. She also plays a pivotal role in curriculum development and establishing partnerships to advance UTSA’s standing in computing, multidisciplinary studies, and data science education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 REU: Enhance REU Participants’ Identification with Research Training and EngagementObjective and MotivationSince the National Science Foundation (NSF) established the Undergraduate ResearchParticipation Program in 1958, thousands of Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)sites have been supported by various agencies, including the NSF, the National Institutes ofHealth, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Education [1, 2]. The
customization, this paper points to new frontiers for delivering student-centeredlearning experiences in engineering education and beyond.IntroductionAs education becomes increasingly complex and specialized, artificial intelligence (AI) offerstools to make teaching and learning more effective, engaging, and equitable [1]. Therefore, wesee artificial intelligence (AI) as a transformative force in education which has a large potentialto offer solutions to challenges posed by traditional, standardized instructional methods.Specifically, modern AI models offer the ability to generate new content in real-time, makingtruly adaptive learning [2] a possibility. These challenges are unique in the context ofengineering education due to the complexity and
, University of Nebraska - Lincoln ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Insights into Faculty's Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems in Engineering ClassroomsIntroduction The integration of technology into education has long sparked debate, particularly asemerging tools like generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) challenge traditional teachingpractices [1], [2], [3], [4]. This ongoing tension between established pedagogical methods andtechnological innovation, which offers new affordances, continues to shape contemporarydiscussions about the adoption of educational technologies, with GenAI being the latest focalpoint. Many of the concerns surrounding this
solution will be used to demonstrate the basic concepts of balanced three-phase power inan introductory setting.Project GoalsThe basic project goals are based on the project goals from the article “Synthesis of Low-Voltage Three-Phase Power for Use in Low-Cost Motor and Systems Experiments at theSophomore Level”1. Some variation has been made to the goals but the overall scope of theproject has not changed. The goals are: to develop a meaningful three-phase system for sophomore engineering students who have only introductory knowledge of three-phase power to improve student knowledge concerning the basics of those systems to give the students increased confidence in applying the knowledge obtained to work at
to Middle-school Students Using LegoTM Machines (Work in Progress)1. IntroductionIn 2011, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) identifiedadvanced manufacturing as a key sector for revitalizing the economy and for promoting a cultureof innovation in the United States (US) [1]. Following this, several federal programs andinitiatives, such as the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP) and the National Networkfor Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI), have been announced to promote manufacturingresearch, education and jobs in the US [2-5]. While these steps are geared towards enabling a“manufacturing renaissance” in the Nation, the high-tech manufacturing sector is faced with aserious shortage of a skilled
space conference which featured 7students as contributing co-authors.Many college-age young people become excited at potential solutions to worrisome issues andtrends such as renewable energy, climate change, nuclear proliferation, and peak oil [1-3]. WhenSpace Solar Power (SSP) is explained [4-9] there is considerable interest; however, the pathwayto making such concept realized in practice can be perceived as long, difficult, and mysterious[10]. The dual purpose of the summer 2015 SSP Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) research teamwas to help create aerospace researchers and to flesh out advanced concepts proposed by thefaculty supervisor (see Figure 1) [11]. Figure 1. Solar Power Satellites (SPS) collecting sunlight in orbit and delivering
to increased student persistence within their degree [1], studentretention in pursuit of science careers [2], and increased rate of graduate education [3]. Inparticular, researchers have noted that undergraduate research creates pathways for minority andunderrepresented students to pursue careers in science and foster a diverse STEM workforce[2][4]-[5].Mentorship is also viewed as a strategy that helps students define career pathways [6]. Thecombination of research experiences and mentorship has been shown to increase a student’sinterest in both learning and STEM that is sustainable [7]-[8]. For example, [7] found that facultymentorship as an environmental factor led to positive outcomes on a student’s motivation toachieve. The inclusion of
project involves an on-campusweekend, during which students design and execute an experiment using three or more of theinstrumentation techniques covered in the course. This collaborative project culminates in aresearch paper summarizing their findings. The course redevelopment has resulted in increasedenrollment, positive student evaluations, and several peer-reviewed publications. This modeldemonstrates a successful hybrid approach that ensures distance learners gain equivalent hands-on experience and research opportunities as their on-campus counterparts.IntroductionExplosives engineering is a specialized field that requires not only a solid foundation intheoretical knowledge but also the ability to design, execute, and analyze experiments [1
