classroom and laboratory?1) VisualizationVisualization is one of the big advantages of TCAD tools. During the process simulation theevolution of actual cross-sections of the structure can be seen. For example the detailed processof growing oxide can easily be visualized at any point in time. Such detailed and accuratevisualizations can only be obtained with TCAD (see figure 2). Without TCAD the student wouldhave to rely on simple sketches or on STM and TEM micrographs in textbooks (or literature) to Page 9.766.2understand how a certain processing step changes the structure of the device. Also doping Proceedings of the 2004 American Society
areas. His industrial experience includes positions at Michelin Research and OakRidge National Laboratory, as well as extensive professional practice in regional design and manufacturing firms.He can often be found with his four children in his home machine shop building steam engines and repairing jeeps.Address: 1 Big Red Way, Department of Engineering, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101;email: joel.lenoir@wku.edu Page 9.1304.9 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering
, environmental and social demands of a problem; Protect safety, health, and welfare.• Problem solving and decision-making – Model engineering problems using a systems approach and appropriate assumptions; Use a range of decision making (evaluation) methodologies; Identify the criteria to be used in decision making (eg sustainability); Use a range of engineering analysis tools and software; Access information from a wide variety of sources, discern value and use; Design and conduct experiments• Technical competence (engineering analysis) – Conceptualise, plan, design, construct and manage civil infrastructure systems; Analyse and interpret field and laboratory data• Teamwork and Leadership – Operate within an engineering organisation; Manage
technological advantage in the sector and will have apromising future.IV. Results 1 Fuel Cell Scooter A 200W fuel cell shown was purchased and attached to the scooter. After thetesting and analysis procedures were completed, the fuel cell scooter was completedin the laboratory, as shown in Fig.3. Fig.3 Fuel Cell Scooter Students in charge of the scooter business plan conducted a market survey at thesame time. They completed a comprehensive survey including visiting shops withrelated products and interviewing managers about the function, price and marketvalue of the scooters they displayed. When they obtained the needed information fromthe market, they analyzed the cost based on the data provided from the
challenges.The most substantial component of the course, the design work itself, takes place outside ofregularly scheduled class times, in open laboratories. Student teams are responsible for settingschedules, maintaining progress, and seeking help when needed. Each team develops a detaileddesign, orders parts (within a strict budget) from a selected list of vendors through theDepartment Shop, and constructs a prototype (using a variety of construction techniques of theirchoosing, ranging from prototyping boards to soldered connections on a fiberglass vector boardto custom-ordered PCBs). Typically, each student team is able to demonstrate that at least someof their subsystems perform as designed, and more than half of all teams are able to demonstratea
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationrelated to these topics. In these engineering courses, the students do most of their work in teams,including homework problems, laboratory activities, and presentations. The year culminates in adesign competition between the ENGR 122 teams. For example, a recent competition was todesign and construct a device that will climb a rope while carrying a weight in a specified time.The Modified CoursesFunding and approval for the modification and delivery of a single section of the freshmanengineering course sequence was obtained during the Fall quarter. Rather than wait a year, wedecided to
prerequisite coursework, 4) database development for class rosters, attendancerecords and grades, 5) coordinating your lesson plan with external schedules, and 6) coordinationwithin your lesson plan including reading assignments, homework assignments, examinations,laboratory exercises, etc.. Page 9.1296.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Intr oduction“How many students are in my class?”, “Where is the classroom?”, “What is a recitationperiod used for?”, “Where can I find a stapler?”, “What have
; Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 2003. 5. Szaroletta, W.K. and K.D. Lutes, “Improving Mechanics Student Satisfaction Through On-Line Data Dissemination and Laboratory Report Submission”, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 2003. 6. Goolsby, L.K., “Converting a Traditional Lecture/Lab Programming Course to an Online Course”, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN, June 2003. 7. Fidan, I., L.L. Neal and R.J. Clougherty, “Design, Implementation and Assessment of WebCT-based CNC”, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
