Asee peer logo
Displaying results 6271 - 6300 of 11463 in total
Conference Session
ERM: Mental Health and Wellness
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cortney Holles, Colorado School of Mines
Paper ID #37235Faculty-Student Interaction and Its Impact on Well-Being inHigher Education for STEMCortney E Holles (Teaching Professor) Cortney Holles is a Teaching Professor in the Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at Colorado School of Mines where she has taught and developed the required first-year ethics and writing course for STEM majors since 2004. She also teaches science communication and service learning. She defended her educational criticism/action research dissertation on “Faculty-Student Interaction and Impact on Well-Being in Higher Education” and earned her Ed.D in 2021. She is now engaged in
Conference Session
Project Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Derek Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University; Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University
understanding of the problem. Moreover, all sponsors indicated that they would prefer a hybrid model over either F2F or virtual communications. This would give students the flexibility to be present on location at the sponsor’s facility for critical project milestones but have the flexibility to meet virtually with their sponsors more frequently throughout the duration of the project.b. Student's Perspective: At the end of the senior design project, all students are asked to write a reflection statement that addresses the following questions: 1. Actual timeline compared to the proposed timeline, 2. Actual costs compared to proposed costs, 3. Ethical considerations for the project, 4. Effectiveness
Conference Session
Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott Hamilton, York College of Pennsylvania; Kelly Arcieri, York College of Pennsylvania
studentoutcomes that we felt were most applicable and most reasonable for supervisors to assess. Itshould be noted that the ABET student outcomes recognize the importance of technical skills and“soft” or professional skills and require both. This is in line with what employers are saying theywant from future employees as well – technical skills, of course, but also professional skills [14,23]. Examples of desired professional skills include leadership, an ability to effectively work ina team, communication skills (both verbal and written), strong work ethic, flexibility/adaptability, and ability to work with others [24, 25]. Conforming to theory and practice, ourassessment tool focused on professional competence and essentially asked the employers
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 3 - Humanitarian Design
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Noah Bezanson; Dhinesh Radhakrishnan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Nafissa Maïga
Zimbabwe (n=25) Senegal (n=138) Education / college / university 24% 24% STEM knowledge 60% 26% Knowledge of tools 12% - Professional competencies - 13% Attitudes (Self-confidence, 12% 11% Pragmatist, Optimist, Determined, Creative, Responsible) Problem Solving - 8% Ethical - 7% Table 3: Skills and knowledge required for engineeringBoth Zimbabwe and
Conference Session
LEAD Technical Session 1: Fostering Leadership Identity Development and DEI in Engineering Students and Professionals
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
toencourage engineering faculty is by introducing leadership pedagogies, practices, andepistemologies. Some popular frameworks that have been used in engineering leadershipresearch and practice are transformational leadership, servant leadership, and ethical leadership[9]. While incorporating leadership in the engineering education ecosystem is challenging, thefinal challenge that Klassen et al. [7] describe is disrupting marginalization. As a predominatelyWhite and male-dominated field, Klassen et al. [7] state, “deeper cultural and structural changesare required for leadership and engineering to reflect the experiences of all students, not justthose who fit the image of historically dominant groups.” Much of the work in both engineeringand
Conference Session
ERM: New Research Methods and Tools
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nadia Kellam, Arizona State University; Madeleine Jennings, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
numbers of participants [3], [10], we could continue to couch our small numbersstudies in large datasets or proposals.This leads to questions for us, as a community, to consider. Is it important to have a large data setif we are not going to analyze all of the data? Would it be better for us to have smaller data setsthat we analyze more critically and deeply? Would it be better to have a smaller number ofparticipants and collect more in-depth data from those participants? Or does having a larger dataset help us have more credibility when sharing our studies with traditional engineering faculty?Is there an ethical concern around collecting data that is not included in later analysis?Generalizable/Contextual Tensions:Generalizability was discussed
Conference Session
EMD Technical Session 2: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laramie Potts, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Huiran Jin
injustices, polarizedsociety and that engendered modern societal discord within the built environment. Such issuesraised during the 4IR will require HEIs to develop greater capacity for ethical and interculturalunderstanding, placing a high premium on “soft skills” in engineering education withadaptability to address injustices from past practices (e.g. [14, 15]). Competence and skilldevelopment for workers in the nascent multibillion-dollar geospatial industry is prescribed bythe Geospatial Technology Competency Model (GTCM) [17]. Geospatial technologyprofessionals work in a variety of specializations of the geospatial industry includingsurveying/geomatics and mapping, civil engineering, architecture, urban planning, forestry, andcoastal and marine
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 8
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kavitha Chintam, Northwestern University; Alexis N. Prybutok, University of Washington; Chloé M. Archuleta; Adrien Deberghes; Beth DiBiase; Ruihan Li; Jeffrey Richards; Linsey Seitz; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
