’ pursuit to ”do good.” Marie received her B.S. in mechanical engineering and international studies from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and M.S. and PhD in science and technology studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. She also earned a graduate certificate in human-centered design (HCD) from the Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program at Virginia Tech. Marie’s interest in values and engagement in professional cultures also extends to innovation and its experts.With Matthew Wisnioski and Eric Hintz, Marie co-editedDoes America Need More Innovators?(MIT Press, 2019). This project engages innovation’s champions, critics, and reformers in critical participation.Dr. Aneesha Gogineni, Saginaw Valley State University
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, in 2019, his master’s in curriculum management with a thesis and with honors from Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel, in 2013, and both his B.Sc. degrees in biology and in psychology as part of the Neuroscience track from Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel, in 2009. In 2019, he joined the New Engineering Education Transformation program at the School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA. As of 2023, he is also Digital Education Lecturer with the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in the same school, and Expert-in-residence with the MIT Abdul Latif Jameel World Education Lab. His work has been
learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals focused on engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
ormeasuring the impact in makerspace curriculum [16]. To address this gap, the University ofTexas, Arlington assembled an ad-hoc taskforce from various universities to develop a nationalstandard of maker-based competencies to enhance student learning outcomes to impactundergraduate students [17]. Among the taskforce was the University of Nevada, Reno. In 2017and 2019, the group received two National Leadership grants from the Institute of Museum andLibrary Services (IMLS).To form their framework, the grant team used the competencies-based education model, whichincludes the assessment of learning outcomes and learning that is personalized, measurable, andtransferable [16]. Ten maker competencies were developed, addressing various transferable
education at the high school level. Short bootcamp or workshop-styleprograms are common where educators and mentors work with high school students for 1-2 weeks.Similar to code.org, the learning goals in such programs are skewed toward the input data (usuallyimages) and the output results (predictions shown in a GUI) while skipping the technical detailsdue to lack of student preparation and time. Nevertheless, the high school students go out of theseworkshops with increased motivation for studying CS [13], increased preparation for college [14],and a positive outlook of AI [15].Educational programs that include technical details have also been organized. In 2019, a work-shop [16] was conducted using Scratch (scratch.mit.edu) to teach concepts like
minoritizedgroups (e.g., students from rural communities, students with disabilities, Hispanic, Black, and 1Williamson, McGill ASEE 2024Indigenous students), the new landscape is particularly troubling to efforts to rectify pastadmissions bias [2, 3] and provide sufficient support for minoritized student populations. At thesame time, the United States is witnessing a shift in demographics among K-12 students, withstudents from minoritized groups comprising greater than 57% of the elementary school studentpopulation across the U.S. [4].This case follows a trend of first creating (in the latter part of the 20th century) and thendismantling
Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future." Sustainable Development 27.4 (2019): 669-680. 2. G. Cebrián, D. Pascual, and A. Moraleda. "Perception of sustainability competencies amongst Spanish pre-service secondary school teachers." International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 20.7 (2019): 1171-1190. 3. S.J. Sanchez, M. Rueda, and D.L. Robertson. "Measuring Sustainability Literacy in Undergraduate and Graduate Engineering Students in a Colombian University." 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2023. 4. A. Décamps, G., Barbat, J.C., Carteron, V. Hands, and C.Parkes. "Sulitest: A Collaborative Initiative to Support and Assess
investigated thephenomenon on K-12 students. Further studies, therefore, are needed to understand the influenceof provided design solutions on pre-college students’ ideation.Conclusion, Limitations, and Future WorkLooking at all of the studies published thus far, the landscape of research on fixation in K-12design education can be described as pockets of exploratory research. The studies published thusfar show that design fixation does not influence students not only during the initial ideageneration stage but also during the design iteration process. The next step of my work includesexploring literature on fixation from different databases including ASEE and expanding thetimeline to 2007 which was when the first article on fixation for high school
