, especially in STEM-related programs 6,7.Nonetheless, the soft skills necessary to succeed in engineering are highlighted in accreditingagencies such as ABET 8,9To mitigate the lack of empathy, employers will often hire engineers who share empathy with theproduct’s target user. For example, the automotive industry has recognized that while femalesbuy 52% and have a significant influence on 85% of all car purchasing decisions, less than 20%of the automotive workforce is comprised of females 10. To address this disparity, theautomotive industry is actively seeking means to increase female employees within variousautomotive sectors. Likewise, it is important that engineering careers that design forhandicapped or elderly target users attract handicapped
outcomes [3] .Additional questions asked about perceived value of curriculum, and participantlikelihood of future entrepreneurial pursuits. Finally, the survey investigated studenttolerance for risk by directly asking about aversion to various forms (General, Financial,and Career), and presenting a hypothetical business investment scenarios. Thesevalidated measures have also been identified as important for individuals consideringbusiness creation [4] [5]. Collected data were analyzed in aggregate, and a Student's t-test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant (p < .05) positivechange for all survey questions.Results and Discussion Figure 8 shows average participant response to complete startup related actions. Forall
computer science and engineer- ing. His research interests include optical networks, real-time computing, mobile and wireless networks, cognitive radio networks, trust and information security, and semantic web. He is a recipient of the US Department of Energy Career Award. His research has been supported by US Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Research Laboratories, Ohio Supercomputer Center, and the State of Ohio. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Software Defined Radio based Signal Detection and RF Parameter Estimation Platform for Enhancing Electrical and Computer Engineering CurriculaAbstract: Supported by an
? Would QM skill, if well developed, be useful in your Engineering Career? Would you think that QM should be taught in all Engineering disciplines programs? If a student can understand Basic QM mathematical formulations well, then would you think dealing with other physical concepts such as electromagnetism, thermodynamics, classical mechanics, etc…. be easier ? Would knowing QM be enabling you to communicate more effectively in any physical arguments? Don’t you think that knowing QM as an intellectual tool would impress your interviewer and generally in your resume for job application would show an outstanding advantage? At some stages during physics class some students feel so overwhelmed by
communication capabilities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Peer Feedback on Teamwork Behaviors: Reactions and Intentions to ChangeIntroductionThe ability to work well in a team has been identified by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) as one of the required graduate outcomes that engineeringprograms must address to meet accreditation standards1. A career in industry will inevitablyinvolve team membership, as companies utilize teamwork to ensure quality control and processsmoothness2. Given this need, engineering programs must encourage the development of theinterpersonal skills necessary for teamwork in their curricula in order
came “Analysis of Networks and Strategies” and “DataMining and Risk Assessment” in the fall 2014 and then “Informatics and SoftwareDevelopment” in 2015.These new courses were seen as critical to an engineering managers’ career success giventhe countless systems producing massive amounts of data in today’s businessenvironment. Engineering professionals are necessary who can analyze complex data,extract knowledge from it, and deploy management strategies based on their insight togive or maintain a competitive advantage to their company.5 The business world hasalready made known that there will be a dire need in the next decade for professionalswho can harness data into meaningful information that can be used in the making ofcritical decisions.6
andteaching the elementary, middle and high school students about internet safety and security wasgiven special importance during this period [10] [13]. They also have age appropriate resourcesfor kids . AFA has taken a step further to educate students on Cyber Security by organizingactivities for students from Elementary level. The ESCEI aims at teaching the students at theselevels about the importance of STEM education and careers in an interactive way. They designeddifferent modules for K-3 graders and for 4th to 6th graders.Cyber Security programs for Non IT StudentsCyber Security programs usually have multi disciplinary approach covering Management, Law,Business, psychology and Technology areas [18]. Though this course is considered ideal