highlight a small fraction of this new body ofwork, where students begin to engage in discussion of ARDEI concepts and ARDEI context istaught explicitly in engineering courses or is included in engineering problem solving.Some educators have begun adding context to show the connections between engineering andsociety to engineering examples, homework, and textbook problems that have traditionallyfocused on the technical aspects of engineering problem solving. Hirschfield and Mayes capturestudent interest in a chemical engineering kinetics course by using tangible examples of baking,antifreeze, and flame retardants, and asking students to reflect on the ethical considerationspresent in the design and use of these chemicals [14]. Riley’s
Conference Session
COED: Spotlight on Diverse Learners
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vijesh J. Bhute, Imperial College London; Ellen Player; Deesha Chadha, Imperial College London
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education Division (COED)
received from the Education Ethics Review Process Team prior toconducting this study.Questionnaire 1 was distributed to teaching staff via Teaching and Learning Network on MSTeams. 34 teachers participated in this questionnaire from different departments across theCollege. Questionnaire 2 was distributed to second-, third- and fourth-year undergraduatestudents from the Department of Chemical Engineering who have experience with universitylearning. 55 students (~14.4%) participated in this questionnaire across these three yeargroups. Both questionnaires 1 and 2 were launched at the beginning of the academic year.Questionnaire 3 was distributed to second year undergraduate students in the Department ofChemical Engineering at the end of teaching
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Session: Understanding Issues Faced by Graduate Students and Faculty
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mais Kayyali, Florida International University; Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
Conference Session
Disciplinary Engineering Education Research – Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mackinley Love, University of Calgary; Philip Egberts, University of Calgary; Joanna Wong, University of Calgary; Miriam Nightingale, University of Calgary
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
was done through an open-ended question asking if participantssaw value in the connection between their laboratories and their in-class learning and futurecareers. Critical reflection has been found to enhance applied learning in professional programssuch as nursing, increasing the quality of student reasoning and understanding [8].Informed consent was obtained with the approval of the Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Boardof the University of Calgary. These surveys guided students through a critical reflection of theirlaboratory experience using Ash and Clayton’s DEAL model [5]. The revised Bloom’s taxonomy[6] was used as a tool to assess the level of learning required in the laboratory. The student surveyquestions are provided in Appendix
Conference Session
Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 5
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hye Rin Lee, University of Delaware; Sotheara Veng, University of Delaware; Yiqin Cao, University of Delaware; Juliana Baer, University of Delaware; Teomara Rutherford, University of Delaware; Austin Cory Bart
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)
[Machine Organization and Assembly Language] (n = 13) ● remove, CS[Introduction to Systems Programming] (n = 2) ● remove, same [Data Structures and Introduction to Algorithms] (n = 1) ● remove, CS[Computers, Ethics, and
Conference Session
Design Thinking and Student Design Teams
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eileen Fong, Nanyang Technological University; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Shamita Venkatesh, Nanyang Technological University; Mi Song Kim, University of Western Ontario; Jingyi Liu, Nanyang Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
their main points and therelated direct statements. These reflections were mapped to the five EDIPT stages andcentered on their individual and team reactions, which recorded the students' problem-solvingand decision-making skills development throughout the course. Ethical approval wasobtained from the first author’s university.Data AnalysisContent analysis was used to analyze the five reflections. Content analysis is a technique thathas been extensively used in studies analyzing newspaper articles, interview transcripts, andtextbooks. The deductive content analysis method was used to conduct the coding processdrawing upon the EDIPT framework. Cue words or sentences in the reflections included inthe analysis must show evidence of the design
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shruti Misra, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Soyoung Kang, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
how to develop a solution concept based onsponsor requirements, make design choices and tradeoffs, and evaluate their design in a practicalsetting [19]. Several studies have investigated frameworks or systems that guide such decisionmaking in design [20-22], design self-efficacy or the ability to complete a design task due to beliefin their ability to succeed [23-26], and preparedness to tackle technical and non-technicalchallenges of the project [27,28]. Other aspects of engineering design that students learn throughcapstones include systems engineering, ethical concerns related to their design, and professionalresponsibility.In addition to advancing engineering design and decision-making abilities (so-called “hard”skills), students also
Conference Session
Thinking Outside the STEM Box: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joseph Valle, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor; Amy Slaton, Drexel University; Donna Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
engineering education asexperiencing similar tensions - playing rigor games to survive within engineering [12],struggling and failing to create a liberatory space, reproducing dynamics of oppression.With all this in the balance, the only option is to dare yet hope, and dream, and risk, andact, and try again. I am confident in this path because of powerful educationalexperiences in my own life that have reoriented me - for example, an experience during a“work week” at Highlander that challenged me to viscerally shift my relationship withwork. While it is difficult for me to articulate, the experience of breaks from work incommunity was so powerful that it began to break down the engineering-capitalist-protestant work ethic so deeply ingrained in me