-and-use-social-media-and-web[access, [ February 5, 2024]20. Current Employment Statistics - CES (National), US Bureau of Labor Statistics, https://www.bls.gov/ces/ [access, [February 5, 2024].21. Zilouchian A., N. Romance, D. Hamadeh, A. Myers and M. Vitale, “A University-State College Collaborative Project to Advance Students' Degree Completion and Career Attainment in Engineering and Computer Science” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, June 2019.22. Campus Ethnic Diversity National Universities; US News and World Report, 2021; https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/campus-ethnic-diversity23. Poverty and Income in Florida; Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BERB) Report(2015); https
Education, vol. 26, pp. 223-237, 2017.[9] C. M. Cunningham and G. J. Kelly, “Epistemic practices of engineering for education,” Science Education, vol. 101, pp. 486-505, 2017.[10] M. M. Johnson, G. J. Kelly, and C. M. Cunningham, “Failure and improvement in elementary engineering,” Journal of Research in STEM Education, vol. 7, pp. 69-92, 2021[11] H. Petroski, Design paradigms: Case histories of error and judgment in engineering. Cambridge University Press, 1994.[12] V. Hendley, “The importance of failure,” ASEE Prism, vol. 8, 19-23, 1998.[13] D. I. Acosta and C. A. Haden, “Museum based tinkering and engineering learning opportunities among Latine families with young children,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 80
software development. He was a founding faculty member of the software engineering degree programs at ASU and developed the project-centric curricular implementation known as the Software Enterprise. He has served twice as program chair and led the program through multiple positive ABET accreditation visits. Kevin blends industry and academic experience to bring theoretically grounded, practice-oriented methods to the classroom. Kevin is a member of ASEE, ACM, and IEEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Developing an Agile Mindset in Software Engineering StudentsAbstractThe agile mindset is a set of values and principles extracted from the Agile Manifesto focused
2019. [Online]. Available: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/new-in-chrome-79[17] A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller, “An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale,” Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 574–594, 8 2008.[18] M. Nowparvar, X. Chen, O. Ashour, S. G. Ozden, and A. Negahban, “Combining immersive technologies and problem-based learning in engineering education: Bibliometric analysis and literature review,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021.[19] A. Negahban, “Simulation in engineering education: The transition from physical experimentation to digital immersive simulated environments,” SIMULATION, vol. 100, 2024.
social justice," in Engineering and Social Justice: Springer, 2008, pp. 47-106.[2] J. A. Leydens, J. C. Lucena, and D. M. Riley, "Engineering education and social justice," in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 2022.[3] R. Painter, "Engineering ethics, environmental justice, and environmental impact analysis: A synergistic approach to improving student learning," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.544. 1-25.544. 14.[4] M. M. Nussbaum, "Environmental justice in the college and university curriculum: A survey of the literature," Environmental Justice, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 95-101, 2014.[5] D. I. Castaneda, J. D. Merritt, and J. A. Mejia, "Integrating an engineering justice
Guide to Getting Started with Inquiry-Based Learning. Taylor & Francis,Jul. 3, 2023.[11] J. A. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integratingreflection into engineering education,” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Jun. 15, 2014.[12] P. Vesikivi, M. Lakkala, J. Holvikivi, and H. Muukkonen, “Team teaching implementationin engineering education: Teacher perceptions and experiences,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no.4, pp. 519–534, Jul. 4, 2019, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1446910[13] S. R. Cavanagh, The Spark of Learning: Energizing the College Classroom with the Scienceof Emotion. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2016.Appendix: Description of CAD Curriculum in 2023
, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Furthermore, he was a shortlisted candidate for the UGC Teaching Award (Early Career Faculty Member).Prof. Norman C. Tien, University of Hong Kong Norman C. Tien is the Taikoo Professor of Engineering and Chair Professor of Microsystems Technology at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). He is also currently the Head of Innovation Academy of Faculty of Engineering and the Managing Director of the Centre for Transformative Garment Production. He served as the Dean of Engineering from 2012 to 2018, and as the Vice-President and Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Institutional Advancement) from 2019 to 2021 at HKU. Prior to joining HKU, Professor Tien was the Nord Professor of Engineering at Case Western Reserve