teamwork experiences. Building on prior work suggestingenhanced performance in diverse teams, this study extends the scope to address team harmony andinterpersonal relationships. Results are expected to provide actionable insights into optimizing teamcomposition in engineering education, enhancing student experiences, and fostering inclusive learningenvironments.1. IntroductionIn today's engineering education, diversity and inclusion play a pivotal role in shaping a progressive andinnovative academic landscape. Embracing individuals from different cultural, social, and economicbackgrounds enriches classroom interactions and drives creativity. Engineering programs aim to providestudents of all genders, ethnicities, and socioeconomic statuses with
StudentsIntroductionThere is a strong and urgent regional need to increase the production of qualified cybersecurityprofessionals in the workforce. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ OccupationalOutlook Handbook, jobs related to Information Security Analysis with responsibilities to planand conduct security measures to organization’s computer networks and systems are rated as oneof the fastest-growing jobs in the United States through 2020-3030 [1]. Georgia Department ofLabor predicts a similar trend and forecasts a 16.5% increase in Computer and Mathematicsoccupations in the state of Georgia through 2028 [2]. More specifically, Information SecurityAnalysis occupations are expected to increase by 34.0%, a rate way higher than the average forall
).In addition students reported several unexpected positive outcomes, such as gaining insights intoindustry-standard security measures and securing related internships.1 IntroductionQuantum computing represents a revolutionary paradigm in computational technology, offeringunprecedented capabilities to solve complex problems across various domains. Examples includemachine learning 1 , security 2 , drug discovery 3 , and optimization 4 . The integration of quantumcomputing and cybersecurity presents a paradigm shift that demands a comprehensive reevaluationof our approach to education and workforce preparation. In response, ensuring a secure cyberspacehas been recognized as one of the National Academy of Engineering’s (NAE) Grand
ReadinessAbstractColleges of Engineering have increasingly emphasized the importance of engineering studentsobtaining professional skills relating to global readiness. This paper describes progress in a cross-sectional, longitudinal study to examine the impact that a College of Engineering at a large, mid-Atlantic public institution has on students’ global readiness and related constructs. Data werecollected from first-year and senior undergraduate engineering students for two years (2012-2013and 2013-2014). Research questions examined: 1) previous international experiences of incomingstudents, 2) international experiences that undergraduates have during their academic careers, 3)students’ perceived value of global readiness, 4) activities students perceive to be
support for the belief that high schoolcontext is a crucial factor in determining future plans to pursue STEM.6,9 Currently, only 13% ofhigh school females express interest in STEM,16 and only 1%-4% express interest inengineering,8 but the gender gap can be reduced by 25% or more in schools which support girls’interests in STEM.9 Further, it has been shown that outreach programs targeting certain factorshave been effective for the recruitment of women to STEM.7 In literature, attempts to identify factors influencing recruitment and retention of women inSTEM have converged to several themes. The first major issue is that of actual versus perceivedability in STEM. Although mathematical abilities are now roughly equal for male and femalestudents
educate the students enrolled in the Department of Engineering and Technology forcareers in the power industry. The curriculum includes three fundamental power engineeringcourses: 1. Electric Power Systems 2. Power Electronics 3. Electrical Machines and DrivesThe first two courses have been developed and implemented under the guidance of theConsortium of Universities for Sustainable Power (CUSPTM) at University of Minnesota.This paper describes in detail the first two pilot implementations of the Power Electronics coursefor Electrical Engineering (EE) undergraduates and presents its assessment results.The pedagogical concept that was used is called “Flipped Classroom Pedagogy” in which activestudent engagement is facilitated through on-line
bestpractices from competency-based programs (ie. Western Governors University), to implement atrue OEOE registration process, and work within the Florida College System. This impactstechnological education by implementing a hybrid competency-based, self-paced, open-labOEOE program where the content is structured into modules organized within 1-credit coursesthat are faculty-mentored and offered in a non-term schedule that is accessible to workinglearners and is learner-centered rather than faculty-centered. This project also focuses onbuilding a collaborative relationship between the secondary system and the college that embedscertification-based articulation resources and pathways into the program; and providingpathways to baccalaureate degrees.This