based on the need of the program constituencies. The current PEOs for the MEprogram at UTSA states that the within a few years after graduation, the graduates will: (1) haveengineering careers in industry, government, and/or will pursue advanced graduate orprofessional degrees, (2) apply their engineering skills to their careers, (3) continue to advancetheir knowledge, communication and leadership skills by using technology, continuingeducation, solving problems, and serving in technical or professional societies, and (4) applytheir understanding of societal, environmental, and ethical issues to their professional activities.These PEOs are consistent with the institutional mission, and the program’s constituents’ needs.ABET EAC used to require
design, manufacturing, and instrumentation.Prof. Amos G. Winter V, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Amos Winter is the Ratan N. Tata Career Development Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechan- ical Engineering at MIT. He earned a B.S. from Tufts University (2003) and an M.S. (2005) and Ph.D. (2011) from MIT, all in mechanical engineering. Prof. Winter’s research group, the Global Engineering and Research (GEAR) Lab, characterizes the unique technical and socioeconomic constraints of emerg- ing markets and then uses engineering science and product design to create high-performance, low-cost, globally-relevant technologies. The group primarily focuses on assistive devices, brackish water desali- nation
participation, and a summary of lessons learned from thesepolicy experiences.I. IntroductionPolicy entrepreneurs promote significant policy change, and usually: have social acuity, defineproblems, build teams and lead by example1. Entrepreneurs “…wait in and around governmentwith their solutions (already) in hand, waiting for problems to float by to which they can attachtheir solutions, waiting for a development in the political stream they can use to theiradvantage”2. The policy agenda setting process “is one of choices looking for issues, problemslooking for decision situations, solutions looking for problems, and politicians looking for petproblems or policies by which they might advance their careers” 2-3. There are negativedefinitions of policy
- each team found particular difficulties in doing this, but the experience is viewed (both by instructors and students) as beneficial for the students' early career. c. The "client" for the project was represented by the multidisciplinary research team (including views from an agricultural economist, a systems engineer, the director of a renewable energy outreach effort for farming coops, and a policy analyst). Such multidisciplinary input from the "clients" tended to inhibit the student teams' independent search for multidisciplinary information on their own, but it tended to sharpen their action and
pathways study of engineering undergraduates, in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. 2008: Pittsburgh, PA. p. 1-17.2. Pierrakos, O., et al. On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. in Proceedings of the 39th Frontiers in Education Conference. 2009. San Antonio, TX: IEEE.3. O'Callaghan, E.M. and N.D.E. Jerger, Women and girls in science and engineering: Understanding the barriers to recruitment, retention and persistence across the educational trajectory. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2006. 12: p. 209-232.4. Mau, W.C., Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career
. After that a newprogram proposal was submitted and approved by the institute’s governing body.Results and DiscussionThe selected Engineering Technology program has both major and support courses to preparegraduates for technical and supervisory careers in a variety of industries. The program combinestechnical knowledge with communications skills and teamwork to provide the flexibility neededin today’s rapidly changing marketplace. The selected program educational objectives are: Demonstrate technical proficiency in the field Apply quantitative reasoning and critical thinking in solving technical problems Effectively communicate technical knowledge, ideas, and proposals to others, including upper management Lead
description of thesecourses to include the topics covered in the training sessions, thus making them an essential partof the course content.What We Hope to Achieve: We want to expose our students, faculty, and staff to inclusion anddiversity issues of which they might not be aware. By requiring students to go through training inboth the sophomore and seniors years, we hope to achieve maximum impact. The early exposureas sophomores will give the students a chance to apply the concepts they learn throughout theiracademic careers, while the second round of training as seniors will serve as a refresher coursebefore they begin their team-based senior projects and, later, enter the engineering workforce.We specifically designed this training curriculum to
2 =0.04682564∴F(t) = 0.2164i.e., 21.64 devices would fail after 10 years.3. Correlation Between Fundamentals and Preparing the Workforce for21st Century. The technology is evolving all the time, but the fundamentalprinciples hardly change. It is therefore the solemn duty of instructors in theclassroom to integrate the fundamentals in any State-of-Art technology. Thiswill ensure that the engineering students who are product of such teachingmethodology never become obsolete. During my own teaching tenure I havegraduated several hundreds of students who are placed in the high techindustry regionally, nationally, as well as internationally, who are vibrantand dynamic throughout their careers as have been found from the surveysof