total faculty at Title IV grantinguniversities, 57% are tenured/tenure-track (T/TT) while 39% are nontenured. Of those who arenontenured, 56% are on a one-year contract, 28% are on a multiyear contract, and 16% are on acontract that is indefinite.2 Focusing on engineering, the latest ASEE report in 2018 found thatthere are 5026 non-tenure track faculty who make up 14.4% of the total faculty in engineering.Also, in 2018, Bayles reported that 8% of all 2323 chemical engineering faculty in the US wereon the teaching track3.The Education Division of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) started a peergroup for TFF in 2022. This group has met monthly on Zoom as well as in person at the AIChEand ASEE national conferences. The goal of
Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE and represents ASEE on the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. He was inducted into the ASEE Hall of Fame in 2023.NAHAL RASHEDI, University of Cincinnati PhD Student of Engineering Education ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Year Two of Developing a New Dataset for Analyzing Engineering Curricula AbstractThis
2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferencePiloting a framework to evaluate and guide student understanding of global, socio-cultural, environmental and economic design factors Kaycie Lane1,* and Logan Perry1 1 Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA Corresponding author: Kaycie.lane@unl.edu * © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceAbstractSeveral previous studies have highlighted the sociotechnical nature of engineering practice whilesimultaneously recognizing the
course with specific questions onthings we had encountered during the trip, which were only for the engineering course.Despite course design, the enrollment number is unpredictable, and the number of students couldimpact the delivery of the course content. In the Japan 2019 trip, there were seven students onthe trip, which was a tight-knit group with a lot of interactions and reflections while on the trip.The pre-trip meetings also effectively prepared the seven travel students for the visits. Also, bothinstructors on the 2019 trip had led the faculty-led trips individually before the 2019 trip, andhence the combo trip progressed well without hiccups. The Japan 2023 trip was the first trip afterthe pandemic hiatus, and eighteen students signed
participating in studies on technologies for disability, overlookingtheir much-needed insight, and treating them as unequal engineering partners in the design andresearch processes [2]. Another literature survey focused on ASEE publications noted that therewas a significant lack of research focusing on disability as an identity and on the experiences ofstudents with disabilities in engineering education [3].Several works have explored the stigma, social exclusion, systemic marginalization, devaluation,and feelings of “otherness” experienced by students with disabilities in engineering education[4], [5]. These consequences were attributed to a variety of reasons, including the lack of rolemodels with disabilities, educators’ misconceptions about the
model of student pathways into engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 40–64, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20429.[6] H. Petroski, “Choosing a Major,” ASEE Prism, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 80, Feb. 10, 2021.[7] H. Thiry and T. Weston, “Choosing STEM Majors,” Talk. Leaving Revisit., 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_4.[8] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2012.tb00039.x.[9] J. K. Painter, K. E. Snyder, and P. A. Ralston, “Why Engineering? Students’ Reasons for Choosing an Engineering Major,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Jan
development in engineering education,” In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, June.[30] B. Eun, “The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories,” Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18-30, 2019.[31] L. Laatsch and J. Choca, “Cluster-branching methodology for adaptive testing and the development of the adaptive category test,” Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 345–351, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.345[32] C. Hasse, “Postphenomenology: Learning cultural perception in science,” Human Studies, 31(1), 43–61, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10746-007-9075-4/METRICS[33] E. Istiyono, W. Sunu, B. Dwandaru, and R. Faizah, “Mapping of physics problem
Al-Handasah Shair and Co) based in Beirut. Absi then joined Vanderbilt University to pursue her PhD in Civil Engineering at Vanderbilt University (graduated 2019), focusing her research on risk and reliability of hypersonic structures. Absi is a licensed professional engineer in the state of TN. Absi is passionate about education and promoting diversity in engineering. She serves as the advisor for the ASCE student chapter, the EDI liaison for the civil engineering department, and the KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network) leader for the engineering school. A 2023 KEEN Engineering Unleashed fellow, Absi incorporates EDI as well as entrepreneurial mindset learning fostering curiosity, connections and
:10.3102/0002831213482038[12] Lane, T. B. (2016). Beyond Academic and Social Integration: Understanding the Impact of aSTEM Enrichment Program on the Retention and Degree Attainment of UnderrepresentedStudents. Lse 15 (3), ar39. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0070[13] Beckwith, J. K., & Hirshfield, L. (2021) .Motivating Factors That Encourage Rural Studentsto Pursue Engineering. ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37517[14] Ebrahiminejad, H., Al Yagoub, H., Ricco, G. , Ohland, M., Zahedi, L. (2019). Pathways andOutcomes of Rural Students in Engineering. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference.10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028380. [15] Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., and Tai, R. (2014). The Role of Advanced HighSchool
. Radford et al., “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI Blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019.[5] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence a modern approach. London, 2010.[6] J. White et al., “A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT.” arXiv, Feb. 21, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382.[7] R. Budish, “AI’s Risky Business: Embracing Ambiguity in Managing the Risks of AI,” J. Bus. Technol. Law, vol. 16, p. 259, 2021.[8] S. Aggrawal and K. Dittman, “Preparing Engineers for the Future: Project Management for Developing Generative AI,” presented at the 2023 Fall ASEE Mid Atlantic Conference, New Jersey, NJ, 2023.[9] X. Ferrer, T. van Nuenen, J. M. Such, M. Coté, and N. Criado
, Aurora University, United States – Illinois, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.proquest.com/docview/2384858972/abstract/CD5B029B15BE4E11PQ/1[3] H. Jabbar, L. Schudde, M. Garza, and S. McKinnon-Crowley, “Bridges or barriers? Howinteractions between individuals and institutions condition community college transfer,” TheJournal of Higher Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 375–398, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1953339.[4] J. Koyama and S. Desjardin, “Building bridges and borders with deficit thinking,” Educ.Real, vol. 44, p. e86415, Apr. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623686415.[5] “Dismantling Deficit Thinking: A strengths-based inquiry into the experiences of transferstudents in and
community-based organizations,” Ed.D. Dissertation, Aurora Univ., Aurora, IL, U. S., 2018. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2384858972/abstract/CD5B029B15BE4E11PQ/1 [5] H. Jabbar, L. Schudde, M. Garza, and S. McKinnon-Crowley, “Bridges or barriers? How interactions between individuals and institutions condition community college transfer,” The J. of Higher Ed., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 375–398, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2021.1953339. [6] J. Koyama and S. Desjardin, “Building bridges and borders with deficit thinking,” Educ. Real., vol. 44, p. e86415, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1590/2175-623686415. [7] C. Dudley-Marling, “The resilience of deficit thinking,” J
on entrepreneurship competenciesor collaborative entrepreneurship competencies can enhance students' knowledge. However, tobetter develop specific entrepreneurship competencies, it is essential for this training to beintegrated into all subjects.BIBLIOGRAPHY[1] Moscoso, B. E., and Fernández, C. J., 2023, “Modelo Pedagógico Para Desarrollar Competencias Colaborativas de Emprendimiento En Estudiantes de Administración de Empresas En Una Universidad Del Ecuador, 2022,” Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(1), pp. 479–499.[2] Cartuche, D., Guerra, M. A., and Murzi, H., 2023, “Work in Progress: Influence of COVD- 19 in Cultural Dimensions in Civil Engineering Students In,” 2023 ASEE Annual Conference &
-26-005-SMA: Medium Power GaAs Amplifier at 28dBm P1dB Operating from 50 MHz to 1 GHz with SMA Input, SMA Output and 26dB Gain, 2020. [online] https://www.fairviewmicrowave.com/images/productPDF/SPA-010-26-005-SMA.pdf.[5] Nooelec, Wideband Low Noise Amplifier, datasheet, 2019-09-30 rev. 1. [online] https://www.nooelec.com/store/lana.html.[6] DekTec, DTA-2131, Multi-standard cable/terrestrial Receiver for PCIe. [online] https://www.dektec.com/products/PCIe/DTA-2131/.Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference 14Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education