his undergraduate and graduate study at NC State University, receiving the PhD in 1971.He currently is jointly appointed at NC State as Professor of Biological and Agricultural Engineering andProfessor of Biomedical Engineering. He is a member of ASAE, IEEE, and BMES.ELIZABETH G. LOBOA, Ph.D.Dr. Loboa obtained her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University in 2002. She taughtbriefly at Stanford prior to taking her position as an Assistant Professor at North Carolina State Universityin the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at UNC Chapel Hill and NC State. She focuses onintegrating more ‘hands-on’ practical laboratory work in theory-based courses.H. TROY NAGLE, Ph.D., M.D.Dr. Nagle received the B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. from
institutions that have the mostawardees are the University of Colorado at Boulder, the University of Michigan, and GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, which have 23, 13, and 11 awardees respectively 3.3.2. NASA Research Associateship ProgramsNASA has participated in the Research Associateship Programs (RAP) administered by theNational Research Council (NRC). RAP was established in 1954 to provide postdoctoral andsenior research awards at participating federal laboratories. The awardees of NASA/RAP will doone-year research at NASA centers, and the number of recipients varies from year to year. Therewere 76 postdoctoral students who received the RAP awards to work at NASA centers in 2002 4.The stipend of the RAP associateship starts at $46,500 plus
, and microprocessorsystems. He received his Ph.D. from Marquette University in 1978 and has done research and extensive consultingin the areas of DSP and communications.OWE PETERSEN is Professor and Program Director for Electrical Engineering at the Milwaukee School ofEngineering. He is a former Member of Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories. His areas of interest areintegrated circuit technology, high-speed integrated circuit design, and quality in manufacturing. He received hisMSEE and Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania (1965, 1971) and his BSEE from the University of Wisconsin(1963) Page 9.578.8
which students at each of the military service academies seekto protect their computer network against infiltrators from the National Security Agency, and thedeveloper of an innovative seminar on terrorism. Figure 1. A New Faculty Member Teaching in the ATCL.The Center for Teaching Excellence also maintains an advanced technologyclassroom/laboratory (ATCL). This classroom, a gift of the West Point Class of 1954, providesan excellent evaluation environment for instructors to test the introduction of new classroomtechnologies. It was from instructors’ experience with various technologies in this classroom thatthe decision was made to equip all Academy classrooms with computer projection and VCRcapabilities. Similarly, faculty
work on the software on there own schedule withoutrelying on laboratory access.The choice of the computer interface hardware is more challenging due to the plethora of dataacquisition and control devices, boards and systems available on the market. Available computerinterface components include those using the IEEE-488 bus, PCI/ISA plug-in cards, VXI/PXIcards, PCMCIA cards, USB, parallel port, and RS-232 (serial port). Each of these interfaces hasits particular application-specific benefits. However, most student projects require themeasurement and control of very few parameters that does not justify the purchase of anelaborate analog and digital I/O system. In these situations, the Dallas-Maxim 1-Wire devicesprovide an elegant solution.The 1
communication.2. The activitiesA) Activities for stimulating the mind; discovering and exploring problems andsolutions; learning new concepts in thinking3D Puzzles. Almost every class starts with solving 3-D mechanical puzzles. The purpose ofthis 5-minute activity is to stimulate the students’ minds and to help introduce an upcomingconcept in problem solving. A few times per semester the students meet in a laboratory withmore than 250 different 3-D puzzles where they simply play. In a way it is a “playground forthe mind” where they explore problems and solutions at their own pace. An example for abook from which puzzles may be designed and built is8. Puzzlebusters1 and brainteasers arepart of their homework assignments. Proceedings of the 2004
relating to quality control education were identified. The followingrecommendations are made considering this input: • Provide additional coverage of the most common applications in quality such as capability studies, statistical process control, and gage control. These areas should be practiced enough to become second nature so that students are ready to apply them as they begin their careers. • Supplement problem solving with hands on exercises that encompass the entire process. If a laboratory section is not included in the course, bring sample parts to Page 9.416.7