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Swetha Nittala, Uber Technologies; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
education and practice and has been working in the areas of innovation, leadership development, inclusion, ethics, and, faculty development leveraging design research and mixed methods approaches.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Swarthmore College Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education andDr. Helen L. Chen, Swarthmore College Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical En- gineering at Stanford University. She has been involved in several major engineering education
Conference Session
Teaching Methodology & Assessment 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
George Frederick Halow, University of Michigan; Maia E. Herrington, University of Michigan; Melanie Spare, Siemens Digital Industries Software; Shannon O'Donnell, Siemens Digital Industries Software; Gilbert Morris, Retired (formerly Siemens)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
and teamwork skills; provide training in critical and creative thinking skills and problem-solving methods; produce graduates who are conversant with engineering ethics and the connections between technology and society…” [1]More recent data suggest that academia is not sufficiently moving the needle. Figure 1, below, isan excerpt from the 2017 Tech-Clarity report “Close the Engineering Skills Gap” [2] whereleaders of companies ranging from aerospace, automotive, machinery, energy, and consumerproducts industries indicate areas in which academia is not preparing students well for futureemployment. Figure 1: Top Skills Schools Do NOT Prepare Students Well For [2]Additionally, Listing 1 provides quotes
Conference Session
Governance, Diplomacy, and International Comparisons in Engineering Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yi Cao, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Xiaoye Ma, Tsinghua University; Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette ; David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; William C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Xiaofeng Tang, Tsinghua University; Zheping Xie, Tsinghua University; Haiyan Zhao
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Dr. Xiaofeng Tang, Tsinghua University Xiaofeng Tang is Associate Professor in the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University. Prior to his current position, Dr. Tang worked as an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineer- ing Education at The Ohio State University. He did postdoctoral research in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received
Conference Session
Socially Responsible Engineering I: Context, Innovation, and Reflection
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University; Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Linda Ann Duke, Kansas State University, Marianna Kistler Beach Museum of Art; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible P.E., Texas Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral candidate in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University Jeong-Hee Kim is Chairperson and Professor of Curriculum Studies and Teacher Education in the De- partment of Curriculum and Instruction at Texas Tech University. Kim is a curriculum theorist, teacher educator, and
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: First-Year Experiences
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
peers.As we enter an age when diversity is highly valued, inclusion and equity are becoming commonterms associated with learning and work environments. ABET EAC Student Outcome 5 specifiescreating “a collaborative and inclusive environment” as part of teamwork, and, as such, it isessential we educate our incoming students on these topics and provide support for their socialand emotional development as part of their professional development.The authors present a new model for an engineering orientation for first-year students thatintroduces them to professional codes of conduct and educates students on the importance ofacting professionally and ethically in classrooms, laboratories, makerspaces, and even in thehallways. The orientation also
Conference Session
Bringing a Different Perspective
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Agnes Germaine d'Entremont P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Andrea S. Webb, The University of British Columbia; Sean Maw P.Eng., University of Saskatchewan; Jennifer Kirkey, Douglas College
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
Site 1A Site 1B Site 2 Faculty 1 of 1 (Engineering) 1 of 1 (Physics) 1 of 2 (Engineering) Students 2 of 2 undergraduate engineering, 2 of 3 undergraduate engineering 1 of 3 graduate engineering 0 of 1 graduate engineering Other 1 graphic artist -Data CollectionThe collection of data about these projects is considered to be program evaluation by theresearch ethics boards at both the University of British Columbia and the University ofSaskatchewan, and therefore was exempt from requirements for formal ethics
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Arielle Marie Rainey, Colorado School of Mines; Dina Verdin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
School of Mines and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Graduate Programs. Her research and teach- ing bring anthropological perspectives to bear on questions of social responsibility and engineering. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Her book Extracting Accountability: Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility will be published by The MIT Press in 2021. She is also the co-editor of Energy and Ethics? (Wiley-Blackwell, 2019) and the author of Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014). She regularly pub- lishes in peer
Conference Session
Socially Responsible Engineering I: Context, Innovation, and Reflection
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Marie Stettler Kleine, Colorado School of Mines; Kari Zacharias, Concordia University; Desen Sevi Ozkan, Tufts University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
