University, West Lafayette. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering Students’ Self-Reflections, Teamwork Behaviors, and Academic PerformancesAbstractThis complete research paper explores the relationship between engineering students’ self-reflection, teamwork, and academic performance.Prior studies in engineering education emphasize the importance of using effective teachingstrategies to enhance students’ academic performances. These strategies help engineeringeducators in multiple ways, including creating a stimulating learning environment, activelyinvolving students in the learning process, enhancing students’ engagement, and improvingstudents
Madison University, Nagel has helped to develop and teach the six course engineering design sequence which represents the spine of the curriculum for the Department of Engineering. The research and teaching interests of Dr. Nagel tend to revolve around engineering design and engineering design education, and in particular, the design conceptualization phase of the design process. He has performed research with the US Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the US Air Force Academy, and he has received grants from the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
including networks and data communications, electric circuits, systems design and com- munication systems.Dr. Firas Hassan, Ohio Northern University Firas Hassan is an associate professor at Ohio Northern University. He got his Ph.D. from The university of Akron. His research interest are in the area of embedded computing of real-time image processing techniques. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 How Analogies Fit in a Framework for Supporting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Electric Circuits Course1. IntroductionIn recent years, many engineering programs have placed an emphasis on instilling theentrepreneurial mindset (EM) in their graduates. The expected
James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology at Arizona State Univer- sity. For the last three years he also held the Elmhurst Energy Chair in STEM education at the University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25243 of Birmingham in the UK. Previously, Dr. Middleton was Associate Dean for Research in the Mary Lou Fulton College of Education at Arizona State University, and Director of the Division of Curriculum and Instruction. He received
. Her experiences as a student and educator contributed to her support of learning settings where students’ diverse backgrounds are valued and included in the curriculum. Currently, she is a Ph.D. candidate in Literacy/Biliteracy at the University of Texas at El Paso engaging in research on students’ experiences in bilingual programs from their own voices and perspectives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Latinx Persistence in and Beyond the Degree: Intersections of Gender and Ethnicity Hispanic-serving institutions [HSIs], which enroll almost half of Hispanic studentsattending college [1], HSIs represent less than 6% of
innovation, creativity, design, and entrepreneurship.The UW Libraries have graciously provided 2500 square feet of space to develop a prototypeLibrary Innovation Center (LIC) during the Fall 2016 semester. Lessons learned and equipmentpurchased will form the basis of the Student Innovation Center (SIC) planned for the EERB.Groundbreaking for the EERB was October 7, 2016 with a scheduled completion of Spring 2019.The purpose of the LIC/SIC is to provide experiential learning space for STEAM (science,technology, engineering, arts, and math) students. The LIC/SIC provides a location for studentsto explore ideas, complete class projects, or pursue an entrepreneurial innovation. Also, thespace is available to conduct classes and workshops. The space is
), and onebrave sophomore (1).BackgroundAs described by Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick in a work in progress at ASEE in 2017 [16], thecourse that these students participated in was organized around objectives that included studentlearning about working in teams and collaborating while building drones.The output of each team was a jointly-constructed drone and a team-designed plan for a “pro-social drone”—that is, a design that would somehow have a positive impact on society. Studentswere challenged to wrestle with what it means for something to be pro-social. In the syllabusstudents were alerted to the ways that this class was likely to be different than others that theyhad taken before.As Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick describe it, the course was
creativity in science and engineering, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4-course module focused on creativity and problem solving leadership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An exploratory study of student perceptions of creativity and its importance in their leadership developmentAbstractCreativity is essential for success in the engineering field at all levels of individual development,from novices to experts and from early
lack of support, growth capital, and general entrepreneurial culture. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25206Dr. James H. Lampley, East Tennessee State University Dr. Lampley received his Ed.D. from East Tennessee State University and currently serves as a Pro- fessor and Research Specialist in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis Department at ETSU. Dr. Lampley has been an ELPA faculty member since 2004. As a Research Specialist he works with dissertation students on quantitative research topics. Dr. Lampley also serves as the Graduate Program Coordinator
U.S. patents/patent applications and is the recipient of two NSF grants ($800K) and several internal and in-kind grants ($30M). He has received numerous awards and honors including the Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence Award, Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Young Researcher Award, School of Engineering Distinguished Award for Excellence in Research, Council of Fellows Faculty Research Award, IBM Vice President Award for Innovation Excel- lence, IBM Lean Recognition Award, Graduate Student Award for Excellence in Research, and Outstand- ing Academic Achievement in Graduate Studies. He was recently named 40 Under 40: Class of 2019 by the Erie Reader. His projects and achievements have been
research team went to Bruni High School and Hebbronville High School inthe Summer of 2019 to examine and verify facilities, to deliver and set up remote teaching andMaking materials, and to gain a familiarity with the classrooms that the STEM mentors would bementoring and teaching in. The STEM mentors themselves have not been to the classroomsphysically, and have only been present through technological assistance. The overall goal was toget a sense of the capabilities of the classrooms and to verify that the classes would have theproper starting conditions and materials for the project.The first phase of the project establishes a baseline using the most common, though alsoleast-embodied, technological assist: teleconferencing. For this phase, we
, Engagement , and Migration in Engineering Programs,” J. Eng. Educ., 2008[9] K. P. Brannan and P. C. Wankat, “Survey of First-Year Programs,” in 2005 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition (2005).[10] J. Sangster, “Work in Progress: Privilege and Diversity as Determiners ofEngineering Identity and Success,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paperID# 26153 (2019).
