular components in preparation for careers as civil engineers.Neither course has an instructor in the traditional sense
alumni of our graduate program who have developed new ways of thinking and acting through our leadership development process.Data on Engineers Moving into Management Figure 1. S&E bachelor‟s degree holders in management jobs by years since degree (NSF 2003)National Science Foundation SESTAT 20031 data (Figure 1) shows that increasing numbers ofengineering graduates leave the direct practice of engineering over time and move intomanagement. This NSF report also shows that there is a corresponding fewer number of Page 22.1546.2engineering graduates whose major work activity is R&D as they progress in their careers(Figure 2
a fulltime practicing professional engineer.Constant turnover in the position was difficult to handle and an adjunct could not expand thecourse into a program. In 2006, the author began to teach the class and initiated a majorcollaborative effort with practitioners in the state in order to 1) improve land development designeducation, including increasing student awareness of land development design as a career path,and 2) increase student – practitioner interaction. The Land Development Design Initiative(LDDI) involves more than 70 engineering and land development firms and directly involvesindustry professionals in teaching, mentoring, curriculum development, and promoting landdevelopment to undergraduate students.Strategic planning for
the next generation of engineering leaders. Companies are also beingasked to help address the expanding needs in our communities as budget cuts impactgovernments and not-for-profits. One corporate model is to encourage their employees to beengaged in the community as well as K-12 and university education. Often, these are separateinitiatives supported by separate groups of employees as shown graphically in Figure 1. Eachaspect is important. As resources are continually squeezed, we should ask how can we providemore impact with fewer resources. An efficiency opportunity is the idea of a multiplier and service-learning could be justsuch a multiplier. The alternative approach is illustrated in Figure 2. At the university level,mentors can
. stroke(255); // Set stroke color to white } float y = 100; // Global Variable // The statements in draw() are run until the // program is stopped. Each statement is run in // sequence and after the last line is read, the first // line is run again. void draw() { background(0); // Set the background to black rect(75, y, 50, 50); y = y - 1; if (y < 0) { y = height; } }Figure 1 - A simple Processing program.By default, the Processing environment calls any defined setup() function first, and only oncewhen the program starts. The draw() function is called repeatedly until the program stops,acting as built-in looping structure. The Processing environment is stateful, tracking the heightand width of the drawing surface
Computers in Education Journal published a selected survey of novelapproaches to robotics education for high school and engineering undergraduate levels whichindicated that currently in the U.S.A. Worcester Polytechnic Institute is probably the onlyuniversity that currently offers a stand-alone B.S. degree in Robotics Engineering 1, while otheruniversities such as Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology adopted the approach of amultidisciplinary robotics minor for students majoring in Computer Science, Electrical,Computer, Mechanical or Software Engineering 2. With the recent approval by the UniversitySystem of Georgia Board of Regents for new B.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering andElectrical and Electronics Engineering to come on line in Fall 2013
system in thelaboratory. The set-up is used for experiential learning and research efforts involving engineeringand computer science majors at the university, as well as for demonstration purposes for theintroductory Control Systems (ENGE 382) and Instrumentation (ENGE 380) courses offered bythe author for engineering majors.1.0 INTRODUCTIONMechatronics[1-3] embodies the synergy of mechanical design, electronics, control, soft-computing and information technology.In this paper various aspects of the field of “Mechatronics” is explored using simple laboratorydevices – (a) Direct Current (DC) servo-motor and, (b) Dual water tank system, with appropriateelectronic interfaces for sensing and control. Particular emphasis is paid towards (i
is the list of components the students were required to purchase for thecourse. • Arduino Duemilanove board. • USB cable to connect the board to a computer for programming. • Bread board. • 16x2 LCD display kit. • Miscellaneous resistors and LEDs.The following list is the items that, in hindsight, should have been required but were not. • 7-segment LED display. • Stepper motor. • H-bridge IC. 1 Page 22.1600.4 The Arduino project website is at http://www.arduino.cc • Piezoelectric speaker. • Miscellaneous buttons, transistors, potentiometers, photoresistors, and other parts.TextbookThere are few books available
Digital Electronics course.The secret to presenting digital circuits successfully to students who have no technicalbackground is to avoid references to electricity or computers and stick purely with the 1’s and0’s. In such a setting, digital circuits are just implementations of mathematical expressions.There are no “volts” or “bytes” or anything that might confuse the simplicity of 1’s and 0’s. Bytreating digital circuits simply as implementations of mathematical expressions, and treatingwires as just pencil lines that connect logical elements in drawings, students can learn to designand build digital circuits comfortably.This paper provides applications of a lab station design that has been disclosed in an earlierASEE paper1, and discusses
. Page 22.1673.2Compounding this last difficulty is the fact that many students are “visual” learners according toFelder’s index of learning styles [1]. For these students, an animation of a physical system canbe an important tool to help them learn [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. It has been shown that students preferhaving access to animations in addition to textbook-only presentations and the animationssignificantly increased their ability to visualize system behavior, as well as increasing enjoymentand self-confidence [3, 7, 8, 9]. In addition, Kolb’s theory of experiential learning posits thatexperience, which can be provided by animations, and reflection are part of student learning[10].There are many ways to present animations of simulations of physical
