Page 11.934.11IGVC, and to fulfill the senior design requirement for the students in our department. Theparticipation in this project gave students real life team work experience. They experienced theapplication of theoretical information in different areas of knowledge to solve real life problems.This experience could later be used in their professional careers to solve similar problems innumerous other applications. The potential of real-world autonomous devices being able tocontrol themselves is growing, and in some cases is very desirable.Throughout the process of designing and building the autonomous vehicles, the teamsencountered many problems and made some mistakes of their own and they had to be realizedand acted on accordingly. The
broad reflection, personally satisfying but not professionally promoted bythe various external structures (departments, colleges, professional societies, colleagues).Second, the age of the instructor fascinates. Young faculty are not typically present inthis activity, for evident reasons: they are starting their research careers and both theirresearch and teaching must be easily judged and rewarded by their engineeringcolleagues, almost none of whom teach technology literacy. Second, the outlook of theyounger instructor is in an earlier, outbound phase of exploration and conquest ofresearch (the stated reason, according to Foster), whereas the senior faculty are morelikely to have completed sufficient “stated reason” voyages to reflect more
integrates the topics in the course should be used. Such a text wouldnot feature separate Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics sections. It would also address thetopics on a more fundamental level and address the fact that both disciplines are essentiallydifferent ways to analyze energy and losses. Furthermore, a custom text that utilized a casestudy approach to developing the theory or the actual case studies used for ME311 would greatlyenhance the course.Another recommendation is to continue to use the Fundamentals of Engineering ReferenceManual as a supplemental text for the course. The opportunity to view and use this referencetool early in students’ academic careers is an excellent way to familiarize them with the layout
. Many were reduced to the role of a “technician”, and some have abandoned Page 11.1257.7engineering, all together, to pursue other careers. This is attributable, to some extent, to colleges’failure in creating an educational experience conducive for the development of the characteristicsmentioned above. The author(9)reported the outcome of a survey of engineering employers in theRegion, that summarized frequently cited perceptions of the weaknesses of recent engineeringgraduates: lack of design capability and creativity, deficiency in thinking critically andindependently, narrow view of engineering and related disciplines, weak communication
traditional classroomteaching and what really takes place in the real world.(9) They give students experience withsituations and challenges they do not usually come across during traditional classroom activities.In any of their form, thoughtfully planned and well prepared cases provide: • Relevance. Cases depict real situations at a particular location and point in time. As such, they tend to provide an insight into the decision-making process. Students see the relevance of the case to their future careers. • Motivation. Cases can provide incentives for students to immerse themselves in real engineering tasks. Also, assuming the role of a practicing engineer can be challenging and stimulating. • Interaction
). Page 11.432.9 Table 1 Petroleum Engineering Program Assessment Objectives1. Broad Education, based on (3a,c,g,h,i,j,k) 1.1. CSM systems and design courses (3a,c,h,k) 1.2. Effective communication (3g) 1.3. Skills necessary for diverse and international professional career (3j), CSM** 1.4. Recognition of need and ability to engage in lifelong learning (3i,j)2. Solid foundation in engineering principles and practices, based on (3a,h) 2.1. Society of Petroleum Engineers’ ABET Program Criteria (3a) 2.2. Strong petroleum engineering faculty with diverse backgrounds (CSM**, PE***) 2.3. Technical seminars, field trips, and field sessions (3h) (CSM**, PE***)3. Applied
provide some anecdotes to give the flavor of unexpected challenges thatinevitably arose during contest operations and how the contest’s design allowed them to be met.The overarching goal of the WPBDC is to increase awareness of and interest in engineeringamong a large, diverse population of middle and high school students. As described in our earlierwork,2 its motivation is to attract young students of the United States to careers in engineering,math, and science in order to mitigate projected national shortfalls in the future. This leads tomore specific goals, which are that each contestant should: • Learn about engineering through a realistic, hands-on problem-solving experience. • Learn about the engineering design process—the application
M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from Vanderbilt University in 1999 and 2001, respectively. In 2001 she joined the Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Department at Rice University, where she is currently an Assistant Professor. Her current research interests include nanorobotic manipulation with haptic (force) feedback, haptic feedback and shared control between robotic devices and their human users for training and rehabilitation in virtual environments, control methodologies for improved performance of haptic interfaces and teleoperator systems, and educational haptics. She is a 2004 Office of Naval Research Young Investigator and the recipient of the NSF CAREER
Responsive As in MR above and presents multiple examples of coursework and clear evidence of applications to the discipline, job, hobby, or later courses HR Highly As in R above and presents many detailed examples Responsive of coursework and applications in career or other activitiesIt has been observed from the experience of implementing this grading system that there appearsto be a tendency for students to be satisfied with MR grade. Furthermore, since MR is a passinggrade and being a qualitative in nature it does not affect the students’ grade point average.Therefore, they do not feel encouraged to exert more
enrolled 14.The good news for departments seeking to maximize the number of U.S. citizens in their graduate programs is thatthe drop in foreign applications has been offset at many universities by rising demand from domestic students. AtDuke, for example, the number of domestic applications for graduate programs hit a 10-year high this year. It alsoexceeded the number of foreign applications for the first time since 2000. The University of Texas saw a similarflip-flop in the nationality of its graduate school applicants. "From my view, this is a very good thing," says LewSiegel, dean of Duke's grad school. "It means that more U.S. students are interested in STEM [science, technology,engineering, and mathematics] careers, and that's a trend we
. “Extensive research has shown that students learn best when theyperceive a clear need to know the material being taught”[19] being able to tie what is done in theclassroom to skills needed for future courses or better yet their future careers post college is a Page 11.319.10huge motivator to students.[20] If students believe that they really do need to know how to dosomething, they will tend to work harder at learning and do their best.[6, 21] - Don't focus on popularityThe author also learned that students will not necessarily like a new methodology or embrace it,even if they agree it is useful. Students resist change, and anything they perceive to
multidisciplinary projects. Page 11.1086.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Research in the Undergraduate EnvironmentAbstractThe benefits of research experiences for undergraduates are significant. For many faculty, thesewere the experiences that convinced us to pursue further education and a career in academia.However, performing research at an undergraduate institution carries with it certain challenges.In traditional research institutions, doctoral students perform most of the research activities, ledby the faculty. These students have completed at least their undergraduate courses and can beexpected to remain
enrolled in the ESL class showed a 57 percent average improvement on thegrammar test.12 For continued support throughout the semester, TAs may work with technicalwriting tutors and possibly graduate students enrolled in English or technical writing programs.This collaboration benefits all involved, providing valuable experience to English studentsconsidering pursuing teaching or technical writing careers and possibly financial assistance forEnglish graduate students, who are chronically underfunded.Finally, quantitative penalties for mechanical/stylistic errors can prove problematic. Forexample, if a TA spots a misspelled word that reappears multiple times in a report, he or she may
hours after Bob received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering Technology from California Polytechnical University, he began his career with General Motors in Southern California. Bob had many challenging assignments in the vehicle assembly side of the business on the factory floor in Industrial Engineering, Tooling, Production Supervision and Future Production Planning. His manufacturing expertise lead to assignments in vehicle design bringing real world production concerns and processes into the product engineering activity to design in quality and buildability. Bob’s manufacturing and engineering expertise were also applied during an assignment at Hughes Aircraft on
come.AcknowledgementsThis work has been supported by a planning grant from the National Science Foundation,Division of Engineering Education and Centers, under program solicitation NSF-03-562,"Department Level Reform of Undergraduate Engineering Education," Grant Number EEC-0343214. This work has also been supported by the College of Engineering & ComputerScience and the Department of Mathematics & Statistics at Wright State University. Page 11.1073.12Bibliography1. Adelman, Clifford, 1998, "Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analyses of Undergraduate Careers," U.S. Department of Education Report, May, 1998.2. Pomalaza-Raez
, Program Outcomes and the Assessment Methods must therefore be established and evaluated. These items are defined below: • Program Educational Objectives: Broad statements that describe career and professional accomplishments that the graduates are expected to achieve. • Program Outcomes: Narrow statements that describe what students are expected to know upon graduation. • Assessment: A method to identify, collect and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of the program objectives and outcomes. The assessment also considers how general education is applied and evaluated in the engineering courses. For example, how math is used in the engineering courses rather than how many math courses are required
2001. Dr. Campbell's research is focused on the area of computational design synthesis. Dr.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 2001. Dr. Campbell's research is focused on the area of computational design synthesis. Dr. Campbell has been acknowledged with best paper awards at conferences sponsored by the ASME, the ASEE, and the Design Society. His research focuses on computational methods that aid the engineering designer earlier in the design process than traditional optimization would. To date, he has been awarded $1.57 million in research funding, including the CAREER award for research into a generic graph topology optimization method. This research represents a
2006-1880: AN ACTIVE LEARNING FLUID MECHANICS COURSE BASED ONOUTCOMES ASSESSMENTIbrahim Olwi, King Abdulaziz University Dr. Ibrahim A. Olwi is an Associate Professor in the Aeronautical Engineering Department of King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He received his MS in 1980 from Ohio State University and his Ph.D. in 1984 from Tulane University, New Orleans. He started his academic career 20 years ago and has been teaching Fluid Mechanics and Aerodynamics courses since then. He published numerous papers in applied aerodynamics and modeling of energy systems. However, his recent interests are focused on thinking based learning strategies and gifted education. He frequently
foundationssuch as the Lemelson Foundation and the Kauffman Foundation. Within the last 20 years, thenumber of colleges and universities offering training in entrepreneurship grew from a few to over1500. Entrepreneurship education comes in a myriad of forms ranging from simply oneentrepreneurship course to many including interdisciplinary courses. Some interdisciplinaryvariations include entrepreneurial finance, entrepreneurial engineering, and entrepreneurship andtechnology-based new ventures. One of the reasons for the increasing rise in entrepreneurshipeducation is student demand. This education provides students with an entrepreneurial mindsetthat enables them to manage a career and/or a business. It provides students with the toolsneeded to pursue
Assistant Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sate University. She received her M.S. in Counselor Education, Student Affairs Administration from Radford University and M.S. in Career and Technical Education and B.S. in Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise both from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sate University. Page 11.887.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Lessons Learned: Implementing a Large-Scale Peer Mentoring ProgramAbstractBeginning in 1992 with the creation of the
others in business careers. In addition, not allentrepreneurship students will have studied business and/or engineering ethics. As a new courseoffering, many institutions are offering Entrepreneurship with no prerequisite courses.Thus, special circumstances pertain to the entrepreneurship student: • With its extensive emphasis on opportunity, technology, and innovation, entrepreneurship differs somewhat from other business ownership or from non- entrepreneurial work within organizations. Page 11.1209.3 • Entrepreneurs face expectations that they will aggressively compete based on
of year one engineering students withinthe Manufacturing and Operations Engineering Department at the University of Limerick.The rationale for the selection of this student sample was grounded on specific criteria: • It could be assumed that the preferential styles of these students are representative of the larger engineering student body as the cohort included students from both core and interdisciplinary engineering courses. • These students have chosen engineering as a career choice; therefore it is less likely that there would be the same level of heterogeneity in attitude, aptitude, and motivation as could be argued with second level (high school) students.Resulting from egalitarian access to
students seethemselves as engineers by graduation. Recent programs include opportunities for students toexplore the different engineering areas. These start to address the Curriculum of Identity. Theynot only challenge students to determine how engineering complements their own personalinterests, they try to excite and support students so they enter their careers as confident,contributing engineers.Service learning and social action activities can also develop the Curriculum of Identity if theparticulars of the action arise from the students’ choices. It is imperative that the activity’sdesign, action plan development, implementation, and execution is entirely motivated by thestudents. Some schools are able to support students who are free to
2006-1629: USING DIVERSITY STATEMENTS TO PROMOTE ENGAGEMENTWITH DIVERSITY AND TEACHINGJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ professional identity. Email: jturns
Annual Conference, session 1392, pp. 1-11, 2001.[10] D. Niemeier, R. Boulanger, P. Bayly, S. Schmid, K. Muraleetharan, and A. Barros, “Integration of engineering education and research: perspectives from the NSF civil and mechanical systems 1998 CAREER workshop,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 199-202, April, 2001.[11] A. Jenkins, R. Breen, R. Lindsay, and A. Brew, Reshaping Teaching in Higher Education : Linking Teaching and Research, London, Kogan Page, and Educational Development Association. Distributed by Stylus in the USA. 2003.[12] E. Takle, “University instruction in observational techniques: survey responses,” Bulletin of the American Meterological Society, vol. 81, pp. 1319-1325, 2000.[13] A. Kenimer, J
year, faculty members elected to focusonly on Track A students.In the STEPS curriculum, engineering, physics, and mathematics faculty members haveconstructed a curriculum to help students more closely link concepts from the three subject areas.Engineering faculty members have also constructed functional requirements for engineeringdesign projects to help students build tighter connections among the three subjects and tofacilitate broad adoption of the curriculum. Based on the functional requirements projectsshould: ‚ Anchor concepts of physics and mathematics in an engineering task ‚ Relate to social and practical needs to help students connect course to career ‚ Relate to specific follow-on engineering classes ‚ Require
-choice type questions becauseacademically weak students can get lucky by picking the right answer and academically strongstudents can get the question wrong by being tripped up by the wording. Allowing students towrite a couple of sentences to defend their answer can mitigate both of these concerns. By Page 11.521.7keeping the responses short, such questions are not very difficult to grade and the extra timespent reading pays off in a more accurate assessment of the student. Questions of this sort aregood practice for engineers who, during their careers, are often faced with selecting the bestoption to address a problem.Multiple choice
attractive than ever to the academe. In order to be successful, today’s collegestudents are computer literate and prefer to integrate their studies with work and family toachieve their career goals. Because technology has been socially embedded in their life, they aremore receptive to emerging technologies connected to both their personal and academic life.Many higher education institutions –– both public and private –– are aggressively pursuingoutreach to students without regard to geographical boundaries. These efforts are makingavailable degree and non-degree program offerings using electronic media. The institutions useinstructional delivery methods that do not require the student to be physically located at the samesite as the instructor
. However, engineering students require a more mathematically rigorouspresentation. This paper presents a method for teaching the topic of infinity in freshman levelmathematics course on discrete mathematics for engineering students, based on the ideas ofbijection and equivalency within the topic of set theory. We also present some ideas of how theconcept of infinity can be targeted in the K-12 environment.I. IntroductionAs part of long-standing efforts to enhance engineering education, the ASEE surveyed prevailingtrends in K-12 education1. Aiming to determine teachers' attitudes towards engineering as anintellectual and career challenge for their students, the ASEE study reveals an interestingparadox. It discovers that an overwhelming majority of