, c, d, a, c, d, b, d 15References[1] H.R. Goldberg and C.D. Hanlon, “The Knowledge Paradox: The more I know, the less I canclearly explain,” Medical Education 53:13-14, 2019.[2] M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 93, Issue3, pp 223-231, July 2004.[3] S. Freeman, S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M.P.Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415, 2014.http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23/8410[4] S.J. Dickerson, R.M. Clark, and A. Jain, (2017) No
., Garcia Jr., S. Creating a Learning Environment that Engages EngineeringStudents in the Classroom via Communication Strategies. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl. Paper ID: 26093.[12] Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. EducationalPsychology Review, 14(1), 87-87.[13] Mills, J., Treagust, D. Engineering Education, Is Problem-based or Project-based Learningthe Answer. Aust J Eng Educ. Jan. 1, 2003.[14] Pella, S. A Situative Perspective on Developing Writing Pedagogy in a Teacher ProfessionalLearning Community. Teacher Education Quaterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, 107-125. 2011.[15] Walberg, H.J & Anderson, GJ 1968, 'Classroom climate and individual learning', Journal
Paper ID #41323Assessment of International Graduate Student Recruitment and Retention inSample STEM ProgramsDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 22 years of the academic experience at five different universities. Students and
and serviceutilization among international students studying in the U.S.,” Couns. Psychol. Q., vol. 35, no. 3,pp. 483–502, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/09515070.2021.1875400.[14] S. Mori, “Addressing the mental health concerns of international students,” J. Couns.Dev., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2000, doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb02571.x.[15] J. J. Lee and S. Castiello-Gutiérrez, “Engaging International Students,” in StudentEngagement in Higher Education, Stephen John Quaye, Shaun R. Harper, Sumun L. Pendakur,Ed. Routledge, 2019, pp. 107–129.[16] A. Kilinc and P. F. Granello, “Overall life satisfaction and help‐seeking attitudes ofTurkish college students in the United States: Implications for college counselors,” J. Coll.Couns., vol. 6, no
2021. Though referred toas a survey, the institutional intent was to simultaneously capture data that helped to understandthe nature of student co-curricular experiences and establish a reflection portal that enabled andencouraged students to reflect on their experiences outside the classroom [21]. Conductedannually, all engineering undergraduate students were asked to self-report and reflect on their co-curricular experiences from the prior year (i.e., students who completed the survey in fall 2020would be reporting about activities that occurred between fall 2019 and summer 2020, inclusive).The experiences included: technical work (e.g., internship), non-technical work (e.g., grocerystore clerk), undergraduate research, student clubs
., & Rong, Y. (2023, June), Tracing the policy shift to new engineering education in China: An analytical lens of historical institutionalism Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. https://peer.asee.org/44512Yanru Xu Dr Yanru Xu is a postdoctoral research fellow in University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Her research interests focus on research-teaching-study nexus in higher engineering education, higher education management, and the sociology of higher education.Ji’an Liu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 How could a New Educational Design Broaden Inclusion of Higher
Transformation Team on the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the Research Committee of Intermodal Freight Transport committee, Freight Transportation Planning and Logistics committee of Transportation Research Board (TRB) among others. Dr. Sarder chaired the Industrial & Systems Engineering Annual Conference in 2016 and 2017, and the Engineering Lean Six Sigma Conference (ELSS) in 2013.Mohammad Mayyas, Bowling Green State UniversityMohammed Abouheaf, Bowling Green State University Dr. Abouheaf earned his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Electronics Engineering from Mansoura University and completed his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington in 2013. Currently, he holds the
. 1Does endorsement of masculine ideals predict sense of belonging and identity over performance and peer interactions?A student’s social identity can be defined as “an individual’s knowledge of belonging to certainsocial groups, together with some emotional and valuational significance of that groupmembership” (Ellemers 2019). We chose to evaluate this concept using the peer relationsquestions from established work regarding the welcoming nature of engineering culture and therole of peers (Davis et al. 2023). Informal group discussions within the department indicated thatstudents felt their peers facilitated more judgement and served as a greater hindrance tobelonging within the department than their
. 2019.[8] K. H. Strickland, “Transfer Students: The True American Ninja Warriors,” About Campus, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 27–30, 2018.[9] A.-L. Dicke, K. Denaro, A.E. Rao, D. A. Copp, H. R. Lee, G. Diggs-Yang and L. Valdevit, “Board 392: Supporting Low-Income Engineering Transfer Students’ Transition from Community College to a 4-Year University through a Comprehensive Scholarship Program,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE 2023, Baltimore, MD, USA, June 25-28, 2023. doi:10.18260/1-2--43107[10] M. Bang, B. Warren, A. S. Rosebery, and D. Medin, “Desettling Expectations in Science Education,” Hum. Dev., vol. 55, no. 5–6, pp. 302–318