explanatory detail about the topic, including descriptions of how it is related to other,associated, topics. While many textbooks (and even web-based presentations) have only shortsections describing the interrelationships between topics, this system puts the relationship at thecore of the presentation of the material to make it more clear why a particular topic is beinglearned and how it fits into the larger context of linear systems.IntroductionAt its lowest level the learning process, according to Bloom’s taxonomy, involves moving astudent from simply remembering information to understanding it [1, 2]. The internet has greatlyincreased the amount and availability of information but has, in some ways, increased thedifficulty of understanding that
sustaining virtual learning and teaching communities through acloud computing service (Blade servers) and enhancing student motivation and performance inMath by using interactive simulation programs. As part of the project, we have developed aseries of MATLAB-based simulations delivered through our Blade servers to help students betterconceptualize abstract Math concepts. During the fall semester of 2010, we implemented 12simulations in a Multivariable & Vector Calculus class in which 117 students were enrolled. Tobetter understand the overall program usability via Blade servers and the value of the simulationsfrom the student perspective, we conducted an evaluation study and answered the following threequestions: 1. How do students perceive the
domain • allow for dynamic reorganization of cards and content • accommodate a tablet PC based system • allow for future design of Drag-n-Drop capabilities from a supervisor’s master control touch screen computer • allow on-demand information retrievalThese requirements were based on conceptual wireless network design, covering an aircrafttechnician’s work environment that included a large transport category aircraft on an airportramp (Figure 1). This was also the basis of the current physical network construction (Figure 2). Technician wireless Technician wireless tablet 1 tablet 2 Maintenance Ops. Control
. Page 22.1196.21. IntroductionInterest in the use of tablet PCs in the classroom increased significantly with the release ofMicrosoft’s Tablet PC edition of Windows XP in 2002 and Hewlett-Packard’s tablet grantincentive program that began in 2004 1. The J.B. Speed School of Engineering began its tabletPC program in 2007 when the first incoming freshman class was required to purchase tablet PCs.Entering freshman in 2008, 2009, and 2010 have also been required to purchase tablet PCs. Dueto this gradual adoption processes, not all students in upper level courses have a tablet PC,though the number is increasing each year. However, the Department of EngineeringFundamentals classes ENGR 101, 102, and 201 are freshmen courses, and therefore all
. Several committees organized by the USNational Academy of Sciences have summarized much of this research in reports published bythe National Academy Press. A key publication that informs our current discussion is HowPeople Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School1.An organizing structure used in the How People Learn volumes (hereafter HPL) is the HPLframework. It highlights a set of four overlapping lenses that can be used to analyze any learningsituation. In particular, it suggests that we ask about the degree to which learning environmentsare1-4:1. Knowledge centered. In the sense of being based on a careful analysis of what we want people to know and be able to do when they finish with our materials or course and providing
-L138 eXperimenter Kit not only for DSP education with a higher performance processor than before, but can use this to introduce the concepts of multi-core devices and system-on-chip designs in a practical way.1 IntroductionMany university DSP courses have made use of the excellent and affordable tools provided byTexas Instruments, such as the C6000-series of DSP Starter Kits (DSKs). The recent introduc-tion of the ZoomTM OMAP-L138 eXperimenter Kit from Logic Product Development Company(usually just called LogicPD),1 featuring Texas Instruments’ dual core system on a chip (SoC) thatincludes an ARM9 and a C6748 VLIW DSP core, has brought a much more capable and afford-able DSP development system to both university educators and
shifting from one to the other as needed. In this paper, theauthor presents an innovative way of achieving such an integration. The paper situates the workwithin the how people learn framework 1,2 .1. IntroductionOver the last few decades, a number of different approaches have been developed to exploit IT toolsand systems in education at all levels from K-12 to undergraduate engineering programs throughcorporate training. While each of these systems and approaches has its own particular goals anduses its own specific methods to achieve them, they can be broadly classified into two groups whichmay be called knowledge-centered approaches and activity-centered approaches respectively. Asthe name suggests, the central focus of knowledge-centered
. The method ishighly versatile and can be used to teach and communicate with local and distance studentssimultaneously. It is a synchronous and hybrid delivery of instruction that uses the internet anddedicated software for lecturing and problem-solution illustration. The method is also mobile,and it can be used in any classroom or laboratory with internet access even when the room lacksdedicated (and often expensive) equipment for distance instruction. Figure 1 shows a schematicdiagram of the main elements involved in the method. Video conferencing Satellite Distant School Classroom
grades. Starting on week seven iPads were provided for the second cohort of students.Variances between the cohorts were again assessed on the second and again at the final classaverage. The results of this analysis show an increase in learning impact for exam II but showno change in the final class average. The results from the attitudinal survey show a very positiveattitude towards the implementation of the iPad in the classroom and this yielded a very positiveclassroom environment.Introduction Throughout history there have been many attempts to incorporate different technologies in theclassroom.1 Some of these technologies have seen more success than others when looked at incomparisons.2 The most commonly used classroom technologies are