III (required) 4 Math 351 Discrete Mathematics 3 Math 361 Linear Algebra 3 Math 371 Graph Theory 3 Math 341 Statistics II 3Figure (A) below shows the Bachelor of Electrical EngineeringTechnology curriculum. Semester (1) Fall Course Course Title Credi Number ts ENGL 101 Expository Writing 3 MATH 123 Pre-Calculus 4 SOET 116 Introduction to CAD and Design 2 ENGS 101 Introduction to Engineering 2 ELEC 101 Electric Circuits I 3 ELEC 109 Electric Circuits I Lab
assessed through a nine item measure; iSTEM perceptions. Participants respondedto a nine-item iSTEM scale developed and validated by the authors in a previous study, tomeasure student perceptions of the interconnections between mathematics, science, andengineering; and STEM clubs. Participants responded “Yes” (1) or “No” (0) to the questionregarding their involvement in extracurricular STEM club.Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used in this analysis because it distinguishes variabilityin scores at the student-level (i.e., level-1) from variability in scores at the classroom level (i.e.,level-2), which results in correctly estimating standard error. Therefore, HLM was used toconduct multilevel-paired sample t-tests. Further, all analyses were
writing,and writing ability in the context of engineering graduate education that includes systematicwriting instruction and intervention structures. The four components of the Writing SySTEM are(1) workshops to teach writing skills and promote the recruitment of diverse participants intoother components, (2) discipline-specific graduate writing courses, (3) peer writing groups, and(4) writing resources hosted on a publicly available Open Educational Resource (OER). Data forthe quantitative analysis of the effects of program components on self-efficacy is still beingcollected for this work-in-progress. The anticipated outcome of this work is to equip graduatestudents with strategies and resources for writing effectively in STEM fields and to
…and work diligently over time to gain scienceknowledge and related skills and experiences.” Storm and Wei6 also emphasize that a sciencelibrarian must understand the “methods, culture, and language of science.” Beck and Callison3find that science librarians must 1) know the terminology/language of relevant scientific fields,2) comprehend the flow of scientific literature, and 3) have credibility with faculty.Mentorship also plays an important role in training a new STEM librarian. Beck and Callison3find that the mentor plays an important role in the development of a science librarian.Henshilwood, et al. 7 describe their mentorship program which include subject specific databases,mastering core functions, and creating deliverable products
Republic to engage in a service learning experience.Students from both tracks enroll in the same in-semester course, which enables the class toconsider differences in contexts and objectives from a variety of different perspectives.RSAP provides students with an opportunity to expand their global competencies while learningabout differences through experience. As a result, program participants develop: 1) anunderstanding of technology and business opportunities and challenges in different nationalcontexts, and 2) an understanding of the implications of contextual differences for Americanengineers. Student interest and the number of participants in the program continue to grow, asmeasured by the two-fold increase in RSAP applications for 2015 to
compete for prizes andrecognition such as for innovative design, fabrication achievements and best presentation. Thecompetition event is a high energy celebratory experience open to the public (Fig. 1).Figure 1. An MAE 3 Undergraduate Tutor (left) with students (right) and their robotat the course-wide final robot competition.Through a process of continuous improvement, the popular course has maintained a mixedreputation among students as “being a lot of work!” and as a valuable high impact learningexperience. Students often share with instructors that the course experience provided a solidfoundation in essential hands-on engineering skills and prepared them for advanced coursework,engineering clubs, capstone design and technical careers. The
engineering students to leave their degree program aretheir first mathematics courses [1], upon which all subsequent engineering concepts rely. Beyondmastering foundational calculus concepts and their practical applications, engineering studentsare honing their skills in mathematically framing, executing, and articulating solutions withindiverse problem-solving contexts [2]. While success in these endeavors is often connected tocognitive predictors such as the student’s GPA and past academic success, test scores, andintelligence [3], they only account for about 15% of the variance in academic success [4]. Incontrast, non-cognitive predictors, generally defined as those skills, attitudes, beliefs andstrategies that affect academic performance but are
experiments. By the end of thesemester, students have integrated them together to create a working micro-grid.IntroductionDespite being routinely identified by the National Academy of Engineering as the greatest engineeringachievement of the 20th century [1], academic support for and student enrollment in power engineeringeducational programs has not kept pace with other sub-disciplines of electrical engineering. This hasresulted in a national need for well qualified power engineering and engineering technology graduates[2]-[4]. Additionally, the technical skills required of power engineers is constantly evolving and nowinclude emerging topics such as smart grids, renewable and alternative energy sources, advanced energyefficiency and demand side