.Institutionalizing SFSIn the past two years, the College of Engineering and the Department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering at UNC Charlotte have committed $66K in matching funds to the SFS program tosupport student salaries. Faculty have eagerly assumed teaching and mentoring responsibilitiesand provided opportunities for undergraduate research to ensure student success and facilitate aneasy transition to graduate school. The department has also provided support for internships inthe microelectronics clean room and in research laboratories, thus incorporating SFS into itsacademic infrastructure and annual budgeting process. The program is now part of the Collegeculture and this commitment will continue once external funding is no longer
andanalyzed. It might also serve as an effective technique in other engineering courses.This assignment also addressed several of the attributes in the New Engineering EducationParadigm, particularly, using an inquiry-based learning approach, teaching a technique that canbe used for life-long learning, using a complex construction site to stress a ‘system’, andfocusing on health, safety and sustainable development issues 6.Bibliography1 Shapira, A. (1995) Bringing the SIte into the Classroom: A Construction Engineering Laboratory. Journal of Engineering Education 84 (1), 1-52 ABET. (2003) ABET website http://www.abet.org/.3 Felder, R.M. and Brent, R. (2003) Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering
ornaments at a low cost. The teamsbrainstormed their production strategies, and the team spokesperson then communicatedthe plans to the larger group which incorporated public speaking. After listening to allthree presentations, Mr. Leonard then conveyed Dillon Works’ strategy for making thisproduct for an actual client. The PSCME staff concluded the field trip by linking themorning activities in the Material Science Laboratory with the process that Dillon Worksemployees undertake when experimenting with ways to manufacture innovative products.5. Pr ogr am AssessmentAll aspects of the workshop were evaluated by the students. At the end of each field trip,students were asked to complete an evaluation form. The questions inquired aboutdemographic
Conference, 2003.[3] Kramer, K. A., "Laboratory Innovations for a Wireless Communications Course Via Collaborations with Local Industry," Proceedings 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002.[4] Todd, R. H., et al, “A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 1995.[5] Brackin, M.P. and Gibson, J.D., “Methods of Assessing Student Learning in Capstone Design Projects with Industry: A Five Year Review,” Proceedings 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002.[6] Archibald, M., et al, “Reconciling Well-Defined Capstone Objectives and Criteria with Requirements for Industry Involvement,” Proceedings 2002 American Society for
gain significantprogramming experience in tasks such as image processing and have met with great success atthe college5 and elsewhere. Similarly, other courses within UNR’s College of Engineering havestandardized on the use of Matlab, the commercial matrix-based programming language andvisualization suite from MathWorks. 6 Matlab’s programming language is quite similar to C andC++ , allowing modular program construction using “m-files” with only minor syntacticaldifference at the level of this course. It also offers easy implementation of graphically-basedinput and output. Matlab was selected as the language to be used in CS 103 because of thesestrengths and its availability in the college’s Linux-based computer laboratory. However
people.Although being first in basic scientific research is extremely important to U.S. industrial strength, this Page 9.826.10does not mean that we will be first in technology. Technology and science are two different pursuits. Aparadigm shift has occurred in the U.S. innovation system in the 21st century. Modern engineering “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”practice is driven primarily by real-world, market-driven needs rather than by technical push from basicresearch laboratories as
agreement of the three teachers (see Table 2), the following generalizations are made: 1. Working with the robotics materials helped students practice problem solving and inquiry skills. 2. The NSES goal of promoting inquiry was addressed in the small group work with the robotics materials. This work involved inquiry/ exploration and problem solving among the groups members and in some cases between groups as well. 3. Small group work with the robotics materials helped make the physical science content more interesting to learn. The robotics material also made the physics content more relevant. 4. Teaching strategies that use visuals and/or concrete materials such as those found in laboratory investigations, can