more motivating, appealing and thereforeefficient manner through the use of digital animation and computer software7. In addition toutilizing methods like these in the classroom, the authors of this paper are putting forth additionaleffort to better prepare students for their career after college. This is being accomplished byprovided students with instructions describing how to create these interactive images on theirown. The idea is that they can become better acquired with the software which could beappealing to future employers, and they can use these skills for verifying the solution to varioushomework assignments in a variety of classes, and the like outside of college.Model DevelopmentThe topics of the interactive images (recorded
- ing his MAT as part of Boston University’s STEEP program which gives students the ability to earn an engineering BA and MAT in 5 years. Michael is also a member of BU’s varsity cross country and track and field teams and volunteers an after-school program for Boston Public School students. A native of Boston, Michael would like to return to the Boston Public Schools as a Math/STEM teacher after completion of the STEEP program.Dr. Gretchen Fougere, Boston University Dr. Fougere has split her career thus far in industrial and academic research and product development, management, and STEM education. At Boston University, she leads and has founded several nationally impactful technology and engineering programs that
to optimize the model. In our contrived problem, students are forced torethink the model, and how experiment can feed back and integrate to modeling efforts. Thisprofoundly reinforces the importance of virtual and real systems integration as a skill for the newknowledge manufacturing age.Current Course Status and ExpansionWe have now offered this course twice to a total of 32 graduate students. The courses have beenco-instructed by two faculty, one Adjunct Professor (with a 35-year professional career) in thefinite element-based simulation content of the course, and the second instructor in theexperimental and data analysis portion of the class (Figure 3). The OEM P.E. also gave lecturesin the importance and the use of testing and
participants are being surveyed using established valid and reliable measuresto identify any changes in students’ professional identity, research self-efficacy, intentions topursue graduate education and careers in biomedical engineering, and thinking and working likea scientist/engineer. Participants are also being surveyed to determine the extent to whichparticipation influences their sense of belonging as a researcher and development ofcommunication skills.Since this REU Site began in 2015, pre- and post-program interviews and surveys of BMECUReS REU participants have been conducted for only one cohort at this time. However, thepreliminary results are encouraging in that they suggest that the BME CUReS REU participantsexperienced increases in
Paper ID #17510A Comparison and Evaluation of Aeronautical Engineering Learning Out-comes using an Airborne Flight Laboratory and a Flight Simulator Labora-tory.Mr. Raymond Colin Lewis, University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy Commenced flying career in the Australian Defence Force; became an Airline Pilot; returned to university to inform work as a Human Factors facilitator for the airline. Worked in Middle East as pilot before commencing as a Senior Lecturer for the University of New South Wales (Canberra) in 2001. As well as teaching, operated University aircraft for Aeronautical Engineering
forthe quality of life and welfare of the society. However the skills listed above are highly correlatedwith the quality level of engineering education given. Country specific educational habits andopportunities affect the learning pattern of individuals enrolled in engineering programs andtherefore have impact on the career and future. In this study, possible improvement suggestionsfor the engineering education in Turkey will be given while comparing the teaching methods andconditions of two Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditedsurveying engineering education programs in Turkey and USA.1. IntroductionEngineering education in Turkey and USA are given with different number of total credits,curriculum, degree and
countries. For example in Pakistan firstBiomedical Engineering program was offered in early 1990’s. The major cause was lack ofresources and awareness which eventually resulted in absence of defined career path neither inacademia nor in industry. The situation is changing now with a positive rate. However, there stillis only a small fraction of students opting for this field in their undergraduate studies. This hasposed a challenge to academia to introduce students of different background to thismultidisciplinary field. A new introductory course for undergraduate ECE students was neededespecially. Several courses are offered at various institutes for non-biomedical students; howevera single course covering the breadth of this field without going
