.[5] Remache, A., & Belarbi, A. (2019). Adapting ICT in higher education in the developing world:influencing dynamics. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 12(3),264-284.[6] Iskander, R., Pettaway, L., Waller, L., & Waller, S. (2016). An analysis of higher educationleadership in the United Arab Emirates. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 444.[7] Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2017). Higher education governance in France, Germany, and Italy:Change and variation in the impact of transnational soft governance. Policy and Society, 36(1),67-88.[8] Hortin, J., A. (1980). Visual literacy and visual thinking. Retrieved from ERIC database(ED214522). International Society for Technology in Education (2008
Mentzer et al. study launched a quantitative investigation examining the extent to which basicpsychological needs were met prior to the pandemic in a traditional face-to-face only version of the coursecompared to a version of the course using our HyFlex model.This quasi-experimental study had two distinct components, each with their own research question and sample.First, we hypothesized that the HyFlex environment met students' basic psychological needs as well as orperhaps better than the traditional face-to-face only environment. As a test for this hypothesis, we accessedbasic psychological needs satisfaction data from Fall 2019 and compared these to data collected during the Fall2020 for a sample of 1344 students. Data were collected as part
16 survey questions (Q1 – Q16) can befound in appendix III. Only 13 out of the 29 students in spring 2019 responded to the survey. Fig. 4. Spring 2020 student end of term survey.Questions 3 and 4 can be mapped to the new ABET student outcome 1 (ABET, 2020). As seenfrom Figure 4, all but 1 of the responders agreed or strongly agreed that the capstone coursehelped to provide the opportunity to apply “knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools ofmathematics, science, engineering, and technology to solve broadly-defined engineeringproblems” (ABET, 2020). Similarly, questions 5 and 6 can be mapped to ABET student outcome2 where 11 and 12 responders (out of 13) respectively agreed or strongly agreed that the
Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, US. He received his BS degree in Civil Engineering from Tongji University, China in 2019, and his MS degree in Civil Engineering from University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, MI, US in 2020. His research interests include applying deep learning and robotics in civil infrastructure inspection.Ishfaq Aziz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Ishfaq Aziz is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA. He received his BS in Civil Engineering and MS in Civil Engineering (Structural) from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). His current research focuses on radar sensing and waveform
the top (14th) ”Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs” by US News Report (2023). With this unique vision, Olga has also served as the principal investigator since 2019 on a multi-year Kern Family Foundation KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network) award titled ”Educating the Whole Engineer” to integrate important competencies such as virtues, character, entrepreneurial mindset, and leadership across the Wake Forest Engineering curriculum. She has led Wake Forest Engineering with a focus on inclusive innovation and excellence, curricular and pedagogical innovation, and creative partnerships across the humanities, social sciences, industry, entrepreneurs, etc. in order to rethink and reimagine engineering
, no. 3, p. 032001, 2019.[20] E. M. Starkey, S. R. Miller, and S. T. Hunter, “Deploying Virtual Product Dissection Lesson Modules in Introductory Engineering Classrooms: A Research-Driven Approach,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[21] S. Yilmaz, C. Seifert, S. R. Daly, and R. Gonzalez, “Design heuristics in innovative products,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 138, no. 7, p. 071102, 2016.
ofethical standards prior to obtaining IRB approval.Recruitment of case sites This study builds on the Society of Women Engineers expansion and engagement efforts withSTEM students and professionals in Europe. In May 2019, a member event took place in Berlin,Germany, providing an opportunity to connect with individuals involved with STEM mentoringprograms at universities in Germany and Austria, a country whose higher education structurealigns with Germany’s. Through recommendations from our organization’s Research AdvisoryCouncil, individuals from various university STEM programs involved with mentoring activitieswere invited to attend a research roundtable discussion held in a conference room at a BerlinTechnical University. The focus of the
2019, our university Tecnológico de Monterrey, rolled out its new educationalmodel called Tec21 across all programs, including engineering. In this model, the semesterperiods were divided into three periods of 5 weeks each, where subjects from the previouscurriculum, which lasted 18 weeks, were condensed into a 5-week teaching period. Thisapproach was based on entirely focusing students on a thematic area (Fig.1).In the Tec21 curriculum plans [1-5], each thematic block is structured with several moduleson related themes and a challenge (linked project), which must be addressed by developingskills derived from the deployment of the modules. All challenges are linked to real-worldenvironmental problems through Educational Partners (companies
courses. These teaching-focused faculty (TFF henceforth), while having different responsibilities across disciplines andinstitution types, are united by their devotion to teaching and serving. At Hispanic-ServingInstitutions (HSI’s henceforth), institutions of higher education in which at least 25% of theenrolled students are Latine or Hispanic, the work of Latine and Hispanic TFF becomes anintegral part of meeting the mission of serving these traditionally underrepresented students.Servingness (Garcia et al., 2019; Garcia, 2020) 4 According to data from ASEE (2018), Latine and Hispanic assistant engineeringprofessors only accounted for 5.4
into Practice, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 249-254, 2002.42. N. T. Long, N. T. H. Yen, and N. V. Hanh, "The Role of Experiential Learning and Engineering Design Process in K-12 STEM Education," International Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 720-732, 2020.43. V. Wilczynski and R. Adrezin, "Higher education makerspaces and engineering education," presented at the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 50571, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016.44. T. D. Drayton, "Beyond the Maker Movement: A Preliminary Partial Literature Review on the Role of Makerspaces in Engineering Education," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.45. Bartle, Emma
Empathy in Engineering Education,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, p. 22414.[7] J. L. Hess and N. D. Fila, “The Development and Growth of Empathy Among Engineering Students,” in ASEE, New Orleans, Los Angeles: American Society for Engineering Education, 2016, p. 16281. Accessed: Feb. 18, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/12192[8] J. Strobel, J. Hess, R. Pan, and C. A. W. Morris, “Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers,” Engineering Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 137–159, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2013.814136.[9] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and R. Pan
. 102, no. 6, pp. 1178–1197, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0027143.[7] K. Meyers et al., “Perspectives on First-Year Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/3740[8] M. L. Morris, R. A. M. Hensel, and J. Dygert, “Why do students leave? An investigation into why well-supported students leave a first-year engineering program,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia, and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929–940, 2007.[10] D. Verdin, A. Godwin, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G
of Teamwork in Capstone Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-catme-to-document-and-improve-the- effectiveness-of-teamwork-in-capstone-courses[24] A. P. Rovai, M. J. Wighting, and R. Lucking, “The Classroom and School Community Inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 263–280, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.09.001.
effectiveness of the Capstone project course is the course’saverage numerical evaluation across all sections. Each section is reviewed for overall weightedaverage for all questions specific to the course. Then these averages are gathered and averaged tofind the mean score for the course itself. For academic year 2018-2019, the course averaged 4.11on a 5 scale. This was the transitionary year. In subsequent years, 2019-2020 was 3.83, 2020-2021 was 4.03, 2021-2022 was 4.21 and 2022-2023 averaged 4.14 [Table 4]. The evaluations in2022 and 2023 show a slight increase from 2020 and 2021. This data is crucial to understand thespan of five-year influence along with identification of the average increase (or decrease) at thetime the unified syllabus and
. Q., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 172–190, 2011.[19] S. Wellings and B. Casselden, “An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists,” J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 789–800, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0961000617742466.[20] D. Ellis and M. Haugan, “Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment,” J. Doc., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 384–403, 1997.[21] K. Mercer, K. Weaver, and A. Stables-Kennedy, “Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 33485. doi
through Immersive Design Challenges in Academic Makerspaces: A Qualitative Case Study,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-an-engineering-identity-through-immersive- design-challenges-in-academic-makerspaces-a-qualitative-case-study[12] E. R. Halverson and K. Sheridan, “The Maker Movement in Education,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 495–504, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.[13] D. Lindstrom, A. D. Thompson, and D. A. Schmidt-Crawford, “The Maker Movement: Democratizing STEM Education and Empowering Learners to Shape Their World,” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher
frequent writing retreats, dissertation workshops, and colloquia. Addingmore administrative resources to aid in scheduling, marketing, and event organization isalso a priority so that the co-directors can focus on delivering one-on-one instruction,developing online writing sources, and building more varied communications-basedsupport for greater disciplinary enculturation as professional academics [15]. 11 References[1] E. Fife, "Making the Case for Technical Communication Courses in Ph.D.Engineering Curricula." Presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June,2019. Tampa, FL. https://peer.asee.org/33079[2] B
University of Georgia [19]. The use oftriads and dyads gives students a method of visualizing how they are making sense of theirnarrative. Triads and dyads allow the student to move the dot on the triangle (triad) or slider (dyad)to fit their narrative best [19]. This data was recorded using coordinates and analyzed for trends.Thematic CodingStudents provided data on their income by selecting from the multiple-choice question that asked:“In 2019 my family's income was…”. The answers students could choose from were 1) Less than$25,000; 2) $25,000-$50,000; 3) $50,000-$100,000; 4) $100,000-$200,000; 5) More than$200,000; and 6) Prefer not to answer or blank. Responses of students who reported a familyincome of less than $100,000 were filtered from the
. Rodriguez-Mesa, Educating engineers 2030–PBL, social progress and sustainability. 2021, Taylor & Francis. p. 1-3.4. Kolko, J., The divisiveness of design thinking. interactions, 2018. 25(3): p. 28-34.5. Coleman, E., et al., Design thinking among first‐year and senior engineering students: A cross‐sectional, national study measuring perceived ability. Journal of Engineering Education, 2020. 109(1): p. 72-87.6. Li, Y., et al., Design and design thinking in STEM education. 2019, Springer. p. 93-104.7. Matthews, J. and C. Wrigley, Design and design thinking in business and management higher education. Journal of Learning Design, 2017. 10(1): p. 41-54.8. Hassi, L. and M. Laakso. Design thinking in the management discourse
-Schwartz, “How do engineering undergraduates define engineering identity?” presented at the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, Philadelphia, PA, 2019.[23] W. J. Schell and B. E. Hughes, “An approach to understand the role of identity in engineering leadership,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[24] K. G. Wolfinbarger and R. L. Shehab, “What behaviors and characteristics do engineering competition team members associate with leadership?” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2015.[25] D. Miscenko, H. Guenter, and D. V. Day, “Am I a leader? Examining leader identity development over time,” The
Introductory MATLABCourse: Successful Implementation for Students Learning”. ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, 2016.[4] D. Belfadel, M. Zabinksi and I. Macwan. Introduction to MATLAB Programming in aFundamentals of Engineering Course, ASEE: Annual Conference and Exposition, Long Beach,California, July 2021.[5] D. Belfadel, M. Zabinksi and R. Munden. Walking on Water Term Design Project inFundamentals of Engineering. ASEE: Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada.June 2020.[6] D. Belfadel, M. Arambulo, M. Zabinksi, R. Munden, and James Cavallo. “Use of theArduino Platform in Fundamentals of Engineering.” ASEE: Annual Conference and Exposition,Tampa, Florida. June 2019.Appendix 1: Sample in class code “Example of Interest Calculation
studentperformance and engagement.References[1] Bolton, R. and Zoghi, B., “Enhancing system dynamics instruction for technologists with simulation,”ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[2] Klegka, J.S. and O'Donovan, T.E., “Using Simulink As A Design Tool,” ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, 2002.[3] Smaili, A. and Zeineddine, F., “SoftLink: A matlab/simulink based code for the analysis, synthesis,optimization and simulation of mechanisms,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[4] KEEN Entrepreneurial Mindset, https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset, accessed 6 February 2022[5] Zhu, H., & Baumann, A., & Lichtenstein, G., “Assessment of Entrepreneurial Mindset Coverage in anOnline First Year Design Course,” 2019 FYEE Conference, Penn State
Creativity of the Professional Workforce”. As a graduate researcher, she is conducting qualitative research related to the experiences of neurodiverse graduate students in STEM fields. Previously, she spent eight years as a K-12 teacher in Connecticut, where she maintained a focus on providing a varied learning environment and differentiated instruction for all types of learners. She is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in Engineering Education in UConn’s College of Engineering.Dr. Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut Alexandra Hain is an Assistant Professor at the University of Connecticut in structural engineering. She received her PhD in Structural Engineering in 2019 from the University of Connecticut. In additon
use of the ARCS model of instructional design,” Journal of instructional development, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2–10, 1987.[8] S. Al-Qudah, J. Davishahl, E. Davishahl, and M. A. Greiner, “Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in undergraduate introductory classes,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[9] E. Vanhala and J. Kasurinen, “Goals and Principles for the Redesign of a Programming Course,” in Workshop on PhD Software Engineering Education, CEUR-WS, 2018.[10] A. Forte and M. Guzdial, “Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 248–253, 2005.[11] E. K. Pullu and M. N. Gömleksiz
-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is on
, doi: 10.1002/jee.20121.[20] R. M. Carbonell, M. E. Andrews, A. Boklage, and M. J. Borrego, “Innovation, Design, and Self-Efficacy: The Impact of Makerspaces,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/innovation-design-and-self-efficacy-the-impact-of-makerspaces[21] S. Hurtado and D. F. Carter, “Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging,” Sociol. Educ., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 324–345, 1997, doi: 10.2307/2673270.[22] J. Blue, B. Johnson, A. Summerville, and B. P. Kirkmeyer, “Beliefs and behaviors of first-generation and low
]. Available: https://www.stc.org/about-stc/defining-technical-communication/[3] A. J. Hanson, P. Lindahl, S. D. Strasser, A. F. Takemura, D. R. Englund, and J. Goldstein, “Technical communication instruction for graduate students: the communication lab vs. a course,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/technical-communication-instruction-for-graduate-students-the-commun ication-lab-vs-a-course[4] S. Summers, A. J. Olivier-Mason, M. Dang, and D. M. Chien, “Experiments in the communication lab: adaptations of the Comm Lab model in three institutions,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2023
development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Makayla Headley, Clemson University I am a doctoral student in Engineering and Science Education. My research interest include
Paper ID #42369Weekly Professional Development Lunches to Build Community Among anS-STEM CohortCaroline Cresap, Louisiana Tech University Caroline Cresap is a second-year chemical engineering major from Zachary, Louisiana. She is a Louisiana Tech University College of Engineering and Science S-STEM SUCCESS Scholar with Ashtyne Monceaux. Along with her ASEE research, she is also an undergraduate researcher in Dr. Yang Xiao’s Reaction Engineering and Catalysis Science Laboratory. Caroline enjoys staying involved in her university and is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), the Honors Student
2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 22 years of the academic experience at five different universities. Students and departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published 100+ journal papers and conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3