prepared to continue into any major discipline in their sophomore year. Studentstook an elective each quarter in the humanities, or social or life sciences. There were 18class hours during the week, half of which were laboratory hours.IFYCSEM (which was colloquially referred to as the IC for integrated curriculum) wasoffered as an “experimental” program throughout its eleven year existence at Rose-Hulman. The first three years were rocky. The first year one-third of the studentstransferred out due to the faculty team’s “overzealous and gung-ho” readiness to“unleash” all the exciting and innovative ideas all at once. Adjustments to studentworkload were made for the following year, but this initial “misstep” cast a negative light
writing produced by engineering undergraduates in their laboratory andlecture courses. Likewise, using a rubric to score RCS participants’ written deliverables seemeda practical approach. However, there were numerous challenges in developing a rubric fordeliverables that were unique in content and varied in genre, such as posters, slide showpresentations, papers, and formal reports.The rubric developed refers to three dimensions: Organization; Words, Sentences, and OtherSemantic Units; and Conventions. The Organization dimension focuses on the writer’s expertisein structuring a document to achieve a particular purpose through communication to an identifiedaudience. Key elements examined in this dimension include a specific, informative title
interests are in the areas of fluid flow,combustion, and heat transfer.Dr. Zahed Siddique is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Product and Process Design Laboratory atUniversity of Oklahoma. His research focuses on product family design, CAD/CAM, design collaboration andengineering design education. Dr. Siddique received his B.Sc., M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering fromGeorgia Institute of Technology. Page 9.625.12 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
follow up actions are recommended: • Revise the survey instrument • Repeat this study for a larger group of students • Apply this study to a different set of learning stylesAcknowledgementsThe author wishes to acknowledge the National Science Foundation for supporting thisproject through the Course Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program,Adaptation and Implementation (A&I) track (Project Number DUE-0196487). Theauthor also wishes to thank the University of Wyoming Office of Research, College ofEngineering and Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering for their matchingfunds and general support of this project. Finally, the author thanks Dr. Trent McDonaldof West, Inc. for his statistical consulting
Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education7. Berver, E., Jerse J.O., Fowler D.W., and Wheat, H.G. 2003. Laboratory and field observations of composite– wrapped reinforced concrete structures. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Structuraland Construction Engineering, 23-26 September, 2003, Rome, Italy. Vol 2 pp. 1459-1465.8. Carpenter, C.L. and Oloufa A. 1995. Postoccupancy Evaluation of Buildings and Development of FacilityPerformance Criteria. Journal of Architectural Engineering 1(2):77-81.9. Chapman C. and Ward S. 1997. Project Risk Management Processes, Techniques and Insights.Chichester, Wiley.10. Colaco, J.P. 2003. Uses of composite
hand toolsand found objects. Social factors in design for this project primarily relate to the decision of howsafe is safe enough, and disparities in drinking water standards among countries. Students design,season, and test their filters over the course of several weeks. Testing can be accomplishedthrough the use of standard laboratory methods if they are available and convenient, or throughthe use of fairly inexpensive synthetic agar substitute gels – where one places the water sampleand counts the number of colonies of coliform bacteria that develop. While the latter method isless precise, it should allow students to have some measure of the effectiveness of their filter, andto track its improvement over the seasoning period.A second, more
Page 9.637.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationits current, more formal form, Engineering 4: Introduction to Engineering Design16. Designed asan introduction to conceptual design, and adopting a Clinic-style approach of student teamsworking for real, not-for-profit clients (e.g., schools, hospitals), the course has been successfullytaught since 1992 as both a prerequisite for Clinic itself and a motivator that attracts students tothe Engineering major. It has also served as a pedagogical laboratory, out of which has evolved astudio style of teaching the course, very much in the traditions of
illustrating complex concepts, especiallycommon in engineering. Horton [2] suggests the use of case studies as an excellent way forlearners to practice judgment skills necessary in real life situations that are not as simple astextbook problems. As instructional strategies are concerned, engaging critical thinking skillsthrough case studies is among a recommended set of activities [3].Case studies can also be used to introduce students to the complex interactions amongtechnology, business, and ethics. The Laboratory for Innovative Technology in EngineeringEducation (LITEE) at Auburn University has produced a number of case studies. One of these