Pennsylvania State University. Following completion of his Ph.D., he took a faculty position in The Department of Kinesi- ology and Health at The University of Wyoming. After three years in this position, he decided to pursue a more research intensive career path and undertook postdoctoral training in Biomedical Engineering at The Mayo Clinic. In 2009, he began a faculty position in the Department of Health, Exercise, and Sport Sciences at Texas Tech University. In January 2012, Dr. Domire joined East Carolina University as an Associate Professor in Department of Kinesiology. Dr. Domire’s work focuses on the impact of tissue material properties on physiological and mechanical function. He also conducts research on computer
autobiography.After students had time to fill out the autobiography in class quietly on their own we would goaround the room and share the responses to the questions. Students were comfortable with thatstructure and sharing. The author would summarize occasionally for the group what commonthemes she heard or ask follow-up questions about activities students mentioned. This entireactivity takes about 40-50 minutes and is best used as an ice breaker on the first day of class.The author would also share her own technical autobiography about what drew her into STEMand emphasizing the idea that career paths can be wandering and unconventional, but that isprobably more common than people may think. The lesson objective is that students getcomfortable with each
].Administrators, however, make decisions regarding the academic careers of teachers, specificallyin terms of tenure decisions. Tenure is typically granted after a teacher or researcher hassuccessfully completed a probationary period and performed with adequate distinction, asdefined by the relevant institution [6]. This definition of adequate distinction however, is largelyambiguous at many institutions. Furthermore, policies, procedures, and criteria for the evaluationof teaching in higher education contribute to the marginalization of teaching within the rewardstructures of universities and colleges [5]. Many institutions unintentionally marginalize teachingby over-emphasizing scholarly research and funding. When this occurs, oddly enough
Engineering Education, 2016 Integrating instrumentation and mechatronics education in Mechanical Engineering curriculumAbstractA diverse and effective undergraduate mechanical curriculum should integrate learning from thedifferent spheres of mechanical engineering, educate students about recent technologicaladvances, and motivate them to pursue careers in this field. However, a seamless integration ofvaried topics in mechanical engineering curriculum is challenging, as courses range fromtraditional engineering classes in thermal fluids, solids and controls, to courses coveringemerging technological aspects of instrumentation, sensors, measurement techniques, advancedcontrol algorithms, electronics, and electrical
improve undergraduate engineering education. Prior to his academic career, Dr. Connolly worked as a systems integration engineer on the Space Station and Space Shuttle programs at the NASA Johnson Space Center, and as a reliability engineer on the B-2 Stealth Bomber program for the Depart- ment of Defense. Dr. Connolly earned a B.E. in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Stony Brook, an M.S.E. in Aerospace Engineering, and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, both from UT Austin. He served as a graduate teaching assistant for six years during his graduate studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Graduate Teaching Assistant Certification as a
paper describes our origins and approach, andsummarizes some of our progress and challenges to date.IntroductionThere is increasing demand for higher education to produce graduates who are job- or career-ready 1,2. For example, most technical companies expect that new hires will be able to tacklecomplex multidisciplinary problems, and the ability to innovate is now an “integrative meta-attribute” desired in all engineering graduates 3. Pulling together disparate fields in innovativeways is now an expectation. A series of reports from the National Academies, e.g., “Educatingthe Engineer of 2020” 4 and “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” 5 emphasize the need forlifelong learning that bridges multiple disciplines. Engineering educators in
engineering students who will enter nonacademic research and industry careers. The first model contrasts with numerous examples of ways complex problems are solved in a classroom and the industrial setting. In a classroom setting, due to time constraints and the need to teach theoretical concepts, problems selected need to be finite and resolvable by students within the extent of the topic that is studied. In industry the complex problem exists, and the correct theory to be applied and the techniques that need to be engaged must be correctly found. Due to this shortage of experience in handling complex problems, students who are entering the industrial setting from the classroom setting often have not been exposed to techniques identifying complex
students’ development as learners.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty