Michigan - An RETSite on Smart Vehicles.” The summer program was six weeks long and hosted five communitycollege faculty, five in-service teachers (high school science) and five pre-service teachers(integrated science majors). Participants were split into five groups and teamed up with anengineering faculty and an engineering undergraduate student each. During their 40 hours/weekwork schedule, participants worked on faculty-supervised research projects for 25 hours/weekand the remaining time was reserved for development of classroom unit plans.This paper presents details about the RET Site’s management and discusses lessons learned fromour experiences. Preliminary assessment results will be presented and discussed. Finally, we willconclude with
effectively motivate and engage studentsin studying. With specifically designed computer games, Game-Based Learning (GBL) cancreate an enjoyable and engage learning experience for students. The emerging Virtual Reality(VR) technology in recent years can significantly improve such learning experience. In thispaper, we present our GBL practice in STEM education through the development and integrationof VR-based GBL modules into the engineering curriculum. The feedback from students, theGBL module can effectively improve the learning experience for users. This work is part of anon-going project sponsored by the DoED. More advanced GBL modules with fascinatingfeatures will be developed in future.KeywordsVirtual Reality (VR), Game-Based-Learning (GBL
Paper ID #19209Knowing Our Story: Framing a Cooperative Inquiry Project to Explore thePersonal Growth of Graduate Students in Engineering EducationMr. Richard J. Aleong, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Richard J. Aleong is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his M.A.Sc. and B.Sc.E in Mechanical and Materials Engineering from Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada. His research interests are focused on integrative thinking and design, interdisciplinary collaboration, and curriculum development to support students’ personal and professional learning
University and Assistant Dean for Student Advancement and Program Assessment in the College of Engineering. Dr. Briedis is involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She has been involved in NSF-funded research in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ABET, ASEE, and AIChE.Dr. S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University S. Patrick Walton received his B.ChE. from Georgia Tech, where he began his biomedical research career in
not for profit in Kansas City, in the late 90’s. She earned her M.S. in Youth Development from the University of Nebraska and her B.S. in Family Studies at Kansas State University.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Walter Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the Assistant Di- rector for Research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. His research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity in STEM. Lee received his Ph.D in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in
advisor of NSPE JU Chapter, she actively participates in conferences, workshops and professional activities.Dr. Steven Christopher Davis, Jacksonville University Dr. Steven Davis is an associate professor of Education at Jacksonville University in Jacksonville, FL. Dr. Davis has been a teacher educator for over 20 years with specializations in curriculum and instruc- tion, educational research, education philosophy, and Special Education. As a former elementary school teacher, Dr. Davis employs his knowledge of best practice in his areas of expertise to help undergraduate and graduate education students prepare for careers as effective practitioners.Dr. Emre Selvi, Jacksonville University Emre Selvi is an Assistant
risk’ student. In an institution where the majority of students are classifiedas being from a ‘non-traditional’ background, with most being from working class backgroundsand the vast majority classified as BME (Black & Minority Ethnic) it was not feasible to lookat social or demographic variables in terms of articulating risk. Instead the decision was takento focus on academic achievement.The award of Bachelor’s Degrees in the UK is usually based upon a credit system wherebystudents are required to achieved 120 credits in each of the first, second and final years of study.At Gosta University a further 120 credits may be achieved by taking an ‘integrated workplacement’ (paid or unpaid internship) and Bachelors’ Degrees are scored using a
Paper ID #19311Using Modular Technology as a Platform to Study Youth Approaches to En-gineering Practice (Work in Progress)Jacqueline F. Handley, University of Michigan Jacqueline Handley is a graduate student at the University of Michigan, in Science Education. Her back- ground is in Material Science and Engineering, with an emphasis on Biomaterials Design. She is inter- ested in, broadly, how best bridge engineering practice and education. More specifically, she is interested in studying how students and teachers conceptualize and engage with engineering design practices, and how to increase access to engineering.Dr
Curriculum (CxC) program has found that byincluding communication assignments as part of traditional engineering assignments, thetraditional content was not sacrificed by the inclusion of communication assignments, but wasenhanced and facilitated learning at higher levels on Bloom’s taxonomy.5 In the Humanities, ithas long been suggested that a diversity of discourse leads to innovative thinking.6,7 At ourinstitution, we decided that the Encounter Engineering in Europe (E3) program was an excellentplace to include assignments designed to promote creativity, such as open-form essay writing,video creation, and multi-modal travel blogging, as a complement to more traditionalassignments, such as argumentative papers and researched reports, all of which
-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12 project, and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six phil- anthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU Tandon’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014
his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Mr. Edward C
strategies in particular. It is a follow up to previous work by the author,on viable strategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in theArab Gulf Region. At the start, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks ofengineering education in the Region. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings onteaching/learning practices in engineering colleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros andcons of the lecture format, and examines the literature on meanings and substance ofdifferent active learning protocols, focusing on cooperative engagement strategies. Thepaper, also, sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, andsuggestions for redesigning classes, if need be, to stimulate
characterization techniques and laboratory apparatus for advancement of novel electronic devices, in addi- tion to curriculum development for inquiry-based learning and facilitation of interdisciplinary, student-led project design. She emphasizes engineering sustainable solutions from a holistic perspective, incorporat- ing analysis of the full technological life cycle and socioeconomic impact.Prof. Bryan M. Jenkins, University of California, Davis, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Prof. Bryan Jenkins teaches and conducts research in the areas of energy and power, with emphasis on biomass and other renewable resources. Dr. Jenkins has more than thirty years of experience work- ing in the area of biomass
levels of thought. He has secured com- petitive funds to support his teaching efforts – from university, industry, and federal sources – and for his efforts has received departmental, college, and national teaching honors including the Farrall Young Edu- cator Award (2004) and the Massey-Ferguson Gold Medal Teaching Award (2016) given by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. He has also been an invited participant in the National Academy of Engineering’s 2013 Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference. Raman chairs the ABE Engineering Curriculum Committee and in that role oversaw the successful 2012 ABET accreditation visit for both the Agricultural Engineering (AE) and Biological Systems Engineering
their first semester, adecrease in loss of students from the fall semester to the spring semester, and a 90.5% retentionrate for the 2015 cohort for the first time in the history of the college.IntroductionFirst year students encounter much stress as they navigate living for the first time away fromhome, separating from their parents, and encountering a rigorous curriculum. Colleges are facinga lot of pressure to achieve over 90% first year retention rates. In this college, the admissionrequirements are for students to be eligible to start in Engineering is to be ready to takeprecalculus (set in 2013) or a higher math course by the start of their first fall semester at school.Over 40% of the students at the university are Pell grant eligible
. Students taking the engineering math intervention coursewere retained in the college of engineering at much higher rates (over 70% versus roughly 56%)and were also farther along in the math curriculum one year later.This improvement is achieved by providing the students an opportunity to remediate and retakethe math placement test in a given semester and by providing math-in-context examples throughengineering based lectures. By providing an opportunity for students increase their placementscore high enough to move more than one course through the curriculum, they are incentivized towork through and persist through any difficult topics. This may be a superior motivator for somestudents.In Fall of 2015 the course was modified again and began using
the ABET learningoutcome requirements as a foundation for the development of the proposed knowledge and skillsfor each graduate. The data collected resulted in further industry engagement in programimplementation and outreach and helped develop a learning program that will equip architecturalengineering students with the ability to adjust to the evolving demands of the building sector.The paper will highlight experiences throughout the process, a review of similar programs, aswell as examples of the program outcomes, rubrics, and curriculum map.I. IntroductionThe College of Architecture and the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University arepartnering to develop an integrated program in Architectural Engineering (AREN). The
simply manner and then revisited at a higher level ofsophistication in subsequent courses, as the students’ mathematical prowess develops. Figure 1. “Spiral” curriculum The administration of the courses in the spiral curriculum is awkward within a standarddiscipline-based department structure and has been handled in an ad hoc manner for many years.Also, as further curricular innovations were developed and more and more faculty becameinvolved in engineering education research, a need for leadership and coordination of activitiesemerged. In order to maintain the integrity of the curriculum it is essential that its managementbe separated from specific degree programs and yet faculty from those degree programs
allow students to work on projects that can be relevant tocurrent leading edge research and technology. The development, content and structure oflaboratory activities and project-based learning as part of this effort to embed renewable energyinto our curriculum are also presented. [7]Background and Curricular Context: ET curricula descriptionEngineering education moves into the twenty first century charged with an environmental agendato respond to wider changes in the society. However, the educators are regularly modifyingcurriculum content to embrace technological changes into the learning outcomes. On the otherhand, renewable energy and sustainability are highly interdisciplinary, crossing over between anumbers of research areas, which makes
Paper ID #20332Engineering Notebooks for Formative Assessment (Resource Exchange)Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on methods of assessment and evaluation.Prof. Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in
research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the context of Next Generation Science Standards.Miss Ezgi Yesilyurt, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Ezgi Yesilyurt is a PhD student in curriculum and instruction/science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a graduate assistant and teaching science methods courses. She received her MS degree and BS degree in elementary science education. She participated European Union Projects in which
.1Even as late as the 1960s EE students were required to take ME courses in statics, dynamics,nature and properties of materials, and thermodynamics.2 Although the 1960s was the incipientage of solid-state electronics, EE students also took compulsory courses in electric machineryand power transmission.The rapid development of digital logic integrated circuits and the microprocessor in the 1970sshifted the extent of the EE curriculum away from these courses. Accelerating the shift were newtopics such as microelectronics, probability and statistics, digital signal and image processing,and digital communications and control. The result is that most, if not all, EE curricula today donot feature any substantive required courses in ME.3The Mechanical
threshold concept when situated in the discussion of teaching transmission lines as Meyer and Land already justified the gravitational field as a threshold concept2 - much of the rationale can be easily transferred. While the concept of a field and reactive power – identified threshold concepts – appeared in the context of teaching transmission lines, the implications of addressing the embedded troublesome knowledge reaches far beyond electromagnetics. Since capacitors and inductors use an electric field and a magnetic field respectively to function, the plausible threshold concept (fields) is integrated throughout the Electrical Engineering curriculum (Figure 2). Lumped
to both the lecture and laboratory componentsand the focus of the new course is on improving of the course. We modified the lectures to focus on thestudents’ performance and retention in calculus, we mathematics topics emphasized in the Wright Stateevaluated the effectiveness of the new course by curriculum, including trigonometry, vectors, solvinglongitudinally tracking students’ success and persistence systems of equations, and derivatives and integrals. We alsoin subsequent engineering mathematics courses. The incorporated using Matlab, with an emphasis on using it as aresults of these analyses show that students’ tool to solve engineering mathematics problems
to engineering in the K-12 classroom. The first pertains to the levelof integration for engineering curriculum, while the other concerns the type of service. Due to its relatively nascent emergence, a foremost challenge to the integration ofengineering curricula into the precollege educational experience is determining where in theacademic landscape it belongs. Here lies an important dilemma facing education reformers:should precollege engineering education exist for the sake of engineering and technology literacyor should it exist as a backdrop and a means to promote science and math content learning? Byits nature, engineering requires the synthesis and practical application of diverse contentknowledge in an endeavor toward
., running a local Makerspace,participating in outreach events in the community, making a t-shirt for an event or team orwearing a costume themed to match a project theme. In an engineering curriculum, it might beworking in teams in a class, forming a study group, sharing your solution to a problem openlywithout fear of academic integrity violations, or sharing notes with others in a class. A keyconsideration is that it can be awkward to assess individual learning or performance in a group.Self-Directed LearningMakers take initiative to identify what they need to know to achieve their overall goal, find andlearn what they need to know from their community (mentors, Makerspaces, Maker Faires, andwebsites) and apply what they have learned to their
, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering GoldShirt Program at CU to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; findings are very encouraging, and the program is being adapted at several other engineering colleges. Dr. Sullivan led the 2004 launch of ASEE’s Pre- College Division, was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Denise W. Carlson, University of Colorado, Boulder Carlson is involved with a broad range of program implementation initiatives through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University
Executive Director of the biomedical engineering honor society, Alpha Eta Mu Beta.Ms. Dorothy Silverman, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Defining the Frontiers of Bioengineering Education at Illinois and BeyondAbstractThe Department of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois is revolutionizing its curriculumby increasing its focus on teaching students about the societal needs that necessitatebioengineering solutions. In this paper, we provide an overview of the goals of our revolutionand the process by which we will create this change. We provide examples of how we arecentering our curriculum around addressing
is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won a couple of teaching awards in 2014 and 2016 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who introduced new ideas to the classroom. Such ideas in- clude using ”props” to increase students’ understanding of the materials, as well as using new technology such as i-clickers and IF-AT cards. Dr. Al-Hammoud also organized a bridge-building contest in one of her courses where she worked with other professors in the department to integrate the
the Engineering GoldShirt Program at CU to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; findings are very encouraging, and the program is being adapted at several other engineering colleges. Dr. Sullivan led the 2004 launch of ASEE’s Pre- College Division, was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Denise W. Carlson, University of Colorado Boulder Carlson is involved with a broad range of program implementation initiatives through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of