. Minichiello and A. Iqbal, "Perceived Factors Contributing to the SubjectiveWellbeing of Undergraduate Engineering Students: An Exploratory Study," International Journal ofEnvironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, (23), 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316284.[3] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, "Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ EthicalDecision Making and Implications for Engineering Ethics Education," 2019. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33666.[4] N. N. Kellam et al, "Uncovering the role of emotion in engineering education within an integratedcurricular experience," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[5] L. F. Barrett, "The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoceptionand categorization
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33074 [8] M. K. Foster, “Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Problem Solving,” Management Teaching Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 123–140, Jun. 2021. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2379298119871468 [9] M. F. Cox, C. Osman, B. Ahn, and J. Zhu, “Engineering professionals’ expectations of undergraduate engineering students,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 60–70, 2012.[10] L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. Mcgourty, “The ABET “Professional Skills” - Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2005.[11] M
Designfor Manufacturing in the Engineering Curriculum," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, pp. 26.564. 1-26.564. 14, 2015.[14] M.S. Carpenter, C. Yakymyshyn, L.E. Micher and A. Locke, "Improved studentengagement through project-based learning in freshman engineering design," 2016.[15] N.D. Martin, C. Dornfeld Tissenbaum, D. Gnesdilow and S. Puntambekar, "Fadingdistributed scaffolds: The importance of complementarity between teacher and materialscaffolds," Instructional Science, vol. 47, pp. 69-98, 2019.[16] D. Wood, J.S. Bruner and G. Ross, "The role of tutoring in problem solving," Journal ofChild Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 17, pp. 89-100, 1976.[17] R. Azevedo, J.G. Cromley, D.C. Moos, J.A. Greene and F.I. Winters, "Adaptive
part would also help the educators for effective quiz orientation of Kahoot. In the appdevelopment part, step by step procedure was described so that any other educator could buildsuch kind of student friendly apps for the android smartphone devices. The paper described thesoftware development kit along with the android studio and modules for the convenience of theaudience of this paper.Data Availability StatementThe code used to develop the applications will be available upon request to the authors.References1. Chachra, S. D., Naiksatam, A., & Khanchandani, K. (2019). Use of Kahoot As A FormativeAssessment Tool in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering EducationTransformations, 32(4).2. Black, P. (2008). Formative assessment in the
simplemethod to repair this was to break the final parallel program into multiple parts, proposal andfinal report and walk-through. The key to motivating students to pursue more hybrid solutionswill be through the proposal review process and by exposing them to QPU and GPU methodsduring practice assignments.References[1] Siewert, Sam B. "Improving Student Outcomes with Final Parallel Program Mastery Approach for Numerical Methods." 2021 ASEE Pacific Southwest Conference-" Pushing Past Pandemic Pedagogy: Learning from Disruption". 2021.[2] Gambetta, Jay. "IBM’s roadmap for scaling quantum technology." IBM Research Blog (September 2020) (2020).[3] Britt, Keith A., and Travis S. Humble. "High-performance computing with quantum processing units
Interactive Timeline, last updated April 21, 2021, https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-evolution-interactive-timeline[4] J. Hamilton, “Myth Busting: The Truth About Animals And Tools,” National Public Radio, 2011. https://www.npr.org/2011/12/23/143833929/myth-busting-the-truth-about-animals-and-to ols (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[5] D. Fraga, “The Manifesto of Ontological Design,” Medium, 2020. https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/the-manifesto-of-ontological-design-7fdb191691 07 (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[6] S. Fernandez, A. Kumar, and M. T. Alkattan, “Solidarity Engineering using a Pedagogy of Love,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2022.[7] D. Walls, “The
academic community as a reviewer for the American Society of Engineering Education. This role allows her to influence the quality and direction of engineering education research, ensuring that it remains rigorous and impactful. Mercy is also deeply committed to mentoring the next generation of scholars. She has served as a mentor to undergraduate and precollege students, guiding them through their academic and research journeys. Her mentees have presented their work at various prestigious conferences and symposia, including the NC A&T Undergraduate Research Symposia, Emerging Researchers Network Conferences, and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conferences. This mentoring work not only showcases
, “Levers for Change: An assessment of progress on changing STEM instruction,” American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Nov. 2019. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.aaas.org/resources/levers-change-assessment-progress-changing-stem-instr uction[3] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. D. Finkelstein, “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 952–984, 2011, doi: 10.1002/tea.20439.[4] “POD Network,” POD Network: Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, 2022. https://podnetwork.org/ (accessed Dec. 09, 2022).[5] ISSOTL, “International Society for the
. 393–413, 2021.[9] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, 2012.[10] D. M. Hatmaker, “Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers: identity negotiation among women engineers,” Gend. Work Organ., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 382–396, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x.[11] Y. M. Xu and B. Gravel, “A case study: Making facilitates an engineering student’s (re)negotiation with her disciplinary relationships,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland, 2023.[12] G. M. Quan and A. Gupta, “Tensions in the productivity of design task tinkering