retain promisingstudents through graduation.1 Therefore, research exploring how students develop commitmentto engineering is of particular interest. This issue is especially important when considering thewidespread goal of increasing the diversity of engineering and promoting the success of diversestudent populations in this field. To better understand career commitment, this research paper explores the relationshipbetween students’ occupational values and their perceptions of engineering as a career field andhow this relationship impacts major commitment. Research has documented substantial sexdifferences in occupational values and interests, where women are more likely to prefercommunal or helping occupations while men are more likely
features, we use feature vector with low dimension. We employ SupportVector Machine (SVM) for the classifier with the gait-based feature vector. The extracted featuredataset are divided into two parts, i.e., training and testing datasets. The training data set areused for training a SVM classifier while the testing dataset are used for the evaluation.According to the experimental results, we know that GEI is an applicable feature for human gaitrepresentation. Despite of the limitation of the dataset, e.g., different races and thickness ofclothes which weaken the distinct differences between males and females, the average accuracyof the proposed approach reaches up to 87% under 10 times holdout validation.1. IntroductionGender classification plays
)professionals is recognized as paramount in the United States. STEM fields currently impact themajority of activities that comprise modern life. The demand for more and better trained STEMprofessionals continues to increase without a clear boundary. To fully participate in today’ssociety, all students, regardless of race, gender or economic status, require a strongunderstanding of the STEM fields.1 Yet, it is well recognized that there exists an achievementgap in STEM between minority and majority student populations. Underrepresented groups orgroups that have been traditionally underserved in STEM, comprise 26% of the general USpopulation but only account for 10% of the science and engineering workforce.2 This disparity isa social justice issue, as
mechatronics engineering throughthis hands-on project as an assessment of the design project presented.I. IntroductionA ball-and-beam system is one of the challenging control bench-marking systems integrated intomany practices and techniques [1]. This project will resolve in taking the ball-and-beam conceptand develop a ball-and-plate balancing system. The system will utilize sensors, actuators, andcontrol law to manipulate the servos in a feedback stabilization using three-degree-of-freedomcompensation. This is essentially implementing two ball-and-beam experiments in parallel toconstructing a ball-and-plate prototype.The concept of the ball-and-beam system is a simple system that is an unstable open-loop.Without an active feedback control system
studying new manufacturing processes and systems for a new discipline in GreenPlastics Manufacturing Technology (GPMT).1-4The primary goal of the NSF project (DUE-1044794) was to transform the exiting materials andmanufacturing curriculum to keep pace with advanced green technologies in the manufacturingand mechanical engineering technology programs (MMET) at Rochester Institute of Technology(RIT). We developed new educational approach and undergraduate teaching modules to promoteSTEM practice for Green Plastics Manufacturing Technology (GPMT) within foundationalcourses in materials and manufacturing education for the MMET programs.The GPMT approaches, which were based on the findings and results in the evidence-basedpedagogy, were applied to
) is one of the pathways to achieve the STEM endorsement (next to Mathematics, Scienceand Computer Science). The goal for House Bill 5 is to provide students with earlier exposure toa coherent course sequence and to increase preparedness and sustain interest in STEM careers.Given the increase in messaging on the value of STEM, we don't know how well the message isacted upon by high school students and as we barely understand students’ choices before theendorsement requirement, we need to set a baseline. Therefore, this study attempts to set out thebaseline through analyses of trends in several years of CTE-STEM course enrollment in TX priorto House Bill 5.We chose to focus on the CTE-STEM pathway out of two reasons: (1) The CTE-STEM
theeffectiveness of immersive (panoramic) videos with hotspots as pre-class materials withinthe flipped classroom approach. This paper presents the implementation of thistechnology in a classic physics experiment on oblique launches, conducted withapproximately 400 first-year engineering students at XXXXXX. These students weredivided into laboratory classes, working in teams of 3 to 4.The paper tests the hypothesis that an immersive video—explaining in detail theexperimental apparatus, the concepts involved, and the experimental procedure throughhotspots—before the class, would promote greater autonomy in modeling and executingthe experiment. The proposal aimed at analyzing: 1. The increase in student engagement with the flipped classroom methodology