to suggest how they ought to solve it. The third approach, socialjustice-oriented engineering, takes a stronger normative stance. Contextualization here is ameans to help students identify social injustices that engineers can then help to ameliorate [6].We interpret the results of our content review through our personal experiences as researchersand educators in science and technology studies (STS) and engineering education. We, like manyengineering educators, are wary of overly prescriptive ethics instruction which elides powerdynamics and places too much onus on individual actors [7]. Contextualization as an end is atempting solution; however, we also recognize the risks of illuminating complexity withoutproviding direction [8]. We see
Conference Session
Engineering Communication I: History and Praxis
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
, engineeringdesign, and project management(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility: understand professional and ethicalresponsibilities as they apply to both particular engineering projects and to the engineering profession as a whole(g) an ability to communicate effectively with both expert and non-expert audiences(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context: understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and social context and use thatunderstanding in the formulation of engineering problems, solutions, and designs(i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, lifelong learning: the development of the researchand analytical skills
Conference Session
Teamwork: Priming, Empathy, and Metacognition
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Justin L. Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
role of empathy in various domains, including engineering ethics, design, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue Uni- versity’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the 2021 division chair-elect for the ASEE Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering and Society division and is the Editorial Board Chair for the Online Ethics Center.Mr. Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez, Purdue University at West Lafayette Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. He previously worked as an export business development manager at a Spanish radio
Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Joseph Murphy, University of California, Los Angeles; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
implemented change the following weekend.He is thus experiencing mutual benefits between his engineering education and his militaryservice in the National Guard.DiscussionThis research on RANGE students mirrors some of our findings on student veterans in general.Like SVE’s, RANGE students were motivated to join the military primarily by financial reasonsand were motivated to major in engineering because of family influences, an opportunity topursue their inclinations for mechanical pursuits, and to earn a good living. While severalparticipants did mention a service ethic as influencing their decision to join the military, thistheme was not quite as strong as it was in our earlier studies of SVEs. The RANGE studentswere also more likely to indicate
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineers and Professional Development - June 23rd
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering
learning and development [1]. Broadly, studies of student engagement have oftenexamined relationships between a student’s educational experiences and the outcomes of interest,finding that, in general, higher engagement was linked to gains in outcomes such as learning andpersistence [2], [3]. In particular, engagement in co-curricular settings, or experiences outside theclassroom, has been linked to the development of several technical and professional outcomesfor engineering students such as leadership, ethical decision making, teamwork, andcommunication [4]–[9]. Beyond those outcomes, co-curricular engagement has also been linkedto outcomes such as self-efficacy and a sense of belonging, which can improve retention andpersistence in engineering
Conference Session
Exploration of Broad Issues and Promotion of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Latin, had greater “transfer” value than others in facilitating learning. Forexample, Latin would help people think more rigorously, thus a student wishing to enterOxbridge should demonstrate proficiency in Latin in the entrance examination. John HenryNewman wrote to his sister Jemima in 1845, predating faculty psychology- “The great pointis to open men’s minds – to educate them-and make them logical it does not matter what thesubject is, which you use for this purpose. If you will make them think in politics you willmake them think in religion”. In the twenty first century Brad J. Kallenburg showed howreasoning in design is analogous with reasoning in ethics, and how the design paradigm canbe a means of bringing engineering ethics into
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keith W. Buffinton, Bucknell University; Vincent P. Manno, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Joseph J. Helble, Dartmouth College; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
. Developing an entrepreneurial mindset is an important part of our education of 1 5 3.4 undergraduate engineering students.11. Developing ethics and empathy for others is an important part of our education 2 5 3.8 of undergraduate engineering students.12. Developing an appreciation for the global context of engineering is an 2 5 3.9 important part of our education of undergraduate engineering students.13. Engineering education research and innovation is important at my
Collection
2016 Public Policy Colloquium
Authors
Norm Matloff
Pro-Industry “Research” RemediesNorm MatloffUniversity ofCalifornia at Davis • Most research with findings favorable to the industry are ASEE Engineering by researchers with financial ties to the industry (e.g.Deans Council Conference Zavodny “Each H-1B creates 2.62 jobs”), Peri, theSetting the Brookings people).Stage • Much of this research cuts ethical corners, e.g. ZavodnyWhy DoEmployers paper.Hire ForeignStudentsInstead ofAmericans?DataRemedies (andNon-Remedies)ConclusionsForeign TechWorkers in the U.S.: Failures and Pro-Industry “Research” RemediesNorm MatloffUniversity ofCalifornia at Davis • Most